Apple's "New" GUI  

725 members have voted

  1. 1. Yay or Nay?

    • Kicks Ass!
      294
    • Meh, Who Cares?
      249
    • Utter Piece of Garbage
      182


Recommended Posts

Some other Leopard stuff: http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?showtopic=54912

1. Dictionary can now search Wikipedia.

2. Middle clicking now works in Safari.

3. When you choose to rename file, only the filename without extension is selected.

4. You can type "exit" in Terminal to close the window.

Some other Leopard stuff: http://forum.insanelymac.com/index.php?showtopic=54912

1. Dictionary can now search Wikipedia.

2. Middle clicking now works in Safari.

3. When you choose to rename file, only the filename without extension is selected.

4. You can type "exit" in Terminal to close the window.

I don't really care about the first and last new additions, but the third option will really come in handy. I've ruined countless because I kept accidentally deleting the file extension and forgetting what file type it was to begin with. Currently, middle clicking on my Mighty Mouse is set to activate Spotlight. Will middle-clicking in Safari override this behavior by default, or do I have to change something in System Preferences?

I was looking at the iPhone overview video the other day, and I can't help but feel a bit disappointed that Apple didn't go for a more or less same UI style in Mac OS X Leopard. Of course some elements have to be changed to make it more suitable for desktop OS usage and default windows definitively shouldn't use that weird blue shade, but overal I'm positive Apple could have done something amazing with it.

I don't have FireWire hard drive or cable, I'd rather not spend the money on it when I have no need for FireWire, USB 2 is fine for me, and all my plug-and-play devices are USB.

I thought you meant that there's something wrong with Firewire itself. Which I wouldn't mind hearing as I'm planning to buy one. :p

I don't really care about the first and last new additions, but the third option will really come in handy. I've ruined countless because I kept accidentally deleting the file extension and forgetting what file type it was to begin with. Currently, middle clicking on my Mighty Mouse is set to activate Spotlight. Will middle-clicking in Safari override this behavior by default, or do I have to change something in System Preferences?

You'll have to set it to "Button 3" as such:

picture2gw1.png

I don't really care about the first and last new additions, but the third option will really come in handy. I've ruined countless because I kept accidentally deleting the file extension and forgetting what file type it was to begin with.

Yea, renaming file names without the extension is really handy. Much better than before.

I thought you meant that there's something wrong with Firewire itself. Which I wouldn't mind hearing as I'm planning to buy one. :p

Firewire is good :)

I have a FW backup HD & it's fast (I have FW 400, not 800). So I reckon FW 800 must be really good.

Yea, renaming file names without the extension is really handy. Much better than before.

Firewire is good :)

I have a FW backup HD & it's fast (I have FW 400, not 800). So I reckon FW 800 must be really good.

I've always found file transfers over FW to be faster on a Mac when compared to USB - even FW 400 beats the pants off of USB; 800 obviously is simply a cut further above :). And, price differences on external drives with 800 v. the prices of those with 400 are always shrinking, too.

Yea, I read that in theory USB 2 is faster, but when used FW is always faster.

I usually buy FW/USB caddies & put my old HDs in them. I see you can now get FW 800 & USB/FW 400/FW 800 caddies (All three outputs in the same caddy).

USB 2.0 is supposed to be faster, but Firewire has more stable transfer speeds or something like that. Plus isn't it the case that USB 2.0 requires processing power from your Mac/PC whereas a Firewire device has it's own build-in chip to handle that?

USB 2.0 is supposed to be faster, but Firewire has more stable transfer speeds or something like that. Plus isn't it the case that USB 2.0 requires processing power from your Mac/PC whereas a Firewire device has it's own build-in chip to handle that?

Firewire transfers in a constant stream, so it's preferred for streaming video from a DV camera or whatnot. USB transfers in bursts.

Firewire transfers in a constant stream, so it's preferred for streaming video from a DV camera or whatnot. USB transfers in bursts.

I find on my G5 that OSX slows down using USB2 transfer. So I have a dual-HDD FW enclosure and a FW burner... works great!

Got it down to 4GB while keeping all key OS stuff, playing with it. Transparency still looks retarded. There's no option to turn it off. New dock still seems bulky even at about 2/3 of the default size.

Edit: Uh, the new Front Row is cool, I guess.

Edit edit: Transparency looks horrendous with certain wallpapers, same with the dock. Certain colors look real bad with the effect the menubar is applying. Light wallpapers cause the dock base to more or less get "lost". Dark wallpapers seem to be your best bet here.

Edited by cosine

Tried Leopard... my thoughts on it (btw, I was running it on an external HD) :

The 3D Dock : Not really nice with fullscreen windows... then again maybe this is just a habit that my eyes don't have

The transparent menu at the top : Really nice sometimes... but I'd still add an option to turn the transparency off

The stability : Ok, Finder has crashed twice, but restarted without me noticing (or almost!) so it wasn't a big deal really. The graphics are a bit slow sometimes.

Finder : Coverflow doesn't work that well in the Finder with a resolution for a 24", 1024x1024 icons would be appreciated.

Dashboard : no longer has the small glowing dot at the bottom to say it's open. why?

Stacks : Really nice!

Some bugs here and there, but all in all, I think it's a really solid release. If it's really feature complete (why wouldn't it be?), the released product has no reason not to be stable. There's at least 3 whole months of bug hunting and bug fixing, which I think is a good deadline.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
    • It's funny when thieves accuse other thieves of stealing. Ai companies just blatantly siphoned all the knowledge of the internet without consent and are now selling it with their service... so excuse me if I find this a bit ironic.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 27 is out.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!