J.J. Abrams' Cloverfield Questions


Recommended Posts

I don't know if it's been mentioned already (since I haven't read through every single post), but it reminds me a bit of the Day of Lavos from Chrono Trigger. Big fire ball on the ground, shooting other fireballs and hurling other debris around.

...but that's what the SNES geek in me sees.

I don't know if it's been mentioned already (since I haven't read through every single post), but it reminds me a bit of the Day of Lavos from Chrono Trigger. Big fire ball on the ground, shooting other fireballs and hurling other debris around.

...but that's what the SNES geek in me sees.

You are not alone, my younger brother said the same thing.

Not sure where that poster above came from (my guess is a photoshop based on the blurred convention photos, or an early draft poster.

Anyway, here's a photo of the official poster, taken by IGN at Comic Con.

cloverfield-20070727113048862.jpg

Abrams has also said that "Monstrous" is not the name of the movie. He's also said that his goal is for this new monster (and it is a new monster) movie is to give America their own 'Godzilla'. Not that the monster is Godzilla like, but in that it will be America's monster, in the same way Godzilla is Japan's monster.

Well, now! I totally missed that poster. It is official, yes? If so, then I suppose the SoL head from the Trailer could be the real thing. Still, there are a lot of questions. How could that SoL head have been thrown that far and landed on the street so precisely? Why does it look only a tad bigger than the cars next to it? In the trailer, you see an explosion in the distance and then very shortly after, the SoL head comes flying in. Are there two monsters? How can the thing be in two places at once? Maybe it isn't...Damn you, J.J. Abrams! So much awesomeness and yet we get absolutely nothing that tells us what kind of awesomeness it is and where the awesomeness comes from! Oh, and I guess the King Kong idea is out. Abrams insiunated that this is a completely new and original monster. All I can think of is that it either comes from the ocean or is able to travel quickly in water and submerge itself.

I think you are overestimating how big the Statue of Liberty actually is. The ear to ear diameter of the statue is approx 10 feet, which is, yes, about the size of a car.

Don't feel bad though, most people who have never seen the statue in person think its much bigger than it is.

I think most of these words make up the monster that is ravaging NYC: Monstrous, Colossal, and (on IGN) Furious. It gets more and more intriguing.Dunno how Cloverfield or Slusho fits in though...

Slusho is a thing that Abrams has used before. It was a drink in Alias.

Cloverfield is a street near Bad Robot. It is nothing except a code name for the movie. (Like Revolution was the code name for the Wii)

I think you are overestimating how big the Statue of Liberty actually is. The ear to ear diameter of the statue is approx 10 feet, which is, yes, about the size of a car.

Don't feel bad though, most people who have never seen the statue in person think its much bigger than it is.

I've been around the area where you can kind of see Liberty Island but I've never actually been on the island itself. I suppose judging the size of the Statue of Liberty from the Spider-Man 2 game isn't a good idea ;)

Some Stuff from AICN...

Right now at the corner of Orchard and Stanton... coming upon it, the whole thing really looked like a genuine accident... except, there were people standing around pretty close, and then I noticed they were holding signs saying "Clovefield ("Cheese")"

Here's pictures from just a few minutes ago... destruction ravaging poor Orchard Street in the Lower East Side. Definitely a challenge setting this up at sunset in this area and there's lots of tension trying to keep the curious back.

Everyone coming up is hitting their phones saying "Oh God... coming up on a horrible accident." It's still not even clear until you get close... just a feeling of dread hanging over things.

"It's some kind of holocaust..." says a restaurant worker nearby, sounding a bit perturbed... "a holocaust movie. It's called 'Today's the Day.'" Uh... no.

The taxi's left blinker is on now... the crew is starting to tell people it will be "dangerous" to stay too close. Shoot is starting....

If you use it, call me... Elsegundo

4232ea2fb488a7412ed5.jpg

14017c3bef6e4367011d.jpg

c3c537e1778dd73aaeb8.jpg

Evangelion. It just feels like Evangelion.

he spoke about Japan and he "we need our own mosnter"

1- Eva is from Japam (Tokyo-3 ot be exact ;))

2- Evas are not monsters, the Angels maybe... but that just goes back to my 1st point

3- it's been said that it's going to be a movie about something that has never been done (NGE has been done)

I still have my hopes up for a Cthullu movie.

since this is a monster that has not gotten the rcognition he desevers!

- morf

That would be sick.

Totally. I it wouldnt make sense since Evangelion is all about character development and its has been confirmed that this movie its gonna be related from the handycams perspective.

he spoke about Japan and he "we need our own mosnter"

1- Eva is from Japam (Tokyo-3 ot be exact ;))

2- Evas are not monsters, the Angels maybe... but that just goes back to my 1st point

3- it's been said that it's going to be a movie about something that has never been done (NGE has been done)

I still have my hopes up for a Cthullu movie.

since this is a monster that has not gotten the rcognition he desevers!

- morf

The Evangelion comment was just wishful thinking.

And Cuthulhu has an entire army of fishmen, why attack alone?

  • 3 weeks later...

Some MAJOR spoilers... read if you dare

Expect an old-fashioned monster movie retold in a very modern Blair Witch sort of way - but with a twist. You see that giant monster that emerges from the ocean to begin laying waste to New York City ... it didn't come alone.

Much of the movie will revolve around the characters fleeing for their lives, not from the big one stomping the city, but from the "raptor-like" smaller versions hunting them down.

- All the monsters are carnivores and eat people throughout.

- The smaller monsters grow from scales shed by the big monster.

- There is no back story as such like for "Godzilla" or "The Host", the big one simply emerges and the present script draft has it ultimately vanishing back into the sea.

- Also don't expect much in the way of survivors at the end, literally anyone can be killed at any time, including the leads.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!