RIAA Now Filing Suits Against Consumers Who Rip CDs


Recommended Posts

Actually your wrong the moment you buy that cd its yours. That means physically and the music. HOWEVER even though you own the music to do with personnely anything you wish. EXCEPT you may not use it for public means. sharing,making copies to give to friends is not allowed. they are incorrect that you cant put it on your computer. the way the copyright law currently reads you MAY make copies ,put it on a mp3,computer etc. again riaa trying to make their own laws.

The ownership fo the music is not transfered to you upon purchase, therefore you do not own it. It is still the property of the copyright holder. They have granted you the right to listen to it for personal use, but you still won nothing but the physical media.

The ownership fo the music is not transfered to you upon purchase, therefore you do not own it. It is still the property of the copyright holder. They have granted you the right to listen to it for personal use, but you still won nothing but the physical media.

:blink: I don't get it.

The Supreme Court disagrees with you..

Garbage URL, is this what you were referring to?

Sony Vs Universal. Add a period to the end of the URL when you get the 404, Neowin forum software is stripping it out of the URL.

All the same, they're trying to rope in people who've ripped CD's they have sole ownership over but have never shared music files with anyone here. They will demand that you rebuy MP3's they've encoded. That is their business model, you must rebuy 70 year old music every time its encapsulation changes, whether it's a vinyl record, CD, or just a file of a particular encoding. Since they're starting to release non-DRM music, expect them to start looking for ways of identifying the source of any MP3 that ever was produced. If it doesn't have the RIAA stamp of approval, you've been stealing from them, even if you have the ORIGINAL CD SITTING ON YOUR DESK NEXT TO THE COMPUTER YOU'RE PLAYING IT ON!

And then there's the Vinyl you may have inherited that was never released on CD because its being held hostage by the corporate owner. There's more to heritage music than Best of the 40's compilations.

Heck, they'd like you to buy an AAC for your iPod and then an MP3 for your non-iTunes system at work. The only answer is to go independent if you are serious about escaping liability. There are good musicians out there who are self publishing, make sure you support them and buy their music. It's time to put Corporate Sponsored Culture to rest.

Our judicial system is based on precedence. If you get enough rulings in your favor, you don't necessarily have to have laws to enforce when you have a backlog of court rulings you can cite where dumb judges and confused juries have imposed penalties.

Edited by gollux

Honestly, why isn't the government stepping in? Can I have a real answer, if there is one. This is getting pretty big now and I think our leaders need to pay attention to it, none of the candidates have even touched base on this. I think they would get a pretty good increase in the early ~18 - 25 year old voters. I think it would show a great responsibility in our government, that we discipline the RIAA, showing that the government has control over some of the power hungry individuals down at the RIAA/MPAA.

Darn. I have made rips of several of my CDs on my computer for personal use.

I could not find a good "contact" page at RIAA.com, and could not find email contacts for any RIAA executives, so I just reported myself with their online form as a "physical" pirate.

Let's see if anything comes of this.

Darn. I have made rips of several of my CDs on my computer for personal use.

I could not find a good "contact" page at RIAA.com, and could not find email contacts for any RIAA executives, so I just reported myself with their online form as a "physical" pirate.

Let's see if anything comes of this.

Did you seriously do that....I hope you didn't, I know if something does happen, ripping a CD is NOT illegal, no matter what they say, but they could pull some ****...

Darn. I have made rips of several of my CDs on my computer for personal use.

I could not find a good "contact" page at RIAA.com, and could not find email contacts for any RIAA executives, so I just reported myself with their online form as a "physical" pirate.

Let's see if anything comes of this.

Based on your sig, I assume you are using Linux. It must be a real mess for you, especially for DVD and MPEG formats.

Darn. I have made rips of several of my CDs on my computer for personal use.

I could not find a good "contact" page at RIAA.com, and could not find email contacts for any RIAA executives, so I just reported myself with their online form as a "physical" pirate.

Let's see if anything comes of this.

i bet they are preparing to come to door now and arrest you ;)

Did you seriously do that....I hope you didn't, I know if something does happen, ripping a CD is NOT illegal, no matter what they say, but they could pull some ****...
Yes. I seriously did.
Based on your sig, I assume you are using Linux. It must be a real mess for you, especially for DVD and MPEG formats.
I haven't wanted to watch movies on my computer. I have a TV for that. But those Linux users who dare install decss may find themselves running afoul of the MPAA. DVD Jon was repeatedly found not guilty in Norway, but I don't know of any cases in the US to test the legality of that.

EDIT: To avoid taking this thread off-topic with the specifics of my reaction to this news, I made a soapbox rant thread instead.

P.S. In the article it says ok...so? Who is the RIAA? They are not the government, they are just a group of people, they don't make laws. If I put on my website "Every time you eat a candy bar, your fingers will fall off" and make that sound professional :rofl: then does that become law? No! Its just some cracked out people with too much money and big heads, they believe that they are the law and no one is going to stop them. We need the real government to get in on this.

They're not making laws up, they're stating existing law.

The physical media is yours, the stuff on it is licensed to you. You don't own it.

Exactly.

The Supreme Court disagrees with you.

I Believe that was just for betamax and VCR. This is CD's and MP3's.

If I can't rip CD's I purchase, then I've bought my last CD. I never play purchased CD's in my vehicle, I always rip 'em put the original up and burn what I want from it to throw in the truck.

i will rip my cds till the day i die nobodys gonna stop me from ripping my cds

& how the hell would they know if anybody rips cds they gonna start putting tracking devices on cds come on r.i.a.a is just a bunch of money hungry n/m i wont say how i feel without getting a warning

They're not making laws up, they're stating existing law.

Exactly.

I Believe that was just for betamax and VCR. This is CD's and MP3's.

Supreme Court decisions don't really decide the specific case that they are related to. They set precedents. The justices basically just say whether they side with the original decision or not.

Am I allowed to copy from CD to a tape to play in my old car stereo?

At this point it is unclear. The legality of you ripping a CD to your computer is currently unclear. The RIAA is pushing the issue that ripping one of your own CDs is illegal. But this hasn't been tested in court (up until now). I'm actually kinda surprised the RIAA is pushing the issue. It will be interesting to see how all this plays out.

the industry maintains that it is illegal for someone who has legally purchased a CD to transfer that music into his computer.

The industry's lawyer in the case, Ira Schwartz, argues in a brief filed earlier this month that the MP3 files Howell made on his computer from legally bought CDs are "unauthorized copies" of copyrighted recordings.

Okay. How about sueing Apple for allowing us to transfer music from our CD's to our iPods, or Creative, or any other mp3 player maker?

I don't want to always pop a cd in to listen to it. I'll rip it as FLAC if it's an album I really love, or just as a mp3 vbr, and voila, then I can transfer those on my ipod instead of always reinserting a CD and then transfering from cd to ipod or I can just open foobar and listen for hours.

RIAA/CRIA/mafIAA suck and should go down like SCO Unix

People have been copying from 1 form or another for their own use for over 30+ years. How can the music industry say you can't now? Doesn't the 30+ years of silence and allowance (unless I'm wrong, you could copy cassette tapes for your own use) void their bitching?

People have been copying from 1 form or another for their own use for over 30+ years. How can the music industry say you can't now? Doesn't the 30+ years of silence and allowance (unless I'm wrong, you could copy cassette tapes for your own use) void their bitching?

I think the RIAA should go to Greenland and freeze to death.

I thought they couldn't get any worse.

And if I remembered correctly, didn't they deem it 'illegal' for people to play music in the background? If so, then they can sue all of the malls, clubs, etc for that violation.

depend, cause (in the uk anyway) they need a special license to play music, have that then they are ok.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • For some reason I suddenly have the urge to go shopping at Sears.
    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
    • For a guy who claims to hate Farage and the ignorant, gullible, rightwing racist skinheads sponsored by Putin that his lies represent, you sure are quoting them time and time and time again, mate. I guess you're conveniently ignoring the fact that your country and commonwealth just happened to work much better when it was still part of the E.U.? Denial isn't just a river in Egypt.
    • Do you live in the U.K? Do any of the people here that are against the UK leaving the E.U, live in the U.K? If not then why are you bothered? If you do live here then it is a different thing . Brexit was a good idea, should have done it years before, it was done badly, but the idea was good. You are saying the same thing as remainers do, oh we did what Putin wanted, we listened to the lies and Farage. I hate Farage and never believed most of what he said, certainly did not believe the £350m a week for the NHS. But we did pay a lot of money to the E.U and yes some of it came back, but what is the point of paying it out for only some of it to come back? Get out of the E.U, no money to them and in theory we can use the money to do things in the country. I said in theory, but our governments are a total and complete waste of space. No matter what colour rosette they wear. You and others say it was a mistake and yet the two main parties in the U.K are not looking at rejoining the EU, I wonder why that is? I was not tricked by anyone. Makes no odds now, we are out and have been for 10 years, what we need is a decent government to run the country. All they do is shout at each other like a load of kids and seems to do nothing and make this country more into a police and nanny state. Getting more like China all the time.
    • 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q, 2TB T-Force G50, and 2TB WD My Passport SSDs drop to great prices by Fiza Ali Prime Day may be over, but there are still worthwhile storage deals available, including discounts on SSDs for shoppers who missed the event or are looking to upgrade their storage solution. Particularly, 2TB Western Digital My Passport, 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50, and 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD are selling at great prices with up to 23% off. The 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD with sequential read speeds of up to 5,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 4,500MB/s. The drive has an endurance rating of 1,300 TBW (terabytes written) and features a DRAM-less design. The company specifies a mean time between failures (MTBF) of 3 million hours. The drive includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader that helps dissipate heat without significantly increasing the drive's thickness. It also supports S.M.A.R.T. monitoring, allowing compatible software to monitor drive health and operating status. The SSD is rated for operating temperatures from 0°C to 70°C, with a storage temperature range of -40°C to 85°C. The drive is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 SSD: $269.99 (Amazon US) The TEAMGROUP MP44Q is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD that delivers sequential read speeds of up to 7,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 5,900MB/s. It uses 3D QLC NAND flash memory to provide 4TB of storage capacity for games, applications, media files, and other data. The drive has an endurance rating of 2,000 TBW and an MTBF of 1.6 million hours. The SSD features a DRAM-less design and supports TEAMGROUP's S.M.A.R.T. monitoring software, allowing users to monitor drive health, temperature, and remaining lifespan. For thermal management, the MP44Q also includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader. It is designed to operate at temperatures between 0°C and 70°C and can be stored at temperatures ranging from -40°C to 85°C. The SSD is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD: $478.99 (Amazon US) The 2TB WD My Passport SSD connects via a USB-C port using the USB 3.2 Gen 2 interface. It delivers sequential read speeds of up to 1,050MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,000MB/s through NVMe technology. In terms of security features, the drive includes password protection with 256-bit AES hardware encryption. The SSD is also designed to resist shock and vibration and is rated to withstand drops from heights of up to 6.5 feet. The recommended operating temperature range is 5°C to 35°C, while the non-operating temperature range is -20°C to 65°C. This drive is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 2TB Western Digital My Passport SSD: $279.99 (Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!