Which was the worst trilogy


  

258 members have voted

  1. 1. Which was the worst trilogy of all

    • Lord of The Rings Trilogy
      15
    • The Matrix Trilogy
      64
    • Star Wars Trilogy
      12
    • Pirates of the Caribbean Trilogy
      32
    • Indiana Jones Trilogy
      9
    • Back to the Future Trilogy
      10
    • X-men Trilogy
      49
    • Spider-man Trilogy
      67


Recommended Posts

gotta be the Matrix Trilogy. Never before has the quality of a storyline dropped so drastically in 3 films. The Matrix itself was awesome, and Reloaded was good in parts, but Revolutions stank more than a bad fart.

I agree 100%. The first film was so cool. The second had some great scenes, especially the whole motorway thing. The third, zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. Sorry

I have to say I have not seen Back to the Future, at least not all three films so I can't comment fairly on that.

  • 2 weeks later...
Mortal Kombat Trilogy.

There's a third Mortal Kombat??

For me, its a toss-up between Spiderman and the Matrix trilogies. Spidey 1 & 3 were rubbish, Matrix 2 wasn't that bad while Revolutions was appalling.

The best trilogies are Indiana Jones and Back to the Future.

Can one of the mods let us know who voted for Lord of the Rings so that we can ban them? Seriously. Then we can get them the help they need...

I want the same thing done to those who voted for Back to the Future.

oh btw one of the votes for LOTR trilogy is mine. :D I'm just tired of some of my friends saying how awesome it is...

I voted for Pirates, even though I wasn't a fan of the The Matrix trilogy either.

And I'm pretty sure the "Back to the Future" trilogy was labeled the greatest movies of all time somewhere. Can't remember where I saw that.

Here are my favorites though (in order):

1. The Jason Bourne trilogy

2. The Lord of the Rings trilogy

3. Back to the Future trilogy

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Bourne Trilogy is by far my favorite.

I can't really narrow it down amongst those. They all had their ups and downs for the most part.

Lord of The Rings Trilogy - Hated the first one, loved the second two

The Matrix Trilogy - Loved the first one, thought the second had some cool characters, thought the third had some good battle scenes.

Star Wars Trilogy - Loved them, haven't seen the 2nd enough

Pirates of the Caribbean Trilogy - Great movies and Kiera is a hottie

Indiana Jones Trilogy - IJ is just a badass

Back to the Future Trilogy - Loved the first two, hated the third.

X-men Trilogy - Too much Rouge/Wolverine ****, but overall decent

Spider-man Trilogy - Wasn't that much of a fan of the first one, but the second two were mediocre.

Overall I'd rate my interest in watching them all about the same. Null vote for me.

  • 2 months later...

You shouldn't have put Indiana Jones, Lord of the Rings and Back to the Future there! They are like the best ever, and you are doing them grave injustice to put them there. :p

Well X- Men was terrible according to me.

PS: People, the poll is for the "worst trilogy", I can't believe LOTR has 12 votes!

Lord of The Rings - 5/5. best trilogy ever

The Matrix - first was a classic. 2 and 3 were ok, nothing special

Star Wars - 4/5

Pirates of the Caribbean - 1 was ok, 2 was great, 3 was horrible

Indiana Jones - never saw any

Back to the Future - 4.5/5

X-men Trilogy - 1 was very good. 2 was amazing. 3 sucked

Spider-man - 1 and 2 were great. 3 was a huge disappointment

Jurassic Park - first was a classic. 2 and 3 were nowhere near great

I KNOW spiderman is not a trilogy, since it's going to make more films (maybe), but it's on the poll anyways

Trilogy can be used as a name for a series of more than 3 as well :) Its weird but its true

I voted spiderman, they are just too much of the same for me

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The actual download size is ~130–180 MB, not 100 MB.
    • Slight change of pace for me! Gunnar & the Grizzly Boys - Standard American (Official)  
    • draw.io Desktop 30.2.4 by Razvan Serea draw.io desktop is a downloadable security-first diagramming application that runs on Windows, MacOS and Linux. Creating diagrams in the desktop app doesn’t need an internet connection. This is useful when you are disconnected or when you must create diagrams in a highly secure environment, where data protection is of the utmost importance. When you use the draw.io desktop app, your diagrams will be stored on your local device. Because this is a stand-alone application, also designed to run offline, there are no interfaces to cloud storage platforms available. Of course, you can still store your diagrams in folders that are synchronised to your cloud storage if you wish. Easy-to-use diagram editor The draw.io apps work just like the office and drawing tools you are used to using. Drag and drop shapes from the shape libraries and drag to draw connectors between them. Drag connectors to add waypoints and set a precise shape and position, or let them reroute automatically. Double click and start typing to add a label to anything. Create tables and swimlane flows with a familiar tool. Style shapes and connectors with customisable palettes, sketch options, fonts and text formatting tools. Search for shapes, including in open-source icon libraries. Use our vast libraries of shapes and templates, organised into logical categories, to create a range of diagrams and infographics. Generate diagrams from text descriptions using our smart templates. Diagram faster with keyboard shortcuts. draw.io Desktop 30.2.4 changelog: Uses electron 42.4.1 Updates to draw.io core 30.2.4. Download: draw.io 64-bit | Standalone ~100.0 MB (Open Source) Download: draw.io 32-bit | ARM64 | ARM64 Standalone Links: draw.io Home Page | Project page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft will soon allow some users to block Copilot from analyzing their Office files by Usama Jawad Microsoft Purview is a pretty useful data governance, security, and management service that allows customers to gain enhanced visibility and control over their content. It's meant for commercial customers, such as organizations that are storing data at scale. As AI continues to expand and infiltrate every corner of a firm, many are a bit conscious about the technology gaining access to their confidential data. Microsoft is now making a configuration change that will allow such customers to rest easy. Right now, users within an organization have the option to apply Purview sensitivity labels (when available) to secure certain files and label them as such. For example, if you apply the "Confidential" label on an Excel file, the file will be encrypted, and a "confidential" watermark will be applied to it. So, if this file is shared with anyone, they are aware that its access is supposed to be restricted. Up until now, Microsoft was allowing some connected experiences, like its AI services, to analyze files, regardless of their sensitivity label. This is of major concern to most organizations, as a recent example highlighted how confidential emails with data loss prevention (DLP) policies like privacy labels were being uploaded to Copilot for analysis. As such, Microsoft is updating an existing Purview data label sensitivity setting that prevents "some connected experiences that analyze content", from being blocked completely from doing this. The label isn't changing, but the blocking is now being enforced across all connected services (including Copilot and other AI tools), and now extends to Microsoft Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. Files with the label applied already will get this enhancement automatically too once it becomes available. Microsoft has urged IT admins to inform their respective helpdesk and compliance teams, update internal documentation, and review sensitivity labels to ensure that they meet their respective compliance needs. This change is tagged as MC1297982 in the Message Center. General availability is scheduled to begin in a phased manner soon and will complete by the end of next month. That said, it is important to note that this only applies to commercial customers who have a license that allows them to use Purview.
    • llamas are unruly going haywire in New Guinea.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      589
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      76
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!