Apple's "New" GUI  

725 members have voted

  1. 1. Yay or Nay?

    • Kicks Ass!
      294
    • Meh, Who Cares?
      249
    • Utter Piece of Garbage
      182


Recommended Posts

Fitts' Law applies no matter how large the monitor is. The point of putting the menu bar at the edge of the screen is that it becomes an infinitely large target (in other words, if you quickly move your mouse in that direction, you can't help but hit it). If the menu bar is attached to a window (as in Windows or most Linux desktops), then you have to be more accurate with where you move your mouse. In fact, at higher resolutions, having the menu bar in a fixed location that cannot be missed is MORE important because the menu bars on windows become smaller at higher resolutions, making them smaller targets.

thats why we have scalable interfaces :rolleyes:

Why do people say that the menu bar looks exactly like Vista?? Because it is transparent??

untitled1vl5.png

They look pretty different to me...

From the image you compared...

You are comparing Mac os x leopard with Vista beta screenshot...In Vista RTM the taskbar has little more transparency & the IE icons changed!

This have just made my day

Quick view and cover flow is officially useful (assuming the right plug in from say -cough adobe cough- comes in)

Apple has a pretty good relationship with Adobe so it's likely that most mayor CS3 standards are supported. PDF and PSD for sure.

I'm happy with it.... they refined OS X and added a some much needed features....

Still oozes sexy. ;) Clean, simple look that Apple is known for.

I mean not even Vista's team thought of adding virtual desktops to their OS. I guess that will come in a Service Pack or Powertoy.

Its already available by lots of 3rd party softwares (Even in XP) :-)

It's just that it seems detached from the application. To a first-time user, it would seem more like a system menu than the menu for the current application. At least now in Leopard the active window is more prominent so that part is more obvious. As for menus being smaller, isn't Leopard supposed to have a resolution independent UI so that controls are the same physical size despite the screen resolution?

I'm not being anti-apple, just noting that they seem to have made the menubar - one of OSX's main UI differences when compared to linux/windows - so much less prominent that there might be a greater strategy behind it.

regardless of screen resolution and desktop size, the Apple menu bar is still very "Fittzy". according to Fittz's Law of UI Design, the corners and screen edges are the fastest accessible points on the screen because the user can simply 'throw' the mouse and hit their targets. that's why the Apple menu is in the top-left corner and the Application Switcher was in the top-right corner, and even the Start button is in a corner (and also why you can pretty much click in that little 1px space and get the Start Menu to come up; it's just Fittzy!).

it's pretty much the same reason why they don't put application switchers (taskbars, Dock, TaskShelf) in the centre of the screen, even though (according to Fittz's law) the current cursor position is always the fastest point accessible (which is why contextual menus are so popular; beats running to the top of the screen any day).

also, does anyone else remember during the original Public Preview (when they moved the Apple menu back to the leftmost position), there was an option to show the application's icon rather than the full name in the menu bar? i thought it was a super smart move and would've gone a long way to making the position of menu items predictable (which i think is also covered in the 'Fittz manual'). i miss this. a lot. seriously.

Edited by ikyouCrow
Yeah. Apple, unlike Microsoft, has the luxury of being able to implement (decent) built-in things withouit getting sued...

I seriously doubt Microsoft will get (successfully) sued over a build-in Virtual Desktop manager tight into Explorer or whatever service.

I seriously doubt Microsoft will get (successfully) sued over a build-in Virtual Desktop manager tight into Explorer or whatever service.

They have been sued over there IM client inside Windows (OSX has iChat) They have been sued over WMP (OSX has Quicktime/iTunes) And now they are being sued by Google over built in Desktop Search (OSX has Spotlight). It is entirely possible for them to be sued over a built in Virtual Desktop manager.

Im just saying that the itunes file structure and interface are garbage, i never have liked them and never will. It is a huge hassle to get songs on my shuffle. I infact have uninstalled itunes and now use vPod a freeware software. WHY couldnt apple make a normal mp3 player, why did it have to be complicated, why cant i simply open my ipod as if it were a jump drive and delete the songs i dont want and drag and drop the songs i do want.

Apple moving the itunes interface to the core os is a bad decision in my opinion.

Im just saying that the itunes file structure and interface are garbage, i never have liked them and never will. It is a huge hassle to get songs on my shuffle. I infact have uninstalled itunes and now use vPod a freeware software. WHY couldnt apple make a normal mp3 player, why did it have to be complicated, why cant i simply open my ipod as if it were a jump drive and delete the songs i dont want and drag and drop the songs i do want.

Apple moving the itunes interface to the core os is a bad decision in my opinion.

iTunes on windows is quite horrid--slow and laggy compared to OS X.

From the image you compared...

You are comparing Mac os x leopard with Vista beta screenshot...In Vista RTM the taskbar has little more transparency & the IE icons changed!

which Vista Beta are you talking about?

whether it is a beta version or the latest one, those two bars are way too different buddy.

I never liked the brushed metal look, and since this is basically it (without the brushed metal, lol :p), I don't really like it either.

It might appeal to the minimalists though, because this UI barely has any personality left IMHO. All flat grey panels and buttons, and the rest is mostly the traditional Aqua style, which conflicts harshly with the new theme IMHO. Like scroll bars and column views. What's with the blue heavy emphasized jelly when the rest of the UI is flat and grey? Maybe it's to spice it up, but it looks like a relic from a theme they introduced in 2001.

Edited by Jugalator

I'm looking forward to some of the new features not mentionned (in the Keynote, I think ... didn't watch) like Automator 2.0 and new widget system. I was really looking forward to a new finder. Not revolutionary. Pathfinder 4 just sucks though - clunky and slow. I should be able to run a Finder equivalent on my G5 without my system bogging down. Which leads me to wonder how fast the Covertunes type interface in the new Finder will run - the iTunes one is slow on my machine.

I think just "looking" at the new interface doesn't do much. Nor seeing someone else use it. I thinnk we'll each have to try it out. We all have our own habits and modes of use. I found using Tiger, I was more impressed with OS X after trying it out for 6 weeks then demoing in a store. Glad I 'switched' two years ago. I'm hoping for more features in Leopard though.

I'm disappointed about the "Top secret feautres"... was it plural because there were only 2 or 3; or less then 10? Were these features really worth keeping out of the developer builds to stop Microsoft? Didn't see anything shattering. I'm thinking it was a way to get attention and it will bite Apple's behind as it has as of late if they keep doing this. See how many positive:negative comments there are on the MacRumors site right now. ;)

I want the new systems.... Mac mini-tower! (not mini) Please!!!

Im just saying that the itunes file structure and interface are garbage, i never have liked them and never will. It is a huge hassle to get songs on my shuffle.

But that is NOT what you said earlier, you said that adding songs to iTunes was difficult (to paraphrase you). I just pointed out that you were wrong about that.

But that is NOT what you said earlier, you said that adding songs to iTunes was difficult (to paraphrase you). I just pointed out that you were wrong about that.

The problem with iTunes is that it doesn't monitor folders. That's just dumb! (Usual IMO applies)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!