HDDVD group cancel CES press conference in wake of Warner announcement


Recommended Posts

This move is very odd to me. I don't understand how a $178 player with 10 free movies is being beaten over Blu-Ray's almost double price.

think about this, it is peer pressure, blu-ray is "cool" HD-DVD is not. People follow trends.

Since we'll never know that for sure (because of the payouts), I've been questioning why you're so sure of that. We didn't actually see anything with the PS3 and Blu-ray, at least nothing that wasn't tainted. We;ll never know.

Because at launch there was very little price difference between the PS3 and HD-DVD players, and within 6 months, many of the studios would have decided on which format they'd want to support. Standalone HD-DVD players at those prices back then would have hardly got enough people to buy them to actually match and even go past movies sales brought on by the PS3. To think otherwise, well.. Now if Toshiba had their players down to $199 by the time PS3 launched it could have been a different story. But they didn't, here we are now, everyone in this format war was offered money, the sales happened how they did. Maybe HD-DVD owners should have bought more discs.

think about this, it is peer pressure, blu-ray is "cool" HD-DVD is not. People follow trends.

youre right.

im still baffled by the decision... i realize HD DVD didnt have better sales and all, but from a cost standpoint... HD DVD is cheaper. i just dont get why people want to pay MORE for a very similar product.

Thank god the format war seems to be coming to an end. Blu-ray is winning because of PS3, no other reason. I'm a Blu-ray supporter but I admit it only is winning because of PS3. More dedicated HD-DVD players are sold then Blu-ray but because PS3 plays Blu-ray and there is almost 9million PS3's sold now there are more Blu-ray movies sold then HD-DVD movies.

Those saying PS3 isn't selling well, get over it. It is now. It's almost sold 9million, yes Xbox360 is killing it with 17.7million sold but it was out a whole year before. Lets not get into a console war the point is PS3 is selling decent numbers and is helping push Blu-ray.

Your not forced to pay 4x for a Blu-ray Player, wait and the prices will drop its bound to happen. No one is forcing you to buy one now while prices start at $399.

Edited by cloudstrife13
Because at launch there was very little price difference between the PS3 and HD-DVD players, and within 6 months, many of the studios would have decided on which format they'd want to support.

At launch, BD cheapest players were twice the price of the cheapest HD-DVD players. It took the PS3 to bring a cheaper BD player to the market.

Honestly I think HD-DVD can still win if attacks Blu-Ray on all fronts, Games, Movies, and Computer. Make the HD DVD Rom standard like the DVD-ROM. Sell HD DVD Roms for 100 bucks, and burners for 150.

Just My Idea, Seeing how This format over isnt just over movies.. I would hope.

It wouldn't make a difference, consumers aren't going to buy a drive just because its cheap when 3/4 of the market is leaning towards another format that won't work with those drives. Not to mention HDDVD is hands down the worst format when looking at computer only use. And they can't do anything regarding games because Microsoft tried to save a buck by not including an HD player by default, they can't all of a sudden start making HDDVD games, alienating the majority of its users. I suppose its a good move for them as HDDVD is about to hit rock bottom this year.

Only thing would be nice is if Blu Ray players dropped in price. I need to get one for my Dad so he stops stealing my damn PS3.

At launch, BD cheapest players were twice the price of the cheapest HD-DVD players. It took the PS3 to bring a cheaper BD player to the market.

I was referring to the PS3 launch. Hence, you know, including the word PS3 in that sentence. ;) Before PS3, HD movie sales across the board were basically nothing, which is the reason why BR took over in only a matter of weeks.

Also, this is a good idea:

"Speaking of doing what's right for consumers, we have an idea. Warner and the rest of the Blu-ray Disc Association should take the high road in the weeks ahead, and offer some kind of deal to HD-DVD enthusiasts as a nice gesture. It could be some kind of arrangement that allows them to exchange a couple of their HD-DVD movies for Blu-ray versions of the same title, or some kind discount on Blu-ray hardware and software. Think of it as a peace offering - a way to welcome HD-DVD consumers into the Blu-ray fold. It's just a thought we had, but we think it's something the BDA should seriously consider, to help put all this format war foolishness - and the acrimony it's inspired online - behind us."

http://www.thedigitalbits.com/index.html#mytwocents

I have had my ps3 for about nearly 2 months, i do not own 1 blu-ray title, and i never brought it due to the blu-ray player. To me the blu-ray player in the ps3 was a bit like a bonus that i recieved. I still believe blu-ray has one due to the fact that people think blu-ray is "cooler" than HD-DVD.

I was referring to the PS3 launch. Hence, you know, including the word PS3 in that sentence. ;) Before PS3, HD movie sales across the board were basically nothing, which is the reason why BR took over in only a matter of weeks.

Also, this is a good idea:

"Speaking of doing what's right for consumers, we have an idea. Warner and the rest of the Blu-ray Disc Association should take the high road in the weeks ahead, and offer some kind of deal to HD-DVD enthusiasts as a nice gesture. It could be some kind of arrangement that allows them to exchange a couple of their HD-DVD movies for Blu-ray versions of the same title, or some kind discount on Blu-ray hardware and software. Think of it as a peace offering - a way to welcome HD-DVD consumers into the Blu-ray fold. It's just a thought we had, but we think it's something the BDA should seriously consider, to help put all this format war foolishness - and the acrimony it's inspired online - behind us."

http://www.thedigitalbits.com/index.html#mytwocents

I'm kind of wondering if Toshiba and Sony aren't going to come to an arrangement that will somehow allow HD DVD playback in Blu-Ray players, as to the best of my knowledge the technology is there on most players. I doubt it'll happen because of all the hurdles, but just something to throw out there.

I was referring to the PS3 launch. Hence, you know, including the word PS3 in that sentence. ;) Before PS3, HD movie sales across the board were basically nothing, which is the reason why BR took over in only a matter of weeks.

I missed the PS3 part of your post, you're right. But as dead as HD-DVD was, so was BD.

And the PS3 was still more expensive at the time than HD-DVD players were, but it was a much cheaper option for BD for sure. The allure of the PS3 now is the speed of its load times for films and the fact it's conceivably upgradeable to profile 2.0 through firmware updates. If money allows for it, I may have to get one as a player. I would have hoped that BD players would have dropped in price more than the PS3, though, sine you are getting a games console also.

I'm kind of wondering if Toshiba and Sony aren't going to come to an arrangement that will somehow allow HD DVD playback in Blu-Ray players, as to the best of my knowledge the technology is there on most players. I doubt it'll happen because of all the hurdles, but just something to throw out there.

Maybe Toshiba will bring out some dual-format players. It'll be interesting to see what they decide to do.

I missed the PS3 part of your post, you're right.

Well without PS3, BD wouldn't have a chance of winning, everyone knows this really. The 20GB was around the same price as the HD-DVD players at that time, and more produced as well.

I doubt it. If Toshiba is going to bargain with Sony, they're either going to cave in and go Blu-Ray or they're not going to work with them at all. It'd be counterproductive to their cause to make dual-format players if it was obvious they felt HD DVD couldn't survive.

Toshiba should bring out a dual-format player and lead the charge. Make it affordable and it will sell. Regardless of what people say, consumers did buy HD-DVDs and this would be a great way for Toshiba to save face and still profit. If Sony refuses to make BD cheaper, Toshiba can get in there and still make some noise.

I still refuse to buy a PS3, though, even after this. Why? Because it tells Sony it's okay to force a format. Maybe Microsoft will come out with a BD add-on now.

When I first heard of this I honestly didn't know what I felt was more pathetic, the fact that the consumer is losing out horribly or the way "certain" members were calling out Boz... :no:

Honestly it's just sad...

And they can't do anything regarding games because Microsoft tried to save a buck by not including an HD player by default, they can't all of a sudden start making HDDVD games, alienating the majority of its users.

Actually interesting point. I wonder where the market would have swung had MS gone HD-DVD and the cost hadn't caused the hardware to rise too much. Surely HD-DVD would have had the advantage since it was the PS3 that really bolstered the BluRay sales and that took an extra year to arrive.

Anyway it looks to me like the wars likely over soon. I'm happy. The format I wanted to win looks like it will loose (HD-DVD) but in the end of the day I'd much rather there was one format sooner than not being able to even adopt a player because films I want are on both formats. Had dual players hit an affordable price then it wouldn't matter, but atm it looks like things will be in Blu Rays favour soon enough. Hell, maybe now I'll end up with a PS3.

As for prices, I still think they will go down. They have DVD to compete with along with the many manufacturers who will be selling HD players. As for HD-DVD's cost advantage. Yes the hardware cost were nice, but at least locally the media still cost the same amount so frankly the cost of a player is not that big an issue when the media itself is still expensive. The HD-DVD drives still cost $500AU upwards too for the base models which here makes the PS3 a better buy in my opinion. So it's only in some regions where HD-DVD has a price advantage anyway, here in Australia I'd be hard pressed to say either was offering particularly good value.

Well the HD-DVD support in their BR players would just be there so that people who own their format can still use the discs. It's useless if it makes the player cost too much though.

I get what you're saying, but my point is that Sony bargaining with Toshiba would allow Toshiba to make Blu-Ray players, and it would allow both to update the firmware to support HD DVD (if it's possible), which Toshiba would kill off (the format), so HD DVDs weren't still being created, but old HD DVDs would be playable. By doing this, it'd be a "good faith" gesture by the companies so that HD DVDs aren't useless.

...

I still refuse to buy a PS3, though, even after this. Why? Because it tells Sony it's okay to force a format. Maybe Microsoft will come out with a BD add-on now.

But MS is forcing DVD on you!

OH

MY

GOD

:o

Toshiba should bring out a dual-format player and lead the charge. Make it affordable and it will sell. Regardless of what people say, consumers did buy HD-DVDs and this would be a great way for Toshiba to save face and still profit. If Sony refuses to make BD cheaper, Toshiba can get in there and still make some noise.

I still refuse to buy a PS3, though, even after this. Why? Because it tells Sony it's okay to force a format. Maybe Microsoft will come out with a BD add-on now.

I've actually already sent an e-mail to all of the contacts at Toshiba I could find... suggesting they urgently work to produce a dual-format player and/or provide a sort of "replacement" path for the thousands of families who purchased an hd-dvd player this holiday season. That is, if they're going to throw in the towel.

I get what you're saying, but my point is that Sony bargaining with Toshiba would allow Toshiba to make Blu-Ray players, and it would allow both to update the firmware to support HD DVD (if it's possible)

Not possible though. A Blu-ray player can't play HD-DVDs with just a firmware update. It would need extra hardware to work, pushing up the price, basically making it a dual-format player.

I'm kind of wondering if Toshiba and Sony aren't going to come to an arrangement that will somehow allow HD DVD playback in Blu-Ray players, as to the best of my knowledge the technology is there on most players. I doubt it'll happen because of all the hurdles, but just something to throw out there.

Maybe they will, who knows, Sony already works with Toshiba for the cell.

It's like saying that a vintage Dodge Challenger that sells for $100,000 at an auction is not worth it because you can go to a dealership and pay $29,999 for a new one. :blink:

:laugh:

That's a GREAT anology!!

im still baffled by the decision... i realize HD DVD didnt have better sales and all, but from a cost standpoint... HD DVD is cheaper. i just dont get why people want to pay MORE for a very similar product.

Better marketing.

i aint over till the fat lady sings ;)

04-fat-lady-sings.jpg

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!