Which was the worst trilogy


  

258 members have voted

  1. 1. Which was the worst trilogy of all

    • Lord of The Rings Trilogy
      15
    • The Matrix Trilogy
      64
    • Star Wars Trilogy
      12
    • Pirates of the Caribbean Trilogy
      32
    • Indiana Jones Trilogy
      9
    • Back to the Future Trilogy
      10
    • X-men Trilogy
      49
    • Spider-man Trilogy
      67


Recommended Posts

Toss up between Matrix Trilogy and Pirates of the Carribean - I went with The Matrix as I only really enjoyed the 2nd one, 3rd was garbage and 1st was average. Haven't seen the final pirates film as the 2nd one was so crap, so couldn't pass fair judgement on it yet.

I vote Star Wars conditionally; I am referring to the episode 1,2,3 trilogy that were complete garbage. While I'm not a big fan, I can safely say that despite Luke Skywalker being totally irritating in episodes 4,5,6, he was at least better than most of prequels.

The Matrix for sure. It seemed like since everyone was talking about the effects of the first one, they figured they could just crap out 2 more with the same sort of junk. Absolutely horrible.

I agree that the sequels were a let down.

I remember watching a lot of the promotional material for Reloaded and Revolutions and they were like "People are going to love this. The amount of explosions and special effects we've put into these will blow you away."

Listen Hollywood, the majority of us don't care about explosions and special effects. What we liked about the original Matrix film was the superbly crafted plot, the underlying subtext, the stunning cinematography, the character development, and yes - I also loved the kung fu and special effects, but only because they complimented the story like a seasoning to a good meal. The second and third films are just gravy and for this reason FAIL.

When will Hollywood stop destroying good films? It seems all they're interested in are the box office sales.

< Off topic, has anyone noticed that this avatar of me is supposed to be Agent Jones on the rooftop scene?

When will Hollywood stop destroying good films?
When people stop synoymising "Hollywood" and "movie industry" :p
It seems all they're interested in are the box office sales.
Duh, it's hollywood, it's never been any different.

You have to look elsewhere for good films anymore.

I really like the Matrix trilogy, especially the sequels. My vote goes for X-men, but I've never really been a fan of X-men in general.

LtDavidW, you're quite wrong. The majority of people do like movies for explosions and effects. Thats why movies with them in it always seem to bring in a hell of a lot of money. It may be unfortunate that it's that way, but that's how it is.

-Spenser

Yeah I liked all of the Matrix movies. Spiderman and Xmen were just complete crap. Well mostly the third movies in each trilogy, and I just have a dislike for the way the movies were made as well as the comics/series themselves.

i have to say...martrx.

im not saying it was a bad movie...but they ruined it with the trilogy.

the first movie had so much potential, and i thought(think) it was such a good movie, then the second came out, and it was long and boring...didnt really add much, but the ending was decent and made me look forward to the 3rd. then the 3rd came and it was so ....... stupid.

they could of made it awesome, they ruined it.

matrix, the worst? wtf, lol.

Well, yeah. Have you seen the Matrix Revolutions? Nothing in that movie is good, whatsoever.

The one before it had some merits but it was still pretty poor.

I don't think Matrix was the worst at all! Possibly the bigger let down because the first was so damned good. Many of those on that list were just never that great to begin with. Personally I enjoyed the second and third films because I wasn't daft enough to fall for all the hype, I just didn't like the lame ending (why didn't the whole of humanity gang up against the machines or something spectacular?).

I voted for Spiderman as the worst trilogy. The last one was sickening, I wanted to punch the main character and that disgusting "smile".

Lord of the Rings is clearly the best, if you like that sort of thing.

Have you seen the Matrix Revolutions? Nothing in that movie is good, whatsoever.

I beg to differ that it's all bad.

While 75% garbage, the last quarter of the movie - the final fight in the rain and superpunch in particular, is awesome.

Some of the music is great also - have a listen to "Don Davis - Navras".

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
    • Interesting read. I knew the adware was quite controversial at the time, however never realised to the point The Guardian wrote an article about Patchou. I just said no and enjoyed his creation, I’d probably be a lot more wary of something like that today though.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!