Apple's "New" GUI  

725 members have voted

  1. 1. Yay or Nay?

    • Kicks Ass!
      294
    • Meh, Who Cares?
      249
    • Utter Piece of Garbage
      182


Recommended Posts

Has anyone brought up the fact the SHADOWS ARE HUGE on windows now?

In the keynote, when Jobs opened a keynote presentation and the loading box came up with this huge shadow, the whole audience went quiet as if to ask him "Okay, Jobs. Make a subtle crack about the shadows." But he never did.

post-22927-1182494349_thumb.jpg

Personally, OS X has always had large shadows and they've always just worked (unlike Vista's shadows which look ... weird ), but these -- watch out if you have a bright background.

^ The drop shadows don't seem nearly as dark when actually running Mac OS X Leopard as they are on that shot you posted.

Does this mean the Time Machine image can be used as its own screen saver? That'd be awesome, I love having space-themed screen savers.

Haven't tried it, but it might.

Booting a restored Mac OS X Install DVD from your iPod isn't really recommended. The iPod gets extremely hot and in some cases it will just cease to function until it cooled down again. It's better to use a normal external HD or burn it to a DVD (DL) like others suggested.

^ The drop shadows don't seem nearly as dark when actually running Mac OS X Leopard as they are on that shot you posted.

Haven't tried it, but it might.

Booting a restored Mac OS X Install DVD from your iPod isn't really recommended. The iPod gets extremely hot and in some cases it will just cease to function until it cooled down again. It's better to use a normal external HD or burn it to a DVD (DL) like others suggested.

The main issue here is that both my external HDD use USB, I've no FireWire cable or FireWire compatible drives.

I'm not sure if you ever noticed, but you can sort of have a breadcrumb bar in Finder as well (I never noticed it till the other day myself). Customize the toolbar and add the Path widget.

Already have that.

What you see is multiple solid square boxes changing size.

http://lloydyweb.com/vintage/first_look_at.../macosx_dp3.jpg

So is each square a separate window then?

Edit: and guys, mind what you're saying ;)

The urban legend is that Intel Macs can boot from USB hard drives. Although I have never tried this as I'm afraid of the Firewire Ghost being very, very angry. That, and not having a USB hard drive.

Can a Core Image file be ported to XAML?

I have my Hard Drive backed up to an external USB HD, and I am able to boot from it on my MBP.

From the first time I sat down infront of a Mac through to the present day I have always thought and found the UI to be cold, unappealing and sterile, with limited customisation. It has never been something I've wanted to work infront of.

Having been consistent in my views over this, in effect I'd rather not work infront of something that brings on a hefty dose of S.A.D.

QuickTime and iTunes on Win32 are the same.

Personal Opinion.

How does one remove Xcode from a Mac OS X disc image? I wanted to know this for quite some time now.

I copied this from a post I saw elsewhere:

How to install Tiger with only single layer DVD media

OK, I have just created a bootable copy of the Tiger install DVD using the following method:

1. Open the Tiger installation DVD using Disk Utility.

2. Using the Disk Utility, create a new dual layer (8.5GB) sparse image called Tiger (actual filename will be Tiger.sparseimage) and mount it.

3. Restore the Tiger installation DVD to the mounted Tiger.sparseimage (not the image file.)

4. Open the mounted Tiger.sparseimage with Finder, and delete the XCodeTools directory.

5. Unmount the mounted Tiger.sparseimage.

6. Using the Disk Utility, create a new single layer (4.4GB) spare image called boot (actual filename will be boot.sparseimage) and mount it.

7. Restore the Tiger.sparseimage image file to the mounted boot.sparseimage (not the image file.)

8. Unmount the mounted boot.sparseimage.

9. Burn the boot.sparseimage to your single layer DVD media.

Booting from this DVD works, but takes a long time.

How long would it take to boot the entire Leopard OS from the iPod? Would it be like running Linux from a Live CD?

An iPod is far faster than a CD drive. It is, after all, a hard drive.

Don't don't don't don't don't boot an OS from your iPod. The hard drives aren't meant to take that kind of strain, and doing it for any extended period of time is bad for it.

That is utter BS. The hard drive in an iPod is no different than any other hard drive, other than being a slightly smaller format than a laptop hard drive. The type of hard drive that it uses was originally intended for use in ultra-portable laptops.

It's most likely because at the moment, the majority of people with the torrent are leeching, few have the complete copy and are seeding. But with each passing day, the ratio will improve. I say give it a week, and the torrents will be very fast, with hundreds of seeders.

Actually, I think it's more a problem of people who have decent upstream connections dropping off quickly after finishing their download. I'll see spikes every once in a while where the download speed goes up to 200KB+ and then it drops back down to around 60KB within a few minutes.

That is utter BS. The hard drive in an iPod is no different than any other hard drive, other than being a slightly smaller format than a laptop hard drive. The type of hard drive that it uses was originally intended for use in ultra-portable laptops.

The difference is that that little hard drive is packed in extremely tightly with the rest of the iPod. And there's practically zero ventilation and no fans. It's fine for the iPod itself, because the hard drive is accessed fairly sparingly. But when you've got an entire OS on there that's thrashing the hell out of it, heat builds up very quickly in that small space. The actual read/write durability could have changed in the past couple years, nobody can say for sure - but that doesn't change the fact that the heat buildup is bad for your iPod. Someone else already posted about it.

Also, thanks Engadget:

Before we get started, we should warn you that doing this can and will use your iPod in a way it was not intended and may severely shorten the life of your iPod. The reason is that the little iPod hard drive wasn't meant to be a full-time operating system drive. It's okay to boot from it from time to time, but the little drives are rated to about 20,000 hours while desktop drives are usually rated to 750,000 hours or more. But, even with that said - the biggest reason thus will eventually kill your iPod is - the heat that will be generated inside the iPod from this much use isn't what the iPod was designed for, so at some point you can and will fry your iPod.
The difference is that that little hard drive is packed in extremely tightly with the rest of the iPod. And there's practically zero ventilation and no fans. It's fine for the iPod itself, because the hard drive is accessed fairly sparingly. But when you've got an entire OS on there that's thrashing the hell out of it, heat builds up very quickly in that small space. The actual read/write durability could have changed in the past couple years, nobody can say for sure - but that doesn't change the fact that the heat buildup is bad for your iPod. Someone else already posted about it.

While you may be somewhat right about the heat build up, it still is no different than any other slim external hard drive. Most of the ones I've used that were based on a 2.5" laptop drive get very hot as well. I'm just trying to make the point that an iPod, contrary to what anyone may want to claim, is still just an external hard drive that happens to also have a screen and function as a media player.

I have my Hard Drive backed up to an external USB HD, and I am able to boot from it on my MBP.

Good to finally have it confirmed. :)

I copied this from a post I saw elsewhere:

Thanks! I'll give it a whirl.

While you may be somewhat right about the heat build up, it still is no different than any other slim external hard drive. Most of the ones I've used that were based on a 2.5" laptop drive get very hot as well. I'm just trying to make the point that an iPod, contrary to what anyone may want to claim, is still just an external hard drive that happens to also have a screen and function as a media player.

While the HD is nothing special, the iPod itself is extremely compact and packs a lot of extra hardware for the additional functionality it offers compared to a slim external HD. Overal the iPod's casing isn't very good at dissipating heat quickly enough and I've seen multiple instances where the iPod would just complete freeze under heavy strain, like during the installation of Mac OS X.

Anyone else think the fontsize in the sidebar is a bit small? I guess I'm just used to having a larger font in both Mail and Finder. Which they borked in Leopard.

Yeah I thought that too. It's almost becoming Windows cleartype style. Thats not meant to come across in a bad way, just I find Windows font smoothing causes me to concentrate more on the text as it's that thin. I don't like that feeling. As I am so use to the thickness of OS X.

Seems just fine to me...

Of course, you would. :)

Yeah I thought that too. It's almost becoming Windows cleartype style. Thats not meant to come across in a bad way, just I find Windows font smoothing causes me to concentrate more on the text as it's that thin. I don't like that feeling. As I am so use to the thickness of OS X.

Not sure what the font size has to do with the font rendering technique?

Of course, you would. :)

What's that supposed to mean? :)

Note though I'm using an eMac with 17" CRT screen with a max resolution of 1280x960. So to me the fonts are still fairly thick. I have no idea what it looks like on a high res LCD panel.

Edit:

Hm they are a bit on the small side yeah. Bit weird they didn't use the exact specs of the iTunes Sidebar.

Edited by .Neo

Does anyone else here find the overal performance of the current build a bit disappointing? It feels slower than Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger and it beach balls a lot. The OS does recover from a beach ball after a few minutes, but the lags are pretty annoying.

The Mac OS X Tiger betas seemed a lot more stable at this stage. :/

^^ Your missing out big time ;)

Need yourself a new iMac

hahaha I know all too well. :laugh:

My college is in the progress of renewing their contracts with Apple, which means I currently can't get a 10% discount. So I definitely have to wait for them to sort things out. :/

I have my Hard Drive backed up to an external USB HD, and I am able to boot from it on my MBP.

So I could theoretically install Leopard to an external hard drive and boot from it (even though it'd be very slow?) This is good to hear, since I'm not big on FireWire.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!