[Official] Doctor Who Thread


Recommended Posts

Hmmmm i wasn't actually that impressed and The Doctor really was more like a wet sponge until nearer the end.

Still prefer 'Blink' as a weeping angels episode and the whole 'The image becomes the angel' seemed very 'tacked on'.

Anyway, hope it explains why Amy doesn't know who the Daleks are because that's just weird..

I thought about this, and... I wonder if it's possible that Amy and everyone from 'her world' isn't from the time frame that The Doctor believes. It could be long after The Stolen Earth, or even before that ever happened, maybe?

Dare I say that was better than Blink and Dead/Library? I think it was anyways. :D

I love how they have "Bob" "Hey, who turned out the lights!" lol Can't wait for next week's now already, and I'm dying to know how the "Crack" will fit into things now.

nooooo Blink is best ever :p

I thought about this, and... I wonder if it's possible that Amy and everyone from 'her world' isn't from the time frame that The Doctor believes. It could be long after The Stolen Earth, or even before that ever happened, maybe?

Something weird is going on for sure. How can Amy not know about the Daleks?

Hmmmm i wasn't actually that impressed and The Doctor really was more like a wet sponge until nearer the end.

Still prefer 'Blink' as a weeping angels episode and the whole 'The image becomes the angel' seemed very 'tacked on'.

I agree with the 'Tacked on' bit, Blink seemed to be for the older people, not little children, much darker and a nice change to the poorly animated 3D models in other episodes.

_47713096_doctor_who226.jpg

Doctor Who fans angered by trailer for Over the Rainbow

Thousands of Doctor Who fans have contacted the BBC to complain that the ending of Saturday night's episode was ruined by a trailer for the next show.

The on-screen caption featured an animated cartoon of presenter Graham Norton, host of Over the Rainbow.

It appeared as The Doctor, played by Matt Smith, was making an emotional speech during the story's cliffhanger ending for The Time of Angels.

The trailer was seen by millions of viewers watching on BBC One in England.

Fans have also been complaining on social networking site Twitter. One wrote: "Why is the BBC treating its audience like idiots?"

Another said: "Don't blink or Graham Norton will catch you."

The BBC often promotes programmes in this way but the corporation has acknowledged that in this case the scheduling was inappropriate.

A BBC spokesman said: "We apologise for the timing of Saturday night's trail."

It is not the first time an unexpected appearance by Norton has angered Doctor Who fans.

When the series returned in 2005 after a 16-year break, a technical error caused Norton's voice to be briefly heard over the episodes opening scenes.

_47713096_doctor_who226.jpg

Doctor Who fans angered by trailer for Over the Rainbow

Thousands of Doctor Who fans have contacted the BBC to complain that the ending of Saturday night's episode was ruined by a trailer for the next show.

The on-screen caption featured an animated cartoon of presenter Graham Norton, host of Over the Rainbow.

It appeared as The Doctor, played by Matt Smith, was making an emotional speech during the story's cliffhanger ending for The Time of Angels.

The trailer was seen by millions of viewers watching on BBC One in England.

Fans have also been complaining on social networking site Twitter. One wrote: "Why is the BBC treating its audience like idiots?"

Another said: "Don't blink or Graham Norton will catch you."

The BBC often promotes programmes in this way but the corporation has acknowledged that in this case the scheduling was inappropriate.

A BBC spokesman said: "We apologise for the timing of Saturday night's trail."

It is not the first time an unexpected appearance by Norton has angered Doctor Who fans.

When the series returned in 2005 after a 16-year break, a technical error caused Norton's voice to be briefly heard over the episodes opening scenes.

Soo - A Fairy ruined some weeping Angels ;) (I'm joking, I'm joking - believe me, I've seen enough gay porn to qualify).

I didn't catch the episode live (I was finishing off Fringe S1), but I just finished watching the iPlayer HD version, and Norton didn't "pop up" over the trailer at the end - looks like it was only on the BBC1 SD Version.

What's so bad about Norton exactly? Is it because he's gay everyone is freaking out? Plus, I thought that his show was on ITV or something?

He was on Channel 4 before moving to the BBC where, at least IMO, he's wasted (his style of humor aint really suited to Auntie Beeb). It's not the fact he's gay, or the fact he's as camp as a christmas, it's the fact the promo appeared right as The Doctor was coming to the end of a particularly emotional / explosive / ranty piece of dialogue, and, I assume, peeps thought it ruined it - which I guess it would - if you're zoned into the plot of the show, and the emotion, it's gonna be distracting when Graham Norton, or anyone for that matter, pops up. Luckily it didn't happen on the HD iPlayer version of the show.

He was on Channel 4 before moving to the BBC where, at least IMO, he's wasted (his style of humor aint really suited to Auntie Beeb). It's not the fact he's gay, or the fact he's as camp as a christmas, it's the fact the promo appeared right as The Doctor was coming to the end of a particularly emotional / explosive / ranty piece of dialogue, and, I assume, peeps thought it ruined it - which I guess it would - if you're zoned into the plot of the show, and the emotion, it's gonna be distracting when Graham Norton, or anyone for that matter, pops up. Luckily it didn't happen on the HD iPlayer version of the show.

Well I can understand being peeved about getting taken out of the moment and plot of course.

So who's the guy on ITV I'm thinking of? lol I coulda swore it was Norton

As Prof.River Song would say, "Spoilers!"

Ten teasers about 'Flesh and Stone'

1. Eureka! Galileo!

2. Amy: "Basically we've *** up the inside of a *******."

3. The Byzantium contains a forest. Yes, a forest.

4. Amy: "Seven."

5. There's a scene reminiscent of a scene from 'Doomsday'.

6. Amy: "Six."

7. What's the opposite of the moral from 'Blink'?

8. River has done something very, very naughty.

9. There's a very important date you'll want to mark in your diaries/iPhones/Google calendars come the end of this episode.

10. The crack. We finally learn what it is and what it wants.

And, just for fun, a bonus teaser:

11. Amy does something to The Doctor that prompts an epiphany. And a collection.

Source: Digitalspy

I'm going with the whole "Wrong universe/time frame" thing... the TARDIS was bust up as the doc was regenerating so i wouldn't be surprised if it had dropped through the void or something. Hence the crack could be 11's doing and he needs to get back through to close it up. Think "The Cardiff Rift".

It may just be me, I dunno. But I can not get into this series. I was skeptical about Smith, I admit that. But I went in openly giving him a chance and I just can't enjoy what I'm seeing. It's like he's trying too hard to be like Tennant, he needs to be more his own Doctor if that makes any sense. The stories as well, to me, seem, for lack of a better word "off"

Last weeks Dalek episode was a yawn fest, I remember every past Dalek episode being an edge of your seat ride, this, just a plain, boring and ridiculous episode. I'll keep watching however, the crack intrigues me and I hold out hope it will get better

Hi,

Ok, I know I won't be making friends by saying this but so far RTD has done a far better job than Moffat (I mean in Series 5, I know Moffat has done a pretty good job on previous series as a writer). Anyway, Davies episodes just seemed more DoctorWho-ish to me, they were darker and didn't go around rebooting everything. Steven Moffat in the other hand is trying too hard changing everything (Giant Rainbow Daleks ? seriously ?). And you know, this is too bad because Matt Smith is doing a hell of a great job even if he's clearly imitating Tennant sometimes, and Amy is just ... hot !

Well, maybe it's just the early episodes and it will get better. I really hope we get something as brilliant as Series 3 final episodes with the Master and the great plot :)

Matt Smith: I like him, but I feel that Tennant did the angry/darker sides of the Doctor better... So far...

The crack: We are not where/when we think we are?

Amy: Hot!

It may just be me, I dunno. But I can not get into this series. I was skeptical about Smith, I admit that. But I went in openly giving him a chance and I just can't enjoy what I'm seeing. It's like he's trying too hard to be like Tennant, he needs to be more his own Doctor if that makes any sense. The stories as well, to me, seem, for lack of a better word "off"

Last weeks Dalek episode was a yawn fest, I remember every past Dalek episode being an edge of your seat ride, this, just a plain, boring and ridiculous episode. I'll keep watching however, the crack intrigues me and I hold out hope it will get better

Hi,

Ok, I know I won't be making friends by saying this but so far RTD has done a far better job than Moffat (I mean in Series 5, I know Moffat has done a pretty good job on previous series as a writer). Anyway, Davies episodes just seemed more DoctorWho-ish to me, they were darker and didn't go around rebooting everything. Steven Moffat in the other hand is trying too hard changing everything (Giant Rainbow Daleks ? seriously ?). And you know, this is too bad because Matt Smith is doing a hell of a great job even if he's clearly imitating Tennant sometimes, and Amy is just ... hot !

Well, maybe it's just the early episodes and it will get better. I really hope we get something as brilliant as Series 3 final episodes with the Master and the great plot :)

These posts for the win!

It's not that i'm not enjoying this series or that Matt isn't doing a good job it just doesn't feel 'who' like. Moffat seems to be changing things for the hell of it, almost like he's scared of being over shadowed by RTD.

Matt needs to kick up a gear and stop trying to be tennant and Moffat needs to stop writing CBBC scripts. Everything seems to be written so that even the casual observer can spot the arcs etc.

I will stick with the series as i always have since Davison, because i am enjoying it. Just not as much as i think i could be.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!