[Cancelled] Sarah Connor Chronicles (Terminator Series)


Recommended Posts

I met Summer Glau last August at Fan Expo in Toronto........ Me and my two buddies waited in line for FOUR hours to talk to her for 2minute-ish each. Her line up, was the longest out of any celebrity there. She was sooo awesome, very nice, more beautiful in person. I got her to sign my Firefly DVD Case. It was awesome.

oh wow thats pretty awesome

We still dream about it to this day hahaha. It was pretty cool.We had Deluxe passes which got us into her Panel event which was cool too. On a side note, the supernatural Impala Car was there too!! Oh man that was a surprise treat. My buddy crawled under the car by the wheel and we got a picture of him looking like he got run over, haha so good.

Ok not to be rehashing old stuff, but I am a little bit confused here. I just watched Episode 9 from Season 2 "Complications," and I have a question about the guy whom the episode was based upon - Charles Fischer. After they killed the older Fischer, weren't Derek and Reese saying that hopefully the younger one would be different. Yet it shows the younger Fischer being put in prison. Now does this not create a paradox ??? I personally think this episode violates a lot. I mean if Fischer's destiny was to work for SkyNet, then why did they ever kill the older one. I mean if no matter what, the older Fischer is to go back and guarantee that he will go to jail and work for SkyNet, why even bother then ?? I am pretty confused about this and if someone wants to shed some light on it, it would be good, cause I can not seem to comprehend this paradox of his fate was sealed or what ?

Ok not to be rehashing old stuff, but I am a little bit confused here. I just watched Episode 9 from Season 2 "Complications," and I have a question about the guy whom the episode was based upon - Charles Fischer. After they killed the older Fischer, weren't Derek and Reese saying that hopefully the younger one would be different. Yet it shows the younger Fischer being put in prison. Now does this not create a paradox ??? I personally think this episode violates a lot. I mean if Fischer's destiny was to work for SkyNet, then why did they ever kill the older one. I mean if no matter what, the older Fischer is to go back and guarantee that he will go to jail and work for SkyNet, why even bother then ?? I am pretty confused about this and if someone wants to shed some light on it, it would be good, cause I can not seem to comprehend this paradox of his fate was sealed or what ?

Yes, there's a good change it creates a paradox and he would probably end up working for Skynet. Unless, he would've been involved in a s3 somehow and maybe died...

Well you have to remember Derek and Jesse thought that maybe young Fischer wouldn't follow into his future self's footsteps after hearing what he did. But they didn't know that he would end up being picked up by Feds and locked up... Older Fischer basically setup his younger self.

Yes, there's a good change it creates a paradox and he would probably end up working for Skynet. Unless, he would've been involved in a s3 somehow and maybe died...

Well you have to remember Derek and Jesse thought that maybe young Fischer wouldn't follow into his future self's footsteps after hearing what he did. But they didn't know that he would end up being picked up by Feds and locked up... Older Fischer basically setup his younger self.

So does that mean the older Charles Fischer got set up by his older self when he was also younger ?

See this is what exactly confuses me about this time paradoxes. Like for example in the very first Terminator - Kyle Reese. He gets sent back from the future to father John Connor but he dies in the past. Does this create an alternate timeline or what since obviously he fights in the war with Connor. I mean also John Connor. Does he become John Connor because it his destiny to become John Connor, or does he become John Connor by all the "training" he receives starting when he's young. It would be really helpful if IF they were to make a Season 3 or whatnot or in T5 or whatever if they were able to explain all these time paradoxes, because they're really confusing & mind boggling

So does that mean the older Charles Fischer got set up by his older self when he was also younger ?

See this is what exactly confuses me about this time paradoxes. Like for example in the very first Terminator - Kyle Reese. He gets sent back from the future to father John Connor but he dies in the past. Does this create an alternate timeline or what since obviously he fights in the war with Connor. I mean also John Connor. Does he become John Connor because it his destiny to become John Connor, or does he become John Connor by all the "training" he receives starting when he's young. It would be really helpful if IF they were to make a Season 3 or whatnot or in T5 or whatever if they were able to explain all these time paradoxes, because they're really confusing & mind boggling

No, not necessarily. TSCC doesn't exactly follow a time loop theory -- it's more like multiple time lines rather than a single time line repeating. We don't know how Old Fischer was put into jail, all we know is he was there and survived J-day. But he did set into motion the events that led to young Fischer being placed in jail. Whether or not this was on purpose, we'll probably never know.

Well I don't think the time paradoxes or much (or any) of the time travel theory TSCC uses would've been explained. In both s1 and s1 the only info about this kind of stuff was that Derek was from one time line and Jesse, Riley, and possibly Cameron are from a different one, and we didn't get any details explaining any of it. Josh Friedman has a theme about keeping things such as time travel, Cameron, and future John as vague as possible so anyone can interpret them however they want.

No, not necessarily. TSCC doesn't exactly follow a time loop theory -- it's more like multiple time lines rather than a single time line repeating. We don't know how Old Fischer was put into jail, all we know is he was there and survived J-day. But he did set into motion the events that led to young Fischer being placed in jail. Whether or not this was on purpose, we'll probably never know.

Well I don't think the time paradoxes or much (or any) of the time travel theory TSCC uses would've been explained. In both s1 and s1 the only info about this kind of stuff was that Derek was from one time line and Jesse, Riley, and possibly Cameron are from a different one, and we didn't get any details explaining any of it. Josh Friedman has a theme about keeping things such as time travel, Cameron, and future John as vague as possible so anyone can interpret them however they want.

But by a different timeline, it would mean different future events, yet they all survived Judgement Day and are all engaged in the Resistance fighting against Skynet, or does it mean different timeline, but only different in one aspect of time i.e. a certain event like for example when Derek shows John, Kyle when he was a little boy, Kyle should not have existed then due to him dying in T1, yet how was he there ?

But by a different timeline, it would mean different future events, yet they all survived Judgement Day and are all engaged in the Resistance fighting against Skynet, or does it mean different timeline, but only different in one aspect of time i.e. a certain event like for example when Derek shows John, Kyle when he was a little boy, Kyle should not have existed then due to him dying in T1, yet how was he there ?

Due to the fact that Kyle had to be born sometime and he was born back then. It's not like if you die in the future or your future self comes back to the past and dies his present self will have an effect. The present Kyle will go on his normal life until jd and the future.

Due to the fact that Kyle had to be born sometime and he was born back then. It's not like if you die in the future or your future self comes back to the past and dies his present self will have an effect. The present Kyle will go on his normal life until jd and the future.

But wouldn't it ? That is exactly where I get confused. When Kyle went back in time in T1 and died protecting Sarah Connor, wouldn't that death technically wipe away all his existence ?

But wouldn't it ? That is exactly where I get confused. When Kyle went back in time in T1 and died protecting Sarah Connor, wouldn't that death technically wipe away all his existence ?

No, why would it? His present self is still alive. His future self just died.

No, why would it? His present self is still alive. His future self just died.

Well here is the way I see it. Kyle Reese goes back in time to 1984 to save Sarah Connor. Kyle Reese dies in 1984. If Kyle Reese died in 1984 protecting Sarah Connor, I don't get how he is able to be a part of the Resistance after Judgement Day happened which was after 1984

Well here is the way I see it. Kyle Reese goes back in time to 1984 to save Sarah Connor. Kyle Reese dies in 1984. If Kyle Reese died in 1984 protecting Sarah Connor, I don't get how he is able to be a part of the Resistance after Judgement Day happened which was after 1984

Simple, when he went back to 1984, there were two Kyle Reese, not one. One was the old Kyle Reese who fought alongside JC and went in the past, the other is baby Kyle Reese, still in diapers. Old Kyle Reese never met any of his relatives (I am speaking of T1 here) so he could never affect the younger Kyle Reese timeline.

Simple, when he went back to 1984, there were two Kyle Reese, not one. One was the old Kyle Reese who fought alongside JC and went in the past, the other is baby Kyle Reese, still in diapers. Old Kyle Reese never met any of his relatives (I am speaking of T1 here) so he could never affect the younger Kyle Reese timeline.

Well, how can we assume that there were two Kyle Reese's in the T1 storyline ?

In my observation and if we are going by the multiple timeline then there's no need to assume that there are two Kyle Reeses. In fact, it shouldn't be assumed at all. It's possible that Kyle Reese will be born later or there is no Kyle Reese at all, but that has zero factor in the continuing Terminator storyline as seen from T1. A lot of people want there to be another Kyle Reese due to the sentimentality of John Connor getting to meet his "father" who is actually younger than him. However, it's unnecessary, just as it is unnecessary to explore the original timeline where Kyle Reese is not John Connor's father.

In TSCC, they chose to establish that Kyle Reese does exist in the timeline that John Connor sees. Once that's established then any changes to the timeline from that point on has no bearing on whether Kyle Reese exists, he simply does. However, he does not have to time travel back in time to start the chain of events. The chain of events have already been established.

Well, how can we assume that there were two Kyle Reese's in the T1 storyline ?

Because there had to be one for future Kyle Reese to come back from the future. Without the present Kyle Reese there would have been no future Kyle Reese.

In my observation and if we are going by the multiple timeline then there's no need to assume that there are two Kyle Reeses. In fact, it shouldn't be assumed at all. It's possible that Kyle Reese will be born later or there is no Kyle Reese at all, but that has zero factor in the continuing Terminator storyline as seen from T1. A lot of people want there to be another Kyle Reese due to the sentimentality of John Connor getting to meet his "father" who is actually younger than him. However, it's unnecessary, just as it is unnecessary to explore the original timeline where Kyle Reese is not John Connor's father.

In TSCC, they chose to establish that Kyle Reese does exist in the timeline that John Connor sees. Once that's established then any changes to the timeline from that point on has no bearing on whether Kyle Reese exists, he simply does. However, he does not have to time travel back in time to start the chain of events. The chain of events have already been established.

Because there had to be one for future Kyle Reese to come back from the future. Without the present Kyle Reese there would have been no future Kyle Reese.

Well I guess it would make sense like that, but if we are to think of time as a linear function, then maybe not

  • 2 months later...
Before we get into talking about tonight?s return of DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES, we have to start by asking you about your time on BEVERLY HILLS 90210 TERMINATOR: THE SARAH CONNOR CHRONICLES. Since we?re the type of TV viewer who has issues when it comes to getting over the cancelation of our favorites [interjects Brian austin Green, "I get it, I'm the same way!"] we?d love to know if you ever had any conversations with [Executive Producer] Josh Friedman as to what would have happened had the show lived to tell the tale?

Brian Austin Green: Yeah, a lot of the next season was going to take place in the future, it was going to be in the desert and the tunnels in a manner similar to what the latest film was. And since it?s a future where John Connor doesn?t exist, the main thrust of the story would have seen him starting at the bottom and becoming the iconic John Connor that everybody knows. It would have been great, but you know what though, I feel that at least we went out on top and we have two really good seasons on Blu-ray and DVD? and it is the holidays? and people can purchase those now!

http://www.thetvaddict.com/2011/01/02/brian-austin-green-talks-terminator-the-sarah-connor-chronicles-desperate-housewives-and-why-he-passed-on-one-tree-hill/

I always get a bit excited every time I see this topic bouncing back. Unfortunately it's always followed by disappointment that they haven't had a change of heart and renewed it :p

It's nice to know how the story arc would have continued though. I wonder how they'd have got Sarah Connor back into it or indeed if she'd have had her own story ark.

I always get a bit excited every time I see this topic bouncing back. Unfortunately it's always followed by disappointment that they haven't had a change of heart and renewed it :p

It's nice to know how the story arc would have continued though. I wonder how they'd have got Sarah Connor back into it or indeed if she'd have had her own story ark.

I'd imagine they'd follow her exploits to set things up for John when he arrives in the future by doing parallel stories.

  • 1 month later...
Syfy announced on Tuesday (February 22) that the network has acquired broadcast rights to "Terminator: The Sarah Conner Chronicles."

The two-season, 31-episode run of "T:TSSC" will air on Syfy starting on Thursday, April 7. The first two episodes will air from 9 to 11 p.m. following an airing of the out-of-continuity "Terminator 3." Subsequent episodes will air on Thursday nights at 7 p.m.

It's here that we need to make it clear: Syfy has acquired the rights to air old episodes of a completed series. "Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles" isn't going to be revived by this move any more than "Firefly" is going to get new life from its upcoming rebroadcast on Science Channel.

"Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles" premiered on FOX in January of 2008 to big numbers, ratings that fell off significantly in subsequent airings. FOX lifted the series from the bubble and ordered a second season, which suffered additional ratings attrition before moving to Friday night and passing away.

The show's demise saddened fans who -- not to speak for an entire fanbase -- largely felt that the show was heading in an interesting direction by the end, particularly with the well-regarded finale.

Developed for the small screen by Josh Friedman, "Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles" starred Lena Headey, Thomas Dekker, Brian Austin Green, Richard T. Jones and Garret Dillahunt.

http://www.hitfix.com/articles/terminator-the-sarah-connor-chronicles-will-be-back-in-repeats-on-syfy

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • On the topic of being locked out of a service. Recently two different friends of mine got locked out of their Google accounts. Both were hack attempts and one of them is waiting 30 days before he can get back in. He had backup codes and MFA but not a passkey. It was a browser token hack. Anyhow he has to wait 30 days for the dispute or whatever to end. The other person only had a password and is screwed losing all of the email, docs and years of photos. Google won’t help her at all. Her fault because she had no backup/recovery setup. Enable passkeys if possible. Also do NOT use browser based password managers. If using a cloud service make sure it is one you can fully sync to one of your devices so you can back it up. Like a PC or Mac with some backup drive plugged into it. Google is the worst to use IMHO. You can’t sync your photos at all. You have to use the “Take Out” service which is manual and takes days. That service strips the meta data from your photos. Also Google Docs synced to a device are useless without a Google accounts. MS Office/Libre Office is not going to open a link to a Google doc to a dead account.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!