Vista SP1 'on schedule' for March RTM

[b0m8er]

Except Brandon works for Microsoft, and you do not. There are many out there claiming that since the RC Refresh 2 contains no significant bugs, and removes the evaluation copy watermark it MUST be RTM. The reality, however, is that until Microsoft marks a build as RTM (which, Brandon has said they haven't yet) it ISN'T released to manufacturing and a done deal.

ok, let's all wait till it's announced and compare md5s then ;)

and one more thing - I don't know if you noticed, but build number I posted is different from RC2 Refrech ;)

With all due respect to Brandon - he's tied by NDA, and can't confirm RTM until it's announced...

[fishrman]

ok, let's all wait till it's announced and compare md5s then ;)

and one more thing - I don't know if you noticed, but build number I posted is different from RC2 Refrech ;)

With all due respect to Brandon - he's tied by NDA, and can't confirm RTM until it's announced...

I haven't signed into Connect in ages; much less bothered to care about specific numbers. Enjoy your MD5 sum comparisons, but I reserve my right to be doubtful of the RTM build having already been marked.