Apple's "New" GUI  

725 members have voted

  1. 1. Yay or Nay?

    • Kicks Ass!
      294
    • Meh, Who Cares?
      249
    • Utter Piece of Garbage
      182


Recommended Posts

Fitts' Law applies no matter how large the monitor is. The point of putting the menu bar at the edge of the screen is that it becomes an infinitely large target (in other words, if you quickly move your mouse in that direction, you can't help but hit it). If the menu bar is attached to a window (as in Windows or most Linux desktops), then you have to be more accurate with where you move your mouse. In fact, at higher resolutions, having the menu bar in a fixed location that cannot be missed is MORE important because the menu bars on windows become smaller at higher resolutions, making them smaller targets.

thats why we have scalable interfaces :rolleyes:

Why do people say that the menu bar looks exactly like Vista?? Because it is transparent??

untitled1vl5.png

They look pretty different to me...

From the image you compared...

You are comparing Mac os x leopard with Vista beta screenshot...In Vista RTM the taskbar has little more transparency & the IE icons changed!

This have just made my day

Quick view and cover flow is officially useful (assuming the right plug in from say -cough adobe cough- comes in)

Apple has a pretty good relationship with Adobe so it's likely that most mayor CS3 standards are supported. PDF and PSD for sure.

I'm happy with it.... they refined OS X and added a some much needed features....

Still oozes sexy. ;) Clean, simple look that Apple is known for.

I mean not even Vista's team thought of adding virtual desktops to their OS. I guess that will come in a Service Pack or Powertoy.

Its already available by lots of 3rd party softwares (Even in XP) :-)

It's just that it seems detached from the application. To a first-time user, it would seem more like a system menu than the menu for the current application. At least now in Leopard the active window is more prominent so that part is more obvious. As for menus being smaller, isn't Leopard supposed to have a resolution independent UI so that controls are the same physical size despite the screen resolution?

I'm not being anti-apple, just noting that they seem to have made the menubar - one of OSX's main UI differences when compared to linux/windows - so much less prominent that there might be a greater strategy behind it.

regardless of screen resolution and desktop size, the Apple menu bar is still very "Fittzy". according to Fittz's Law of UI Design, the corners and screen edges are the fastest accessible points on the screen because the user can simply 'throw' the mouse and hit their targets. that's why the Apple menu is in the top-left corner and the Application Switcher was in the top-right corner, and even the Start button is in a corner (and also why you can pretty much click in that little 1px space and get the Start Menu to come up; it's just Fittzy!).

it's pretty much the same reason why they don't put application switchers (taskbars, Dock, TaskShelf) in the centre of the screen, even though (according to Fittz's law) the current cursor position is always the fastest point accessible (which is why contextual menus are so popular; beats running to the top of the screen any day).

also, does anyone else remember during the original Public Preview (when they moved the Apple menu back to the leftmost position), there was an option to show the application's icon rather than the full name in the menu bar? i thought it was a super smart move and would've gone a long way to making the position of menu items predictable (which i think is also covered in the 'Fittz manual'). i miss this. a lot. seriously.

Edited by ikyouCrow
Yeah. Apple, unlike Microsoft, has the luxury of being able to implement (decent) built-in things withouit getting sued...

I seriously doubt Microsoft will get (successfully) sued over a build-in Virtual Desktop manager tight into Explorer or whatever service.

I seriously doubt Microsoft will get (successfully) sued over a build-in Virtual Desktop manager tight into Explorer or whatever service.

They have been sued over there IM client inside Windows (OSX has iChat) They have been sued over WMP (OSX has Quicktime/iTunes) And now they are being sued by Google over built in Desktop Search (OSX has Spotlight). It is entirely possible for them to be sued over a built in Virtual Desktop manager.

Im just saying that the itunes file structure and interface are garbage, i never have liked them and never will. It is a huge hassle to get songs on my shuffle. I infact have uninstalled itunes and now use vPod a freeware software. WHY couldnt apple make a normal mp3 player, why did it have to be complicated, why cant i simply open my ipod as if it were a jump drive and delete the songs i dont want and drag and drop the songs i do want.

Apple moving the itunes interface to the core os is a bad decision in my opinion.

Im just saying that the itunes file structure and interface are garbage, i never have liked them and never will. It is a huge hassle to get songs on my shuffle. I infact have uninstalled itunes and now use vPod a freeware software. WHY couldnt apple make a normal mp3 player, why did it have to be complicated, why cant i simply open my ipod as if it were a jump drive and delete the songs i dont want and drag and drop the songs i do want.

Apple moving the itunes interface to the core os is a bad decision in my opinion.

iTunes on windows is quite horrid--slow and laggy compared to OS X.

From the image you compared...

You are comparing Mac os x leopard with Vista beta screenshot...In Vista RTM the taskbar has little more transparency & the IE icons changed!

which Vista Beta are you talking about?

whether it is a beta version or the latest one, those two bars are way too different buddy.

I never liked the brushed metal look, and since this is basically it (without the brushed metal, lol :p), I don't really like it either.

It might appeal to the minimalists though, because this UI barely has any personality left IMHO. All flat grey panels and buttons, and the rest is mostly the traditional Aqua style, which conflicts harshly with the new theme IMHO. Like scroll bars and column views. What's with the blue heavy emphasized jelly when the rest of the UI is flat and grey? Maybe it's to spice it up, but it looks like a relic from a theme they introduced in 2001.

Edited by Jugalator

I'm looking forward to some of the new features not mentionned (in the Keynote, I think ... didn't watch) like Automator 2.0 and new widget system. I was really looking forward to a new finder. Not revolutionary. Pathfinder 4 just sucks though - clunky and slow. I should be able to run a Finder equivalent on my G5 without my system bogging down. Which leads me to wonder how fast the Covertunes type interface in the new Finder will run - the iTunes one is slow on my machine.

I think just "looking" at the new interface doesn't do much. Nor seeing someone else use it. I thinnk we'll each have to try it out. We all have our own habits and modes of use. I found using Tiger, I was more impressed with OS X after trying it out for 6 weeks then demoing in a store. Glad I 'switched' two years ago. I'm hoping for more features in Leopard though.

I'm disappointed about the "Top secret feautres"... was it plural because there were only 2 or 3; or less then 10? Were these features really worth keeping out of the developer builds to stop Microsoft? Didn't see anything shattering. I'm thinking it was a way to get attention and it will bite Apple's behind as it has as of late if they keep doing this. See how many positive:negative comments there are on the MacRumors site right now. ;)

I want the new systems.... Mac mini-tower! (not mini) Please!!!

Im just saying that the itunes file structure and interface are garbage, i never have liked them and never will. It is a huge hassle to get songs on my shuffle.

But that is NOT what you said earlier, you said that adding songs to iTunes was difficult (to paraphrase you). I just pointed out that you were wrong about that.

But that is NOT what you said earlier, you said that adding songs to iTunes was difficult (to paraphrase you). I just pointed out that you were wrong about that.

The problem with iTunes is that it doesn't monitor folders. That's just dumb! (Usual IMO applies)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Micron reveals AI companies are spending billions to lock up its memory years in advance by Karthik Mudaliar The demand for more memory is far from over, and Micron is turning the AI-driven memory shortage into a much more predictable business. The company has revealed that it has signed 16 strategic supply agreements backed by roughly $22 billion in customer deposits and other financial commitments. The contracts cover DRAM and NAND deliveries over several years, with some running through 2030. With the AI boom, demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) has grown so quickly that large customers are now prepared to help finance future production in exchange for a guaranteed supply. According to Micron’s latest financial results, the company received commitments worth about $22 billion across its new agreements. Around $18 billion is expected to arrive as cash deposits, while the rest will come through other financial arrangements. Micron says the agreements could generate approximately $100 billion in future contracted obligations. They cover around 20% of its expected DRAM shipments and one-third of its NAND shipments during their respective terms. It should be noted that although AI infrastructure is the main force behind the current shortage, not all 16 agreements with Micron involve AI companies. Micron said the customers also include consumer electronics and automotive businesses, two sectors that increasingly compete with data centers for the same manufacturing capacity. HBM is consuming an increasing share of that supply. Unlike conventional desktop or server RAM, HBM stacks multiple memory dies vertically and places them close to an AI accelerator. This gives GPUs and other AI chips access to data at much higher speeds, but it also requires more complicated manufacturing and packaging. Micron says its 12-layer HBM4 memory is now shipping in high volume for a lead customer, with samples also supplied to other companies. The chipmaker has already generated more than $1 billion in HBM4 revenue and says the product is ramping twice as quickly as its earlier HBM3E generation. Samsung has similarly warned that the memory shortage could continue into 2027 and beyond. Consumer memory companies have also had to address sharp increases in DDR5 pricing, suggesting the effects are already reaching beyond the data center. For consumers, that could mean the AI memory crunch lasts longer than expected, even as manufacturers invest heavily in new production.
    • XnConvert 1.112 by Razvan Serea  XnConvert is a cross-platform batch image-converter and resizer with a powerful and ease of use experience. All common picture and graphics formats are supported (i.e. JPG, PNG, TIFF, GIF, Camera RAW, JPEG2000, WebP, OpenEXR) as well as supporting over 500 other image formats. Also available within the batch operations include rotating, adding of watermarks, adding of text along with many image-adjustment features such as brightness, shadows and more. Among the features included are: Batch adding of files and folders Support for drag and drop of files Batch rotating, cropping, resizing and more Adding of photo masks Preserving or removing image metadata in conversions Multipage image file support (i.e animated GIF, APNG, TIFF) Command line integration via NConvert Filters - such as 'Blur', 'Gaussian Blur', 'Emboss', "Sharpen' and much more Effects - such as 'Old camera' and much more Download: XnConvert 64-bit | Standalone | ~30.0 MB (Freeware) Download: XnConvert 32-bit | Standalone Links: XnConvert Website | Screenshot | Release Announcement Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft updates Visual Studio Code with chat cost tracking and multi-agent chats by Paul Hill Microsoft has just launched Visual Studio Code 1.126, its latest weekly release. This time, the company has focused on letting you see the total cost of chat sessions to spot expensive conversations; enabling multiple chats per session that run side-by-side in one agent host Copilot session; and letting you browse new folders safely in restricted mode. We have now reached the stage where free AI in IDEs is coming to an end. To help you keep track of your costs, VS Code now lets you see the entire cost of a chat session, rather than just individual turns. This should give you more transparency about which sessions consume the most credits, so you can better manage your usage over time and spend less. For those of you using the Agents window, you know it is possible to run and manage multiple agent sessions at once. In this update, a Copilot session started from an agent host can hold several chats at once. Explaining how this feature works, Microsoft writes: Finally, from this update forward, Microsoft will remove the pop-up when opening an untrusted folder. When you open a new folder now, it will automatically open in Restricted Mode. You will see a banner that lets you manage the trust level of the folder. Microsoft has made this change so that it’s easier to start inspecting code without giving it trust right away. If you have VS Code, you can check for updates within the app now to get this new version. Otherwise, you can download it from the Visual Studio Code website.
    • Anthropic accuses Alibaba of using 25,000 fake accounts to copy Claude's capabilities by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic has accused Alibaba of using nearly 25,000 fraudulent accounts to extract capabilities from Claude on a huge scale. According to a report from Reuters, Anthropic told US lawmakers that operators linked to Alibaba and the company’s Qwen AI team generated 28.8 million exchanges with Claude between April 22 and June 5, 2026. That is a lot of Claude conversations, but Anthropic says this was not ordinary chatbot use. The company believes the accounts were part of a coordinated effort to collect answers that could help train or improve rival AI systems. The alleged campaign reportedly focused on some of Claude’s most valuable skills, including software development, multi-step reasoning, and agentic tasks. In practical terms, that means getting an AI model to plan and complete work across several stages rather than simply answering a single question. This is called 'distillation,' where AI companies use outputs from a larger model to train a smaller and cheaper one. The smaller model learns to imitate useful parts of the more capable system without needing the same amount of computing power. The distillation process isn't automatically suspicious, but the problem comes when one company gathers another provider's outputs without permission and at an industrial scale. Also, this does not mean Alibaba obtained Claude’s source code, model weights, or original training data. Instead, Anthropic claims the accounts repeatedly asked Claude carefully designed questions and collected the answers. Those answers could then be used as training material for another model. Anthropic has made similar accusations against DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax earlier this year. As Neowin previously reported, Anthropic said those three companies collectively generated more than 16 million Claude exchanges through roughly 24,000 accounts. Anthropic says the new campaign produced almost twice as many exchanges in a matter of weeks. Anthropic reportedly told lawmakers that the campaign could help Chinese AI developers approach the capabilities of its Mythos Preview model. Mythos is focused on advanced cybersecurity work, including finding and exploiting complex software vulnerabilities. via Reuters | Photo via DepositPhotos.com
    • An Indian manufacturer that assembles roughly one-third of Apple's iPhones and supplies semiconductor components to Tesla confirmed Monday that attackers had stolen and publicly published a 630-gigabyte cache of confidential files — including engineering blueprints stamped "TRADE SECRET," a 52-page quality inspection document for iPhone circuit board components, and cryptographic certificates that security experts say could be weaponized in follow-on attacks. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/319019/20260624/apple-tesla-supplier-tata-electronics-confirms-630-gb-data-theft-iphone-specs-dark-web.htm
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      176
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      133
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!