[Cancelled] Sarah Connor Chronicles (Terminator Series)


Recommended Posts

I met Summer Glau last August at Fan Expo in Toronto........ Me and my two buddies waited in line for FOUR hours to talk to her for 2minute-ish each. Her line up, was the longest out of any celebrity there. She was sooo awesome, very nice, more beautiful in person. I got her to sign my Firefly DVD Case. It was awesome.

oh wow thats pretty awesome

We still dream about it to this day hahaha. It was pretty cool.We had Deluxe passes which got us into her Panel event which was cool too. On a side note, the supernatural Impala Car was there too!! Oh man that was a surprise treat. My buddy crawled under the car by the wheel and we got a picture of him looking like he got run over, haha so good.

Ok not to be rehashing old stuff, but I am a little bit confused here. I just watched Episode 9 from Season 2 "Complications," and I have a question about the guy whom the episode was based upon - Charles Fischer. After they killed the older Fischer, weren't Derek and Reese saying that hopefully the younger one would be different. Yet it shows the younger Fischer being put in prison. Now does this not create a paradox ??? I personally think this episode violates a lot. I mean if Fischer's destiny was to work for SkyNet, then why did they ever kill the older one. I mean if no matter what, the older Fischer is to go back and guarantee that he will go to jail and work for SkyNet, why even bother then ?? I am pretty confused about this and if someone wants to shed some light on it, it would be good, cause I can not seem to comprehend this paradox of his fate was sealed or what ?

Ok not to be rehashing old stuff, but I am a little bit confused here. I just watched Episode 9 from Season 2 "Complications," and I have a question about the guy whom the episode was based upon - Charles Fischer. After they killed the older Fischer, weren't Derek and Reese saying that hopefully the younger one would be different. Yet it shows the younger Fischer being put in prison. Now does this not create a paradox ??? I personally think this episode violates a lot. I mean if Fischer's destiny was to work for SkyNet, then why did they ever kill the older one. I mean if no matter what, the older Fischer is to go back and guarantee that he will go to jail and work for SkyNet, why even bother then ?? I am pretty confused about this and if someone wants to shed some light on it, it would be good, cause I can not seem to comprehend this paradox of his fate was sealed or what ?

Yes, there's a good change it creates a paradox and he would probably end up working for Skynet. Unless, he would've been involved in a s3 somehow and maybe died...

Well you have to remember Derek and Jesse thought that maybe young Fischer wouldn't follow into his future self's footsteps after hearing what he did. But they didn't know that he would end up being picked up by Feds and locked up... Older Fischer basically setup his younger self.

Yes, there's a good change it creates a paradox and he would probably end up working for Skynet. Unless, he would've been involved in a s3 somehow and maybe died...

Well you have to remember Derek and Jesse thought that maybe young Fischer wouldn't follow into his future self's footsteps after hearing what he did. But they didn't know that he would end up being picked up by Feds and locked up... Older Fischer basically setup his younger self.

So does that mean the older Charles Fischer got set up by his older self when he was also younger ?

See this is what exactly confuses me about this time paradoxes. Like for example in the very first Terminator - Kyle Reese. He gets sent back from the future to father John Connor but he dies in the past. Does this create an alternate timeline or what since obviously he fights in the war with Connor. I mean also John Connor. Does he become John Connor because it his destiny to become John Connor, or does he become John Connor by all the "training" he receives starting when he's young. It would be really helpful if IF they were to make a Season 3 or whatnot or in T5 or whatever if they were able to explain all these time paradoxes, because they're really confusing & mind boggling

So does that mean the older Charles Fischer got set up by his older self when he was also younger ?

See this is what exactly confuses me about this time paradoxes. Like for example in the very first Terminator - Kyle Reese. He gets sent back from the future to father John Connor but he dies in the past. Does this create an alternate timeline or what since obviously he fights in the war with Connor. I mean also John Connor. Does he become John Connor because it his destiny to become John Connor, or does he become John Connor by all the "training" he receives starting when he's young. It would be really helpful if IF they were to make a Season 3 or whatnot or in T5 or whatever if they were able to explain all these time paradoxes, because they're really confusing & mind boggling

No, not necessarily. TSCC doesn't exactly follow a time loop theory -- it's more like multiple time lines rather than a single time line repeating. We don't know how Old Fischer was put into jail, all we know is he was there and survived J-day. But he did set into motion the events that led to young Fischer being placed in jail. Whether or not this was on purpose, we'll probably never know.

Well I don't think the time paradoxes or much (or any) of the time travel theory TSCC uses would've been explained. In both s1 and s1 the only info about this kind of stuff was that Derek was from one time line and Jesse, Riley, and possibly Cameron are from a different one, and we didn't get any details explaining any of it. Josh Friedman has a theme about keeping things such as time travel, Cameron, and future John as vague as possible so anyone can interpret them however they want.

No, not necessarily. TSCC doesn't exactly follow a time loop theory -- it's more like multiple time lines rather than a single time line repeating. We don't know how Old Fischer was put into jail, all we know is he was there and survived J-day. But he did set into motion the events that led to young Fischer being placed in jail. Whether or not this was on purpose, we'll probably never know.

Well I don't think the time paradoxes or much (or any) of the time travel theory TSCC uses would've been explained. In both s1 and s1 the only info about this kind of stuff was that Derek was from one time line and Jesse, Riley, and possibly Cameron are from a different one, and we didn't get any details explaining any of it. Josh Friedman has a theme about keeping things such as time travel, Cameron, and future John as vague as possible so anyone can interpret them however they want.

But by a different timeline, it would mean different future events, yet they all survived Judgement Day and are all engaged in the Resistance fighting against Skynet, or does it mean different timeline, but only different in one aspect of time i.e. a certain event like for example when Derek shows John, Kyle when he was a little boy, Kyle should not have existed then due to him dying in T1, yet how was he there ?

But by a different timeline, it would mean different future events, yet they all survived Judgement Day and are all engaged in the Resistance fighting against Skynet, or does it mean different timeline, but only different in one aspect of time i.e. a certain event like for example when Derek shows John, Kyle when he was a little boy, Kyle should not have existed then due to him dying in T1, yet how was he there ?

Due to the fact that Kyle had to be born sometime and he was born back then. It's not like if you die in the future or your future self comes back to the past and dies his present self will have an effect. The present Kyle will go on his normal life until jd and the future.

Due to the fact that Kyle had to be born sometime and he was born back then. It's not like if you die in the future or your future self comes back to the past and dies his present self will have an effect. The present Kyle will go on his normal life until jd and the future.

But wouldn't it ? That is exactly where I get confused. When Kyle went back in time in T1 and died protecting Sarah Connor, wouldn't that death technically wipe away all his existence ?

But wouldn't it ? That is exactly where I get confused. When Kyle went back in time in T1 and died protecting Sarah Connor, wouldn't that death technically wipe away all his existence ?

No, why would it? His present self is still alive. His future self just died.

No, why would it? His present self is still alive. His future self just died.

Well here is the way I see it. Kyle Reese goes back in time to 1984 to save Sarah Connor. Kyle Reese dies in 1984. If Kyle Reese died in 1984 protecting Sarah Connor, I don't get how he is able to be a part of the Resistance after Judgement Day happened which was after 1984

Well here is the way I see it. Kyle Reese goes back in time to 1984 to save Sarah Connor. Kyle Reese dies in 1984. If Kyle Reese died in 1984 protecting Sarah Connor, I don't get how he is able to be a part of the Resistance after Judgement Day happened which was after 1984

Simple, when he went back to 1984, there were two Kyle Reese, not one. One was the old Kyle Reese who fought alongside JC and went in the past, the other is baby Kyle Reese, still in diapers. Old Kyle Reese never met any of his relatives (I am speaking of T1 here) so he could never affect the younger Kyle Reese timeline.

Simple, when he went back to 1984, there were two Kyle Reese, not one. One was the old Kyle Reese who fought alongside JC and went in the past, the other is baby Kyle Reese, still in diapers. Old Kyle Reese never met any of his relatives (I am speaking of T1 here) so he could never affect the younger Kyle Reese timeline.

Well, how can we assume that there were two Kyle Reese's in the T1 storyline ?

In my observation and if we are going by the multiple timeline then there's no need to assume that there are two Kyle Reeses. In fact, it shouldn't be assumed at all. It's possible that Kyle Reese will be born later or there is no Kyle Reese at all, but that has zero factor in the continuing Terminator storyline as seen from T1. A lot of people want there to be another Kyle Reese due to the sentimentality of John Connor getting to meet his "father" who is actually younger than him. However, it's unnecessary, just as it is unnecessary to explore the original timeline where Kyle Reese is not John Connor's father.

In TSCC, they chose to establish that Kyle Reese does exist in the timeline that John Connor sees. Once that's established then any changes to the timeline from that point on has no bearing on whether Kyle Reese exists, he simply does. However, he does not have to time travel back in time to start the chain of events. The chain of events have already been established.

Well, how can we assume that there were two Kyle Reese's in the T1 storyline ?

Because there had to be one for future Kyle Reese to come back from the future. Without the present Kyle Reese there would have been no future Kyle Reese.

In my observation and if we are going by the multiple timeline then there's no need to assume that there are two Kyle Reeses. In fact, it shouldn't be assumed at all. It's possible that Kyle Reese will be born later or there is no Kyle Reese at all, but that has zero factor in the continuing Terminator storyline as seen from T1. A lot of people want there to be another Kyle Reese due to the sentimentality of John Connor getting to meet his "father" who is actually younger than him. However, it's unnecessary, just as it is unnecessary to explore the original timeline where Kyle Reese is not John Connor's father.

In TSCC, they chose to establish that Kyle Reese does exist in the timeline that John Connor sees. Once that's established then any changes to the timeline from that point on has no bearing on whether Kyle Reese exists, he simply does. However, he does not have to time travel back in time to start the chain of events. The chain of events have already been established.

Because there had to be one for future Kyle Reese to come back from the future. Without the present Kyle Reese there would have been no future Kyle Reese.

Well I guess it would make sense like that, but if we are to think of time as a linear function, then maybe not

  • 2 months later...
Before we get into talking about tonight?s return of DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES, we have to start by asking you about your time on BEVERLY HILLS 90210 TERMINATOR: THE SARAH CONNOR CHRONICLES. Since we?re the type of TV viewer who has issues when it comes to getting over the cancelation of our favorites [interjects Brian austin Green, "I get it, I'm the same way!"] we?d love to know if you ever had any conversations with [Executive Producer] Josh Friedman as to what would have happened had the show lived to tell the tale?

Brian Austin Green: Yeah, a lot of the next season was going to take place in the future, it was going to be in the desert and the tunnels in a manner similar to what the latest film was. And since it?s a future where John Connor doesn?t exist, the main thrust of the story would have seen him starting at the bottom and becoming the iconic John Connor that everybody knows. It would have been great, but you know what though, I feel that at least we went out on top and we have two really good seasons on Blu-ray and DVD? and it is the holidays? and people can purchase those now!

http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/01/02/brian-austin-green-talks-terminator-the-sarah-connor-chronicles-desperate-housewives-and-why-he-passed-on-one-tree-hill/

I always get a bit excited every time I see this topic bouncing back. Unfortunately it's always followed by disappointment that they haven't had a change of heart and renewed it :p

It's nice to know how the story arc would have continued though. I wonder how they'd have got Sarah Connor back into it or indeed if she'd have had her own story ark.

I always get a bit excited every time I see this topic bouncing back. Unfortunately it's always followed by disappointment that they haven't had a change of heart and renewed it :p

It's nice to know how the story arc would have continued though. I wonder how they'd have got Sarah Connor back into it or indeed if she'd have had her own story ark.

I'd imagine they'd follow her exploits to set things up for John when he arrives in the future by doing parallel stories.

  • 1 month later...
Syfy announced on Tuesday (February 22) that the network has acquired broadcast rights to "Terminator: The Sarah Conner Chronicles."

The two-season, 31-episode run of "T:TSSC" will air on Syfy starting on Thursday, April 7. The first two episodes will air from 9 to 11 p.m. following an airing of the out-of-continuity "Terminator 3." Subsequent episodes will air on Thursday nights at 7 p.m.

It's here that we need to make it clear: Syfy has acquired the rights to air old episodes of a completed series. "Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles" isn't going to be revived by this move any more than "Firefly" is going to get new life from its upcoming rebroadcast on Science Channel.

"Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles" premiered on FOX in January of 2008 to big numbers, ratings that fell off significantly in subsequent airings. FOX lifted the series from the bubble and ordered a second season, which suffered additional ratings attrition before moving to Friday night and passing away.

The show's demise saddened fans who -- not to speak for an entire fanbase -- largely felt that the show was heading in an interesting direction by the end, particularly with the well-regarded finale.

Developed for the small screen by Josh Friedman, "Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles" starred Lena Headey, Thomas Dekker, Brian Austin Green, Richard T. Jones and Garret Dillahunt.

http://www.hitfix.com/articles/terminator-the-sarah-connor-chronicles-will-be-back-in-repeats-on-syfy

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Is the article messed up? I understand 26H2 is in Beta, now Build 28020.2308. I'm not even sure what this is supposed to mean: "..... Microsoft is officially moving the Experimental Channel to version 26H2." And...would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
    • Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 changelog: Add RISC-V 64 support to UEFI:NTFS Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Improve progress reporting for compressed image extraction Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta 2 | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Tixati 3.43 by Razvan Serea Tixati is a free and easy to use BitTorrent client featuring detailed views of all seed, peer, and file transfer properties. Also included are powerful bandwidth charting and throttling capabilities, and a full DHT implementation. Tixati is one of the most advanced and flexible BitTorrent clients available. And unlike many other clients, Tixati contains NO SPYWARE, NO ADS, and NO GIMMICKS. Tixati portable version is meant to run on a USB flash drive or other portable media. It stores all its configuration files in the same folder as the executable binary files, and all file paths are stored in a format relative to the program executable folder. It is important you do not delete the "tixati_portable_mode.txt" file within the executables folder. This file is what triggers Tixati to run in portable mode. (The executable binaries are actually the same as the standard edition binaries.) When running the portable edition from a USB flash drive, especially one that is formatted in FAT16/FAT32, you may experience some lag when initially loading a new transfer. This is because initializing and allocating large files on flash-based media consumes a greater amount of time and resources compared to a conventional hard-drive. Tixati has the following features: detailed views of all aspects of the swarm, including peers, pieces, files, and trackers support for magnet links, so no need to download .torrent files if a simple magnet-link is available super-efficient peer choking/unchoking algorithms ensure the fastest downloads peer connection encryption for added security full DHT (Distributed Hash Table) implementation for trackerless torrents, including detailed message traffic graphs and customizable event logging advanced bandwidth charting of overall traffic and per-transfer traffic, with separate classification of protocol and file bytes, and with separate classification of outbound traffic for trading and seeding highly flexible bandwidth throttling, including trading/seeding proportion adjustment and adjustable priority for individual transfers and peers bitfield graphs that show the completeness of all downloaded files, what pieces other peers have available, and the health of the overall swarm customizable event logging for each download, and individual event logs for all peers within the swarm expert local file management functions which allow you to move files to a different partition even while downloading is still in progress 100% compatible with the BitTorrent protocol Windows and Linux-GTK native versions available Tixati 3.43 changelog: Several major DHT improvements Added several screening heuristics to filter malicious DHT nodes, prevent Sybil floods Rewrote DHT search algorithms to add support for multi-path lookups Improved DHT logging, more details in several error messages Extended timeout lengths for outgoing queries over I2P Added incoming query / response per second to DHT table status display Updated Regex engine to PCRE2 Faster Search function, scans channel user profiles in much less time Fixed problems with file name parsing and date handling in RSS Faster and more accurate RSS filtering and episode number detection Several optimizations to global text processing functions, such as UTF-8 cleaning, line splitting, and token parsing Complete update of port-mapping UPNP/NAT-PMP engine, added PCP support, mapping over VPN support, and more Several refinements to default gateway detection on Windows / Android, which is used for port-mapping Support for IPv6 interface-scoped addresses, which is sometimes needed for IPv6 gateway detection and port mapping Full support for PCP port remapping, added backup zero-port query in case requested port is rejected New UPNP/NAT-PMP Monitor in Help > Diagnostics New reflected local port/location tracker that analyzes DHT replies to detect true port/location and NAT mapping type New TCP/UDP Ports monitor in Help > Diagnostics, with several statistic and information tabs, and a detailed event log Calculated/reflected local port is now used for port parameter in tracker queries and peer handshake Fixed several problems with Linux Wayland compatibility Completely replaced tray icon functions in Linux, new SNI implementation is now the default with GSI backup Implemented full DBus-Menu server to be used by new SNI tray icon implementation Replaced Linux tray balloon notification DBus client Rewrote auto-shutdown DBus interface for Linux Rewrote sleep inhibit DBus interface for Linux Dropped deprecated Linux dbus-glib dependencies Completely new Windows asynchronous file handling, now using IOCP model with several block-alignment optimizations Better handling of system network resets and interface down/up cycles Added option to fully clear configuration in Settings > Import/Export Remember last option checkboxes when using Import/Export Fixed minor I2P incoming connection routing problems Much faster I2P vanity host name finder Much faster channel user vanity key finder Raised length limit for torrent tracker remote failure messages to 120 from 64 Fixed problems setting download location on a torrent before the meta info is resolved Added location/MOC paths to category pane tooltips Several minor Web Interface fixes Refinements to static and scrolling ellipsizing layout routines Several fixes and improvements to single and multi-line text edit controls Many other minor fixes throughout the user interface A major overhaul of the Android framework has also been done: API target raised to 35, page alignment set to 16K Rewrote all inset processing routines Full rewrite of foreground service, application, and main activity objects New permission request routines Added multi-cast lock request before UPNP/LPDP discovery operations Fixed file permission and locking problems when loading .torrent from web browsers Fixed problems with Z-ordering of modal / non-modal and popup windows Fixed handling of back gesture on newer OS Added status bar icon adjustment based on status bar background color Added option in Settings > UI > Behavior to continue running in tray when task removed from recents App can be closed by swiping away notification Rewrote IME interface, fixed several problems with auto-correct, on-screen keyboard visibility, and cursor positioning Added full support for Android hardware mouse and keyboard function Added full tooltip implementation for Android hovering via mouse or other cursor device Full rewrite of popup menu widgets to better support hardware pointers and keyboard Added mouse cursor updating framework for Android hovering Added Settings > Import/Export to Android builds Added language file support to Android builds Download: Tixati 64-bit | Tixati 32-bit ~20.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Portable Tixati 3.43 | 114.0 MB Download: Tixati 3.43 for Linux | Android View: Tixati Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      83
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!