[Official] Doctor Who Thread


Recommended Posts

Hmmmm i wasn't actually that impressed and The Doctor really was more like a wet sponge until nearer the end.

Still prefer 'Blink' as a weeping angels episode and the whole 'The image becomes the angel' seemed very 'tacked on'.

Anyway, hope it explains why Amy doesn't know who the Daleks are because that's just weird..

I thought about this, and... I wonder if it's possible that Amy and everyone from 'her world' isn't from the time frame that The Doctor believes. It could be long after The Stolen Earth, or even before that ever happened, maybe?

Dare I say that was better than Blink and Dead/Library? I think it was anyways. :D

I love how they have "Bob" "Hey, who turned out the lights!" lol Can't wait for next week's now already, and I'm dying to know how the "Crack" will fit into things now.

nooooo Blink is best ever :p

I thought about this, and... I wonder if it's possible that Amy and everyone from 'her world' isn't from the time frame that The Doctor believes. It could be long after The Stolen Earth, or even before that ever happened, maybe?

Something weird is going on for sure. How can Amy not know about the Daleks?

Hmmmm i wasn't actually that impressed and The Doctor really was more like a wet sponge until nearer the end.

Still prefer 'Blink' as a weeping angels episode and the whole 'The image becomes the angel' seemed very 'tacked on'.

I agree with the 'Tacked on' bit, Blink seemed to be for the older people, not little children, much darker and a nice change to the poorly animated 3D models in other episodes.

_47713096_doctor_who226.jpg

Doctor Who fans angered by trailer for Over the Rainbow

Thousands of Doctor Who fans have contacted the BBC to complain that the ending of Saturday night's episode was ruined by a trailer for the next show.

The on-screen caption featured an animated cartoon of presenter Graham Norton, host of Over the Rainbow.

It appeared as The Doctor, played by Matt Smith, was making an emotional speech during the story's cliffhanger ending for The Time of Angels.

The trailer was seen by millions of viewers watching on BBC One in England.

Fans have also been complaining on social networking site Twitter. One wrote: "Why is the BBC treating its audience like idiots?"

Another said: "Don't blink or Graham Norton will catch you."

The BBC often promotes programmes in this way but the corporation has acknowledged that in this case the scheduling was inappropriate.

A BBC spokesman said: "We apologise for the timing of Saturday night's trail."

It is not the first time an unexpected appearance by Norton has angered Doctor Who fans.

When the series returned in 2005 after a 16-year break, a technical error caused Norton's voice to be briefly heard over the episodes opening scenes.

_47713096_doctor_who226.jpg

Doctor Who fans angered by trailer for Over the Rainbow

Thousands of Doctor Who fans have contacted the BBC to complain that the ending of Saturday night's episode was ruined by a trailer for the next show.

The on-screen caption featured an animated cartoon of presenter Graham Norton, host of Over the Rainbow.

It appeared as The Doctor, played by Matt Smith, was making an emotional speech during the story's cliffhanger ending for The Time of Angels.

The trailer was seen by millions of viewers watching on BBC One in England.

Fans have also been complaining on social networking site Twitter. One wrote: "Why is the BBC treating its audience like idiots?"

Another said: "Don't blink or Graham Norton will catch you."

The BBC often promotes programmes in this way but the corporation has acknowledged that in this case the scheduling was inappropriate.

A BBC spokesman said: "We apologise for the timing of Saturday night's trail."

It is not the first time an unexpected appearance by Norton has angered Doctor Who fans.

When the series returned in 2005 after a 16-year break, a technical error caused Norton's voice to be briefly heard over the episodes opening scenes.

Soo - A Fairy ruined some weeping Angels ;) (I'm joking, I'm joking - believe me, I've seen enough gay porn to qualify).

I didn't catch the episode live (I was finishing off Fringe S1), but I just finished watching the iPlayer HD version, and Norton didn't "pop up" over the trailer at the end - looks like it was only on the BBC1 SD Version.

What's so bad about Norton exactly? Is it because he's gay everyone is freaking out? Plus, I thought that his show was on ITV or something?

He was on Channel 4 before moving to the BBC where, at least IMO, he's wasted (his style of humor aint really suited to Auntie Beeb). It's not the fact he's gay, or the fact he's as camp as a christmas, it's the fact the promo appeared right as The Doctor was coming to the end of a particularly emotional / explosive / ranty piece of dialogue, and, I assume, peeps thought it ruined it - which I guess it would - if you're zoned into the plot of the show, and the emotion, it's gonna be distracting when Graham Norton, or anyone for that matter, pops up. Luckily it didn't happen on the HD iPlayer version of the show.

He was on Channel 4 before moving to the BBC where, at least IMO, he's wasted (his style of humor aint really suited to Auntie Beeb). It's not the fact he's gay, or the fact he's as camp as a christmas, it's the fact the promo appeared right as The Doctor was coming to the end of a particularly emotional / explosive / ranty piece of dialogue, and, I assume, peeps thought it ruined it - which I guess it would - if you're zoned into the plot of the show, and the emotion, it's gonna be distracting when Graham Norton, or anyone for that matter, pops up. Luckily it didn't happen on the HD iPlayer version of the show.

Well I can understand being peeved about getting taken out of the moment and plot of course.

So who's the guy on ITV I'm thinking of? lol I coulda swore it was Norton

As Prof.River Song would say, "Spoilers!"

Ten teasers about 'Flesh and Stone'

1. Eureka! Galileo!

2. Amy: "Basically we've *** up the inside of a *******."

3. The Byzantium contains a forest. Yes, a forest.

4. Amy: "Seven."

5. There's a scene reminiscent of a scene from 'Doomsday'.

6. Amy: "Six."

7. What's the opposite of the moral from 'Blink'?

8. River has done something very, very naughty.

9. There's a very important date you'll want to mark in your diaries/iPhones/Google calendars come the end of this episode.

10. The crack. We finally learn what it is and what it wants.

And, just for fun, a bonus teaser:

11. Amy does something to The Doctor that prompts an epiphany. And a collection.

Source: Digitalspy

I'm going with the whole "Wrong universe/time frame" thing... the TARDIS was bust up as the doc was regenerating so i wouldn't be surprised if it had dropped through the void or something. Hence the crack could be 11's doing and he needs to get back through to close it up. Think "The Cardiff Rift".

It may just be me, I dunno. But I can not get into this series. I was skeptical about Smith, I admit that. But I went in openly giving him a chance and I just can't enjoy what I'm seeing. It's like he's trying too hard to be like Tennant, he needs to be more his own Doctor if that makes any sense. The stories as well, to me, seem, for lack of a better word "off"

Last weeks Dalek episode was a yawn fest, I remember every past Dalek episode being an edge of your seat ride, this, just a plain, boring and ridiculous episode. I'll keep watching however, the crack intrigues me and I hold out hope it will get better

Hi,

Ok, I know I won't be making friends by saying this but so far RTD has done a far better job than Moffat (I mean in Series 5, I know Moffat has done a pretty good job on previous series as a writer). Anyway, Davies episodes just seemed more DoctorWho-ish to me, they were darker and didn't go around rebooting everything. Steven Moffat in the other hand is trying too hard changing everything (Giant Rainbow Daleks ? seriously ?). And you know, this is too bad because Matt Smith is doing a hell of a great job even if he's clearly imitating Tennant sometimes, and Amy is just ... hot !

Well, maybe it's just the early episodes and it will get better. I really hope we get something as brilliant as Series 3 final episodes with the Master and the great plot :)

Matt Smith: I like him, but I feel that Tennant did the angry/darker sides of the Doctor better... So far...

The crack: We are not where/when we think we are?

Amy: Hot!

It may just be me, I dunno. But I can not get into this series. I was skeptical about Smith, I admit that. But I went in openly giving him a chance and I just can't enjoy what I'm seeing. It's like he's trying too hard to be like Tennant, he needs to be more his own Doctor if that makes any sense. The stories as well, to me, seem, for lack of a better word "off"

Last weeks Dalek episode was a yawn fest, I remember every past Dalek episode being an edge of your seat ride, this, just a plain, boring and ridiculous episode. I'll keep watching however, the crack intrigues me and I hold out hope it will get better

Hi,

Ok, I know I won't be making friends by saying this but so far RTD has done a far better job than Moffat (I mean in Series 5, I know Moffat has done a pretty good job on previous series as a writer). Anyway, Davies episodes just seemed more DoctorWho-ish to me, they were darker and didn't go around rebooting everything. Steven Moffat in the other hand is trying too hard changing everything (Giant Rainbow Daleks ? seriously ?). And you know, this is too bad because Matt Smith is doing a hell of a great job even if he's clearly imitating Tennant sometimes, and Amy is just ... hot !

Well, maybe it's just the early episodes and it will get better. I really hope we get something as brilliant as Series 3 final episodes with the Master and the great plot :)

These posts for the win!

It's not that i'm not enjoying this series or that Matt isn't doing a good job it just doesn't feel 'who' like. Moffat seems to be changing things for the hell of it, almost like he's scared of being over shadowed by RTD.

Matt needs to kick up a gear and stop trying to be tennant and Moffat needs to stop writing CBBC scripts. Everything seems to be written so that even the casual observer can spot the arcs etc.

I will stick with the series as i always have since Davison, because i am enjoying it. Just not as much as i think i could be.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
    • Interesting read. I knew the adware was quite controversial at the time, however never realised to the point The Guardian wrote an article about Patchou. I just said no and enjoyed his creation, I’d probably be a lot more wary of something like that today though.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      89
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!