Recommended Posts

Wow, just because s/he's been right so far, doesn't mean they are right this time... Don't believe everything you see on the internet, images can be easily manipulated. You guys carry on, I see no one here is capable of proving that these screenshots are real.

What could we possibly provide short of an actual build or video of Steve Sinofsky saying its real that would make you believe? Answer: Nothing, because you're being absurd.

The screenshots validate the earlier review, and both the review and the screenshots have been confirmed by highly regarded and longstanding members of "the scene." Moreover, they simply look legit, whereas 99.99999999999% of the fakes out there look absolutely amateur and outlandish. The screens just look in line with where an early alpha OS should be, and the little details add to that authenticity (no faker would go about making a screenshot labeled Windows 7 all over the place and then make the version number 6.1, for example)

You're being unreasonably skeptical for the sake of being an *******, and you're going to look even more like one sooner rather than later.

i really don't care what they name it. iono, i'm moving away from windows more and more it seems. my desktop is dual booted with vista and ubuntu and i have a macbook pro that i LOVE! it's not the problems that i'm having with windows, it's just the features and the way things work with leopard that i love. it was different at first, but with more use i am growing to use it more then i actually use my desktop.

either way...fake or not...what does it matter. until it's out everyone can speculate all they want. that's what is with everyone and vista imo. they got so hyped about what it would be like and how awesome it was...and it had some flaws and now people down it.

well windows 7 is just a codename. likie longhorn was vista (vista name was anouced in july 2005)

I know its fake because of the windows 7 ultimate. in the about box. please that right there tells you its fake.

You're a retard.

Run winver in Windows Vista. Let me know what your banner says. Because mine says "Windows Vista Ultimate"

Windows Vista SP1 will be 6.0.6001, not 6.1

No. Vista was Windows Version 6.0 from the get go.

Why is this Windows 7 labeled 6.1? My guess is that right now they have forked the 7.0 kernel from winmain while they finish off Windows Server 2008, and these builds of Windows 7 are currently being built on top of the Windows Server 2008 kernel, hence they just bumped the major/minor version to 6.1 to differentiate it from WS2008. Expect 7.0's kernel to merge into winmain at WS2008's RTM and Windows 7 version identifier to really become 7.0

1. not everyone has vista or vista ultimate and I was talking about the early builds of longhorn not the RTM vista :rolleyes:

2. we are talking about the about box that says windows 7 ultimate NOT "windows vista ultimate" ;)

3. 6.1 = Vista SP1 :yes:

Wow, suddenly everyone's a beta expert on Windows 7.

Agreed!

Do people even realize you be going through at least 18 months of beta testing? Right now, I am enjoying Windows Vista and all its great features, functionality and technologies. I don't see any need to look into Windows 7 right now since based on the screenshots its basically Windows Server 2008 with AERO enabled.

I can understand from an enthusiasm point of view, but I am doing CCNP right now and we are running Windows 2000 Professional with SP4 in the lab. We need to stop thinking of Windows as some sort of Pokemon game where its all about collecting them all. Its an operating system, albeit, a modern, multimedia operating system. But its still an OS that is basically a traffic cop for your applications and devices.

Lets not get into rushing this, lets focus on it taking its time to incubate and relevant and appropriate occasions where it will be shown discussed - WinHEC 2008, PDC 2008 and so on.

Agreed!

Do people even realize you be going through at least 18 months of beta testing? Right now, I am enjoying Windows Vista and all its great features, functionality and technologies. I don't see any need to look into Windows 7 right now since based on the screenshots its basically Windows Server 2008 with AERO enabled.

I can understand from an enthusiasm point of view, but I am doing CCNP right now and we are running Windows 2000 Professional with SP4 in the lab. We need to stop thinking of Windows as some sort of Pokemon game where its all about collecting them all. Its an operating system, albeit, a modern, multimedia operating system. But its still an OS that is basically a traffic cop for your applications and devices.

Lets not get into rushing this, lets focus on it taking its time to incubate and relevant and appropriate occasions where it will be shown discussed - WinHEC 2008, PDC 2008 and so on.

also enough with the bashing on the internet mac+windows, vista sucks, linux geeks who gives a damn. In the real world do we care what you like to eat, that you prefer mcdonalds over wendys that your right handed or that your in love with your nighboors dog. NO so why bring it to the internet especially to a place that doesn't tolorete it. (even though I see rude comments still on the forums weeks after they are posted.....)

They look just how the first windows seven builds should look like, and i think they could very well be real, the only problem i have is that they stuck windows 7 branding in all over, and if its as early of a build as we all think usually windows vista branding will be shown as they would not take the time to change small things like that till later.

If i recall windows vista builds still had many XP brandings in them till the later builds.

well windows 7 is just a codename. likie longhorn was vista (vista name was anouced in july 2005)

I know its fake because of the windows 7 ultimate. in the about box. please that right there tells you its fake.

1. not everyone has vista or vista ultimate and I was talking about the early builds of longhorn not the RTM vista :rolleyes:

2. we are talking about the about box that says windows 7 ultimate NOT "windows vista ultimate" ;)

3. 6.1 = Vista SP1 :yes:

1. Fine, talk about the early builds of Longhorn. Its not pertinent to the discussion. Windows 7 is being built off the Windows Vista codebase, not the pre-reset Longhorn code, including the branding code. Which means the code to identify different SKUs is there. All the images therefore have to be replaced in order for it to not show "Windows Vista Home Premium" on Windows 7 HP, for example, so why not take the extra five seconds to change the text in the image in photoshop? It probably helps the designers and coders easier identify what resource is what further along in development when final branding images are being made.

2. ...Yeah. I have no idea where you were trying to go with this.

3. No. Windows Vista SP1 = 6.0.6001, just like Windows Server 2008 will be 6.0.6001. The 6.1 change was a rumor that never materialized, which you can see from the fact that every single build of SP1 (as well as every post-Vista RTM build of Windows Server 2008) is version 6.0.6001

@statm1

If I would use only 1 gig, Vista would also reduce its memory-hunger, but now it has room, so vista uses it. im looking forward to an upgrade to 4 or 8 gigs.. and if i have 8 gigs, vista would use 2 gigs, i think. bcause it does not matter (mostly) anymore. i just installed stalker a few hours ago, and while installing, i got only 160mb ram free, means nothing worked smooth, not even my mouse-courser !

Go and read up on how superfetch actually works before making posts like that. The overhead of the OS is only about 350-400 MB, it is not as memory hungry as some people think

Minwin is not new, and as far as can be determined is in Vista anyway.

No, it isn't in Vista. MinWin will debut in Windows 7, the kernel in Vista is a rehashed version of the same NT kernel used in XP and 2000

Fake!, If it was real, I'd be annoyed that it's nearly the exact same to vista.

Why? it is an early alpha build, the coders at MS are not superhuman and to expect a vast myriad of changes so soon is just ignorant. If you are expecting the first alpha build to actually leak to be massively different to Vista you are going to be sorely disappointed because it will not be. Longhorn build 3683 was rather cool because although it was a bit rough around the edges, it also had a fair bit of new stuff in it, but you will not get the same wow factor with the early alphas of Windows 7 because the new kernel is in heavy development, meaning most of the earlier alpha builds will be mainly development concepts.

For starters, Windows 7 is supposed to be Version 7.x on the winver.exe

Incorrect, that is not necessarily the case, it depends on what branch of the windows kernel they are using. If they are currently using the kernel from Server 2008, then that would actually be kernel version 6.1

Wow, just because s/he's been right so far, doesn't mean they are right this time... Don't believe everything you see on the internet, images can be easily manipulated. You guys carry on, I see no one here is capable of proving that these screenshots are real.

Creamhackered has been alpha and beta testing for years, he has a lot of contacts inside of MS, and he knows what he is talking about. At the end of the day the only real ways of proving the build as real would be to either leak it, or get someone from MS on here to confirm it, and as the alpha is currently covered under NDA the chances are you will get neither. I don't know why you need to be an ignoramus about it, but he truth is that creamhackered knows what he is talking about.

This isnt real, its a early early build and it has WINDOWS 7 ? branding all over it, if i recall windows vista didnt have any branding that early.

That really doesn't mean anything, it is just a stupid generalisation.

umm i just find something missing on those things

post-246194-1201195036_thumb.jpg

where in that is the sidebar?

i just see the gadgets but where is sidebar?

post-246194-1201195088.jpg

also why the desktop says EVAL COPY

and on WinVer it dosnt say "this thing will die on DATEHERE"

for those lil things

those screens are fake

Lol

even my conecpts have those missing things on the "Real" screensho0ts

lol

check it out

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=615747

Edited by SaT117
Wow, just because s/he's been right so far, doesn't mean they are right this time... Don't believe everything you see on the internet, images can be easily manipulated. You guys carry on, I see no one here is capable of proving that these screenshots are real.

You really need to get off that high horse you're on and drop the immature attitude. You sound like a 5 year old kid. Stop trying to come off as an expert on Windows betas because you clearly have no clue what you're talking about.

Go look at early Longhorn builds. They all looked like XP and most of them even said Longhorn XP Professional because they were built using the XP Professional code until the code switch. Windows 7 looks like Vista because it's being built on top of it. All the major UI changes always come later down the line with only little changes before that. Just because the build number says 6.0 or 6.1, that doesn't mean it's not Windows 7. It will most likely have that 7.0 build number at RTM. Longhorn had build numbers in the 3.XXX, 4.XXX and 5.XXX range. Using your logic that would mean it's Windows 3, 4 and 5.

Also, go back and read through the forum from when Longhorn was all the rage and you'd see that creamhackered knows what he's talking about. Also if Chris123NT is who I think it is he would know what he's saying also and they both say these are real.

Stop trying to get real proof because anyone out there with Windows 7 M1 right now, that isn't suppossed to have it, is most likely too nervous to release anything. There's a reason the people that do leak stuff usually sit on releasing it for a little bit. Right now it's just too soon to start spreading copies of it everywhere.

I'm in no way an expert on Windows betas, but I learned a few things from the Longhorn period.

Edited by NightmarE D

Oh well...

First it was Vista sucks and XP is the OS of the GOD's... Strange i remember that from 98 -> XP migration..

Then Windows 7 screenshot's are fake... Strange i remember screenshot's from 2000, XP, Vista always being real when someone like cream confirms it, and it's soooooooo strangeeeeeeeeee that xp and vista development was like those screenshot's..lol..

Kids remember there are some of us who had pass all transitions since Windows 3.0.. So when someone like cream speaks respect that..

umm i just find something missing on those things

<SNIP>

where in that is the sidebar?

i just see the gadgets but where is sidebar?

<SNIP>

also why the desktop says EVAL COPY

and on WinVer it dosnt say "this thing will die on DATEHERE"

for those lil things

those screens are fake

Lol

even my conecpts have those missing things on the "Real" screensho0ts

lol

check it out

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=615747

It would be easier for all of us if you read through the entire thread instead of asking the same questions over and over again...

a) In Windows 7 the sidebar has been integrated into Explorer, and therefore miss the background ribbon and the configuration buttons on the desktop. In other words, you can add, or hide gadgets by right clicking on the desktop.

b) There will be no limited trial of this build until it hits the beta testers in the latter build stages. The M1 build is purerly for industry evaluation.

But hey, what do I know... you're the one photoshopping it right..?

No, it isn't in Vista. MinWin will debut in Windows 7, the kernel in Vista is a rehashed version of the same NT kernel used in XP and 2000

And minwin isn't based on previous code? This isn't Singularity. Minwin was mentioned years ago and then it was a project to break windows into easier to manage chunks, where has anyone said it is exclusive and new to W7 only?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-crFaYLW-xk

video... it might real :woot:

The video was uploaded by the same person who took the screenshots apparently. It looks perfectly real to me.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • KataLib 5.3.0.0 by Razvan Serea KataLib is more than just a music player — it's a complete audio suite designed for music lovers and creators alike. It combines a powerful audio player, a flexible metadata editor, a capable audio converter, and a music library manager into one streamlined application. Core Features: Audio Player Enjoy seamless playback of virtually any audio format or even streaming video files. DJ Mode lets you mix tracks with manual or automatic crossfades. You can also load and save WinAmp-style playlists for quick access to your favorite sets. Audio Converter Convert between a wide range of audio formats effortlessly. Trim or normalize your output automatically, and even extract audio from streaming video sources. Ideal for preparing files for different devices or platforms. Metadata Editor View and edit ID3v2 tags and other metadata. Batch edit multiple files at once, and fetch missing information directly from the MusicBrainz database. You can also apply or update album art with ease. Music Library Manager Organize your entire audio collection, search across tracks instantly, and download cover images from the internet — or use your own custom artwork. KataLib makes it easy to keep your library tidy and enriched with useful info. Supported Formats: KataLib supports a wide range of both lossy and lossless audio formats: Input: OPUS, AAC, FLAC, M4A, MP3, MP4, MPC, APE, AIF, MKV, AVI, MOV, FLV, WEBM, Ogg Vorbis, WAV, WAVPack, WMA, AC3, OGA, MP2, MPGA, MPEG, DTS, M4B, DSD (DFS) Output: OPUS, FLAC, M4A, MP3, Ogg Vorbis, WAV Under the hood, KataLib uses the trusted FFmpeg engine for audio conversion and media playback, ensuring compatibility with virtually all mainstream media formats. KataLib 5.3.0.0 changelog: Added Option to select the Zoom level of the Oscilloscope visualizer. The taskbar button of the app now displays the progress of its processing tasks. The metadata text of the Visualization Video can now be aligned by the user. We can now reorder the order of the Visualizers and Metadata, in the Visualization Video Setup dialog, by removing any item and adding it again. It will be added at the end. Changed The font size of the Visualization Video can now be more than 30 points. Updated yt-dlp library to version 2026... Fixed Opening the Visualization Video Setup dialog could fail if the settings were wrong. Sometimes there were false duplicates in the Rename Tracks dialog. Tracks without metadata appeared without title in the Recent menu. Download: KataLib 5.3.0.0 | 90.0 MB (Open Source) Links: KataLib Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • EA Sports UFC 6 review: Brutal, satisfying, and surprisingly accessible to newcomers by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe EA’s UFC series of fighting games has been putting out games for over 10 years now, but it’s a series I have never spent any time with. As a PC guy, the series being console-exclusive is the primary reason for that. The latest entry to the series, EA Sports UFC 6, is still not coming to PC, but I have an Xbox now. When EA reached out to see if I could have a crack at the game and give my opinion about it, I finally got the chance to see what this franchise is about. I have spent about a week playing UFC 6 on the Xbox Series X. Despite my lackluster skill with fighting games, I still have fun with entries like Street Fighter and Tekken. I quickly came to realize this is a different kind of fighting game, not the arcade titles I am usually dabbling with. Most of the week that I spent playing UFC 6 was in the career mode, trying not to get knocked out while slowly improving my combos and reactions. The review below will be from the perspective of a newcomer to the series and an amateur fighting game fan, so please forgive any mistyped lingo or series-staple mechanics I am not comprehending. In the Ring Getting a solid hit in UFC 6 is satisfying. It’s probably the most satisfying impact reaction I have seen in a fighting game. The ripples in the muscles, the spray of sweat (and blood), the meaty sound, and the subsequent stumble all carry a lot of weight. If I miss a heavy swing like that, though, I already know that I'm in for a world of hurt from the incoming counters. The fighting is a real treat. The actions aren’t as snappy as arcade titles, so a miss feels like a much bigger mistake here. This slowness did take some getting used to, but I felt the improvement in my abilities even after a few drills with basic punch and kick combos. If I’m not deliberate with my actions in the ring, whether it be a hasty retreat or a flying punch, the possibility of getting instantly knocked out is always there. The head, chest, and legs all come with their own health bars, so guarding just one area is just asking for trouble. A few hits to the head, and it's game over. Meanwhile, you won’t even be able to stay on your feet if they get damaged enough, drastically lowering the total amount of stamina available for the rest of the match. I was also encountering a large range of fighting styles to customize my own fighter with. There are a huge number of real-life superstars here from multiple eras. It’s not as exaggerated as Street Fighter or Tekken, but the way they move, evade, throw punches, or even take steps is based on their real-life counterparts. I can see this being a big draw for any mixed martial arts fan. One feature I was surprised to see here was the 'Flow State' ability. As rounds progress, a power-up meter can give a temporary boost to the unique fighting style of the selected fighter, essentially boosting what they are good at. There is an entire visual effect that kicks in when activating this, too. The surprising part was seeing something like this in a game that feels like it’s aiming to be more of a simulator than an arcade fighter. My skill level is too low to use this exactly how the game wants me to, so I ended up triggering it whenever the opponent did it as well. Streamlined vs Authentic When I first started it up, UFC 6 asked me about my experience with the series. Being genuinely new, I took its advice and opted for a lowered difficulty level and 'Streamlined' controls. Quickly, I realized that this wasn’t for me. My chosen fighters were throwing random attacks, no matter what combination the game was trying to teach me. Win streaks were happening, and I was already getting bored out of my mind just a few matches in. Turning off this mode and switching to 'Authentic' controls fixed everything right up. I was now able to control my fighter with more precision than I expected. I could control each arm and leg, which body part my attacks would aim at, and the fully customizable controls for setting up unorthodox moves were a cherry on top. None of these made me an expert at the game, but at least I was being beaten up fairly. This is not a point against UFC 6, though. Giving the option for anyone to enjoy the game is always a good thing in my eyes. There is a lot of customizability in the difficulty, with everything from slow-motion reactions to specific assists being offered as toggles. If I had a friend coming over and wanted to try a quick 1v1, the streamlined controls option is one I’d consider to make it a light and fun fight. The one part of the fighting that did not click with me was the grappling. Being taken to the ground brings in an entirely new control mechanism involving mounts and submissions that feel more like quick-time events than the heavy, tactical fighting I had seen so far while standing. The game wants me to hold sticks in certain directions to change the position or pull off submissions, trying to do the opposite actions of the opponent. Even though I tried to get used to this gameplay, it just felt like a momentum killer, and I eventually just wanted to get back on my feet to get back into the action. Legacy and Career It was UFC 6’s career mode that I wanted to play the most when I started it up. I grew up with EA Sports games, and taking my team from the ground to the top has always been my favorite task. UFC 6 has that same option but also offers a more cinematic entrance to the career experience than I expected with ‘The Legacy’ mode. This mini-campaign follows an up-and-coming fighter, Chris Carter, who is attempting to reach the heights his father had reached in the sport. Starting with a small-time gym and coach, the story follows both his growth in the space as well as the growing rivalry with a friend and fighter, Danny Lopez. The fights in this mode are very good at introducing a newcomer like me to the sport and its varying techniques. Cinematics land between the major fights, showing the growing tension between the two fighters as the years go by, feeling the pressure to not miss out on the hard-earned chances. The dialogue can be a little corny at times, especially when the bar fights kick off, but I largely enjoyed the storyline. At the end of it, I was pretty much familiar with all the mechanics of the career mode, unlocking new skills and moves, and how I needed to approach fights, both outside and inside the ring. This story mode isn’t a very lengthy one, so don’t expect an hour-long campaign. Once the conclusion is reached, Carter’s journey continues as if it’s a normal career playthrough, though I decided to start over from scratch now that I have some know-how about the basics. The career mode is very streamlined, which is to be expected considering there isn’t a team to manage like in other EA Sports games. It’s the journey of one fighter. When a fight comes up in the calendar, I could choose how many weeks I dedicate to preparing for it at the gym. A longer prep time gives the opportunity to get my fighter’s fitness up (giving a bonus during fights), earn more money and points for unlocking new skills, and gain more fans to fast-track the rise to stardom. While that sounds like a lot of things to manage, it’s more like a few clicks. There is a social media menu that sometimes pops up with canned replies I can send to fans, and the sponsors are once again a single click away from being assigned as finished. It’s the training aspect that adds a gameplay angle. Using the money from winnings and sponsorships, I was hiring different types of trainers and learning fancier moves to use in the ring. One small thing I appreciated was that it was possible to injure each other during these training sessions. If a trainer goes down in a bad way while sparring, they won’t be available for the remainder of training. If my fighter is injured, it takes valuable time and resources to heal and recuperate. Just like in real life, it makes sense not to go so hard during training sessions and save that energy for the main event. Every training or sponsorship activity I took part in used up the days and weeks I had before the next fight, bringing a balancing element to the whole ordeal. There were times I simulated most of these to just get to the next fight, but the grind for gaining even the slightest bit of advantage while trying not to overdo it is an enjoyable one. Outside of quick fights and career modes, UFC 6 also introduces an almost museum-like mode to explore a trio of fighters considered to be legends of the sport: Max Holloway, Alex Pereira, and Zhang Weili. The aptly named Hall of Legends mode is unlike everything else seen in the game. Each of these fighters has entire levels dedicated to them that I could walk around in and explore their journey into the UFC. This includes footage from real-life fights and interviews about their original inspirations and training methods. Each of these spaces is almost like an interactive documentary. Once the highlights are done, the mode offers the opportunity to take over a deciding fight from the superstars. It’s an impressive transition. Going from the real-life televised event with crowds and commentary to immediately taking over in the game has some real hype behind it. Performance and visuals It’s clear to see that UFC 6 is going for a photo-realism look with its visuals compared to any other fighting game. The fighters don’t look great in selection screens. But inside the arenas, under the flood lights, surrounded by crowds, and facing an opponent, the visuals are more than impressive. As ghastly as it is to witness, things like blood spraying into the mat and muscles reddening as they get pummeled keep improving the immersion. The fluid animations help sell the illusion even further. A missed kick carries the momentum to require a corrective step. Hard punches that glance off blocks give off the air of a hit that still took some wind off the opponent’s guard. The special moves with flips and spins look mega awkward when missing, just as they do in real life. Suffice to say, the Frostbite Engine powering this game is one of the biggest strengths of EA development studios. Playing on the Xbox Series X, the 60 FPS gameplay did not miss the mark or cause any slowdowns that I could detect. I still wish this series were on PC to see just how far the developer can push the engine. One area I continue to have issues with, surprisingly enough, is the menus. The game has fast loading screens, but almost every menu I click through has a large amount of noticeable lag before it registers. This is immensely painful in the career mode, since I have to go through multiple menus between fights to train and do sponsorships, and having a 3-second pause when selecting a simple move between pages is the only time that made me quit the game. Thanks to Xbox’s quick resume, though, I was able to instantly jump back in the next day to the same point (and wade through more laggy menus). Conclusion My primary mission going into this EA Sports UFC 6 review as a newcomer to the series was to find out if this is a good jumping-in point for someone like me. Suffice it to say, the game passed that test with flying colors. Despite the high skill ceiling, the legacy mode introduction campaign, multiple types of accessible controls, and streamlined career had me picking up the basics and fighting styles much faster than I expected. I wish I had gotten to try out competitive multiplayer during my time with the game, too, but the lack of players in the pre-release version prevented this. The impressive visuals and animations, coupled with the impact physics that let me feel every punch and kick easily, made this the most immersive fighting game I have played. The only part that gave me pause was the grappling gameplay, which killed the momentum in most fights. The Flow State amplifying system didn’t hamper the experience, but I also felt like it made more sense for an arcade fighter, not this. Easily the most annoying thing about UFC 6 was its laggy menus, which I hope get some sort of fix later. Returning series veterans might have a completely different experience from me. But for a new fan like me looking to climb ranks and see fighters get floored in spectacular ways, UFC 6 doesn’t miss a step. EA Sports UFC 6 is releasing on June 19 across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. Ultimate Edition owners can already jump in via advanced access. This review was conducted on the Xbox Series X version of the game provided by EA.
    • No, Microsoft is obviously just spending money on maintaining a product with 0 users.
    • I disagree here sorry. The majority of their customers are corporations who are locked in to their eco system and have no choice. Private individuals don't contribute that much to their income.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Contributor
      MarkHughes4096 went up a rank
      Contributor
    • Dedicated
      jordanspringer earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rookie
      Rimplesnort went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Markus94287 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      94
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      79
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!