Lost Season 4

By Rappy
in The Media Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Mathachew Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
I think Jin lost his memory like Desmond

and works for the car campny but knows Jin and His Baby

They said she had a boy to jin but it was a girls

i dont understand the scene were he gives the Panda to the women who had the baby...was that Sun.

I don't follow what you're saying in the first part, but....

Jin's portion was a flashback. He was congratulating the Ambassador of China on his new grandson, so it wasn't son, it was the Ambassador's daughter.

Grand Master

Rappy Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted
Note, the year of the dragon was 2001.

Seems to me that Jins flashback was 2001 and Sun's was the future.

To me though, thats a lame trick by the writers and a poor episode.

I thought it was quite clever because even tho I read spoilers I didn't know Jins part was a flashback so I was generally surprised!

Grand Master

Mathachew Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
Note, the year of the dragon was 2001.

Seems to me that Jins flashback was 2001 and Sun's was the future.

To me though, thats a lame trick by the writers and a poor episode.

The year of the dragon was 2000 (2001 was the snake).

As has been noted several times now, it's clear it was a flash back and flash forward, how was the story execution not clever?

I thought it was quite clever because even tho I read spoilers I didn't know Jins part was a flashback so I was generally surprised!

I think you mean genuinely :p

Grand Master

SuperJediMedia

Posted
Posted

Nevertheless it's only LESS than 1 month in 2001 for it to qualify as Dragon... those little details aren't important I don't think.

All it means it IS a flashback, if Jin said "I am only married for 2 months"

Unless he is married to another Woman, besides Sun, in 2012

Grand Master

Mathachew Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
Why everyone is so sure that Jin is dead and it was the flashback not the flashforward? It doesn't make any sense to have the flashback just to fool people. Because Jin's story in this episode wasn't even interesting.

We know Jin was married once, and he said he was only married for two months. Also, the guy who sold him the Panda said it was the year of the dragon, which was 2000, possible very early 2001. We know it was a flashback.

Grand Master

Aaron Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
I'm going to say that Jin is NOT one of the Oceanic Six. Just because there's a gravesite doesn't mean he got off the island. If Jin dies on the island and only Sun got off the island, it makes sense for her to have a funeral for Jin once she's home.

What I found interesting were the two facts we learned about Hurley:

1) He's got enough money to fly to Korea just to see Sun's baby

2) He doesn't want to see any of the other four Oceanic Six members...when Sun said no one else was coming, Hurley replied "Good."

Also, Sun seemed to be in a hotel room at the beginning of the episode. Why is she traveling?

I thought Jack mentioned something about free tickets in the end of season 3? He said something about a Golden Pass.

Grand Master

oldaccount1

Posted
Posted
The way I understand it is this.

Sun is part of the Oceanic 6.

People still on the island manage to get off the island after the Oceanic 6 are rescued. However they aren't allowed to come public or slip into there old lives.

Sun doesn't know Jin's alive. Jin doesnt want to go back to Sun or has had his memory erased.

Now THAT'S an intriguing theory! (Y)

Grand Master

episode

Posted
Posted
Are there any Hints/indication what year is it when Sun Delivered?

I already covered that. But again ...

DOC was around 10/25/04 (as stated in D.O.C.)

That means her flash forward took place roughly nine months later, 7/25/05.

Possibly Jin's tombstone was erected by his family in Korea when the plane crashed, in a memorial thinking they wouldn't recover his body? That could explain the dates.

Jin's family was poor, and his father lived in a small fishing village. Sun put up that tombstone. But again, that might only be to perpetuate the lie that there were no other survivors.

Heres a personal thought on the tombstone: Jin said in the episode that the man he was -- an 'enforcer' for Sun's father -- died when they came to the island. 9/22/04, the date on Jin's 'tombstone' is the date they came to the island, and thus would be the day 'the old Jin' died.

I think he is alive on the island. He did what it took to get Sun off, but doing so required him to stay.

Experienced

Imnotrichey

Posted
Posted
The way I understand it is this.

Sun is part of the Oceanic 6.

People still on the island manage to get off the island after the Oceanic 6 are rescued. However they aren't allowed to come public or slip into there old lives.

Sun doesn't know Jin's alive. Jin doesnt want to go back to Sun or has had his memory erased.

Is there something that they have shown that makes you believe others (non Oceanic 6) got off the island that were from the flight?

Grand Master

SuperJediMedia

Posted
Posted
Even so, he's still going to be on the show. Who knows how long it will be before Sun actually gets off the island? We could be seeing Jin around for a long time still.

Did you not notice preview for next week & spoilers said Someone from Oceanic 815 will die. It's gotta be him then! :(

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Microsoft unveils new Surface Laptop with improved trackpad, Snapdragon X2, and more

      By FunkyMike · Posted

      Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • Microsoft announces 12th-gen Surface Pro with Snapdragon X2 processors

      By tsupersonic · Posted

      make your own notch - it's not that hard
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10

      By Copernic · Posted

      VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • UK to ban under-16s from social media following a six-week trial with teenagers

      By FloatingFatMan · Posted

      OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
    • what other retro software do yall use

      By +InsaneNutter · Posted

      Interesting read. I knew the adware was quite controversial at the time, however never realised to the point The Guardian wrote an article about Patchou. I just said no and enjoyed his creation, I’d probably be a lot more wary of something like that today though.

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      89
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!