Leopard Networking with Vista


Recommended Posts

I am having major issues with Leopard networking

With tiger i used to go in and set the thing on a local domain (HOME) but now it appears to auto pickup pcs etc.

Well i have enabled file sharing SMB and AFP sharing

Now NO pc can connect to the mac and the mac can't connect to any VISTA based pc, just says connection refused.

This issue has just happened with leopard, it was working fine in tiger, as vista could connect etc

How can i get my pc to connect to my mac shares and my mac to connect to my pc shares

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/597549-leopard-networking-with-vista/
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

All works fine here. No issue at all with Vista accessing my Leopard MBP or with my MBP accessing my Vista machine.

I activated normal file sharing in Vista selected the Folders I wanted to share and made sure the network my Vista machine was connected to was set to Private (for file sharing to activate it needs to be set to private).

From my Leopard install I just naturally access the machine through the finder or through my own Aliass to certain folders on the Vista machine.

For Vista to access my Leopard machine I activated Windows sharing on Leopard and mapped the computer from the Vista explorer. All worked fine there (Although I had to enter my Username and Password the first time I set it up).

It's quite easy to do takes 5 minutes I'd say.

All works fine here. No issue at all with Vista accessing my Leopard MBP or with my MBP accessing my Vista machine.

I activated normal file sharing in Vista selected the Folders I wanted to share and made sure the network my Vista machine was connected to was set to Private (for file sharing to activate it needs to be set to private).

I have done this

From my Leopard install I just naturally access the machine through the finder or through my own Aliass to certain folders on the Vista machine.

My Vista computer or any other computer on the network doesn't show up in finder

For Vista to access my Leopard machine I activated Windows sharing on Leopard and mapped the computer from the Vista explorer. All worked fine there (Although I had to enter my Username and Password the first time I set it up).

It's quite easy to do takes 5 minutes I'd say.

Which method did you use? AFP, FTP, or SMB?

SMB of course. Just the normal built in file sharing provided by Vista.

I've done this for 12 months, it also worked fine in in the following configurations:

XP <-> Tiger

XP <-> Leopard

Vista <-> Tiger

Vista <-> Leopard

With zero problems with anything. My Vista machine will never appear in the Finder of my Leopard machine if I have the local network set to Public however. It must be set to Private for it to be detected and show up in the Finder.

Yeah I can't get them to talk to each other no matter what I do. Can you give a step by step of what to do

I switched it to smb and it says to access go to "smb://192.xxx.x.xx" which fails

And again, my vista network is set to private, and the macbook still doesn't see it.

I had to do a terminal hack of sorts to get mine to connect to the network shares at work. I don't have the site though, the problem was that leopard by default sends it's passwords encrypted, windows by default doesn't support encrypted passwords unless it is enabled, so windows was seeing a scrambled mess instead of my password. Mind you this was on a domain but it could be happening for you too.

My huge issue is that I can't save anything to the network drives. It's that >4k bug, and it's killing me. I often deal with huge photoshop files (graphic designer) and not being able to transfer anything to the network drives at work to share with others is becoming a pain in the ass.

I had to do a terminal hack of sorts to get mine to connect to the network shares at work. I don't have the site though, the problem was that leopard by default sends it's passwords encrypted, windows by default doesn't support encrypted passwords unless it is enabled, so windows was seeing a scrambled mess instead of my password. Mind you this was on a domain but it could be happening for you too.

My huge issue is that I can't save anything to the network drives. It's that >4k bug, and it's killing me. I often deal with huge photoshop files (graphic designer) and not being able to transfer anything to the network drives at work to share with others is becoming a pain in the ass.

Yeah :/ I guess I'll just have to use flash drives to transfer files. Maybe 10.5.2 will fix it.

I had to do a terminal hack of sorts to get mine to connect to the network shares at work. I don't have the site though, the problem was that leopard by default sends it's passwords encrypted, windows by default doesn't support encrypted passwords unless it is enabled, so windows was seeing a scrambled mess instead of my password. Mind you this was on a domain but it could be happening for you too.

My huge issue is that I can't save anything to the network drives. It's that >4k bug, and it's killing me. I often deal with huge photoshop files (graphic designer) and not being able to transfer anything to the network drives at work to share with others is becoming a pain in the ass.

You mean this? https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=535088

Where you have to to dumb down Vista's SMB security level to talk to OS X? OS X (Tiger) has a really old version of the Samba protocol...don't know about Leopard.

i got it figured out

with tiger i am used to it poping up a login box asking you to login but with leopard it looks like they removed that wonderfull feature and replaced it with a connect as button.....

They removed it because you don't always need to login to get to a share.

I can browse the PCs (some XP some Vista) on this network without a password. With a password I can access a little more.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • These features described above are good, but far from what developers like me was eager to get. And that main feature that developers will love it`s the ability to connect to LOCAL AI models running on Ollama. So if you have a beefy spec machine you can now use your own model 100% local inside Visual Studio 2026 18.7.0
    • Microsoft Teams is getting a controversial location tracking feature that users may hate by Usama Jawad Image generated with Microsoft Copilot Earlier this year, Microsoft planned to roll out a controversial location tracking feature in Teams, but following customer feedback, it decided to delay its release. The bad news is that the company has decided to launch it later this year, but it's based on roughly the same design that was shared earlier, which means that many users still have good reason to worry. Basically, Microsoft Places and Teams have received workplace check-ins via Wi-Fi. The idea is that if an employee arrives at the office and connects to their enterprise network, their profile status indicator will show them as being present in the office. For example, if you arrive at work, open Teams on your PC, and connect to the "Studio B" company Wi-Fi network, your Teams profile will indicate that you are present in "Studio B", as shown below: Microsoft says that this feature is basically a replacement for physical workplace check-in peripherals, it reduces the need to manually update your status, and it also enables co-workers to know that you're at work so that they can coordinate in-person meetings with you. IT admins can enable this workplace check-in capability at a tenant level, and users have the ability to control whether they want to enable it or not. Of course, all of that sounds great on paper, but naturally, many Teams customers may still have concerns, as they did before. This is because it enables your reporting manager and other members of the organization to track if you are at the office, when you arrive at the office, and where you are right now. This could be problematic for people who work in what they consider to be flexible work environments or hybrid setups, and this kind of location tracking could be considered an invasion of privacy. Microsoft has tried to alleviate some of these concerns by letting users know that they can manually set their location easily, which essentially overrides workplace check-in if they feel uncomfortable with it. However, that doesn't really solve the problem because your organization could enforce a workplace policy that mandates that this feature remains enabled. The Redmond tech giant has also assured users that this capability does not store historical data and is only a real-time indicator of location. Finally, it only generates a signal when you connect to a corporate network, which means that if you are working from home and connect your PC to your personal Wi-Fi, it won't broadcast your location to your employer; you will simply be shown as "Remote". Microsoft has encouraged IT admins to prepare for this change and begin informing users so they know what to expect once it begins rolling out later this year.
    • Wow, Microsoft IS cooking lately... This only shows that they COULD improve, they just chose not to for whatever reasons. That obsession with AI was destroying them from the inside out.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      AndrewSteel earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Veteran
      Taliseian went up a rank
      Veteran
    • One Month Later
      Clizby earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!