[Official] Doctor Who Thread


Recommended Posts

In the bit where the Doctor is telling Amy she has to trust him then he walks away. He comes back and holds her hand and tells her to remember what he said when she was 7 - he's wearing his jacket which was previously taken by the Angels.

Given Moffat's attention to detail this is surprising and must be significant? Especially since we never hear anything again about what he said when she was seven. So is this another future Doctor? Realise someone has said this already but its gotta be important and can't just be a mistake given how much attention was clearly given to this episode.

Future Doctor?

Also keep in mind that in the first episode at the end, we see actually SEE 7 year old Amy sitting on her suitcase in the garden look up and HEAR the Tardis coming - but we never see that, and we've naturally been led to believe that she never actually saw the Doctor from the time he said 5 minutes until the time she was 21 or something.

But of course Moffat seems to be chucking important little things in (no doubt this "Duck Pond" is having some significance too), so I'm guess a future version of himself did come back that night for whatever reason to tell her something important?

The more I hear about this 'Future Doctor' turning up, the more I start to believe it...

One theory here, the doctor that Amy started to travel with 1st is the Doctor that is bending the time to save her(ironic that its the day before the wedding and , more recently Amy's time?), the crack he has studying in the Tardis in the first episode I think confirms something like that.I think somewhere if my theory is true, then the Doctors next experience of Amy after Prisoner Zero is sometime in the later episodes,if thats not true, then perhaps its not the future Doctor who asks Amy to trust him, perhaps its the PAST version of the Doctor, before he meets up with Amy to travel with him.5tun2s.jpg

article00964ba7a000005d.jpg

Is Doctor Who getting too scary for kids?

During the 1970s terrified children would hide behind the sofa in a bid to escape the Daleks.

But these days Doctor Who fans have a lot more to be frightened of than a slow moving piece of tin.

The next episode will see the Doctor attacked by a clan of vampires wielding sharp fangs, as he visits 17th century Venice.

The fifth series has already seen the Doctor attacked by the Weeping Angels, the terrifying Smilers, and the old favourites the Daleks.

The BBC has come under fire for being 'too scary' before, with an episode featuring alien-possessed corpses back in 2005.

article00964ba66000005d.jpg

Then they said the content was 'carefully considered' for the pre-watershed audience.

But as the aliens get ever more inventive, parents are sure to question whether their children can handle the excitement.

The show is aimed at the family market, with this week's episode to be broadcast at 6pm.

But it has already drawn complaints from some about the miniskirts worn by the Doctor's leggy assistant Amy Pond, played by Karen Gillan.

article00964ba0a000005d.jpg

Last week's episode even saw her attempt to seduce The Doctor, played by Matt Smith, pushing him up against the side of the tardis in her bedroom.

She joked about how long it was since the 907-year-old Time Lord last had sex, making suggestive innuendoes and provocatively lying down on the bed in front of him.

This week's upcoming episode, written by Toby Whithouse, sees the Doctor, played by Matt Smith, taking Amy for a romantic mini-break in Venice.

article00964ba73000005d.jpg

But when the Tardis lands in the city, they discover dessicated corpses and terror in the canal.

They need to get past the blood-sucking residents of the House of Calvierri and the rest of the scary vampire killers.

vampires5.jpgvampires4.jpg

---

Some images from The Hungry Earth have been emerging.

blogtorhungryearth2.jpg

blogtorhungryearth1.jpg

Also keep in mind that in the first episode at the end, we see actually SEE 7 year old Amy sitting on her suitcase in the garden look up and HEAR the Tardis coming - but we never see that, and we've naturally been led to believe that she never actually saw the Doctor from the time he said 5 minutes until the time she was 21 or something.

Thank you! I thought I'd seen this, but wasn't 100% sure and was a little confused by it. This is starting to make some sense now thinking about what he said about remembering what he said to her when she was 7, and The Doctor seemingly travelling back on his own timeline to give events a little nudge here and there. I must admit, now that the story arc is developing this series is starting to really come alive.

Those ******* who "complained" had better not ruin this for the rest of us. After last weeks episode, Dr Who has now overtaken Caprica as my favourite show of 2010 (thus far).

Its meant to be scary for gods sake! Or at least head-fudge with you. What do people want? Happy, campy stuff from the RTD days? Sorry, RTD who? And for complaining about Amy Pond's short skirt - lol! Do these people stop others in the street and tell them to cover up? Insane!

Granted i might get too worked up, but it highlights exactly whats wrong with the UK these days; people are so afraid of change and doing stuff even a tiny bit different.

It may just be me, I dunno. But I can not get into this series. I was skeptical about Smith, I admit that. But I went in openly giving him a chance and I just can't enjoy what I'm seeing.

I wasn't going to watch any more episodes, but I watched the two parter, and I feel now like I did the first couple of episodes...definitely not something that'll hold my interests.

To quote one of the replies from the link above (somewhere):

I enjoyed Chris Eccleston and David Tennant’s portrayals. So far I’m unimpressed by Matt Smith and Steven Moffat’s efforts. It’s one thing to want the job, it’s another to be capable of doing it.

Those ******* who "complained" had better not ruin this for the rest of us. After last weeks episode, Dr Who has now overtaken Caprica as my favourite show of 2010 (thus far).

Its meant to be scary for gods sake! Or at least head-fudge with you. What do people want? Happy, campy stuff from the RTD days? Sorry, RTD who? And for complaining about Amy Pond's short skirt - lol! Do these people stop others in the street and tell them to cover up? Insane!

Granted i might get too worked up, but it highlights exactly whats wrong with the UK these days; people are so afraid of change and doing stuff even a tiny bit different.

we complain about anything really in this weird country :rofl:

Ten teasers about 'The Vampires of Venice'

1. Rory is halfway through his stag do when The Doctor arrives to collect him. And it's quite an entrance.

2. On entering the TARDIS, Rory doesn't really say what The Doctor wants him to.

3. The First Doctor makes an appearance.

4. The 'vampires' like Amy. Who can blame them? She's delicious!

5. "Where are you from? Did you **** ******* the *****?"

6. Ever wanted to see The Doctor get electrocuted? Luck's in.

7. "Some tiny. Some were as big as the sky."

8. What's 10,000 in number and waiting in the water?

9. Amy enjoys a massive snog with either Rory or The Doctor. Right in front of the other.

10. "All I can **** is... *******."

There are tons of new details about this spin-off's fourth season. Apparently, Androvax will be back, and so will the Slithereen/Blathereen. A new race, called the Shansheeth, will be voiced by Harry Potter's David Bradley. Luke will leave after the first story, but there will be a "companion of the week" after that. Executive Producer Nikki Wilson talks about what to expect from the new menaces:

The Nightmare Man is part of a really big emotional journey for Luke which involves him facing his fears and excitement about the future. The Shansheeth are vulture undertakers who get embroiled with the gang on a big adventure for the middle of the series.

Here's video of the Nightmare Man coming to Bannerman Road and showing Luke visions of Evil Rani and Evil Clyde taunting him, while Evil Sarah Jane burns his books in a fire:

The Nightmare Man is the first episode of the season, and the second story involves a yellow and black monster, plus men in black suits and sunglasses emerging from a 1960s Hummer ? apparently the same men in black from the Doctor Who animated story "Dreamland." [Planet Gallifrey and Digital Spy]

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Apple is expanding Private Cloud Compute beyond its own data centers by Pradeep Viswanathan At WWDC 2026, as part of the improved Apple Intelligence capabilities, Apple today announced that it is expanding Private Cloud Compute (PCC), its privacy-focused cloud infrastructure for Apple Intelligence, beyond its own data centers for the first time. Private Cloud Compute was designed to handle Apple Intelligence requests that are too complex to run fully on-device. The PCC system does not store user data and does not allow Apple or anyone else to access user requests. Last year, Apple also expanded its Security Bounty program with rewards of up to $1 million for researchers who could find serious vulnerabilities in PCC. Until now, Apple's PCC data centers were using Apple's own silicon. As part of the expansion, Apple is working with Google and NVIDIA to run new Apple Intelligence workloads on Google Cloud systems powered by NVIDIA GPUs. Apple will be using this new infrastructure to execute more demanding AI tasks while maintaining the same privacy and security guarantees of PCC. The new implementation uses NVIDIA Confidential Computing with NVIDIA GPUs, Intel CPUs with TDX, and Google’s Titan chip. Apple says it has worked with Google to build additional protections beyond a traditional confidential computing deployment. Despite the expansion to third-party data centers, Apple claims that its core PCC requirements remain unchanged, including stateless computation, no privileged runtime access, non-targetability, and verifiable transparency. The company highlighted that it will continue to control the PCC software stack, and Apple devices will only trust PCC software that has been cryptographically approved by Apple. To take security to the next level, Apple mentioned that it is maintaining an append-only ledger of Google Cloud hardware that is part of the PCC fleet. The company claims this will help reduce the risk of supply chain attacks. In addition to AI infrastructure, Apple also worked with Google to use technologies behind the Gemini family of models to build the next generation of Apple Foundation Models to power Apple Intelligence features across on-device and cloud workloads. As expected, for more demanding AI tasks like agentic tool use and complex reasoning, Apple will rely on the expanded PCC infrastructure running on Google Cloud. The expansion of PCC on Google Cloud will gradually ramp toward the full set of protections during the summer preview period. As before, Apple will also publish binaries for public inspection, provide research tooling, and give researchers access to live PCC nodes in research mode through the Apple Security Bounty Program.
    • my problem with outlook (new) is that it connects only to outlook.com. all connections to external providers goes through there. Got your mail server and want to use imap directly? no way... it adds a connector on outlook.com. last bug; if your email on an external provider if the same as principal email of your microsoft account, it doesn't work...
    • It's the only reason I finally have an iPhone (for work) and enjoy using it so much that I'm tempted to move from android next time I need to replace my own device
    • So is Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, just to mention a few. What's your point? Everyone is a threat from their enemies' perspective. I'd say that Israel is only a threat to their immediate enemies like Hamas, Hezbollah and the Iranian regime, not to anyone else.
    • The government is not the good guy either. You propose 99% of people require that the government overreach and govern their freedom of information and privacy, while ignoring the government is made up 100% of people, of which 99% are (as you described) brain dead. You can't have both. The reality is Signal is absolutely right and the government is doing what it has always done. Ignoring that we are their boss and grabbing all the power they possibly can to make sure we aren't. Your (societies) ###### parenting is not reason enough as to why I can't have a safe platform for my data/information. Thinking the government is helping is precisely what they are targeting psychologically to take suckers like you for a ride. "Think of the children" was, has, is, and will always be a mechanism of control. In the rare occasion it's actually essential the mass consensus has always been there and it doesn't become a debate.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      222
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      86
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!