[Official] Doctor Who Thread


Recommended Posts

In the bit where the Doctor is telling Amy she has to trust him then he walks away. He comes back and holds her hand and tells her to remember what he said when she was 7 - he's wearing his jacket which was previously taken by the Angels.

Given Moffat's attention to detail this is surprising and must be significant? Especially since we never hear anything again about what he said when she was seven. So is this another future Doctor? Realise someone has said this already but its gotta be important and can't just be a mistake given how much attention was clearly given to this episode.

Future Doctor?

Also keep in mind that in the first episode at the end, we see actually SEE 7 year old Amy sitting on her suitcase in the garden look up and HEAR the Tardis coming - but we never see that, and we've naturally been led to believe that she never actually saw the Doctor from the time he said 5 minutes until the time she was 21 or something.

But of course Moffat seems to be chucking important little things in (no doubt this "Duck Pond" is having some significance too), so I'm guess a future version of himself did come back that night for whatever reason to tell her something important?

The more I hear about this 'Future Doctor' turning up, the more I start to believe it...

One theory here, the doctor that Amy started to travel with 1st is the Doctor that is bending the time to save her(ironic that its the day before the wedding and , more recently Amy's time?), the crack he has studying in the Tardis in the first episode I think confirms something like that.I think somewhere if my theory is true, then the Doctors next experience of Amy after Prisoner Zero is sometime in the later episodes,if thats not true, then perhaps its not the future Doctor who asks Amy to trust him, perhaps its the PAST version of the Doctor, before he meets up with Amy to travel with him.5tun2s.jpg

article00964ba7a000005d.jpg

Is Doctor Who getting too scary for kids?

During the 1970s terrified children would hide behind the sofa in a bid to escape the Daleks.

But these days Doctor Who fans have a lot more to be frightened of than a slow moving piece of tin.

The next episode will see the Doctor attacked by a clan of vampires wielding sharp fangs, as he visits 17th century Venice.

The fifth series has already seen the Doctor attacked by the Weeping Angels, the terrifying Smilers, and the old favourites the Daleks.

The BBC has come under fire for being 'too scary' before, with an episode featuring alien-possessed corpses back in 2005.

article00964ba66000005d.jpg

Then they said the content was 'carefully considered' for the pre-watershed audience.

But as the aliens get ever more inventive, parents are sure to question whether their children can handle the excitement.

The show is aimed at the family market, with this week's episode to be broadcast at 6pm.

But it has already drawn complaints from some about the miniskirts worn by the Doctor's leggy assistant Amy Pond, played by Karen Gillan.

article00964ba0a000005d.jpg

Last week's episode even saw her attempt to seduce The Doctor, played by Matt Smith, pushing him up against the side of the tardis in her bedroom.

She joked about how long it was since the 907-year-old Time Lord last had sex, making suggestive innuendoes and provocatively lying down on the bed in front of him.

This week's upcoming episode, written by Toby Whithouse, sees the Doctor, played by Matt Smith, taking Amy for a romantic mini-break in Venice.

article00964ba73000005d.jpg

But when the Tardis lands in the city, they discover dessicated corpses and terror in the canal.

They need to get past the blood-sucking residents of the House of Calvierri and the rest of the scary vampire killers.

vampires5.jpgvampires4.jpg

---

Some images from The Hungry Earth have been emerging.

blogtorhungryearth2.jpg

blogtorhungryearth1.jpg

Also keep in mind that in the first episode at the end, we see actually SEE 7 year old Amy sitting on her suitcase in the garden look up and HEAR the Tardis coming - but we never see that, and we've naturally been led to believe that she never actually saw the Doctor from the time he said 5 minutes until the time she was 21 or something.

Thank you! I thought I'd seen this, but wasn't 100% sure and was a little confused by it. This is starting to make some sense now thinking about what he said about remembering what he said to her when she was 7, and The Doctor seemingly travelling back on his own timeline to give events a little nudge here and there. I must admit, now that the story arc is developing this series is starting to really come alive.

Those ******* who "complained" had better not ruin this for the rest of us. After last weeks episode, Dr Who has now overtaken Caprica as my favourite show of 2010 (thus far).

Its meant to be scary for gods sake! Or at least head-fudge with you. What do people want? Happy, campy stuff from the RTD days? Sorry, RTD who? And for complaining about Amy Pond's short skirt - lol! Do these people stop others in the street and tell them to cover up? Insane!

Granted i might get too worked up, but it highlights exactly whats wrong with the UK these days; people are so afraid of change and doing stuff even a tiny bit different.

It may just be me, I dunno. But I can not get into this series. I was skeptical about Smith, I admit that. But I went in openly giving him a chance and I just can't enjoy what I'm seeing.

I wasn't going to watch any more episodes, but I watched the two parter, and I feel now like I did the first couple of episodes...definitely not something that'll hold my interests.

To quote one of the replies from the link above (somewhere):

I enjoyed Chris Eccleston and David Tennant’s portrayals. So far I’m unimpressed by Matt Smith and Steven Moffat’s efforts. It’s one thing to want the job, it’s another to be capable of doing it.

Those ******* who "complained" had better not ruin this for the rest of us. After last weeks episode, Dr Who has now overtaken Caprica as my favourite show of 2010 (thus far).

Its meant to be scary for gods sake! Or at least head-fudge with you. What do people want? Happy, campy stuff from the RTD days? Sorry, RTD who? And for complaining about Amy Pond's short skirt - lol! Do these people stop others in the street and tell them to cover up? Insane!

Granted i might get too worked up, but it highlights exactly whats wrong with the UK these days; people are so afraid of change and doing stuff even a tiny bit different.

we complain about anything really in this weird country :rofl:

Ten teasers about 'The Vampires of Venice'

1. Rory is halfway through his stag do when The Doctor arrives to collect him. And it's quite an entrance.

2. On entering the TARDIS, Rory doesn't really say what The Doctor wants him to.

3. The First Doctor makes an appearance.

4. The 'vampires' like Amy. Who can blame them? She's delicious!

5. "Where are you from? Did you **** ******* the *****?"

6. Ever wanted to see The Doctor get electrocuted? Luck's in.

7. "Some tiny. Some were as big as the sky."

8. What's 10,000 in number and waiting in the water?

9. Amy enjoys a massive snog with either Rory or The Doctor. Right in front of the other.

10. "All I can **** is... *******."

There are tons of new details about this spin-off's fourth season. Apparently, Androvax will be back, and so will the Slithereen/Blathereen. A new race, called the Shansheeth, will be voiced by Harry Potter's David Bradley. Luke will leave after the first story, but there will be a "companion of the week" after that. Executive Producer Nikki Wilson talks about what to expect from the new menaces:

The Nightmare Man is part of a really big emotional journey for Luke which involves him facing his fears and excitement about the future. The Shansheeth are vulture undertakers who get embroiled with the gang on a big adventure for the middle of the series.

Here's video of the Nightmare Man coming to Bannerman Road and showing Luke visions of Evil Rani and Evil Clyde taunting him, while Evil Sarah Jane burns his books in a fire:

The Nightmare Man is the first episode of the season, and the second story involves a yellow and black monster, plus men in black suits and sunglasses emerging from a 1960s Hummer ? apparently the same men in black from the Doctor Who animated story "Dreamland." [Planet Gallifrey and Digital Spy]

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!