Which was the worst trilogy


  

258 members have voted

  1. 1. Which was the worst trilogy of all

    • Lord of The Rings Trilogy
      15
    • The Matrix Trilogy
      64
    • Star Wars Trilogy
      12
    • Pirates of the Caribbean Trilogy
      32
    • Indiana Jones Trilogy
      9
    • Back to the Future Trilogy
      10
    • X-men Trilogy
      49
    • Spider-man Trilogy
      67


Recommended Posts

Toss up between Matrix Trilogy and Pirates of the Carribean - I went with The Matrix as I only really enjoyed the 2nd one, 3rd was garbage and 1st was average. Haven't seen the final pirates film as the 2nd one was so crap, so couldn't pass fair judgement on it yet.

I vote Star Wars conditionally; I am referring to the episode 1,2,3 trilogy that were complete garbage. While I'm not a big fan, I can safely say that despite Luke Skywalker being totally irritating in episodes 4,5,6, he was at least better than most of prequels.

The Matrix for sure. It seemed like since everyone was talking about the effects of the first one, they figured they could just crap out 2 more with the same sort of junk. Absolutely horrible.

I agree that the sequels were a let down.

I remember watching a lot of the promotional material for Reloaded and Revolutions and they were like "People are going to love this. The amount of explosions and special effects we've put into these will blow you away."

Listen Hollywood, the majority of us don't care about explosions and special effects. What we liked about the original Matrix film was the superbly crafted plot, the underlying subtext, the stunning cinematography, the character development, and yes - I also loved the kung fu and special effects, but only because they complimented the story like a seasoning to a good meal. The second and third films are just gravy and for this reason FAIL.

When will Hollywood stop destroying good films? It seems all they're interested in are the box office sales.

< Off topic, has anyone noticed that this avatar of me is supposed to be Agent Jones on the rooftop scene?

When will Hollywood stop destroying good films?
When people stop synoymising "Hollywood" and "movie industry" :p
It seems all they're interested in are the box office sales.
Duh, it's hollywood, it's never been any different.

You have to look elsewhere for good films anymore.

I really like the Matrix trilogy, especially the sequels. My vote goes for X-men, but I've never really been a fan of X-men in general.

LtDavidW, you're quite wrong. The majority of people do like movies for explosions and effects. Thats why movies with them in it always seem to bring in a hell of a lot of money. It may be unfortunate that it's that way, but that's how it is.

-Spenser

Yeah I liked all of the Matrix movies. Spiderman and Xmen were just complete crap. Well mostly the third movies in each trilogy, and I just have a dislike for the way the movies were made as well as the comics/series themselves.

i have to say...martrx.

im not saying it was a bad movie...but they ruined it with the trilogy.

the first movie had so much potential, and i thought(think) it was such a good movie, then the second came out, and it was long and boring...didnt really add much, but the ending was decent and made me look forward to the 3rd. then the 3rd came and it was so ....... stupid.

they could of made it awesome, they ruined it.

matrix, the worst? wtf, lol.

Well, yeah. Have you seen the Matrix Revolutions? Nothing in that movie is good, whatsoever.

The one before it had some merits but it was still pretty poor.

I don't think Matrix was the worst at all! Possibly the bigger let down because the first was so damned good. Many of those on that list were just never that great to begin with. Personally I enjoyed the second and third films because I wasn't daft enough to fall for all the hype, I just didn't like the lame ending (why didn't the whole of humanity gang up against the machines or something spectacular?).

I voted for Spiderman as the worst trilogy. The last one was sickening, I wanted to punch the main character and that disgusting "smile".

Lord of the Rings is clearly the best, if you like that sort of thing.

Have you seen the Matrix Revolutions? Nothing in that movie is good, whatsoever.

I beg to differ that it's all bad.

While 75% garbage, the last quarter of the movie - the final fight in the rain and superpunch in particular, is awesome.

Some of the music is great also - have a listen to "Don Davis - Navras".

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Also known for https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jan/29/adware-internet.   Regards, Aryeh Goretsky    
    • Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!