New Line Shifts to Blu-ray Exclusivity


Recommended Posts

:blink:

HD DVD "rings" better than "Blu-Ray", IMO

Being a part-time worker at a retail chain, people are more curious about Blu-Ray Disc than HD-DVD. The different name makes it sound like its something superior to HD DVD. I mean, HD DVD, to the average consumer, makes it sound like its a DVD but in higher quality. Blu-Ray sounds like something for the next-gen and far superior to HD DVD. Its no surprise that Blu-Ray is beating up HD-DVD in sales. Having the letters "DVD" in their name loses appeal because that word has been around for years and everyone knows what a DVD is, but not a Blu-Ray disc.

Being a part-time worker at a retail chain, people are more curious about Blu-Ray Disc than HD-DVD. The different name makes it sound like its something superior to HD DVD. I mean, HD DVD, to the average consumer, makes it sound like its a DVD but in higher quality. Blu-Ray sounds like something for the next-gen and far superior to HD DVD. Its no surprise that Blu-Ray is beating up HD-DVD in sales. Having the letters "DVD" in their name loses appeal because that word has been around for years and everyone knows what a DVD is, but not a Blu-Ray disc.

(Y) This is how I felt and what I would have expected.

If Paramount go Blu-Ray at CES, then that seals the deal for me.

I'm off to buy a Playstation 3.

I doubt paramount, but universal? We don't know what type of contract universal has, but we kinda know that paramount has a 18-month exclusivity deal.

Being a part-time worker at a retail chain, people are more curious about Blu-Ray Disc than HD-DVD. The different name makes it sound like its something superior to HD DVD. I mean, HD DVD, to the average consumer, makes it sound like its a DVD but in higher quality. Blu-Ray sounds like something for the next-gen and far superior to HD DVD. Its no surprise that Blu-Ray is beating up HD-DVD in sales. Having the letters "DVD" in their name loses appeal because that word has been around for years and everyone knows what a DVD is, but not a Blu-Ray disc.

One of my brothers works full-time at Best Buy (well, as "full-time" as you can get in high school -- he works probably around 6 hours a day; don't need anyone's negative input on that if they care to share any, thanks ;)), and he's had similar comments, but drastically different reasoning behind them. People ask what a "Blu-Ray" is, whereas they already can figure out that a "HD DVD" is a high-definition DVD. When people are informed that they're essentially the same thing, their responses tend to be 'Well what's with the stupid name?', to which they're informed of the blue laser for reading, and which they simply don't comprehend why you would name a disc after the laser that's used.

But you're exactly right -- everyone knows what a HD DVD is, and not everyone knows what a Blu-Ray is. But, my question is this -- how on earth is that an advantage? I've never seen (and, from his comments, neither has my brother) anyone indicate that "Blu-Ray" sounds like a higher quality. It just sounds different.

Well this makes the Netflix and LG set top box look even better. For those of us that don't watch a movie but once (or maybe on HBO later) it is best we don't buy either format. This will also kill video streaming to other TV's in your house because DRM and copy protection in Blue Ray will not let this happen. Also since Sony is part of Blue Ray if you plan on watching HD movies on your computer then you are in for "rootkit" hell. I look for streaming movies via cable or DSL to take off now. If they lower the prices per movie and increase the time allowed to watch the movie it will kill the the format war anyway. Cable companies and DSl companies have been enjoying this war and making out like crazy.

One of my brothers works full-time at Best Buy (well, as "full-time" as you can get in high school -- he works probably around 6 hours a day; don't need anyone's negative input on that if they care to share any, thanks ;)), and he's had similar comments, but drastically different reasoning behind them. People ask what a "Blu-Ray" is, whereas they already can figure out that a "HD DVD" is a high-definition DVD. When people are informed that they're essentially the same thing, their responses tend to be 'Well what's with the stupid name?', to which they're informed of the blue laser for reading, and which they simply don't comprehend why you would name a disc after the laser that's used.

But you're exactly right -- everyone knows what a HD DVD is, and not everyone knows what a Blu-Ray is. But, my question is this -- how on earth is that an advantage? I've never seen (and, from his comments, neither has my brother) anyone indicate that "Blu-Ray" sounds like a higher quality. It just sounds different.

They've been hyping "blue laser" dvds since 2002 or something like that. A lot of people know there is something new, and that it uses blue laser. Blue laser, blu ray... it makes HD-DVD look as if it didn't use the same technology

But you're exactly right -- everyone knows what a HD DVD is, and not everyone knows what a Blu-Ray is. But, my question is this -- how on earth is that an advantage? I've never seen (and, from his comments, neither has my brother) anyone indicate that "Blu-Ray" sounds like a higher quality. It just sounds different.

It doesn't sound like its higher quality, it sounds more next-gen and new. Remember, consumers love new things and I don't know about you, but choosing to name their next-gen format HD-DVD is like beating a dead horse (the dead horse being the word DVD). That is similar to them creating a format 15 years ago named HD-VHS. When something new comes out, people begin to ask questions and in all honesty, they believe its a better product because nearly every retail store promotes Blu-Ray more than HD-DVD and they demonstrate Blu-Ray demos more than HD-DVD.

If you buy a movie on DVD from Sony (or anything related to Sony), you get a nice add about Blu-Ray included in the DVD box and also a big Blu-Ray promotion before the preview....

That's marketing. If you did not know what Blu-Ray was, you sure know after that.

I have yet to notice any kind of add like that on a DVD to promote HD-DVD.

If you buy a movie on DVD from Sony (or anything related to Sony), you get a nice add about Blu-Ray included in the DVD box and also a big Blu-Ray promotion before the preview....

That's marketing. If you did not know what Blu-Ray was, you sure know after that.

I have yet to notice any kind of add like that on a DVD to promote HD-DVD.

Exactly! This is where HD-DVD is also faltering. I've yet to see any, if much, advertising at all. Be it posters, pamplets or on television. Hell, I've even seen Blu-ray advertisements before movies at the theater.

It doesn't sound like its higher quality, it sounds more next-gen and new. Remember, consumers love new things and I don't know about you, but choosing to name their next-gen format HD-DVD is like beating a dead horse (the dead horse being the word DVD). That is similar to them creating a format 15 years ago named HD-VHS. When something new comes out, people begin to ask questions and in all honesty, they believe its a better product because nearly every retail store promotes Blu-Ray more than HD-DVD and they demonstrate Blu-Ray demos more than HD-DVD.

Your comparison is apples and oranges. Why would you name a format HD VHS when it obviously was not? We're talking about the same physical type of format (discs), whereas DVD was a physical change from VHS. You can't compare the two in the least bit.

Oh man, some people just crack me up

<snipped>

You know I'd actually like to see that film in Hi Def >.< (Titanic that is)

HD VHS

Speaking of which, lets forget this stupid format war and go with D-VHS(Hi def on VHS)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D-vhs

Your comparison is apples and oranges. Why would you name a format HD VHS when it obviously was not? We're talking about the same physical type of format (discs), whereas DVD was a physical change from VHS. You can't compare the two in the least bit.

I wasn't comparing it; it was more of an analogy, albeit a bad one, I'll admit. I think my point was proven since a few people understood it and agreed.

This is the way I've always seen it. HD DVD is known MOSTLY among the nerded out crowd like us, and BD is known by even your average Joe.

Now I'm confused. Weren't the HD-DVD backers on this very forum stating "HD-DVD is the easiest for your average joe to catch onto due to the name" ... could have swore I read that multiple times?

Blu-ray nutheads can be nerds too. :p

Considering it is an issue with a minority of consumers [very, very, small minority] yet it is an issue with the vast majority of distributors, it makes sense that they would want to back a format that included region coding [for new releases]. I fail to see how this is an issue for debate because it really doesn't affect 90% of consumers.

So people actually like region encoding?

We don't, but New Line seems to like them. If you read the articles, New Line say that it's because of the lack of region coding that they did not put out many HD-DVD title...

You can have Rush Hour 3 on Blu-Ray, but it's not on HD-DVD.... And it's from New Line....

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      65
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      56
    5. 5
      monterxz
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!