[Official] Doctor Who Thread


Recommended Posts

Hi,

Ok, I know I won't be making friends by saying this but so far RTD has done a far better job than Moffat (I mean in Series 5, I know Moffat has done a pretty good job on previous series as a writer). Anyway, Davies episodes just seemed more DoctorWho-ish to me, they were darker and didn't go around rebooting everything. Steven Moffat in the other hand is trying too hard changing everything (Giant Rainbow Daleks ? seriously ?). And you know, this is too bad because Matt Smith is doing a hell of a great job even if he's clearly imitating Tennant sometimes, and Amy is just ... hot !

Well, maybe it's just the early episodes and it will get better. I really hope we get something as brilliant as Series 3 final episodes with the Master and the great plot :)

I would have to agree. but then, I found the RTB episodes enjoyable because of David Tennant performances - remember each Dr has to put on his own perspective on who he is, no one will be the same. So far however, i'm liking the new episodes. Matt is doing a great job and seems to of taken the role with open arms. Amy Pond, well, she is just great, and sooooooooooooooooooooo much better eye candy than Rose Tyler.

Matt needs to kick up a gear and stop trying to be tennant

i thought that at first, but then i guessed that for this series at least they are probably trying to keep the doctors character somewhat familiar. actually, anyone who's seen the older doctor who's will recognize similarities with other doctors too.

i thought that at first, but then i guessed that for this series at least they are probably trying to keep the doctors character somewhat familiar. actually, anyone who's seen the older doctor who's will recognize similarities with other doctors too.

This is exactly what i'm hoping/assuming and i think i wrote exactly that further back in this thread.

Great minds eh ;)

As Prof.River Song would say, "Spoilers!"

Ten teasers about 'Flesh and Stone'

1. Eureka! Galileo!

2. Amy: "Basically we've *** up the inside of a *******."

3. The Byzantium contains a forest. Yes, a forest.

4. Amy: "Seven."

5. There's a scene reminiscent of a scene from 'Doomsday'.

6. Amy: "Six."

7. What's the opposite of the moral from 'Blink'?

8. River has done something very, very naughty.

9. There's a very important date you'll want to mark in your diaries/iPhones/Google calendars come the end of this episode.

10. The crack. We finally learn what it is and what it wants.

And, just for fun, a bonus teaser:

11. Amy does something to The Doctor that prompts an epiphany. And a collection.

Source: Digitalspy

oooo I like number 9/10!

I don't know, I don't think Moffat is doing any less of a job than RTD did over the past few years. Maybe it came on down from high (aka BBC HQ) to tone things down a notch and aim for lighter stuff, which I can appreciate since Doctor Who is supposed to be kinda light hearted after all. But Tennant definitely brought out that darkside in the character we know he has now because of what he's had to do over the years himself. Matt Smith is certainly (at least so far) very capable as an actor in his own right to play the 11th Doctor, and from what I've seen of the very few times his Doctor has gotten angry or upset he can play the darker undertones also.

Let's give Moffat a chance though. After all he's written some of our favorite episodes I'd gather eh? Blink etc? All terrific no? :)

I don't know, I don't think Moffat is doing any less of a job than RTD did over the past few years. Maybe it came on down from high (aka BBC HQ) to tone things down a notch and aim for lighter stuff, which I can appreciate since Doctor Who is supposed to be kinda light hearted after all. But Tennant definitely brought out that darkside in the character we know he has now because of what he's had to do over the years himself. Matt Smith is certainly (at least so far) very capable as an actor in his own right to play the 11th Doctor, and from what I've seen of the very few times his Doctor has gotten angry or upset he can play the darker undertones also.

Let's give Moffat a chance though. After all he's written some of our favorite episodes I'd gather eh? Blink etc? All terrific no? :)

here here! (Y)

This is exactly what i'm hoping/assuming and i think i wrote exactly that further back in this thread.

Great minds eh

Yeah, i think to be honest the first episode was when he was very 'tennant' and although occasionally you could say he still shows glimpses of him it should be expected, after all they are technically the same person. More importantly however is this claim that you are anywhere near my level of greatness, i am on my own up here :p

Dare I say that was better than Blink and Dead/Library? I think it was anyways. :D

I love how they have "Bob" "Hey, who turned out the lights!" lol Can't wait for next week's now already, and I'm dying to know how the "Crack" will fit into things now.

As other's have said, I'll bet good money on it being the Doctor travelling to alternate universes again. The 10th Doctor said in S2 that if he hops Universes again then it's going to rip open time and space itself - The 10th did this again in S4 when returning Rose home again and The 11th has probably done it for a third time using his dysfunctional new Tardis (it would also explain why his timing is completely off every time he tries to get anywhere).

It'd explain why neither Amy nor Winston Churchill know nothing about the Daleks - after all in the official timeline of things the Daleks invaded Manhattan in the 1930s - well within Churchill's life - so surely he would have caught a whisper about it? Oh well, it'll all be explained in a few days!

To me Matt Smith seems to be channeling Jon Pertwee more than DT. He's going to be a different Doctor altogether.

I don't see why people think he's being like DT tbh, I don't see the resemblance in their acting besides the fact that they were both a bit goofy, which isn't something DT started, and generally goes with being The Doctor.

I don't see why people think he's being like DT tbh, I don't see the resemblance in their acting besides the fact that they were both a bit goofy, which isn't something DT started, and generally goes with being The Doctor.

Well, to be honest he is sometimes borrowing some of DT's style : talking, moving and acting very quickly, the characteristic "HA !", and some other stuff for instance. It's verry different from say Eccleston's doctor. I think the resemblance resides in that both are very dynamic goofy doctors that don't make sens most of the time.

Well, to be honest he is sometimes borrowing some of DT's style : talking, moving and acting very quickly, the characteristic "HA !", and some other stuff for instance. It's verry different from say Eccleston's doctor. I think the resemblance resides in that both are very dynamic goofy doctors that don't make sens most of the time.

To me that seems to come from the writing, things have to be dramatic and running has to happen pretty quickly to get places to continue the story, lol, but as you said, the similarities seem to come how they both act, maybe that is why he was chosen for how alike he could be to Tennant.

SO what's peoples opinions on who River Song actually is then?? Personally I don't like to think she's actually the doctor's wife... I just can't seem him going with her =/ I'm edging towards some sort of mindreader / telepathic who's taking the doctor for a little ride :shifty:

SO what's peoples opinions on who River Song actually is then?? Personally I don't like to think she's actually the doctor's wife... I just can't seem him going with her =/ I'm edging towards some sort of mindreader / telepathic who's taking the doctor for a little ride :shifty:

When we see her die, I'm pretty sure she says that the Doctor wouldn't survive and nor would she, which makes me assume she is either Time Lord or at least part Time Lord to know this, she also knows Gallifreyan which is something she could have learnt during her travels with The Doctor or for some other reason.

So going back on people we have met who she might possibly be, I wouldn't be surprised if she is The Doctors cloned Daughter that we have yet to meet again, but that is just the first thing that comes to my mind when wondering who she might be, and would also explain a few things.

But who knows, I hope we get an answer soon. :D

I wouldn't be surprised if she is The Doctors cloned Daughter that we have yet to meet again

I think you may be onto something there... I mean having Jenny come back to life at the end of the episode was Steven Moffat's idea after all :rofl: Certainly seems an idea I'd be happy with than her being his wife o.O

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!