Which was the worst trilogy


  

258 members have voted

  1. 1. Which was the worst trilogy of all

    • Lord of The Rings Trilogy
      15
    • The Matrix Trilogy
      64
    • Star Wars Trilogy
      12
    • Pirates of the Caribbean Trilogy
      32
    • Indiana Jones Trilogy
      9
    • Back to the Future Trilogy
      10
    • X-men Trilogy
      49
    • Spider-man Trilogy
      67


Recommended Posts

gotta be the Matrix Trilogy. Never before has the quality of a storyline dropped so drastically in 3 films. The Matrix itself was awesome, and Reloaded was good in parts, but Revolutions stank more than a bad fart.

I agree 100%. The first film was so cool. The second had some great scenes, especially the whole motorway thing. The third, zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. Sorry

I have to say I have not seen Back to the Future, at least not all three films so I can't comment fairly on that.

  • 2 weeks later...
Mortal Kombat Trilogy.

There's a third Mortal Kombat??

For me, its a toss-up between Spiderman and the Matrix trilogies. Spidey 1 & 3 were rubbish, Matrix 2 wasn't that bad while Revolutions was appalling.

The best trilogies are Indiana Jones and Back to the Future.

Can one of the mods let us know who voted for Lord of the Rings so that we can ban them? Seriously. Then we can get them the help they need...

I want the same thing done to those who voted for Back to the Future.

oh btw one of the votes for LOTR trilogy is mine. :D I'm just tired of some of my friends saying how awesome it is...

I voted for Pirates, even though I wasn't a fan of the The Matrix trilogy either.

And I'm pretty sure the "Back to the Future" trilogy was labeled the greatest movies of all time somewhere. Can't remember where I saw that.

Here are my favorites though (in order):

1. The Jason Bourne trilogy

2. The Lord of the Rings trilogy

3. Back to the Future trilogy

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Bourne Trilogy is by far my favorite.

I can't really narrow it down amongst those. They all had their ups and downs for the most part.

Lord of The Rings Trilogy - Hated the first one, loved the second two

The Matrix Trilogy - Loved the first one, thought the second had some cool characters, thought the third had some good battle scenes.

Star Wars Trilogy - Loved them, haven't seen the 2nd enough

Pirates of the Caribbean Trilogy - Great movies and Kiera is a hottie

Indiana Jones Trilogy - IJ is just a badass

Back to the Future Trilogy - Loved the first two, hated the third.

X-men Trilogy - Too much Rouge/Wolverine ****, but overall decent

Spider-man Trilogy - Wasn't that much of a fan of the first one, but the second two were mediocre.

Overall I'd rate my interest in watching them all about the same. Null vote for me.

  • 2 months later...

You shouldn't have put Indiana Jones, Lord of the Rings and Back to the Future there! They are like the best ever, and you are doing them grave injustice to put them there. :p

Well X- Men was terrible according to me.

PS: People, the poll is for the "worst trilogy", I can't believe LOTR has 12 votes!

Lord of The Rings - 5/5. best trilogy ever

The Matrix - first was a classic. 2 and 3 were ok, nothing special

Star Wars - 4/5

Pirates of the Caribbean - 1 was ok, 2 was great, 3 was horrible

Indiana Jones - never saw any

Back to the Future - 4.5/5

X-men Trilogy - 1 was very good. 2 was amazing. 3 sucked

Spider-man - 1 and 2 were great. 3 was a huge disappointment

Jurassic Park - first was a classic. 2 and 3 were nowhere near great

I KNOW spiderman is not a trilogy, since it's going to make more films (maybe), but it's on the poll anyways

Trilogy can be used as a name for a series of more than 3 as well :) Its weird but its true

I voted spiderman, they are just too much of the same for me

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!