[Season 7] Smallville


Recommended Posts

Very good ep. But they still cant seem to break away from the formula

If an antagonist (and protagonists sometimes) finds out about Clarks secret, they'll either

a) get knocked out and forget everything

b) get killed

Thats one dumb thing I didnt like. Other ones would be Clark not making more use out of his powers..dragged storylines..anything to do with Lana...that sort of thing.

Someone wanna tell me which episode Lana became "brain dead" in? I haven't watched this season at all since the first two episodes really. Saw this weeks though, since I knew something big was gonna happen with Lex :D

Hopefully with new showrunners (even though they've been with the show a long time) the plotlines won't be so out there next season, and maybe, just maybe they can negotiate with Michael to bring Lex back also. And Lana? (She's leaving also, isn't she?)

Loved the Tone, Acting...

But I hated the Plothole...

I mean, he has SUPER hearing, and he couldn't hear that Woman, and Lex walking in the mansion?

Dumb Writing on that!!! :|

If you're serious about having taken your blinders off, you'll see that that kind of plot hole exists in just about every episode of Smallville, like whenever he gets surprised and taken down. Doesn't he have super-reflexes for when he's super-speeding around?

Something I don't understand. Why was Lex's assistant killed off? Who was it that killed her? And if it was Lex behind it, what was his motive?

Lex hired an assassin to kill her because she knew too much. You could tell by the way Lex reacted to her. I really saw it coming right whent she asked him about the locket. It's ironic though. She found out that Clark is "the traveller" and she left him a voicemail too. I wonder if he listened to it.

I don't know if the episode was supposed to air today or not but I watched it yesterday night. Well, according to this (TV.com) the episode should air date is "4/24/2008". :blink:

Has anyone else seen it yet?

God that episode sucked.

Why do they always have to have them hacking a system by typing on a keyboard on a screen full of pictures. No command line no nothing. They treat us like we are stupid.

Reminds me of this video some guy made on youtube. He called it hacking Hollywood style

That wasn't the worst...

The worst was when Clark said "I Don't Care about Lex" when a week ago at the end he said "I am gonna stop Lex"

WTH Writers WHAT THE ****???

Anyway Season Finale descriptions -

The CW's Official Description (Added 4/25/08): LEX DISCOVERS CLARK?S SECRET ? Kara (Laura Vandervoort) tells Lex (Michael Rosenbaum) he is destined to defeat the Traveler and offers to take him to the Fortress to learn how. Clark (Tom Welling) is stunned that Kara would go to Lex but it is revealed that Brainiac is impersonating Kara and she?s actually trapped in the Phantom Zone. Chloe is arrested by the Department of Domestic Security and Lana awakens from her comatose state. Meanwhile, in an epic turn of events, Clark and Lex face off in the Fortress and Lex learns Clark?s secret. Erica Durance and Aaron Ashmore also star. Todd Slavkin directed the episode written by Don Whitehead & Holly Henderson

Edited by JediXAngel

sadly the quality of the show has dropped immensely. they're simply out of story and inserting random stuff. like jimmy and chloe dancing for like 5 mins... zzzz... i guess i'll watch the finale but thats it for me. and i suspect the show won't survive past 1 more season if that.

I am FINE with Tom Welling's acting 100%.

If I wasn't fine with his acting, I certainly wouldn't tolerated all these 7 years, like I told episode...

Now, the part ****es me off most is the writers on the show just make no sensible logic in what they write!!!

screw all you moaners about the writing and acting, i'll watch it till the end. Reason? because its good tv.

it has a good combination, excellent musical score + great action scenes + decent visuals + good acting + interesting plots each episode. smallville ftw.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!