Vista SP1 'on schedule' for March RTM


Recommended Posts

With a major launch event next month serving as an unmovable anchor for Microsoft at this point, the ancillary launches for Vista Service Pack 1 and XP SP3 would probably raise suspicion if they were delayed.

A group of 15,000 private beta testers received what's being called "RC Refresh 2" of the release candidate for Windows Vista Service Pack 1, Microsoft confirmed to BetaNews this morning. Numbers for the actual release candidate or the beta number, judging from Microsoft's recent correspondence with us, are no longer being used, which could lead some to believe that this may not be the final "refresh" coming down the pike.

Source Beta News

Continued http://www.betanews.com/article/Vista_SP1_..._RTM/1201280378

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/615886-vista-sp1-on-schedule-for-march-rtm/
Share on other sites

I really doubt that the release will be delayed till March.

From the progress I'm seeing and since all the 'evaluation...' blurbs and the time bomb being removed from Vista SP1 Refresh 2. I would guess the release of Vista SP1 is imminent and not at all a month or more away.

I dont think it will take six years, it's only a Service Pack, Microsoft want to make sure it doesn't make things worse, but things are better, much better, it's gonna shut the Vista bashers up, no doubt

I've testing it and there a vast inprovements in performance.

Applications load faster, boot and shut down times are increased so there no waiting for lenghty periods of time.

If your able to test it, have a go, if not then you'll have to wait until the release.

I've seen better application compatibility / marginally better performance and an improved experience.

I think that Vista SP1 is not as ambitious as it could have been, but it's a solid release.

If it fixed boot times to be on par with XP and copying files (bug) time fixed then i will switch.

On my C2D 2.4 GHz with 4GB DDR and WD SATAII I have always had faster boot times with Vista than with Windows XP. Go figure.

Still, is it better than the Vista RTM? More importantly, though, is it as good as/better than Windows XP?

Yes Vista SP1 is a vast improvement over Vista RTM.

For me Vista RTM was just a little short of being better than Windows XP (mostly due to poor drivers) but as of Vista SP1, IMHO, is clearly a better operating system.

Because Microsoft reset development of Windows Vista it caused them to be behind in a major way and they had no time to mak it as good as it should have been.

Had they not reset development then Windows Vista would have shipped on time and included everything planned for it.

had it been released when originally planned then we would be looking at the successor being released about this time now.

But i think Windows Vista is a worthy successor to Windows XP and worth the upgrade.

I've been using Windows Vista Ultimate (genuine) since 2006 and sure there have been issues ie lack of drivers, application compatibility, reliability and performance but some of that isn't purely down to Microsoft.

If you think about it third party software creators like Cyberlink, Norton to name a few have had plenty of time to make sure their applications were fully compatible and drivers were available at launch.

But instead of boycotting them we're blaming Microsoft for all of the problems just because we use software and devices on the platform.

We all know that Windows Vista has had issues but tell me are the really that bad?

Edited by Windows Tester
If it fixed boot times to be on par with XP and copying files (bug) time fixed then i will switch.

The boot times depend machine-to-machine. On mine, XP and Vista boot in the same amount of time. Also, the file copy bug was fixed in a patch MS released a little while ago. It works, too.

SP1 won't be a big deal and it won't convince business users to switch to it from a perfectly good XP install base. Just like the Office 2007 SP1 didn't really do much to improve Office 2007. The Service Pack will be a 65 meg download for anybody who already has an updated RTM not a big deal.

Sigh...business may switch when they need more memory and Vista 64 will start looking neccessary then.

I've had this installation of Vista installed for 8 months and it's the first time I haven't felt the need to reformat the computer when a new SP comes out.

Vista still feels as quick today as it did 8 months ago. I also have no problem installing betas of the service packs and even un-installing them in order to install a new beta!

I've had this installation of Vista installed for 8 months and it's the first time I haven't felt the need to reformat the computer when a new SP comes out.

Vista still feels as quick today as it did 8 months ago. I also have no problem installing betas of the service packs and even un-installing them in order to install a new beta!

yeah, one thing i have noticed is that the speed of boot and the os generally doesn't seem to be degrading over time like it did in xp.

yeah, one thing i have noticed is that the speed of boot and the os generally doesn't seem to be degrading over time like it did in xp.

Yeah I have noticed this too, vista still boots in like 30-40 seconds and I haven't noticed any performance degradation like I would with XP.

Sigh... it hasn't RTM'd yet. So unless you have a bit torrent from the future, it has not.
ohh trust me it has!

I won't say anything about my sources, but:

Microsoft Windows Vista Service Pack 1. X86. ENGLISH

FILE: Windows6.0-KB936330-X86.exe - 455,562,200 bytes

MD5: d597866e93bc8f80ecca234c4e9ce5a2

;)

Edited by b0m8er
ohh trust me it has!

I won't say anything about my sorces, but:

Microsoft Windows Vista Service Pack 1. X86. ENGLISH

FILE: Windows6.0-KB936330-X86.exe - 455,562,200 bytes

MD5: d597866e93bc8f80ecca234c4e9ce5a2

;)

Except Brandon works for Microsoft, and you do not. There are many out there claiming that since the RC Refresh 2 contains no significant bugs, and removes the evaluation copy watermark it MUST be RTM. The reality, however, is that until Microsoft marks a build as RTM (which, Brandon has said they haven't yet) it ISN'T released to manufacturing and a done deal.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!