Apple's "New" GUI  

725 members have voted

  1. 1. Yay or Nay?

    • Kicks Ass!
      294
    • Meh, Who Cares?
      249
    • Utter Piece of Garbage
      182


Recommended Posts

Looks like a bug how when you click on the Apple menu icon & menu items the icon & text change to white, but the Spotlight icon remains black when clicked on :blink:

They sure did pick vile colours. Feels like 3 themes slapped together. No colour coordination in that.

However, I don't care about that now as I have seen one of the most awesome slickest themes behind the scenes. Which I'm not too bothered running Shapeshifter 24/7 when Leopard arrives. It's everything I hoped illuminous would be. So beautiful, so useable so damn hot!

I just can't believe how hobbyists can produce better UI 's than big corporations, and this is Apple's answer to it.

I even got the icons that was kicking about somewhere, loaded them in Pixadex to see then Candybar. To me personally I think the folder icons are so vile. Bland could not even describe it.

They sure did pick vile colours. Feels like 3 themes slapped together. No colour coordination in that.

However, I don't care about that now as I have seen one of the most awesome slickest themes behind the scenes. Which I'm not too bothered running Shapeshifter 24/7 when Leopard arrives. It's everything I hoped illuminous would be. So beautiful, so useable so damn hot!

I just can't believe how hobbyists can produce better UI 's than big corporations, and this is Apple's answer to it.

I even got the icons that was kicking about somewhere, loaded them in Pixadex to see then Candybar. To me personally I think the folder icons are so vile. Bland could not even describe it.

And this is why we have opinions. :yes:

I'm personally finding that this new UI is really growing on me. It definitely needs tweaking (most of the nitpick is just a side-effect of making everything vector) but it truly is nice.

However, I don't care about that now as I have seen one of the most awesome slickest themes behind the scenes. Which I'm not too bothered running Shapeshifter 24/7 when Leopard arrives. It's everything I hoped illuminous would be. So beautiful, so useable so damn hot!

Not sure I follow that part. Are you talking about a different theme Apple is designing for Mac OS X Leopard or a 3rd party one?

Not sure I follow that part. Are you talking about a different theme Apple is designing for Mac OS X Leopard or a 3rd party one?

He is talking about a 3rd party theme. One being developed which he has seen. One that he wished the official OS X interface would look like, coined "illuminious" by Mac OS X users. It turned out just to be the Quick Looks UI as I and others expected.

Definitely plenty of UI bugs in Leopard. It's actually pretty stable for me though. Finder's crashed once since I started using it this morning, and that was when using Cover Flow over the network.

Could you list a couple of the more glaring UI bugs? I'm curious, since Leo has been incredibly fast and smooth (eyecandy animations) so far.

It is NOT incredibly fast and smooth visually. The only thing that's smoothest than ever is Spotlight. I've seen this app quick sometimes, but never as quick as Leopard... I really have no idea of what they did with it, but it's crazy.

.Neo has already posted a small list of GUI bugs a few pages back. It's also to notice that some links between the applications have no style, so it screws up the small paragraphs of text in which they are.

There is still much work to do. On top of the GUI issues, the graphics drivers need updating. I get low fps within the UI where I did not have them before. I am having issues with the remote control as well. The new frontrow UI look great and responds well (though my volume control through the remote does not work). I also think the audio quality has dropped a bit, so those drivers might need updating as well.

Could you list a couple of the more glaring UI bugs? I'm curious, since Leo has been incredibly fast and smooth (eyecandy animations) so far.

When I use Spaces or Expose or Dash Board, the dock remains on screen but without any icons on it. And it still has its reflection lol

that is a pretty big UI bug to me and it looks stupid.

Also the Dock's movements when its set to magnification are very sloshy almost Windows XP like when you grab a window and drag it around furiously.

When I use Spaces or Expose or Dash Board, the dock remains on screen but without any icons on it. And it still has its reflection lol

that is a pretty big UI bug to me and it looks stupid.

Also the Dock's movements when its set to magnification are very sloshy almost Windows XP like when you grab a window and drag it around furiously.

Uh . . . not from where I'm sitting. Exactly the opposite - in fact, ALL visual effects are incredibly smooth. Heck I've got four spaces open right now, and switching is fast and smooth. What's your setup? Speed, RAM, vidcard, etc?

See, this is the problem: one person experiences a particular bug, while the other does not. Please don't tell me something is wrong with spaces and the dock, when *for me* they're fine. Maybe *your* configuration is the problem. Did you do a clean install of Leo, or did you just upgrade?

I find that the major cause of all these problems (at least in part) is people doing an upgrade instead of doing a completely clean install of Leopard. I wiped my hard drive, erased all through disk utility (I backed up all my stuff to dvds prior) and installed Leopard. Not one noticeable bug yet, apart from perhaps certain graphical design/spacing flaws, but none that I've really noticed. In fact, this preview build of Leo seems to be faster and more stable than Tiger! Strange but true . . . under *my* system.

And this thing about Mail crashing . . . what's that? I've been sending and receiving e-mails from my auto-configured (wow) gmail account for about 48 hours, with Mail open constantly, and in its own space. Works like a charm.

The only real problems I've encountered so far are certain apps that simply don't work, but so far it's only been one for me (NeoOffice, I don't use it though, just there to modify .doc files when I get them.) But the list is a very subjective one. The apps I use every day might not be the ones you use.

My specs:

imac core duo 1.83ghz

1gb RAM

Radeon X1600 128mb

My system isn't even 64-bit, is a bit over a year old (rendered obsolete by the core 2 duo), and this beta OS that allegedly offers much more than Tiger, at least graphically, is taking it like a man. The only annoyance is that Quicktime takes a bit more time to recognize files that require perian/avi/xvid codecs. Perhaps it's a codec issue, perhaps a Quicktime issue. Either way, it's nothing major. And Quicklook doesn't let me play .wmv clips (I have Flip4mac installed), they can only be played by opening them directly in Quicktime. They play fine in Safari. But this is on *my* configuration, and does not necessarily represent the experiences of others. Hey, Not bad for an older machine.

I did a fresh install on a new drive.

Core Duo

17" MacBook Pro

2GB 667MHz DDR2 RAM

X1600 256MB GDDR3

100GB 7,200 Drive (But I installed on to a USB 5,200RPM 40GB hard drive)

Anything else you want oh enchanted one?

Don't know what to tell ya. Quite frankly, with all the conflicting reports about bugs, UI issues, speed issues, etc., it seems that build 9a466 was not intended to be released for the purposes of a bug-hunting excursion. It was intended as a framework in which developers could start their work. Unless of course, Apple is unaware that Leopard seems to perform differently from configuration to configuration.

I really can't explain it beyond what I've already stated.

Uh . . . not from where I'm sitting. Exactly the opposite - in fact, ALL visual effects are incredibly smooth. Heck I've got four spaces open right now, and switching is fast and smooth. What's your setup? Speed, RAM, vidcard, etc?

See, this is the problem: one person experiences a particular bug, while the other does not. Please don't tell me something is wrong with spaces and the dock, when *for me* they're fine. Maybe *your* configuration is the problem. Did you do a clean install of Leo, or did you just upgrade?

I find that the major cause of all these problems (at least in part) is people doing an upgrade instead of doing a completely clean install of Leopard. I wiped my hard drive, erased all through disk utility (I backed up all my stuff to dvds prior) and installed Leopard. Not one noticeable bug yet, apart from perhaps certain graphical design/spacing flaws, but none that I've really noticed. In fact, this preview build of Leo seems to be faster and more stable than Tiger! Strange but true . . . under *my* system.

And this thing about Mail crashing . . . what's that? I've been sending and receiving e-mails from my auto-configured (wow) gmail account for about 48 hours, with Mail open constantly, and in its own space. Works like a charm.

Christ, maybe you should learn to come to grips with the fact that some people might have problems with the beta build of something, let alone an operating system. God damn. There really needs to be another Apple forum for all the rabid idiots to post in so everyone else can have an actual discussion without the one-sided "APPLE IS GOD AND CAN DO NO WRONG" posts.

Christ, maybe you should learn to come to grips with the fact that some people might have problems with the beta build of something, let alone an operating system. God damn. There really needs to be another Apple forum for all the rabid idiots to post in so everyone else can have an actual discussion without the one-sided "APPLE IS GOD AND CAN DO NO WRONG" posts.

Well that's exactly the problem. It seems difficult to reproduce bugs from system to system. My issue happens to be that Quicktime problem I stated above. And I think my answer to WinMacLin was pretty fair, and I'm sure he was preparing a fair and reasonable reply.

Don't know what to tell ya. Quite frankly, with all the conflicting reports about bugs, UI issues, speed issues, etc., it seems that build 9a466 was not intended to be released for the purposes of a bug-hunting excursion. It was intended as a framework in which developers could start their work. Unless of course, Apple is unaware that Leopard seems to perform differently from configuration to configuration.

I really can't explain it beyond what I've already stated.

You wanted to know which was a more hefty bug. So I posted one I was experiencing. You came off as pretty arrogant when I said about the bug as if I don't know how bugs manifest themselves. I wasn't looking for an education. I was just giving you the information you requested as I'm sure all the ones Neo expirenced he had already posted (the major ones he could remember when posting). I felt my dock bug was a rather major one.

To begin with this beta was indeed not meant for the public which is why I have not posted about the bugs previously as I know this is just a developers technology preview. But you requested it and you shall receive.

I have no such thing as a dock that stays when I summon Expos? or Spaces. The bugs I have here are all minor, except for the graphics speed.

I have the graphics speed issue but only effecting the dock (The sloshing effect I mentioned in a previous post) the other graphics are all fine.

Infact here is a picture of it on my install with Spaces.

Spaces.jpg

as you can see the Dock is still visible at the bottom. And infact if I move one of those windows down inside the Spaces window it will be reflected but I took this screeny many days ago and I cannot take another to illustrate it right now.

Edited by WinMacLin

LOL it's a pretty funny bug... but I haven't tried Spaces with a 2x2 grid, only a 1x4.

Btw... the resolution independency was supposed to be for accessibility options only I think, but when I zoom on the screen, I can see all the pixels. It's not as smooth as in Tiger... what happened with that feature?

LOL it's a pretty funny bug... but I haven't tried Spaces with a 2x2 grid, only a 1x4.

Btw... the resolution independency was supposed to be for accessibility options only I think, but when I zoom on the screen, I can see all the pixels. It's not as smooth as in Tiger... what happened with that feature?

I think you might've just turned off smoothing. Resolution independence is going to be in there soon though. You can definitely see that the UI is full vector. Zooming probably still just works on the top layer of the OS (so it's zooming in on what's already been rendered [the raster output]).

My UI bugs aren't bugs. They're just nitpicking at everything that isn't really polished off yet. The buttons have some jaggy, unsightly edges. The scrollbars are kinda weird and jaggy/blocking looking. The close/min/max buttons have some jaggy edges and the x/-/+ in them are semi-blurry. Just things like that. Things that'll certainly get polished before final release. Every actual animation and action in Leopard was lightning fast.

And I agree about Spotlight. It's blazing fast!

I'm still hoping Aqua will be replaced by the iTunes 7 interface elements (buttons, scrollbars, etc.) in Leopard. This way OS X would become consistent with the new Apple.com and iPhone UI color scheme (matte blue + gray). Aqua looks really lame without the pinstripes and with the dark gray titlebars and toolbars. Plus, it's seven years old, which is like 70 in computer years.

I'm still hoping Aqua will be replaced by the iTunes 7 interface elements (buttons, scrollbars, etc.) in Leopard. This way OS X would become consistent with the new Apple.com and iPhone UI color scheme (matte blue + gray). Aqua looks really lame without the pinstripes and with the dark gray titlebars and toolbars. Plus, it's seven years old, which is like 70 in computer years.

I wish Apple would use the iPhone's red glossy notification badges as for Mail, iChat etc. in Mac OS X Leopard as well. The current badgets don't really fit in with the new Dock style, way too flat, matte and a bit dated

Edited by .Neo
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Micron reveals AI companies are spending billions to lock up its memory years in advance by Karthik Mudaliar The demand for more memory is far from over, and Micron is turning the AI-driven memory shortage into a much more predictable business. The company has revealed that it has signed 16 strategic supply agreements backed by roughly $22 billion in customer deposits and other financial commitments. The contracts cover DRAM and NAND deliveries over several years, with some running through 2030. With the AI boom, demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) has grown so quickly that large customers are now prepared to help finance future production in exchange for a guaranteed supply. According to Micron’s latest financial results, the company received commitments worth about $22 billion across its new agreements. Around $18 billion is expected to arrive as cash deposits, while the rest will come through other financial arrangements. Micron says the agreements could generate approximately $100 billion in future contracted obligations. They cover around 20% of its expected DRAM shipments and one-third of its NAND shipments during their respective terms. It should be noted that although AI infrastructure is the main force behind the current shortage, not all 16 agreements with Micron involve AI companies. Micron said the customers also include consumer electronics and automotive businesses, two sectors that increasingly compete with data centers for the same manufacturing capacity. HBM is consuming an increasing share of that supply. Unlike conventional desktop or server RAM, HBM stacks multiple memory dies vertically and places them close to an AI accelerator. This gives GPUs and other AI chips access to data at much higher speeds, but it also requires more complicated manufacturing and packaging. Micron says its 12-layer HBM4 memory is now shipping in high volume for a lead customer, with samples also supplied to other companies. The chipmaker has already generated more than $1 billion in HBM4 revenue and says the product is ramping twice as quickly as its earlier HBM3E generation. Samsung has similarly warned that the memory shortage could continue into 2027 and beyond. Consumer memory companies have also had to address sharp increases in DDR5 pricing, suggesting the effects are already reaching beyond the data center. For consumers, that could mean the AI memory crunch lasts longer than expected, even as manufacturers invest heavily in new production.
    • XnConvert 1.112 by Razvan Serea  XnConvert is a cross-platform batch image-converter and resizer with a powerful and ease of use experience. All common picture and graphics formats are supported (i.e. JPG, PNG, TIFF, GIF, Camera RAW, JPEG2000, WebP, OpenEXR) as well as supporting over 500 other image formats. Also available within the batch operations include rotating, adding of watermarks, adding of text along with many image-adjustment features such as brightness, shadows and more. Among the features included are: Batch adding of files and folders Support for drag and drop of files Batch rotating, cropping, resizing and more Adding of photo masks Preserving or removing image metadata in conversions Multipage image file support (i.e animated GIF, APNG, TIFF) Command line integration via NConvert Filters - such as 'Blur', 'Gaussian Blur', 'Emboss', "Sharpen' and much more Effects - such as 'Old camera' and much more Download: XnConvert 64-bit | Standalone | ~30.0 MB (Freeware) Download: XnConvert 32-bit | Standalone Links: XnConvert Website | Screenshot | Release Announcement Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft updates Visual Studio Code with chat cost tracking and multi-agent chats by Paul Hill Microsoft has just launched Visual Studio Code 1.126, its latest weekly release. This time, the company has focused on letting you see the total cost of chat sessions to spot expensive conversations; enabling multiple chats per session that run side-by-side in one agent host Copilot session; and letting you browse new folders safely in restricted mode. We have now reached the stage where free AI in IDEs is coming to an end. To help you keep track of your costs, VS Code now lets you see the entire cost of a chat session, rather than just individual turns. This should give you more transparency about which sessions consume the most credits, so you can better manage your usage over time and spend less. For those of you using the Agents window, you know it is possible to run and manage multiple agent sessions at once. In this update, a Copilot session started from an agent host can hold several chats at once. Explaining how this feature works, Microsoft writes: Finally, from this update forward, Microsoft will remove the pop-up when opening an untrusted folder. When you open a new folder now, it will automatically open in Restricted Mode. You will see a banner that lets you manage the trust level of the folder. Microsoft has made this change so that it’s easier to start inspecting code without giving it trust right away. If you have VS Code, you can check for updates within the app now to get this new version. Otherwise, you can download it from the Visual Studio Code website.
    • Anthropic accuses Alibaba of using 25,000 fake accounts to copy Claude's capabilities by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic has accused Alibaba of using nearly 25,000 fraudulent accounts to extract capabilities from Claude on a huge scale. According to a report from Reuters, Anthropic told US lawmakers that operators linked to Alibaba and the company’s Qwen AI team generated 28.8 million exchanges with Claude between April 22 and June 5, 2026. That is a lot of Claude conversations, but Anthropic says this was not ordinary chatbot use. The company believes the accounts were part of a coordinated effort to collect answers that could help train or improve rival AI systems. The alleged campaign reportedly focused on some of Claude’s most valuable skills, including software development, multi-step reasoning, and agentic tasks. In practical terms, that means getting an AI model to plan and complete work across several stages rather than simply answering a single question. This is called 'distillation,' where AI companies use outputs from a larger model to train a smaller and cheaper one. The smaller model learns to imitate useful parts of the more capable system without needing the same amount of computing power. The distillation process isn't automatically suspicious, but the problem comes when one company gathers another provider's outputs without permission and at an industrial scale. Also, this does not mean Alibaba obtained Claude’s source code, model weights, or original training data. Instead, Anthropic claims the accounts repeatedly asked Claude carefully designed questions and collected the answers. Those answers could then be used as training material for another model. Anthropic has made similar accusations against DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax earlier this year. As Neowin previously reported, Anthropic said those three companies collectively generated more than 16 million Claude exchanges through roughly 24,000 accounts. Anthropic says the new campaign produced almost twice as many exchanges in a matter of weeks. Anthropic reportedly told lawmakers that the campaign could help Chinese AI developers approach the capabilities of its Mythos Preview model. Mythos is focused on advanced cybersecurity work, including finding and exploiting complex software vulnerabilities. via Reuters | Photo via DepositPhotos.com
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!