Juno (2007)

By NotChetHanks
in Movie Ratings

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

zeroday

Posted
Posted

I loved this film. It made me laugh, and the acting was excellent. The soundtrack was good aswell, a bit mono-ish, but fitted the film perfectly. 10/10. Will probably buy this on DVD (Y)

I liked it - and great soundtrack too!

Anyone else just waiting for Juno and Mark(Jason Bateman) to kiss? Its wrong but they were so alike! :o

lol I thought it was gonna happen aswell :pinch:

Mentor

HideAndGoatse

Posted
Posted
I liked it - and great soundtrack too!

Anyone else just waiting for Juno and Mark(Jason Bateman) to kiss? Its wrong but they were so alike! :o

I was waiting for it, but was disappointed when it didn't happen, even though its wrong!

Kind of a chick flick, but I like it 9/10

"Your eggo is preggo"

Grand Master

Rappy Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
I saw this 2 weeks ago and loved it. Great casting, great performances, interesting plot, well directed, interesting cinematography. Right up there with Ghost World.

9/10

Wow I never really thought to liken it to that but now you say it (Y)

Mentor

KitCh

Posted
Posted

I must admit this is one film that at the time of seeing the trailer I thought "oh this could be worth the one watch..." but after actually watching it I found myself really enjoying it and finding it quite hilarious. A top notch film and I'd totally recommend it to anyone else

10/10 :woot:

Veteran

Minimoose

Posted
Posted

Good movie but i found it boring (i hope u understand where im coming from).

10/10 Acting

8/10 Story (Wasnt exciting enough for me, but pretty original so extra brownie points there)

9/10 From the more mature part of my mind (Not much)

0/10 This is rating from the childish mind part of me which only likes big explosions and blood :) Cant wait to see Rambo, although i think my local cinema isnt showing it which is ridiculous :(

Grand Master

Kushan

Posted
Posted

I don't get why this film is getting such high praise, it's...well...it's ****. I'm sorry, but that's the best way to describe it.

I hate how the 16 year old girl talks like she's 30 and may as well have come straight from Dawson's creek, I hate how her all-american, all-loving family didn't seem to give two ****s that she was pregnant and was fully supportive and brilliant the whole time. That does not happen. Ever.

I was bored watching this film and really don't get why it gets such high praise.

Grand Master

MGS4-SS

Posted
Posted
I don't get why this film is getting such high praise, it's...well...it's ****. I'm sorry, but that's the best way to describe it.

I hate how the 16 year old girl talks like she's 30 and may as well have come straight from Dawson's creek, I hate how her all-american, all-loving family didn't seem to give two ****s that she was pregnant and was fully supportive and brilliant the whole time. That does not happen. Ever.

I was bored watching this film and really don't get why it gets such high praise.

Well, its because you dislike good quality work.

Grand Master

Hurmoth

Posted
Posted
But what exactly is good quality about it? Come on, tell me what it is I'm missing here.

The film is funny as hell, very witty, very well written, fantastic acting, beautiful story, awesome directing. There isn't one bad thing I can say about the film.

I loved every damn second of this film :yes:

And you're one of the very few who doesn't like this film: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/juno/reviews_users.php (1164 positive reviews from the RT Community and only 123 rotten reviews).

  • 1 month later...
Mentor

EnzoFX

Posted
Posted

I've actually seen parents react that way..... So you can't say it never happens, though its hard to buy. Sometimes you have to just go with it. In the movie, the reason for such understanding is because the dad himself had gone through a divorce, so he has experience, and knows the best course of action is not to just go all crazy on her.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2 to finally get one of the most requested features

      By sphbecker · Posted

      If you don't care to read what I said, then you prove my point. Maybe written media is beyond your attention span. Titles are not summaries my friend.
    • Politically funny images of the World

      By +Nik Louch · Posted

      Nobody asked... in fact, I said "I don't care about political leanings"  
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2 to finally get one of the most requested features

      By Elliot B. · Posted

      TLDR. Here is a far better title (just a basic example): Windows 11 26H2 to allow disabling Web search results
    • Politically funny images of the World

      By Dan~ · Posted

      Restore will get my vote, only if to see if things are any different, doubt it though but Labour and Conservatives too out of touch and same thing over and over and over…, Lib Dem who?
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2 to finally get one of the most requested features

      By sphbecker · Posted

      There is nothing wrong with this title. You have completely missed the plot when it comes to "clickbait." The issue was never that a title tries to entice you to click, that is how titles have worked for over 100 years. The issue is when the title subverts expectations, getting you to click expecting something that isn't there. The classic clickbait example is "Boyfriend caught cheating, what happens next will shock you," then what happened next is the girlfriend was upset...which is probably the least shocking outcome imaginable. If sounds like what you want is for the titles to be a collection of 10-word summaries that you can skim, get the just of the story, and only click if you want more details. That is not, never has been, and never will be what titles are. You can go all the way back to print newspapers during the great depression and see the same thing. The newspaper was locked in a vending machine, all you can see is the headline, you choose to put in 5¢ to buy the paper and read the rest if you want. Those headlines were written in a way to sell the paper, not just to provide a summery. Here are two actual headlines from that time, "Wall Street Lays an Egg," or "Stocks Hit Bottom?" Maybe you'd say something like "it was wrong then and it's still wrong now." Okay, fine opinion to have, but it isn't like Neowin is doing something unjurnalistic, they are just following the age-old standards for written media.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!