Xbox 360 Fall Update


Recommended Posts

I am not sure how 16:10 support can come. I mean Xbox 360 supports 720p and 1080p so if you support 16:10 resolution it means that people who have a resolution of 1440x900 will be somewhere between 720p and 1080p right ?

I mean i am not too sure about this whole concept. Can someone explain how it can be done and all ?

The Xbox can allready render inbetween resolutions if you have VGA cable, for example instead opf rendering 720p on 720p sets you can instead use their native 768 res (and I still don't understand why 720 sets are made with 768 res)

The biggest problem I suspect is that 16:10 actually bring another aspect ration, not the resolution. and some games may have their GUI hardcoded at 720 or 16:9 aspect, instead of having a dynamic GUI coded based on distances from their closest corner.

The Xbox can allready render inbetween resolutions if you have VGA cable, for example instead opf rendering 720p on 720p sets you can instead use their native 768 res (and I still don't understand why 720 sets are made with 768 res)

The biggest problem I suspect is that 16:10 actually bring another aspect ration, not the resolution. and some games may have their GUI hardcoded at 720 or 16:9 aspect, instead of having a dynamic GUI coded based on distances from their closest corner.

I see

I just hope they introduce 16:10 support since lots of people are using it although i am a little skeptical about it

The biggest problem I suspect is that 16:10 actually bring another aspect ration, not the resolution. and some games may have their GUI hardcoded at 720 or 16:9 aspect, instead of having a dynamic GUI coded based on distances from their closest corner.

True, But I'd even be happy for it just to place black bars top and bottom. My display won't adjust the image but so instead I get a 10% vertical stretch on the VGA input.

I really hope they'd add support for DivX/Xvid, but I don't think it'll ever happen. Which is sad, cuz I have loads of Xvid and h264 vids but Zero WMV files. So much for sharing with my 360. Oh, and maybe better MP3 support? I just can't seem to play 320kbps MP3s?

I really hope they'd add support for DivX/Xvid, but I don't think it'll ever happen. Which is sad, cuz I have loads of Xvid and h264 vids but Zero WMV files. So much for sharing with my 360. Oh, and maybe better MP3 support? I just can't seem to play 320kbps MP3s?

Probability of Xvid/Divx making it to the fall dashboard upgrade is high seeing how Microsoft has already introduced it in the Windows MCE Extenders v2 so i am quite sure that its gonna be coming to Xbox 360 too. Anyways you can always use ffdshow codec in your computer and stream all your xvid/divx files through MCE as Xbox 360 can act as an extender you can easily view stuff.

I see

I just hope they introduce 16:10 support since lots of people are using it although i am a little skeptical about it

It is entirely possible to scale images to different sizes. Technically, Halo 3 does this since it's native resolution is 640p or something, so it has to be scaled up to 720p and then again to 1080p in certain cases, so it's nothing new. The side effect is you get a lot more aliasing than usual (aka "jaggies"). The least Microsoft could do is add in the support for it, it wouldn't be that difficult, but the question remains - do enough people use 16:10 widescreen monitors to justify it? Only Microsoft knows the answer to this.

So why is everyone crying?

Difference in resolution. Xbox 360 jumps from 1388x768 or something like that all the way up to 1920x1080 on VGA with nothing in between. There are two very common widescreen LCD monitor resolutions in between those.

This means my monitor has to scale from the lower res, and it doesn't do as well as 360 at scaling.

On the 360? Not very noticeable. I didn't even know my TV was 16:10 until people started talking about it and I looked it up.

I can notice a difference, especially watching a DVD. The image is stretched out, especially if the aspect ratio is that so you normally wouldn't see any black bars (ie: properly formatted for 16:9), people's heads are stretched out and everyone looks way too skinny. :p

I can notice a difference, especially watching a DVD. The image is stretched out, especially if the aspect ratio is that so you normally wouldn't see any black bars (ie: properly formatted for 16:9), people's heads are stretched out and everyone looks way too skinny. :p

But why would you ever set your TV to stretch???

Only one I really care about is the full support of the media center library. I.e. if Media Center has no problems playing back xvid/divx/etc then I want the 360 to play it. Exactly like I'd expect it to do.

I don't really care about anything else.

I can't get streaming of Xvid/DivX to work on my 360, I get a codec not supported error. So I dunno what's up with that. Using TVersity btw. Though everything plays perfect on my PC. I guess that it's just something in the encodes I have that the 360 doesn't like regardless.

You can. The 360 fully supports that, but some games disable it for bandwidth reasons.

Games disable it when they enter online mode to preserver your network for speed.

soem older games, the coders where sloppy and they just enabled online gamign mode when you started the game :)

BROWSER

i dont care what anyone says about it not being a computer and just a console...theres f'in media center/ movie dls/ they want it to be a computer but not giving the browser...and i really want a browser on my 360

Codec...other stuff would be nice too.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Turbo Pascal was my first real programming experience more than 30 years ago at university. I mostly taught myself from the included examples and help documentation, because the university only taught the basic syntax and philosophy of Pascal, without going deeply into Turbo Pascal’s advanced features. I still remember when I discovered that I could embed assembly language directly into Pascal code, call BIOS functions, manipulate screen memory, use mouse interrupts, and control peripherals from my programs. That opened huge doors for me. Programming back then felt really fun, direct, and close to the machine. What I loved about Pascal was its readability and the almost instant compile time. Turbo Pascal was an amazing environment, but unfortunately Turbo Pascal for Windows 3 did not feel like it fully carried that legacy forward. Later, Delphi got things back on the right track after the messy transition to TP for Windows. Sadly, Delphi suffered from years of uncertainty as it moved from Borland to CodeGear and then to Embarcadero. That instability made many developers lose confidence in it, even though Delphi itself remained a powerful and productive tool. I still work with Delphi from time to time, but I definitely miss the old days of Turbo Pascal.
    • I hope this encodes in to AV1 or AV2 as currently tiktok uses h265 and h264.
    • Qualcomm reportedly in talks to build custom video chips for TikTok parent ByteDance by Karthik Mudaliar Qualcomm is reportedly in advanced discussions to provide custom chip-design services to Chinese tech giant ByteDance, the same company behind TikTok. According to a report from Reuters, Qualcomm could be involved in designing custom silicon tailored for ByteDance's massive data-center workloads. If it goes through, the deal would make ByteDance one of Qualcomm's early anchor customers for its fastly growing custom chip-design division, For years, Qualcomm was the king of making smartphone processors and modems. The company has also been moving into the PC ecosystem and other formats such as on-device AI for Android XR headsets. However, this particular deal is about Qualcomm's custom Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). For a platform like TikTok, ByteDance needs hardware that can help it ingest, process, and serve billions of short-form videos daily. Generalised hardware is no longer the most cost-effective and efficient route, which is why ByteDance is trying to develop custom Video Processing Units (VPUs). VPUs designed specifically for ByteDance’s algorithmic needs could drastically reduce data-center power consumption and improve encoding speeds at an unprecedented scale. The underlying tech behind these processors is actually from Qualcomm's recent acquisition of AlphaWave Semi, a high-speed connectivity specialist company. By combining AlphaWave’s high-bandwidth IP with Qualcomm’s architectural expertise, the company could begin mass production by the end of 2026, if the talks go through. All this also comes at a time when U.S.-China tech relations have dwindled. Escalating trade frictions between Washington and Beijing have severely impacted the export of high-end AI chips from U.S. firms like Nvidia, AMD, and Lam Research. Yet, the Qualcomm-ByteDance discussions show that U.S. tech companies are still actively seeking growth avenues and are open to doing business with China, where regulators still permit. Reuters notes that the outcome of this deal could be uncertain, and ByteDance might also seek partners other than Qualcomm. via Reuters | Image via DepositPhotos.com
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      OHI Accounting earned a badge
      One Year In
    • First Post
      Almohandis earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      119
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!