Recommended Posts

Real or not, you gotta admit that that blue graphic isob> much better than the god-awful green/turquoise thing they use in Vista. WTF were they thinking?

Even still that godawful sidebar is a waste of space! I agree the Blue is better than green snot color they came up with. Heres hoping for something more creative ala the Office Ribbon running throughout some of the new user interfaces.

LOL! You guys are funny. I could photoshop a picture of a Vista desktop, photoshop the winver.exe and post it on here and call it Windows 7, and you would believe me. Unless you provide us with rocksolid proof that it is a Windows 7 beta, and not somehow part of Vista (there are rumor screenshots of "Vista SP2 Beta" out there), you are full of ****.

i didn't read the entire thread, but just looking at the shot...isn't windows 7 codenamed Vienna or Blackcomb? And when we were seeing EARLY builds of vista it didn't say Windows Vista it said "windows longhorn".

raise the bs flag on the shots....but iono, and honestly don't care at this point. No sense in getting all hyped and excited over a product that wont' be released for another year and MS won't even comment on at all because vista is still trying to get rolled out mainstream.

but...who knows, maybe vista is the new windowsME? something to keep everyone happy for a bit until a GOOD os comes out, but honestly i don't see what everyone complains about vista for. I run x64 vista ultimate and have had ZERO issues (well, compared to issues that i would/could happen in XP).

while this could be fake, my question is why would it be named "windows 7 ultimate"

sysabout.jpg

It just doesn't make sense to me... when we had longhorn builds, they wernt called "Windows longhorn home edtion" or Windows longhorn professional edtion. It was just simply "longhorn"

i didn't read the entire thread, but just looking at the shot...isn't windows 7 codenamed Vienna or Blackcomb? And when we were seeing EARLY builds of vista it didn't say Windows Vista it said "windows longhorn".

It was originally codenamed Blackcomb and that was gonna be "vista" Longhorn was originally gonna be a minor update to XP. Oblously that changed, the codenamed renamed blackcomb till like 2006 or what ever when it was changed to vienna. later in 2007 it was changed to windows 7 but still is called vienna. windows 7 is the enternal name. it was leaked...

idk i like windows 7 and hope they keep the final name at windows 7

For starters, Windows 7 is supposed to be Version 7.x on the winver.exe

source? Windows vista is version 6.0 so windows 7 will be 7.0. your talking about VISTA SP1 and thats gonna be 6.1

in that case, my bad. Still not convinced it's real. I'm not trusting anyone (even a mod) that these are real.

People dont believe Cream because hes a mod...they belive because EVERY time hes said a pic was real.....IT WAS!!......hes has a way of knowing since like 2000....why would it end now?

Faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaake!

<snipped>

while this could be fake, my question is why would it be named "windows 7 ultimate"

sysabout.jpg

It just doesn't make sense to me... when we had longhorn builds, they wernt called "Windows longhorn home edtion" or Windows longhorn professional edtion. It was just simply "longhorn"

Run winver in Windows Vista. Let me know what your banner says. Because mine says "Windows Vista Ultimate"

source? Windows vista is version 6.0 so windows 7 will be 7.0. your talking about VISTA SP1 and thats gonna be 6.1

Windows Vista SP1 will be 6.0.6001, not 6.1

No it isn't 7.x until it hits RTM. look at Vista during it's development it was always 4XXX and 5XXX. Then at 6000 it was rtm.

No. Vista was Windows Version 6.0 from the get go.

Why is this Windows 7 labeled 6.1? My guess is that right now they have forked the 7.0 kernel from winmain while they finish off Windows Server 2008, and these builds of Windows 7 are currently being built on top of the Windows Server 2008 kernel, hence they just bumped the major/minor version to 6.1 to differentiate it from WS2008. Expect 7.0's kernel to merge into winmain at WS2008's RTM and Windows 7 version identifier to really become 7.0

Edited by John S.
indeed and looking at longhorn/vista alpha...

lh_alpha_029.gif

while this could be fake, my question is why would it be named "windows 7 ultimate"

sysabout.jpg

It just doesn't make sense to me... when we had longhorn builds, they wernt called "Windows longhorn home edtion" or Windows longhorn professional edtion. It was just simply "longhorn"

Heh, look at the screen shot above the one I quoted from your mac+windows, then you'll see early builds of Longhorn were called something other than just longhorn. Infact it still said Longhorn XP Professional.

Wow, just because s/he's been right so far, doesn't mean they are right this time... Don't believe everything you see on the internet, images can be easily manipulated. You guys carry on, I see no one here is capable of proving that these screenshots are real.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!