Which was the worst trilogy


  

258 members have voted

  1. 1. Which was the worst trilogy of all

    • Lord of The Rings Trilogy
      15
    • The Matrix Trilogy
      64
    • Star Wars Trilogy
      12
    • Pirates of the Caribbean Trilogy
      32
    • Indiana Jones Trilogy
      9
    • Back to the Future Trilogy
      10
    • X-men Trilogy
      49
    • Spider-man Trilogy
      67


Recommended Posts

gotta be the Matrix Trilogy. Never before has the quality of a storyline dropped so drastically in 3 films. The Matrix itself was awesome, and Reloaded was good in parts, but Revolutions stank more than a bad fart.

I agree 100%. The first film was so cool. The second had some great scenes, especially the whole motorway thing. The third, zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. Sorry

I have to say I have not seen Back to the Future, at least not all three films so I can't comment fairly on that.

  • 2 weeks later...
Mortal Kombat Trilogy.

There's a third Mortal Kombat??

For me, its a toss-up between Spiderman and the Matrix trilogies. Spidey 1 & 3 were rubbish, Matrix 2 wasn't that bad while Revolutions was appalling.

The best trilogies are Indiana Jones and Back to the Future.

Can one of the mods let us know who voted for Lord of the Rings so that we can ban them? Seriously. Then we can get them the help they need...

I want the same thing done to those who voted for Back to the Future.

oh btw one of the votes for LOTR trilogy is mine. :D I'm just tired of some of my friends saying how awesome it is...

I voted for Pirates, even though I wasn't a fan of the The Matrix trilogy either.

And I'm pretty sure the "Back to the Future" trilogy was labeled the greatest movies of all time somewhere. Can't remember where I saw that.

Here are my favorites though (in order):

1. The Jason Bourne trilogy

2. The Lord of the Rings trilogy

3. Back to the Future trilogy

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Bourne Trilogy is by far my favorite.

I can't really narrow it down amongst those. They all had their ups and downs for the most part.

Lord of The Rings Trilogy - Hated the first one, loved the second two

The Matrix Trilogy - Loved the first one, thought the second had some cool characters, thought the third had some good battle scenes.

Star Wars Trilogy - Loved them, haven't seen the 2nd enough

Pirates of the Caribbean Trilogy - Great movies and Kiera is a hottie

Indiana Jones Trilogy - IJ is just a badass

Back to the Future Trilogy - Loved the first two, hated the third.

X-men Trilogy - Too much Rouge/Wolverine ****, but overall decent

Spider-man Trilogy - Wasn't that much of a fan of the first one, but the second two were mediocre.

Overall I'd rate my interest in watching them all about the same. Null vote for me.

  • 2 months later...

You shouldn't have put Indiana Jones, Lord of the Rings and Back to the Future there! They are like the best ever, and you are doing them grave injustice to put them there. :p

Well X- Men was terrible according to me.

PS: People, the poll is for the "worst trilogy", I can't believe LOTR has 12 votes!

Lord of The Rings - 5/5. best trilogy ever

The Matrix - first was a classic. 2 and 3 were ok, nothing special

Star Wars - 4/5

Pirates of the Caribbean - 1 was ok, 2 was great, 3 was horrible

Indiana Jones - never saw any

Back to the Future - 4.5/5

X-men Trilogy - 1 was very good. 2 was amazing. 3 sucked

Spider-man - 1 and 2 were great. 3 was a huge disappointment

Jurassic Park - first was a classic. 2 and 3 were nowhere near great

I KNOW spiderman is not a trilogy, since it's going to make more films (maybe), but it's on the poll anyways

Trilogy can be used as a name for a series of more than 3 as well :) Its weird but its true

I voted spiderman, they are just too much of the same for me

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Qualcomm's new Snapdragon Reality Elite chip brings on-device AI to Android XR devices by Pradeep Viswanathan Qualcomm has been delivering dedicated SoCs for mixed reality and spatial computing devices for several years. The journey started with the Snapdragon XR1, followed by the Snapdragon XR2 in 2019, the Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 in September 2023, and finally the Snapdragon XR2+ Gen 2 in 2024. Today, Qualcomm announced a major upgrade with the new Snapdragon Reality Elite Platform, which targets premium mixed reality and spatial computing devices. OEMs can use this SoC to power both all-in-one video-see-through headsets and lightweight, tethered optical-see-through glasses. Qualcomm highlighted that the Snapdragon Reality Elite will power the next wave of Android XR devices coming later this year. These wearables will offer better visuals, improved power efficiency, and deeper on-device AI integration compared to the previous generation. The Snapdragon Reality Elite can deliver up to 48 TOPS of AI performance, allowing large language models and large vision models to run directly on the device for the first time. In addition to enabling new spatial AI experiences, these new AI capabilities will improve head and hand tracking, as well as see-through features. On the performance side, the Snapdragon Reality Elite offers up to 60% higher GPU performance, up to 30% higher CPU performance, and up to 160% higher NPU performance compared to the previous generation. The platform supports visuals of up to 4.4K per eye at 90 frames per second for sharper images and smoother motion. Qualcomm is also claiming significant efficiency improvements. The Snapdragon Reality Elite can offer up to 20% longer battery life under the same workload. More importantly, the chipset can run up to 12 degrees Celsius cooler under load, making headsets more comfortable for users to wear for longer periods. The platform also includes improvements to video see-through, featuring lower latency and better image quality. Qualcomm states that its EVA hardware block helps accelerate demanding computer vision workloads, improving how digital content blends with the real world.
    • Umm... GitHub continues to use AWS. That's the story, that's the headline. There's no "new" news here. GitHub continues to require additional capacity beyond the originally-planned Azure allocations. There's nothing special about this; nothing noteworthy. They're still using AWS' infra until the cutover is complete.
    • Hello, Also known for https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jan/29/adware-internet.   Regards, Aryeh Goretsky    
    • Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!