Pokemon Emerald Question - Clock and time


Recommended Posts

I just started playing Pok?mon Emerald today, and at the very beginning, I went and set my clock in my room. I went back just right now (I've been playing for about 25 minutes), and the clock was still at 12:00pm. For some reason I feel like it should probably be a "live" clock. Am I wrong? I hope my game isn't messed up, I bought it on eBay. Thanks for any help!

Wait... so it is supposed to be moving all the time? How can I find out if it is a fake game?

I looked at a couple of sites, and the cartridge says Game Boy Advance at the top, it has all the nintendo logos it's supposed to have. The game seems to play fine, with the exception that the clock doesn't move, this is making me mad.

Edited by Chsoriano
Wait... so it is supposed to be moving all the time? How can I find out if it is a fake game?

I looked at a couple of sites, and the cartridge says Game Boy Advance at the top, it has all the nintendo logos it's supposed to have. The game seems to play fine, with the exception that the clock doesn't move, this is making me mad.

The clock is supposed to work in real time, so it's supposed to be always moving, unless the cartridge's battery is dead (if the battery is dead, it would be indicated whenever you load your save file).

Things to determine if the game is legit:

- It says GameBoy Advance at the top

- Clear Green Cartridge

- Official Nintendo Seal

- ESRB rating seal (Assuming this is a North American version)

- Mention of "The Pok?mon Company" on the label

- Under the case, where the contacts are, there should be a Nintendo logo, and some letters and numbers (AGB-EXX-XX, where X is just numbers)

That's all I can think of for the moment.

I also noticed some other differences, I am assuming this confirms that it is a counterfeit game:

-label on the game cartridge is not foil/holographic

-the Nintendo seal says "Official Nintendo Seal of Quality" instead of "Official Nintendo Seal"

-the Nintendo seal is very blurry compared to that on other GBA cartridges

-the model number on the back is different

-the board (game board inside the cartridge) is flipped, the battery is on the top-left instead of the top-right

Anyone care to offer a second opinion? I already called Nintendo, and they got some information from me, but they didn't say it was or wasn't a counterfeit game, but I already called eBay about the issue also. Nintendo just suggested that I go to the ic3.gov website to report it.

-the Nintendo seal is very blurry compared to that on other GBA cartridges

-the board (game board inside the cartridge) is flipped, the battery is on the top-left instead of the top-right

I think the blurry seal may be the biggest give away. That may be evidence that it was scanned from a real cartridge then reprinted at a lower DPI for some reason, maybe just a crappy printer. Also the flipped board is slightly suspicious as well.

Please see the Identifying Bootleg / Pirated Gameboy Advance (GBA) Games guide on Cheap Ass Gamer. Its halfway down the page here: http://www.cheapassgamer.com/forums/faq.ph...g_trading_guide

The weirdest thing is that even if the battery was dead, time would still move on, just not in real time. Weird.

I kind of expected that, but I didn't know for sure.

Xerus, thanks for the site, I'll check it out. I just went out and bought the game, now I'm playing it... quite a bit different from back when I played Pokemon (Red & Blue)...

I've played with Sapphire, and noticed the clock had no effect on the game at all.

Yeah, that's what Nintendo told me, but I still don't want a fake game. Oh, and I also noticed, in the counterfeit game, every time I turned it on, it would say "Loading game" or something like that and then say "Game is now playable". In the one I have now it just goes straight to the continue, new, or option menu.

Yeah, that's what Nintendo told me, but I still don't want a fake game. Oh, and I also noticed, in the counterfeit game, every time I turned it on, it would say "Loading game" or something like that and then say "Game is now playable". In the one I have now it just goes straight to the continue, new, or option menu.

I guess I also got a counterfit.. still works though

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I really hope the author's health is ok. Squirreling away a official backup of this software. Looks like the internet archive already cached a copy as well - https://web.archive.org/web/20...ldbit-soft.fi/software.html
    • AMD is supported out of the box in linux because of their open source driver. Nvidia does not. All my systems are amd and all of them work nicely on linux arch without doing anything.
    • Never had a problem with TPM and started using that many years ago in Win10. Through several motherboards and OS versions, it just does what it does without complaint. My games library doesn't even know it's there. Secure boot does a lot more than support anti-cheat, as it came along long before anti-cheat software. I've used it religiously since before I started using TPM, and I always liked it for being able to nullify virus contagions that try their best to come in underneath the firmware during boot, so that the OS doesn't see them, etc. That is its purpose, imo. I'll never understand why people who elect to use another OS feel compelled to run down Windows... I guess they need to do that to feel secure about their choices? I run Windows because it supports all the software (including games) natively that I want to buy, and I've never had to run down another OS to make me feel better about it. (Although it's certainly possible to do that, of course...) Win10 is on a ventilator atm, and Win11 is very close to being free, and I finally got to stop running StartAllBack as I moved to the Experimental/Dev channel and my 26300.8553 build supports the moveable taskbar and it's running fine at the top of the screen! Finally, my last major dislike of Win11 is being rectified! So, I'm not at all surprised to see Win11's share of the Steam survey hitting 70%.
    • I can answer about the Linux bit. I only used AMD GPUs. I currently have a 9060XT (8GB) that fits my needs, I'm not a gamer, so I don't need that much GDDR. But lately, NVIDIA has grown a lot in the recent years. Oh, the horrors of NVIDIA drivers not working. But they have been getting better. I know a lot of members onm here that are running cachyOS and other distros, and are fine with a 4090/5090 variants. Really, though, I would stick with AMD variants.
    • Everything they say you can already do yourself on the registry by changing some things.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!