[Official] Doctor Who Thread


Recommended Posts

Hi,

Ok, I know I won't be making friends by saying this but so far RTD has done a far better job than Moffat (I mean in Series 5, I know Moffat has done a pretty good job on previous series as a writer). Anyway, Davies episodes just seemed more DoctorWho-ish to me, they were darker and didn't go around rebooting everything. Steven Moffat in the other hand is trying too hard changing everything (Giant Rainbow Daleks ? seriously ?). And you know, this is too bad because Matt Smith is doing a hell of a great job even if he's clearly imitating Tennant sometimes, and Amy is just ... hot !

Well, maybe it's just the early episodes and it will get better. I really hope we get something as brilliant as Series 3 final episodes with the Master and the great plot :)

I would have to agree. but then, I found the RTB episodes enjoyable because of David Tennant performances - remember each Dr has to put on his own perspective on who he is, no one will be the same. So far however, i'm liking the new episodes. Matt is doing a great job and seems to of taken the role with open arms. Amy Pond, well, she is just great, and sooooooooooooooooooooo much better eye candy than Rose Tyler.

Matt needs to kick up a gear and stop trying to be tennant

i thought that at first, but then i guessed that for this series at least they are probably trying to keep the doctors character somewhat familiar. actually, anyone who's seen the older doctor who's will recognize similarities with other doctors too.

i thought that at first, but then i guessed that for this series at least they are probably trying to keep the doctors character somewhat familiar. actually, anyone who's seen the older doctor who's will recognize similarities with other doctors too.

This is exactly what i'm hoping/assuming and i think i wrote exactly that further back in this thread.

Great minds eh ;)

As Prof.River Song would say, "Spoilers!"

Ten teasers about 'Flesh and Stone'

1. Eureka! Galileo!

2. Amy: "Basically we've *** up the inside of a *******."

3. The Byzantium contains a forest. Yes, a forest.

4. Amy: "Seven."

5. There's a scene reminiscent of a scene from 'Doomsday'.

6. Amy: "Six."

7. What's the opposite of the moral from 'Blink'?

8. River has done something very, very naughty.

9. There's a very important date you'll want to mark in your diaries/iPhones/Google calendars come the end of this episode.

10. The crack. We finally learn what it is and what it wants.

And, just for fun, a bonus teaser:

11. Amy does something to The Doctor that prompts an epiphany. And a collection.

Source: Digitalspy

oooo I like number 9/10!

I don't know, I don't think Moffat is doing any less of a job than RTD did over the past few years. Maybe it came on down from high (aka BBC HQ) to tone things down a notch and aim for lighter stuff, which I can appreciate since Doctor Who is supposed to be kinda light hearted after all. But Tennant definitely brought out that darkside in the character we know he has now because of what he's had to do over the years himself. Matt Smith is certainly (at least so far) very capable as an actor in his own right to play the 11th Doctor, and from what I've seen of the very few times his Doctor has gotten angry or upset he can play the darker undertones also.

Let's give Moffat a chance though. After all he's written some of our favorite episodes I'd gather eh? Blink etc? All terrific no? :)

I don't know, I don't think Moffat is doing any less of a job than RTD did over the past few years. Maybe it came on down from high (aka BBC HQ) to tone things down a notch and aim for lighter stuff, which I can appreciate since Doctor Who is supposed to be kinda light hearted after all. But Tennant definitely brought out that darkside in the character we know he has now because of what he's had to do over the years himself. Matt Smith is certainly (at least so far) very capable as an actor in his own right to play the 11th Doctor, and from what I've seen of the very few times his Doctor has gotten angry or upset he can play the darker undertones also.

Let's give Moffat a chance though. After all he's written some of our favorite episodes I'd gather eh? Blink etc? All terrific no? :)

here here! (Y)

This is exactly what i'm hoping/assuming and i think i wrote exactly that further back in this thread.

Great minds eh

Yeah, i think to be honest the first episode was when he was very 'tennant' and although occasionally you could say he still shows glimpses of him it should be expected, after all they are technically the same person. More importantly however is this claim that you are anywhere near my level of greatness, i am on my own up here :p

Dare I say that was better than Blink and Dead/Library? I think it was anyways. :D

I love how they have "Bob" "Hey, who turned out the lights!" lol Can't wait for next week's now already, and I'm dying to know how the "Crack" will fit into things now.

As other's have said, I'll bet good money on it being the Doctor travelling to alternate universes again. The 10th Doctor said in S2 that if he hops Universes again then it's going to rip open time and space itself - The 10th did this again in S4 when returning Rose home again and The 11th has probably done it for a third time using his dysfunctional new Tardis (it would also explain why his timing is completely off every time he tries to get anywhere).

It'd explain why neither Amy nor Winston Churchill know nothing about the Daleks - after all in the official timeline of things the Daleks invaded Manhattan in the 1930s - well within Churchill's life - so surely he would have caught a whisper about it? Oh well, it'll all be explained in a few days!

To me Matt Smith seems to be channeling Jon Pertwee more than DT. He's going to be a different Doctor altogether.

I don't see why people think he's being like DT tbh, I don't see the resemblance in their acting besides the fact that they were both a bit goofy, which isn't something DT started, and generally goes with being The Doctor.

I don't see why people think he's being like DT tbh, I don't see the resemblance in their acting besides the fact that they were both a bit goofy, which isn't something DT started, and generally goes with being The Doctor.

Well, to be honest he is sometimes borrowing some of DT's style : talking, moving and acting very quickly, the characteristic "HA !", and some other stuff for instance. It's verry different from say Eccleston's doctor. I think the resemblance resides in that both are very dynamic goofy doctors that don't make sens most of the time.

Well, to be honest he is sometimes borrowing some of DT's style : talking, moving and acting very quickly, the characteristic "HA !", and some other stuff for instance. It's verry different from say Eccleston's doctor. I think the resemblance resides in that both are very dynamic goofy doctors that don't make sens most of the time.

To me that seems to come from the writing, things have to be dramatic and running has to happen pretty quickly to get places to continue the story, lol, but as you said, the similarities seem to come how they both act, maybe that is why he was chosen for how alike he could be to Tennant.

SO what's peoples opinions on who River Song actually is then?? Personally I don't like to think she's actually the doctor's wife... I just can't seem him going with her =/ I'm edging towards some sort of mindreader / telepathic who's taking the doctor for a little ride :shifty:

SO what's peoples opinions on who River Song actually is then?? Personally I don't like to think she's actually the doctor's wife... I just can't seem him going with her =/ I'm edging towards some sort of mindreader / telepathic who's taking the doctor for a little ride :shifty:

When we see her die, I'm pretty sure she says that the Doctor wouldn't survive and nor would she, which makes me assume she is either Time Lord or at least part Time Lord to know this, she also knows Gallifreyan which is something she could have learnt during her travels with The Doctor or for some other reason.

So going back on people we have met who she might possibly be, I wouldn't be surprised if she is The Doctors cloned Daughter that we have yet to meet again, but that is just the first thing that comes to my mind when wondering who she might be, and would also explain a few things.

But who knows, I hope we get an answer soon. :D

I wouldn't be surprised if she is The Doctors cloned Daughter that we have yet to meet again

I think you may be onto something there... I mean having Jenny come back to life at the end of the episode was Steven Moffat's idea after all :rofl: Certainly seems an idea I'd be happy with than her being his wife o.O

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Apple is expanding Private Cloud Compute beyond its own data centers by Pradeep Viswanathan At WWDC 2026, as part of the improved Apple Intelligence capabilities, Apple today announced that it is expanding Private Cloud Compute (PCC), its privacy-focused cloud infrastructure for Apple Intelligence, beyond its own data centers for the first time. Private Cloud Compute was designed to handle Apple Intelligence requests that are too complex to run fully on-device. The PCC system does not store user data and does not allow Apple or anyone else to access user requests. Last year, Apple also expanded its Security Bounty program with rewards of up to $1 million for researchers who could find serious vulnerabilities in PCC. Until now, Apple's PCC data centers were using Apple's own silicon. As part of the expansion, Apple is working with Google and NVIDIA to run new Apple Intelligence workloads on Google Cloud systems powered by NVIDIA GPUs. Apple will be using this new infrastructure to execute more demanding AI tasks while maintaining the same privacy and security guarantees of PCC. The new implementation uses NVIDIA Confidential Computing with NVIDIA GPUs, Intel CPUs with TDX, and Google’s Titan chip. Apple says it has worked with Google to build additional protections beyond a traditional confidential computing deployment. Despite the expansion to third-party data centers, Apple claims that its core PCC requirements remain unchanged, including stateless computation, no privileged runtime access, non-targetability, and verifiable transparency. The company highlighted that it will continue to control the PCC software stack, and Apple devices will only trust PCC software that has been cryptographically approved by Apple. To take security to the next level, Apple mentioned that it is maintaining an append-only ledger of Google Cloud hardware that is part of the PCC fleet. The company claims this will help reduce the risk of supply chain attacks. In addition to AI infrastructure, Apple also worked with Google to use technologies behind the Gemini family of models to build the next generation of Apple Foundation Models to power Apple Intelligence features across on-device and cloud workloads. As expected, for more demanding AI tasks like agentic tool use and complex reasoning, Apple will rely on the expanded PCC infrastructure running on Google Cloud. The expansion of PCC on Google Cloud will gradually ramp toward the full set of protections during the summer preview period. As before, Apple will also publish binaries for public inspection, provide research tooling, and give researchers access to live PCC nodes in research mode through the Apple Security Bounty Program.
    • my problem with outlook (new) is that it connects only to outlook.com. all connections to external providers goes through there. Got your mail server and want to use imap directly? no way... it adds a connector on outlook.com. last bug; if your email on an external provider if the same as principal email of your microsoft account, it doesn't work...
    • It's the only reason I finally have an iPhone (for work) and enjoy using it so much that I'm tempted to move from android next time I need to replace my own device
    • So is Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, just to mention a few. What's your point? Everyone is a threat from their enemies' perspective. I'd say that Israel is only a threat to their immediate enemies like Hamas, Hezbollah and the Iranian regime, not to anyone else.
    • The government is not the good guy either. You propose 99% of people require that the government overreach and govern their freedom of information and privacy, while ignoring the government is made up 100% of people, of which 99% are (as you described) brain dead. You can't have both. The reality is Signal is absolutely right and the government is doing what it has always done. Ignoring that we are their boss and grabbing all the power they possibly can to make sure we aren't. Your (societies) ###### parenting is not reason enough as to why I can't have a safe platform for my data/information. Thinking the government is helping is precisely what they are targeting psychologically to take suckers like you for a ride. "Think of the children" was, has, is, and will always be a mechanism of control. In the rare occasion it's actually essential the mass consensus has always been there and it doesn't become a debate.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      222
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      86
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!