• 0

Definitive Best Defragmenter 2008


Definitive Best Defragmenter  

866 members have voted

  1. 1. Your choice?

    • Auslogics
      54
    • DirMS/Buzzsaw
      1
    • Diskeeper
      184
    • JKDefrag
      101
    • Norton Speed Disk
      5
    • O&O Defrag
      119
    • PageDefrag
      1
    • PerfectDisk
      224
    • Vopt
      5
    • Windows Defrag
      97
    • Other (please specify below)
      75


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I like to use Windows built in (with tunexp) or simply now Ultimate Defrag Freeware Edition (Version 1.72)

More info can be located at Neowin:

https://www.neowin.net/news/software/08/05/...are-edition-172

  • 0

Well, I'm currently using Defraggler, which seems pretty effective to me.

I really liked Norton Speed Disc when I used to use Symentec products. It was my understanding that it organized the files based on frequency of use, therefore as time went on, you became fragmented less often.

  • 0
Well, I'm currently using Defraggler, which seems pretty effective to me.

I really liked Norton Speed Disc when I used to use Symentec products. It was my understanding that it organized the files based on frequency of use, therefore as time went on, you became fragmented less often.

DiskTrix UltimateDefrag does this as well. It puts least used files on the inner tracks and most used on the outer.

So my choises are:

1. DiskTrix UltimateDefrag

2. O&O Defrag 10

3. IOBit SmartDefrag

  • 0

Having used Diskeeper, PerfectDisk, Defraggler, JkDefrag and UltimateDefrag I must say that only UltimateDefrag really impressed me.

In the most recent versions Diskeeper and PerfectDisk have become too bloated (installing a bunch of services etc), previous versions of PerfectDisk were good, but v8 made me switch to something else.

Defraggler just seems to be too simple, and it doesn't seem to have any advanced placing algorithms. It's lightweight though, but it doesn't seem that different from the one included in Windows really. JkDefrag seems to be a tad better, although I don't like the "fully automatic" approach it uses.

UltimateDefrag on the other hand is lightweight (no services or startup entries) and provides a very good defragmentation engine, with a lot of different options like placing files on the fastest part of the disk, moving the least used files to the outer part of the disk and so on. Performance-wise, UltimateDefrag is the best I've tried so far. :)

  • 0
PerfectDisk, hands down winner.

Multiple reviews have put it past Diskeeper (I used to use it)

But PD just goes way past it (Y)

i used PD and it F*d my drive up and kept on giving me page fault errors.

  • 0
I stick to Auslogics free Defrag. It's never caused a problem, yet.

Well, then you might as well uninstall it because it does relatively the same job as Windows Defrag.

You want proof? Here's how.

1. Install VMware Server (free but you have to request a serial via online form which you receive via e-mail.)

2. Install Windows OS and desired applications.

3. Download the now free (Domain) version of UltimateDefrag and install it.

4. Install AusLogics Disk Defrag.

5. Make a virtual snapshot.

6. Analyze your virtual disk with UD, make a screenshot and save it.

7. Defrag with Windows Defrag. Take a pic of the defragmented HDD. Save it.

8. Revert to the snapshot and repeat step 7.

9. Compare the two screenshots.

Unless there have been significant code changes in AusLogics, the displays should look very similar as should the number of fragmented files left.

You can perform this procedure for comparison with any defragmenter since UD gives you the real-time true disk circular display.

  • 0

In my experience, there are NOT best defragmenter, all of them disappoint me.

I am still waiting for something good and smart, making all the job in real time (like Diskeeper) but moving things customized (like UltimateDefrag), and with a good off-line defrag (like PerfectDisk)

  • 0
In my experience, there are NOT best defragmenter, all of them disappoint me.

I am still waiting for something good and smart, making all the job in real time (like Diskeeper) but moving things customized (like UltimateDefrag), and with a good off-line defrag (like PerfectDisk)

I pretty well feel the same currently :/

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Windows 10 IoT LTSC is supported until 2032, Windows 11 LTSC until 2029. So oddly enough the Windows 10 version is supported longer.
    • Latest Rufus update improves new Windows 11 install method by Taras Buria Pete Batard, the maker of Rufus, a very popular app for creating bootable Windows (and other OS) media, has released a new beta version of its app. Rufus 4.15 beta is now out, and while it offers no new features, there are all sorts of improvements and fixes, including for the new Windows 11 installation method that was introduced in version 4.14 in early May. The "Silent Windows 11 installation" is a new feature whose goal is to automate operating system installation. All you have to do is boot from the drive, and then Rufus takes over, doing all things for you, such as setting up a new account, skipping ads and prompts, and more. It is a very handy tool, but initially, it had some bugs and issues that required addressing. With version 4.15 beta, Rufus is fixing that, particularly a bug with installation failing at 75%, crashes on Snapdragon X-based PCs, and more. Here is the changelog: Rufus 4.15 beta is now available for download from its GitHub repository. If you have never used Rufus before, you can check out our guide here. It is a very useful utility to have, as it allows you to deal with plenty of Windows 11's annoyances, which are still there, despite Microsoft's ongoing efforts to fix them.
    • Microsoft fixes one of Excel Copilot's most frustrating limitations by Usama Jawad Microsoft began integrating Copilot into Excel a couple of years ago and has been upgrading it with new functionalities since then. While some changes have been controversial, Microsoft is hoping to win over users by allowing them to be more productive via Copilot. To that end, it has now announced a Copilot improvement that may actually be appreciated by people who use it regularly. Excel customers often use the Copilot prompt box to issue instructions to format and customize their data, but it can become quite tiring to keep repeating the same instructions again and again. Microsoft now allows you to define Copilot personalization rules for formatting, naming conventions, formulas, and report styles. These can be accessed via Settings > Personalization, where you can explain your rules in natural language like "Always format currency in USD with no decimals", and just let Copilot take care of the rest. Microsoft is going a step further in this direction by allowing you to set workbook rules too. These rules are stored as a .Rules sheet, and are preserved while the workbook is shared. This fosters collaboration while making sure that standard rules govern the Copilot editing experience across the organization. Other advantages of this capability include pointing it to specific examples, defining dynamic formulas, and referencing an entire sheet and asking Copilot to infer rules based on that. You can leverage this feature by opening Copilot in Excel, clicking on "+", and selecting Create workbook rules. If you have an existing .Rules sheet, you can simply start listing the rules in column A as well. Personalization features are available to all Copilot in Excel users across the web, Mac, and Windows. Meanwhile, workbook rules are currently being previewed for Windows and Mac customers on the Insiders channel. General availability is scheduled after a few weeks, but a concrete date is currently unknown. Overall, the Excel capability is quite similar to ChatGPT's memory features, which allow you to permanently store items in the AI model's context window.
    • Imagine you still haven't discovered Total Commander that is doing all those things for three decades already...
    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      78
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!