Recommended Posts

^so you haven't any problems with it? how long have you had them? I read that these monitors have back light bleeding issues.

the price diff bt 20 and 22 is not much, so y not get the 22''.

No problems at all. I have only had them for 2 weeks though.

I don't notice any backlight bleeding and I've got no dead pixels. If possible, test the screen before you buy it, your mileage may vary.

The price difference was bigger since the 20" were on sale and also dual screens = price difference * 2.

Get the 22" if you want to, my desk wouldn't handle it.

No problems at all. I have only had them for 2 weeks though.

I don't notice any backlight bleeding and I've got no dead pixels. If possible, test the screen before you buy it, your mileage may vary.

I've got two of the FP202W Benq monitors...had them since last Novemember, and I love them. I'm sure the new version that they've got out now is even better, considering how it has a 5ms reponse time and a 1000:1 contrast ratio. The version that I've got is 8ms/600:1. I haven't noticed any ghosting or backlight bleeding issues with them. They come with both VGA/DVI cables in the box (or, they used to), so you can pick which you would like to use. The DVI looks much more crisp than the VGA on this monitor.

Picture 1

Case: Lian Li PC-10A

Monitor: Samsung 226BW 22" Widescreen

snc10092pp9.jpg

Picture 2

Speakers: Creative T20 Gigaworks

Keyboard/Mouse: Microsoft Entertainment Desktop 7000

External HD: WD MyBook 320GB Premium

Remote: Microsoft Media Centre Remote Control

Phone: Nokia N70 and Desktop Charger

snc10093vt8.jpg

Picture 3

Speakers: Creative T20 Gigaworks

Keyboard/Mouse: Microsoft Entertainment Desktop 7000

External HD: WD MyBook 320GB Premium

Remote: Microsoft Media Centre Remote Control

Phone: Nokia N70 and Desktop Charger

snc10089pr8.jpg

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!