Recommended Posts

I think pple have said that 3.6ghz on this is a breeze =| I don't know, this is off the top of my head, maybe it was 3.2ghz. What memory do u have (PC2-5300?)? 3ghz isn't too shabby tho with everything else @ stock (u're even running a stock cooler right?). I reread the original few posts, no o'cing eh, pffft, throw that out the window lol... Don't forget too, u can turn up the video card fan to help with temps or to o'c more if u really want to. Disable Q-Fan and Speedstep too if u are going to run this o'c all the time :)

If u get around to it Radish, post ur 3dmark again with o'c as a comparison :)

3.2GHz would be more than enough for this setup, not using the stock cooler but an Arctic Cooling Freezer Pro 7. Currently using Corsair DDR2-5300, I also don't use Q-Fan or Speedstep.

Radish?

3ghz seems like a good overclock. Anything beyond that seems kind of pointless. I have also heard that the 6600 will get to 3.2 on stock cooling and up to 4.5 on water. I got mine to 2.97 on stock cooling but the temps are a little higher than what i would like though thats party because my room is so warm.

Argh, just seem to have bad luck I do :pinch:

Been getting BSOD's of late and the "nv4_disp.dll" file kept on coming up, updated to the latest 158.22 WHQL's with no change. Also I can't seem to extract archives when I downloaded them from the internet.

Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.4 would not extract as part of it's setup and I redownloaded it a few times. Ran CHKDSK /R on the boot drive, and it passed with no errors. Last thing was Memtest, and it fails straight from the start :(

Now gotta get some new RAM :hmmm:

Radish?

No that usually means that your ram cant handle your overclock. Try these things and then run another memory test.

1. make sure you increased the latency on the ram. Latency is measured in cycles so if the processor is doing more cycles in a second your ram will have to go faster. Increasing the latencies will give the ram some breathing room.

2. If that doesnt work then try lowering the multiplier on your ram so that it runs at a slower speed but doesnt slow doen your cpu.

3. If all else fails lower overclock.

4. if that doesnt work then you need new ram.

Good news and bad news (as before) -

Good news - One of the sticks passes on Memtest.

Bad news - The other fails from the start, but they are part of a 2GB Corsair kit. Which probably means I'll have to return both and be without a working PC :(

Radish?

sorry to hear that Radish, but I have confidence in Corsair to resolve ur issue :) When u were testing with memtest, was ur o'c profile still intact? Could this also be part of the reason it fails (ie revert things back to stock). Again not o'c and I don't have alot of experience with it to understand if this could be why it is failing. I'm assuming u're working with a ratio or have ur DDR2 set to a specific speed.

Try the latency trick, or over volt the memory. Most of the higher end DDR2 kits are detected as 1.6/1.8V (I forget which one), and the manfuacturer would suggest running at 1.9/2.0/2.1/2.2V (it'll be under warranty so check the website). I'm not sure which exact model u have, I'll assume PC2-5400/DDR2-667 XMS2?

I think I know what was wrong - the ratio for the RAM. It was running at 5:4, but it doesn't make sense that one of the sticks would be faulty (thought both would be bad).

Anyway, got it on track now with the image attached :D

BFG have said they want the GFX card first before issuing a replacement, and Ebuyer said I can't send a single stick of RAM to them - it has to be the whole kit.

So it looks like I'll have to get some RAM and a cheap PCI-E card, while the RMA's are done :/

Radish?

post-4583-1180984012_thumb.jpg

arrrgghhh - bad =|

so u're going to RMA the video card, let me know how that goes, if u are going thru with it :)

For the Ram, I'll assume that one stick is better than the other (it happens) in terms of being able to handle the bandwidth. Yeah we had 1 stick go bad on us here at work (Corsair also), and the guy said no we need the whole kit, not the 1 stick.

You can always get a PCI card for now, then u can let me know about the garbage on the screen if it's still there :p I can't remember for the life of me if my 7800GT had this issue with garbage :(

Not going to RMA the 8800 GTS for the time being (doesn't really bother me to be honest), the RAM is going to be RMA'ed though (more important).

I'm thinking it's the 8800 BIOS that has the issue.

Radish?

dare to update the bios on the video card Mr. Prime? :) I know I don't have the nuts to do that lol. Well u do have 10yrs to decide on the video card. I myself am not bothered by it anymore, but it is something that annoyed me in the beginning since no one has reported this issue on google searches. You're the only one I know that has almost the same setup as myself. Anyhow will be getting a new board eventually so we'll see what happens (possibly in the fall/winter timeframe).

Am interested in seeing how the Ram thing goes Radish. Thanks for posting all ur info and helping me feel at ease with the whole 8800 P5W-DH problem :D

  • 2 weeks later...

Is there BIOS updates for the GFX card? :shifty: I'll probably update the motherboard when the X38 chipset is out.

I sent the RAM off yesterday via RM Special Delivery, they recieved it today - hopefully I'll get my new RAM next week (Y)

Radish?

  • 4 weeks later...

^ Guess not :p

Now a technical question, my RAM is currently running at 5-6-6-2 timings. I looked on the Corsair website and it states 5-5-5-15-2T - which is correct and would I see any benefit changing to 5-5-5-15-2T timings?

http://www.corsairmemory.com/configurator/...lts.aspx?id=487 = link to the RAM.

Radish?

^ Guess not :p

Now a technical question, my RAM is currently running at 5-6-6-2 timings. I looked on the Corsair website and it states 5-5-5-15-2T - which is correct and would I see any benefit changing to 5-5-5-15-2T timings?

http://www.corsairmemory.com/configurator/...lts.aspx?id=487 = link to the RAM.

Radish™

Did you mean 5-6-6-12? 2 seems kind of tight for the last timing. If it is the same corsair RAM as what I have, it should run fine at 4-4-4-12 2T which will give a little bit better performance than 5-5-5-15 or 5-6-6-12 2T. But I am not sure what would be better between 5-6-6-12 and 5-5-5-15.

edit: I clicked your link, we have different RAM so what I said may not apply.

Did you mean 5-6-6-12? 2 seems kind of tight for the last timing. If it is the same corsair RAM as what I have, it should run fine at 4-4-4-12 2T which will give a little bit better performance than 5-5-5-15 or 5-6-6-12 2T. But I am not sure what would be better between 5-6-6-12 and 5-5-5-15.

edit: I clicked your link, we have different RAM so what I said may not apply.

EVEREST CPUID -

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...amp;p=588602651

Radish?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!