AutoPatcher no longer allowed


Recommended Posts

That doesn't quite seem right considering they'd been allowed to do this for four years. Those EULAs haven't changed for that entire time so why would Microsoft care now?

Hard to say, it could have been anything; even a change in staff/management.

With the mention of malicious code, it makes me wonder if someone repacked AutoPatcher with malware and a new MD5Hash on a mirror site and then an end user who used that AutoPatcher reported the problem to Microsoft. It's really hard to say.

This has hit international news ... I'll copy this to "Clippings" Section

The Register

The Inq. (a real good story for once!!!)

Heise Security

PC Pro (UK)

SlashDot

BetaNews

TechSpot

Search Security - Aus.

Atomic Aus.

From Australia to the United Kingdom ... that's pretty damn good for Neowin...

Why doesn't MS hire the people responsible for making Autopatcher? Here, they were, freely making a tool which saved countless MS users (home and SMB users and system admins, etc) hours or their time and money patching up their systems in a way which was quicker, easier and more intuitive than what Microsoft was able to accomplish. I can see the logic in the service packs and/or downloading each patch individually (incase one patch interferes with system or software) but why couldn't MS management or its development team realize that this was/is a handy way to patch its OS?

I don't know if my criticims offer a reason for pulling Autopatcher. But I think it should make it to official MS release and employ at least a few of the people responsible.

Wow Autopatcher is so usefull and I thought it was helping peaple using Windows OS

I'm really failing to understand Microsoft's action, they should help projects like this not try to stop them

I hope Microsoft will listen to the community and rethink their position like they previously did several times

Why doesn't MS hire the people responsible for making Autopatcher? Here, they were, freely making a tool which saved countless MS users (home and SMB users and system admins, etc) hours or their time and money patching up their systems in a way which was quicker, easier and more intuitive than what Microsoft was able to accomplish. I can see the logic in the service packs and/or downloading each patch individually (incase one patch interferes with system or software) but why couldn't MS management or its development team realize that this was/is a handy way to patch its OS?

I don't know if my criticims offer a reason for pulling Autopatcher. But I think it should make it to official MS release and employ at least a few of the people responsible.

I'm pretty sure microsoft do offer yearly/halfyearly/quarterly/somethingly iso downloads of their patches, or ordering of a cd with them (not sure exactly how often).

Whilst not anywhere near as handy as Autopatcher, I do believe they do provide something.

It is a shame about autopatcher though, handiest piece of software I've used as a sysadmin.

I meant Microsoft would never see a dip in sales(as many people are "switching to Linux" because of this), by pulling this little stunt. Chances are, no one is switching to Linux because they lost AutoPatcher.

This is a forum, so I felt the most appropriate way to "deal with it" was post.

As for the rest of what you said, I'm about to head to bed and don't feel like diving into a legal argument at this time.

just curious what he hell has sales got to do with any of this, i really doubt anyone will switch to linux just because microsoft said they couldn't use the auto patcher. really that is just an insane comment, hey it's hard enough for someone that knows windows well to install stuff on linux, let alone any normal user.

Depending on the flavor of Linux. Linux's update by day might just be the SVN of a program from a repo you installed. Not the OS itself. Kinda like Windows Defender and their updates of the anti-spyware database.

just curious what he hell has sales got to do with any of this, i really doubt anyone will switch to linux just because microsoft said they couldn't use the auto patcher. really that is just an insane comment, hey it's hard enough for someone that knows windows well to install stuff on linux, let alone any normal user.

I also think this depends on the flavor of Linux as well. For most people I'd imagine it's easier to install stuff on Linux then Windows. I mean they have two package managers built right into the OS. All you have to do is load it up, type in whatever your searching for. Click the checkbox then install/ok. Then it's pretty much automated for the rest of it. And then if that's not enough for a "normal" user then they could always just go to www.getdeb.net and download debs of the latest programs. The same as downloading an exe and installing it. But yes I agree, I really doubt this would make anyone switch to Linux.

I kinda wonder if the reason that AutoPatcher was shut down was because it was already what XP SP3 (and probably Vista SP1) is going to be, just a bunch of updates!?!

One of the good things about AutoPatcher was that it also had a lot of useful apps included with it if the user wanted to install any of them, which probably made it too useful, at least as far as Microsoft was concerned.

It's obvious that the program was good, or Microsoft would've used the "malware" excuse LONG before now. In my opinion (and we all know what they say about opinions), Microsoft felt threatened for whatever reason!

Turn on Automatic Updates and you won't have to sit through them. Just let the computers do it's job of downloading the updates while you do other things like install software. I had to do this during Work Experience. On each new computer I go to Windows Update and downlad and install the updates. While the computers is doing those, install software and drivers and stuff like that. Not hard work at all, just repetitive work to do. As for repair shops, if you don't want to eat up bandwidth, just make sure Automatic Updates is ON and Windows will do it via the customer's own internet connection after they take them home.

I only tried Autopatcher once years ago but haven't bothered with it since because my computer does it all automatically without my involvment. To say that while using Windows Update leaves you open to bad things is rubbish. If this was the case then MS would have made it so that their updates are instantly installed the second they are downloaded yet, they made it so it waits for a specific time to install these.

I just try to provide a very professional and complete service to all my customers. Auto updates only install the critical updates there are still many updates to install that it does not cover... hardware updates and addins for example...

If you leave these to your customers they may update... say an nvidia driver that does not need updated and boom... no video... bsod... ive had it happen many times... only to have the computer show up again in my shop and i have to take time to repair that mistake because I should have had it done correctly the first time...You may not realize but the public in general are idiots and of course... they didnt do it .. you did.... in addition if you are fixing a computer and being paid for a complete, clean, professional product ... dont you think you should give it to them... and what about the customers on dial up... what.. they can do updates over the course of 12 months and still not get them completed

Downloading and installing updates from service pack 2 forward ... there are what...???... like 200 when you include ie7,mp11,.net ... when updating, repairing and installing O/S on 5-8 cpus every day... you really need an auto patcher tool to save you lots of time per machine so you can move on to the next one...

I guess a guy could use a wsus server but then you have the added expense of a server just to do updates and nothing else... why when you can have an auto patcher...

Hey ... Maybe thats it......MS shutting down auto patcher to push its wsus server.... that makes a little bit of sense also ... now doesnt it...

Well I hope for everyones sake... MS backs off on this and AP returns...

Im keeping my fingers crossed but i think they old arther will set in before it happens... heres hoping im wrong...

That really sucks. I've been using Autopatcher since the beginning. It's the first thing I run after a fresh install. I really hope MS changes their minds. Regardless, I'd like to thank the Autopatcher team for all thier hard work over the years making such an awesome app.

Someone's not reading my post(s), or at least is not understanding them.

You can go to Microsoft's Update Catalog, download all the updates, put them on a CD/DVD/Flash Drive and take them around with you to OTHER computers, just like Autopatcher. This makes the third time I've mentioned this. Oh, and the Update Catalog also includes WHQL drivers for download... and Office patches too.

And, how many times has Autopatcher 'changed' things and required a full-release download, instead of just an update?

And, I think the August one was like 350+MB.

The Microsoft way- just download the new updates from the Catalog and burn them.

Yeah, I said MS's way is more cumbersome, so I know that.

*cheers*

.

You go ahead and doubleclick every patch that you downloaded from UC to start them one after the other.

I prefer the Autopatcher way; select (f.e. only the critical patches) and launch the install process.

It 's unattended !

Wait a minimum of time and 'voil?', a fully patched system.

I don't want to sit through the series of downloads every day !

.

Hard to say, it could have been anything; even a change in staff/management.

With the mention of malicious code, it makes me wonder if someone repacked AutoPatcher with malware and a new MD5Hash on a mirror site and then an end user who used that AutoPatcher reported the problem to Microsoft. It's really hard to say.

AutoPatcher has had several security features for years now. Altering a module will be caught be AutoPatcher's own MD5 integrity checks and the user will be alerted appropriately.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Mafia: The Old Country expansion Man of Honor announced, brings back Salieri from original by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe During Summer Game Fest, 2K and Hanger 13 brought out a new Mafia: The Old Country trailer, revealing the game's first expansion. Named Man of Honor, this is slated to add two new chapters to the Enzo storyline that the game follows. There is an iconic character returning to the series with this expansion, with players set to run into Ennio Salieri, the future Don of the Salieri crime family. Fans of the original Mafia, or its Definitive Edition remake, may remember that name as one of the biggest characters in the storyline. This expansion is set prior to his rise to being the kingpin in the City of Lost Heaven. "Set in Sicily during the winter of 1905, Enzo Favara has proven himself a reliable soldier of the Torrisi crime family in the months since his initiation," says the studio about the new chapters. "Now, the Don entrusts him and Cesare with a delicate assignment of assisting Ennio Salieri, a man of honor recently released from prison and intent on reclaiming what is his." Working at Salieri's side, players will be heading into fresh environments as they return to the role of Enzo as a high-ranking soldato. The studio also promises brand-new weapons, fresh vehicles, and charms to collect in this expansion. Moreover, the expansion will add new content to the updated Free Ride mode. Alongside new collectibles and locations, this will add more challenges to beat alongside Salieri, which are described as runs that will "test the skills of even the most elite mafiosi." The Mafia: The Old Country Man of Honor story expansion will release on August 14, 2026, across PC, Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5. It will cost $10 for owners of the base game to jump into.
    • Try installing Logitech Options
    • Telltale returns with The Wolf Among Us, re-revealing the sequel and a new remaster by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Telltale Games, the studio known for its episodic games from the 2000s, had a surprise appearance at the Summer Game Fest showcase today. The studio has gone through a collapse, an acquisition, and a revival but has largely gone silent in recent years. Today's sudden announcement was for the popular The Wolf Among Us series, with news about the sequel and a remaster dropping. Set after the events of the 2013-released title, the sequel will bring back Biby Wolf for a new adventure in Fabletown. This town of fairy tale characters is becoming unstable, with Snow White not being able to keep order as before. "When a brutal series of crimes threatens to fracture the fragile balance holding Fabletown together, Bigby Wolf, sheriff of Fabletown, finds himself drawn into a dangerous conspiracy that reaches deep into the city’s criminal underworld," says the studio. "As suspicion spreads across the city and powerful forces work against him, Bigby must uncover the truth and decide what kind of sheriff - and what kind of wolf - he is willing to become." At the same time, Telltale also announced The Wolf Among Us Remastered, bringing back the classic with a fresh coat of paint. This will include all five episodes from the original game plus over an hour of extra content that will offer behind-the-scenes videos, cast interviews, image galleries, and deleted scenes. The remaster will also have updated visuals and improved UI elements and accessibility features, alongside upgrades to the animations, audio, and frame rates. Telltale has been working on this project for almost a decade now, but if the new release schedule holds, fans will be able to jump into The Wolf Among Us 2 sometime in 2027. As for The Wolf Among Us Remastered, this is slated to release during this holiday season.
    • I use a Linux laptop every day. I have tried to switch to Linux on my gaming PC which has a 5070 ti. It was not a great experience
    • Alien Isolation 2 will bring a new protagonist and setting, watch the reveal trailer here by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Only a few weeks ago, Sega and Creative Assembly dropped a teaser for a new Alien Isolation. Today at Summer Game Fest, Alien: Isolation 2 was officially announced with a new trailer while also confirming a whole lot of information about the setting of this survival horror project. Check out the reveal trailer above. Leaving behind the Sevastopol space station, the sequel will take players to a remote colony world. With a Xenomorph (or more) on the loose, players will be navigating both the surface of the weather-ravaged planet as well as "the claustrophobic confines of the Weyland-Yutani outpost of Kurosaki Station." Interestingly, Creative Assembly is leaving behind Amanda Ripley, the daughter of Alien's Ellen Ripley, as the protagonist too. While it hasn't confirmed a name yet, players will be taking the role of a new character for this new adventure. The setting is also being described as a new hunting ground for the Alien. This will have players improvising and developing new tools to aid in their survival and escape, all to avoid "cinema’s deadliest killer." "It has been over a decade since we created the original Alien: Isolation and I am so excited to show everyone the first glimpse of the sequel," says Al Hope, Creative Director at Creative Assembly. "Our dedicated Survival team at Creative Assembly has been working hard to create a new, evolved Isolation experience continuing the legacy of the Alien franchise, making the eponymous killer smarter, the environment harsher and the chance of survival slimmer." Promising the same deadly tension from the original from over a decade ago, Alien: Isolation 2 is in development for PC, Xbox Series X|S, Nintendo Switch 2, and PlayStation 5. A release date has not been announced yet.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      moog19 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Mentor
      grik went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Dedicated
      JKR earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      77
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      68
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!