Denon say Blu-Ray Profile 1.1 discs may not play on 1.0 players


Recommended Posts

That's right. Jeff Talmadge, Denon's Director of Product Development and Systems Integration, says they're concerned about new disc/old player compatibility here:

http://www.listenup.com/content/partner_st...adge.aug.07.php

But there is a possibility ? and this is maybe not so public knowledge ? that when these discs come out that fit this new profthey may not work properly with the Profile 1.0 players[/b]."

From a fanboy this may be dismissable. From this guy itserious[/b] news.

Ouch.

If this is a true, then this is a big blow to early adaptors that brought Blu-Ray players.

Thank you Sony for releasing Blu-Ray with missing features only for them to update it so soon after.

I get the feeling by this time next year we may have Profile 1.2 discs announced. What a joke.

It's things like this that make me wonder how people can support BD so blindly.... obviously all next generations are going to go through some problems but for the people that will go to the grave saying one is better than the other just baffles me..

I would hope that a firm-ware update will fix this problem.

If not then early adopters have a very expensive box of junk under their TV.

I think early DVD players had the same problem with the Matrix DVD when it came out.

That's what you get for releasing a product that is not finalised. HD DVD on the other hand has no such issues because they sorted everything before release.

I don't know how people can support Blu-Ray with that sort of work ethic.

That's what you get for releasing a product that is not finalised. HD DVD on the other hand has no such issues because they sorted everything before release.

I don't know how people can support Blu-Ray with that sort of work ethic.

That's not necessarily true: http://xbitlabs.com/news/storage/display/20070909234615.html

Moreover, neither Toshiba, nor DVD Forum have confirmed that triple-layer HD DVDs will playback on existing HD DVD hardware, such as players and computer drives.

We might end up with HD DVD players not supporting all movies.

Not good news, but until it's confirmed it's pure speculation.

I'm sure everyone involved will work their asses off to do everything possible to make sure everything is compatible.

That's not necessarily true: http://xbitlabs.com/news/storage/display/20070909234615.html

We might end up with HD DVD players not supporting all movies.

I am following up on this issue over at AVS forums with insiders and it has been confirmed that TL51gb discs are working wth 2nd Gen and 3rd Gen HD DVD players and that they are currently testing it with 1st gen and it will most likely work with all HD DVD player without problems.

Another issue with TL51 might be yield problems with replication as BD50 discs have, meaning very low rate. This has not been confirmed but is speculated.

And btw, this is completely not releveant. HD DVD is finished format and 30gb is enough for everything intended. The whole hoopla with TL51 is talking point and eventual full HD/DVD triple layer twin discs so studios can publish one disc that would have both DVD and HD DVD version without the need of flipping, like with combos.

Blu-Ray problem however is more serious. The problem is lack of HARDWARE like secondary video decoder, ethernet and a few other things like persistent storage etc etc. This is not simply fixable by firmware update.

When Denon's main tech guy says there might be problems, you better believe it. Not that we didn't know this already, but it's good too see someone speaking up.

What this means is that ALL Blu-Ray players being sold right now are ALL Blu-Ray 1.0, BD-Live incapable and they simply lack secondary video decoder and have older BD-J support. The new movies coming out that are Profile 1.1 (meaning they include dual video streams) may actually cause several problems on non-1.1 players. Time will tell, but firmware updates (like BD-J to the latest verson) can fix only so much.

What a load of crap...

Even if the 1.1 profile BD discs didn't work in a 1.0 BD player, I seriously doubt you'd have to buy a new player - simple firmware upgrade. Not un-heard of...

Again, it's hardware problems and un-unified Profiles and support among all players. Blu-Ray is a HUGE mess.

Here just read what the authors of Nature's Journey, an eagerly expected title, go through and why they actually had to delay the Blu-Ray version release.

http://www.highdefdigest.com/news/show/Str...ase_Delayed/951

I thought players could be upgraded to support the new profiles via firmware updates, or am I out to lunch on this one?

I thought I read several months ago that the ethernet cable and larger storage/cache got added to the specification after the initial units were selling which left certain players out there lacking the right connectivity options to get any firmware update.

Since then ethernet's become a part of the standard I think...but as the article is saying its an issue for the older drives.

I'm really no expert but...sure Boz knows more.

I thought I read several months ago that the ethernet cable and larger storage/cache got added to the specification after the initial units were selling which left certain players out there lacking the right connectivity options to get any firmware update.

Since then ethernet's become a part of the standard I think...but as the article is saying its an issue for the older drives.

I'm really no expert but...sure Boz knows more.

Why wouldn't a BD player be able to get a firmware update the same way some (most?) current DVD players do, by booting up with a firmware update CD in the drive?

Why wouldn't a BD player be able to get a firmware update the same way some (most?) current DVD players do, by booting up with a firmware update CD in the drive?

see answer in bold

What this means is that ALL Blu-Ray players being sold right now are ALL Blu-Ray 1.0, BD-Live incapable and they simply lack secondary video decoder and have older BD-J support. The new movies coming out that are Profile 1.1 (meaning they include dual video streams) may actually cause several problems on non-1.1 players. Time will tell, but firmware updates (like BD-J to the latest verson) can fix only so much.

In other news Denon stated "We decided to go Blu-ray because we found a partner that we can work with at this point in time quicker than we could to do HD DVD. "

This may mean some companies can work faster with Blu-Ray than HD DVD.

In my opinion, I'm getting tired of a certain someone's HD DVD propaganda. Somebody is blowing a small statement completely out of proportion.

The worst thing that could happen with profile 1.1 discs is older players will not support the 1.1 features. It does not mean the discs will not play at all. This simply means no web-content and no video overlays while watching a movie.

Why not make a big deal about how there's a much bigger possibility that HD DVD's new 51GB 3-layer disc will most likely not work at all in existing HD DVD players.

Why not make a big deal about how there's a much bigger possibility that HD DVD's new 51GB 3-layer disc will most likely not work at all in existing HD DVD players.

Because movie's don't have to be pressed onto 51GB discs, so it won't matter whether or not they can or can't.

-Spenser

In other news Denon stated "We decided to go Blu-ray because we found a partner that we can work with at this point in time quicker than we could to do HD DVD. "

This may mean some companies can work faster with Blu-Ray than HD DVD.

In my opinion, I'm getting tired of a certain someone's HD DVD propaganda. Somebody is blowing a small statement completely out of proportion.

The worst thing that could happen with profile 1.1 discs is older players will not support the 1.1 features. It does not mean the discs will not play at all. This simply means no web-content and no video overlays while watching a movie.

Why not make a big deal about how there's a much bigger possibility that HD DVD's new 51GB 3-layer disc will most likely not work at all in existing HD DVD players.

Firstly, you have no clue what the worst that could happen is. Are you one of the people working on Blu-ray? I thought not.

Secondly, I've read statements from people in the HD-DVD group that there's a very small chance that the triple-layer discs won't work in existing players.

Firstly, you have no clue what the worst that could happen is. Are you one of the people working on Blu-ray? I thought not.

Secondly, I've read statements from people in the HD-DVD group that there's a very small chance that the triple-layer discs won't work in existing players.

Fine then, IMO the worst that could happen...

Any I don't argue that there's a small chance triple layer HD DVD's won't work in existing players...if one of the layers is a regular DVD layer. For 51GB HD DVD's it's completely different story.

Because movie's don't have to be pressed onto 51GB discs, so it won't matter whether or not they can or can't.

-Spenser

And Blu-Ray discs don't have to contain profile 1.1 features either.

That's not necessarily true: http://xbitlabs.com/news/storage/display/20070909234615.html

We might end up with HD DVD players not supporting all movies.

Actually they did confirm it at CeBit. Triple-Layer will play fine in all HD-DVD players. Toshiba stated that the worst case issue is that the laser may have more read errors when going to the 3rd layer, but that the buffer would more than make up for those issues.

Also since part of the HD-DVD spec requires players to have an ethernet port you can count on a firmware update to change the calibration on the laser if need be.

However the BD spec says nothing as regards ethernet, so gen 1.0 people could get seriously screwed on this.

I don't see this being as big of a deal as you guys are making it out to be. Worst possible scenario? Someone can't play a few extra features. Sony does some stupid things, but even they would know it's be format suicide to break compatibility completely.

And Blu-Ray discs don't have to contain profile 1.1 features either.

Profile 1.1 sounds like a standard disc type, where all discs pressed from a certain point would be 1.1. I could be wrong, I really have no idea, but that's just what it sounds like to me.

Don't get me wrong though, even though I lean towards HDDVD, I'd just as much rather see Blu-ray win than have 2 formats flying around.

-Spenser

Yes, I know Wikipedia is not exactly the most reliable source, but there you have it.

When software authored with interactive features dependent on Profile 1.1 hardware capabilities are played on profile 1.0 players some features may not be available or may offer limited capability. Profile 1.0 players will still be able to play the main feature of the disc, however.

1.0 players will still be able to play 1.1 movies.

Boz has made a mountain out of a molehill.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!