AutoPatcher no longer allowed


Recommended Posts

I wonder if it is possible to release just the autopatcher shell, and users could download their own fixes from Microsoft?

Users could then create their own autopatcher while still getting the files from MSFT.

Read up a few posts mate. That is the general idea of what is going to happen...

So, what you are saying is that when AP release October (??) new version; M$ servers are going to be flooded with a few thousand or so downloaders.

Are M$ aware that this will happen ? On one day ?

It may be interesting to see the outcome of their previous actions against AP has backfired onto them.

I had a call from Microsoft Legal this morning and they have told me that we are no longer allowed to endorse AutoPatcher on Neowin.

Microsoft will only allow updates to be downloaded from its own servers.

AutoPatcher started in 2003 and has been redistributed in some of the worlds best computer magazine cover CD/DVD's. I have no explanation for why Microsoft allowed it to continue unchecked for 4 years before making this decision.

I asked the representative if Windows Genuine Advantage had anything to do with it and he categorically told me this was not the case, he added that Windows Update for pre-Vista versions of Windows can now be accessed using Firefox and that the concern at Microsoft had more to do with the possible malicious code that could be redistributed with certified Microsoft updates.

We have no grounds to challenge the decision by Microsoft.

I'd like to thank the whole AutoPatcher team for their continued work, unfortunately none of the team is online, but they have been contacted via the AutoPatcher.com website by Microsoft Legal.

The AutoPatcher forums have been disabled for guests and members.

Here Here! i would like to throw my thanks behind that sentiment, Microsoft just wanted to regain that creepy bit of control over us again (anyone noticed how 'intergrated' windows live messenger is?

I don't like, and never have liked, ANY large entity, looking over my shoulder, and the powers that be have enough information on us all, anyway, without the paraniod anroid that is MS-Everything, starting to reclaim all the fun from having access to the totality of the world's knowledge, making sure that they know exactly what we are updating on our machines.

Autopatcher gave us all a little bit of control over overzealous 'critical' updates.

I only hope some underground version bubbles up soon.

They will be sadly missed

So, what you are saying is that when AP release October (??) new version; M$ servers are going to be flooded with a few thousand or so downloaders.

Are M$ aware that this will happen ? On one day ?

It may be interesting to see the outcome of their previous actions against AP has backfired onto them.

As as been said before, a few thousand downloaders in a day is not going to melt down microsoft.com.

So, what you are saying is that when AP release October (??) new version; M$ servers are going to be flooded with a few thousand or so downloaders.

Are M$ aware that this will happen ? On one day ?

It may be interesting to see the outcome of their previous actions against AP has backfired onto them.

Please dont use M$, MS is far more convenient. I know its picky, but it really nerves me.

Wait wait wait, If M$ released hashes for its patches then they wouldn't have to worry about making sure that patches distro'd via 3rd party are genuine. The real problem is that the wga check for those patches that needed it was done by the autopatcher crew and anyone who used the subsequent content didn't need to go through the wga check. useful for pirates, etc. I like the idea of having the framework be distributable so that users can make their own autopatcher. It sucks that they lost their forum space, because such things could be deliberated by the crew and the public there, but oh well. Great app. Lookin forward to seeing a public forum for the AP crew up soon.

Actually, OSX is UNIX-based, not Linux based... it uses the XNU kernel which is a Mach/FreeBSD combination...

Anyways, AutoPatcher will be back - legally.

Don't know why we're on this subject but FreeBSD is UNIX-like but has not attained UNIX certifications. Therefore, OS X != UNIX.

Anyway, carry on.

Wait wait wait, If M$ released hashes for its patches then they wouldn't have to worry about making sure that patches distro'd via 3rd party are genuine. The real problem is that the wga check for those patches that needed it was done by the autopatcher crew and anyone who used the subsequent content didn't need to go through the wga check. useful for pirates, etc. I like the idea of having the framework be distributable so that users can make their own autopatcher. It sucks that they lost their forum space, because such things could be deliberated by the crew and the public there, but oh well. Great app. Lookin forward to seeing a public forum for the AP crew up soon.

The updates already had digital signatures - didn't stop MS worrying about integrity. It's true, though, how many of us went into the AutoPatcher directory and checked to make sure the digital signatures were correct? Probably at most about 2.

Sure a non-trivial part of the AP userbase were pirates, so what? It's not as if the team were promoting piracy, we even told pirates we couldn't give them support on the forums if they admitted they had a pirated copy of windows.

Hi "Rich"

Actually I only started writing M$ since using Neowin (seems the standard here) I suppose it's meant to signify Microsoft dollar hungry.

But actually I do agree that the label is a bit childish, otherwise I should use U$ for US and so forth.

So under your recommendation I hereby revert back to my original MS. For Microsoft Sucks !!

Kim

Autopatcher may be defeated. But that doesn't mean people aren't gonna try and do stuff with it for their own personal use.

As far as I'm aware, Autopatcher and all it contains can be slipstreamed into an XP Home/Pro SP2 CD. That sure would eliminate painfully slow hours of updating everything from scratch!

I don't understand why autopatcher forum is to be removed completely. I thought MS objects the download links only. This can be achieved by removing the links. If MS considers any talk about AP infringes their 'rights', this thread should also be considered 'illegal' ;)

The AutoPatcher forum thread was designed to Add/Edit and generally Help with the new AP updates.

As the Download page has ceased the forum is not required

Very true. The forum contained organized list of fixes, add-ons, discussions about add-ons/ fixes etc. If MS is afraid that those who have already downloaded latest AP will benefit, then the forum must be shut down. But wait! MS is only concerned that 'innocent' AP 'victims' will be infected with 'malicious code' distributed by AP. Those who have got AP are already in danger :o . What a scary scenario :devil: . MS should do something fast to save all these innocent victims ;)

On August 29th I wrote MS via a contact link M2Ys4U posted in #neowin. Today they wrote back.

What I wrote:

Please reconsider your decision to kill off the AutoPatcher project. The project provided a massive benefit to its users, a lot of whom were on Dialup or had to patch a large number of computers and wished to save a lot of time. The product also helped increase the security of Windows, thus improving Microsoft's image.

Regards, Frank Becker

What the MS representative wrote back:

Dear Frank,

Thank you for contacting us about AutoPatcher.

I realize that this has clearly caused you a lot of difficulties. I would like provide you with more information on our position.

It is our policy that the distribution of supplemental code such as hotfixes, security updates, and service packs is discouraged. This policy is in place due to concern for the safety and security of our customers, as we can only guarantee the download?s contents when it comes from a Microsoft web site. Distribution of these materials without permission is also an infringement of our copyright.

We try and contact anyone who is in violation of our policy as soon as we can, once we are aware of what they are doing. AutoPatcher is not the only company we have contacted.

We recommend that our customers sign up for Microsoft Update (MU) and enable Automatic Update functionality to receive all updates directly from us. In addition, we have enterprise services such as Windows Server Updates Services (WSUS) that we recommend our enterprise customers to use.

We provide this guidance as it is common to see email scams encouraging people to download our latest patches, but the URL takes them to sites where they are actually exposed to malware. In order to ensure that customers are getting actual Microsoft updates and not malware, we recommend customers get their updates directly from us.

On a separate note, I see you have selected Germany as your country of residence. For more information you may wish to contact your local Microsoft office on the following website as they may able to provide more information;

http://www.microsoft.com/worldwide/phone/c...country=Germany

I hope this information has answered your query, but if you have any more questions please contact our Customer Services team in the UK on 0870 60 10 100. The lines are open from 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday, excluding public holidays. If you still have any more questions, please reply to this email.

Many thanks for contacting us.

Kind regards,

MAMATHA DALEER

Customer Service Professional

Microsoft Customer Services

Dear Rich,

Thank you for contacting us about AutoPatcher.

I am sorry for the frustration this has caused. I would like provide you with more information on our position.

It is our policy that the distribution of supplemental code such as hotfixes, security updates, and service packs is discouraged. This policy is in place due to concern for the safety and security of our customers, as we can only guarantee the download?s contents when it comes from a Microsoft web site. Distribution of these materials without permission is also an infringement of our copyright.

We try and contact anyone who is in violation of our policy as soon as we can, once we are aware of what they are doing. AutoPatcher is not the only company we have contacted.

We recommend that our customers sign up for Microsoft Update (MU) and enable Automatic Update functionality to receive all updates directly from us. In addition, we have enterprise services such as Windows Server Updates Services (WSUS) that we recommend our enterprise customers to use.

We provide this guidance as it is common to see email scams encouraging people to download our latest patches, but the URL takes them to sites where they are actually exposed to malware. In order to ensure that customers are getting actual Microsoft updates and not malware, we recommend customers get their updates directly from us.

I hope this information has answered your query, but if you have any more questions please give us a call on 0870 60 10 100. The lines are open from 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday, excluding public holidays. If you still have any more questions, please reply to this email.

Many thanks for contacting us.

Kind regards,

MAMATHA DALEER

Customer Service Professional

Microsoft Customer Services

Protect Your PC: Microsoft recommends that you protect your PC from Viruses and Security threats. Please visit our website http://www.microsoft.com/uk/security/protect/alert.mspx and follow the steps to stay secure.

Very true. The forum contained organized list of fixes, add-ons, discussions about add-ons/ fixes etc. If MS is afraid that those who have already downloaded latest AP will benefit, then the forum must be shut down. But wait! MS is only concerned that 'innocent' AP 'victims' will be infected with 'malicious code' distributed by AP. Those who have got AP are already in danger :o . What a scary scenario :devil: . MS should do something fast to save all these innocent victims ;)

i always thought that even just something like what i highlighted, just a simple well organized and complete list of what is needed for an up-to-date installation of a specific windows os, could be very useful, even now that ap is no more avaible; due to the absence of somthing really comparable on ms websites, it would be a smart and quick info source which could help someone who want to collect and keep all the updates&co to save a lot of time, time which otherwise has to be spent in searching on ms download center or ms catalog website

now a little doubt: when ap will be re-born as a web based utility to download directly from ms the original packages and then, i guess, to automatically build on the user's pc the omni-comprensive pack, won't ms complain again about those theoric potential security issues ? i.e. saying that they're afraid of the risk that the utility could alter their packgaes or insert anyway in the final pack aimed to update windows malicious code etc. .... and so won't they "stop the show" again ?

Lets hope MS come up with there own solution for it I vaguely remember before XP SP2 they did a security rollup where several updates where in the one download.

I think it would be nice if they offered this every now and then a single download that has all the updates in it after SP2 perhaps they could have it make you register the PC after you have ran the updates on it making it possible to update peoples PC’s for them when they are on dial up etc.

Big thanks to Autopatcher team as you guys saved alot of my time in installing the updates on my client's computer. If they are not violating WGA then why do microsoft fear, as their every product is vunerable, ther is nothing new to it or they have the option to get the Autopatcher team into microsoft and ask them to officially release the Setup manually in the form of CD's/ DVD's on famous magzines, which would in turn help the users and purpose of the microsoft is also solved.

MS must have an auto response for people emailing about it:

Dear Sir/Madam, Thank you for contacting us about AutoPatcher.

I am sorry for the inconvenience caused. I would like to provide you with more information on our position.

It is our policy that the distribution of supplemental code such as hotfixes, security updates, and service packs is discouraged. This policy is in place due to concern for the safety and security of our customers, as we can only guarantee the download's contents when it comes from a Microsoft web site. Distribution of these materials without permission is also an infringement of our copyright.

We try and contact anyone who is in violation of our policy as soon as we can, once we are aware of what they are doing. AutoPatcher is not the only company we have contacted.

We recommend that our customers sign up for Microsoft Update (MU) and enable Automatic Update functionality to receive all updates directly from us. In addition, we have enterprise services such as Windows Server Updates Services (WSUS) that we recommend our enterprise customers to use.

We provide this guidance as it is common to see email scams encouraging people to download our latest patches, but the URL takes them to sites where they are actually exposed to malware. In order to ensure that customers are getting actual Microsoft updates and not malware, we recommend customers get their updates directly from us.

On a separate note, we have noted that you reside in Australia. For more information, you may wish to contact your local Microsoft office on the following website as they may be able to provide more information;

http://www.microsoft.com/worldwide/phone/c...untry=Australia

I hope this information has answered your query, but if you have any more questions please call us on 0870 60 10 100. Our lines are open from 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday, excluding public holidays. If you still have any more questions, please reply to this email.

Many thanks for contacting us.

Kind regards,

PADMAVATHI LAKSHMAN

Customer Service Professional

Microsoft Customer Services

Protect your PC: Microsoft? recommends that you protect your PC from Viruses and security threats.

Please visit our website http://www.microsoft.com/uk/security/protect/alert.mspx

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Hope all is well. I am in UK.  
    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!