I will not buy Windows 7 unless it has ... *Feature*


Recommended Posts

We all know that Microsoft keeps tabs on Neowin, perhaps some of the Redmondians / Microsoftians even take some of our feedback to heart.

So in that spirit, what feature must be present in Windows 7 or you will refuse to buy it?

For me it's:

Virtual Desktop.

But it needs to have a live preview of what's happening in each Virtual Desktop and it must be customizable.

The reason for demanding it is simple, I spend a fair bit of time at work either working on or fixing iMac's and Mac Pro's. Quite a few have OS X 10.5 and my favorite feature of OS X 10.5 is 'spaces', basically a Virtual Desktop feature. I really like assigning applications to a specific Virtual Desktop. Essentially what I have grown accustomed to is having my Firefox run in full screen in 'space' one, Email Client in 'space' two, 'Utility' tools in 'space' three and 'space' four is for anything else.

Without a capable and well implemented 'Virtual Desktop' feature in Windows 7, I refuse to buy it.

windows 7 should not order folder contents according to what it thinks its best.

If i decide that i like viewing avi's in a list, each time i visit a folder with avi's they should be in a list. They should not appear as thumbnails or anything else. All ms os's to date including vista lay out folder contents the way they want, not the way i - the user want. Its so annoying to have to go in each time and set the view accordingly.

Ridiculous.

windows 7 should not order folder contents according to what it thinks its best.

If i decide that i like viewing avi's in a list, each time i visit a folder with avi's they should be in a list. They should not appear as thumbnails or anything else. All ms os's to date including vista lay out folder contents the way they want, not the way i - the user want. Its so annoying to have to go in each time and set the view accordingly.

Ridiculous.

(Y) Totally agree with you there. I get so annoyed when XP or Vista decides how best to view whatever content I have. I want that gone.

Maybe Explorer can suggest in a 'not in you face' way how the folder could be viewed but leave the option to the user.

For me the feature is winFS. If gmail is using labels for things instead of folders, then why can't operating systems?

If i decide that i like viewing avi's in a list, each time i visit a folder with avi's they should be in a list. They should not appear as thumbnails or anything else. All ms os's to date including vista lay out folder contents the way they want, not the way i - the user want. Its so annoying to have to go in each time and set the view accordingly.

Set up a folder how you want it.

then goto:

Tools -> folder options -> View -> Apply to all folders

;)

Set up a folder how you want it.

then goto:

Tools -> folder options -> View -> Apply to all folders

;)

yeah but that will unconditionally set all folder views to the view type i have chosen for that folder, i want to selectively choose how to view certain filetypes, eg i like viewing music as tiles, images as thumbnails, videos as a list, etc...

windows should accept what i have chosen and not revert back to what it thinks is best every time.

they should focus on less boot times (comparing it to a iMac), i think they should scrap AERO, yes i said it, and make a nicer design which will appeal alot to the buyers and this time, reduce the amount of ram and CPU used just for that, umm..better multicore support. more back up opions, more support for 64 bit. now this one ima give them an idea, have an IN Built or a standalone purchase Microsoft anti-virius, that would get them truck loads of money especially with their name, and if its in the windows 7 it would be the best thing, especially when you have to format etc, its alwaysthere so you have protection. and yeah. i cant think of anything else atm. but i will buy windows 7 anyways.

We all know that Microsoft keeps tabs on Neowin, perhaps some of the Redmondians / Microsoftians even take some of our feedback to heart.

So in that spirit, what feature must be present in Windows 7 or you will refuse to buy it?

For me it's:

Without a capable and well implemented 'Virtual Desktop' feature in Windows 7, I refuse to buy it.

Microsoft already gets slated for ani-trust issues by including so many features in its bundle.

try:

http://www.codeplex.com/vdmhttp://shock-4way-3d.uptodown.com/en/

alternately

http://search.live.com/results.aspx?q=virt...manager+windows

There are seriously plenty of them out there.

For me, the only thing windows version whatever needs out of the box is a useable interface and the ability to add/remove modules that make my digital life simple.

It pretty much has to have a task bar, a start menu, a desktop and a file explorer.

Make it slim, make it cheap, make it functional and customizable- by all means, sell me optional add ons (such as IIS or even windows media player).

Multiple Monitor needs to have better support, taskbar, screensavers, backgrounds.

Not as good or as much UltraMon but at least basics.

Make the small popup in Office 2007 ie when select text etc, system wide like select folder gives copy, paste into, print etc depending on folder or file.

windows 7 should not order folder contents according to what it thinks its best.

If i decide that i like viewing avi's in a list, each time i visit a folder with avi's they should be in a list. They should not appear as thumbnails or anything else. All ms os's to date including vista lay out folder contents the way they want, not the way i - the user want. Its so annoying to have to go in each time and set the view accordingly.

Ridiculous.

+1

For me, the only thing windows version whatever needs out of the box is a useable interface and the ability to add/remove modules that make my digital life simple.

Make it slim, make it cheap, make it functional and customizable- by all means, sell me optional add ons (such as IIS or even windows media player).

I don't think this will happen, but it would be great. I'd love to have a "Windows Seven Basic Lite" version that is stripped down to only the explorer, a basic image viewer and a few necessary services but will then cost nothing more than 30$. Great.

Further features I'd like to see:

  • virtualization for running old Windows apps
  • built-in theme support
  • a filesystem that doesn't fragment (applies that to WinFS?)

I'd really like to see:

  • Wallpaper changer (I currently use Wallpaper Master, but I'd like to see something similar built-in)
  • Stop rearranging folders by what it thinks is best. This is annoying, especially in My Music, where it keeps rearranging most of the album folders into regular music folders.
  • An OS is meant to be secure, right? So how about bundling Windows Defender and Windows Live OneCare in Windows 7? That would increase the sales!
  • Bundle Office into Windows 7 (or at least a minimal version)
  • Include better games. You can only enjoy Minesweeper for so long. :D
  • Keep all the Vista features, but give it performance like XP, or better.
  • Automatic defragmentation tool.
  • The ability to use custom themes right out of the box, without having to download a modified uxtheme.dll.

The ability to select basic or advanced installation... please!

a. Basic mode: about the same way Vista is installed, the most quick/unattended installation possible

b. Advanced mode: you can select every component you want to install, every service you want to activate, with a few recommended settings: preset for office, preset for gaming... Another method could be Windows 7 ask you... but maybe is more tedious.

I will not buy it unless it gives me almost 100 % performance out of my hardware. Unlike Vista which as compared to XP gives lower performance from my graphics card in games. And the same with the hard disk. While copying files, sometimes it seems like I'm using a very ancient low RPM HDD, where as I have 2 160 gb 7200 WD HDD with 8 mb cache each. So yea, we buy the hardware and we want to utilize it to the fullest extent please.

I'd like an option to see drives mounted on the desktop (like OS X or various linux distros).

Also, some sort of a LIGHTER theme, or at least 3 or more options like XP had.

ON xp and vista couldnt you just create shortcuts for the drives and put them onto the desktop by right clicking on the drive and creating a shortcut?

For me Windows 7 needs to be modular...

Install the basics, as mentioned here start menu, task bar...etc.. just the small bits and pieces to make teh PC run. Have ability to add/remove anything else...

I only use windows at home for gaming, so less system resources for the OS and more performance to games :p

Oh and reduce the footprint..and OS should not take 15Gb (even XP takes 1.5Gb) and OS should be small.....

1. Improve performance over Vista.

2. Modular install for space savings and ease of backup. (I don't need every language installed)

3. Make it easier to migrate settings to new machine.

4. Complete overhaul of the search feature (schedule, index filenames only, index right now, etc.)

5. An actual File Manager like Directory Opus 9.

I'm shocked at how little has changed from XP to Vista after 5 years of working on it so I don't have high hopes for Windows 7.

How about...

- Decent anti-virus security. Or write the OS so it can't get viruses. Far fetched, but it'd be nice.

- Built in theme support. Which is why I love Linux; you can make it look like anything.

- A partitioner that actually works during install. Cuz I don't know how many times I've installed XP and it hasn't been able to detect my Linux drives (which it should) or my OS X drives.

- Doesn't make me feel like downgrading to Vista, or XP for that matter.

For me Windows 7 needs to be modular...

Install the basics, as mentioned here start menu, task bar...etc.. just the small bits and pieces to make teh PC run. Have ability to add/remove anything else...

I only use windows at home for gaming, so less system resources for the OS and more performance to games :p

Oh and reduce the footprint..and OS should not take 15Gb (even XP takes 1.5Gb) and OS should be small.....

Yay, thats two of us - I don't game as much as I used to, but windows is bundled with a helluva lot of stuff that I don't need, nor would I ever.

Its more the cost I'm thinking of tbh - I need 3 licenses of vista for myself:

  • laptop - work mainly so doesn't need any of the gaming stuff
  • main rig - OK this is the one where most modules would be required so the current "home premium is great here"
  • media center - this is my biggest bug bear I have to admint - I fork out ?100(ish) for an OS where all I use is WMC.

We need a minimal windows that is just a hub and like I said before, make all the other stuff available at extra cost (or free for download)if it was only ?50(Retail - cheaper for OEM) for the OS, but then cost be an extra ?25 for WMC I'd be happy, its the way the cost is ramped up for things I don't use or need.

[/rant]

Personally I'm not going to invent a reason not to buy it. I'll probably pick up the ultimate version when it comes out.

Wow you should at least get the Megaultrazord Green Ranger version..... I mean the Ultimate version will be equal to Vista Home Basic......

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • What they really need to do is automatically spell "loses" and "lose" correctly since nobody seems to know how to anymore. Then they blame spellcheck/autocomplete and don't realize autocomplete is just filling in the word for them automatically so it was misspelled in the first place.
    • If someone chooses to continue using SB and therefore goes through the manual intervention in the thread, afterwards the BSOD problem is gone. Whether they then re-enable the task doesn't matter, they're done, though on such machines it might pay to keep it disabled in case the next update (if there is a next) causes the same problem. OTOH, if someone disables SB in the BIOS, the problem is also gone. Incidentally, I noticed that this task exists even on machines that don't support SB. It's just installed across the board...and runs. Doing what on such machines is a little hazy.
    • qBittorrent 5.2.2 by Razvan Serea The qBittorrent project aims to provide a Free Software alternative to µtorrent. qBittorrent is an advanced and multi-platform BitTorrent client with a nice user interface as well as a Web UI for remote control and an integrated search engine. qBittorrent aims to meet the needs of most users while using as little CPU and memory as possible. qBittorrent is a truly Open Source project, and as such, anyone can and should contribute to it. qBittorrent features: Polished µTorrent-like User Interface Well-integrated and extensible Search Engine Simultaneous search in most famous BitTorrent search sites Per-category-specific search requests (e.g. Books, Music, Movies) All Bittorrent extensions DHT, Peer Exchange, Full encryption, Magnet/BitComet URIs, ... Remote control through a Web user interface Nearly identical to the regular UI, all in Ajax Advanced control over trackers, peers and torrents Torrents queueing and prioritizing Torrent content selection and prioritizing UPnP / NAT-PMP port forwarding support Available in ~25 languages (Unicode support) Torrent creation tool Advanced RSS support with download filters (inc. regex) Bandwidth scheduler IP Filtering (eMule and PeerGuardian compatible) IPv6 compliant Available on most platforms: Linux, Mac OS X, Windows, OS/2, FreeBSD qBittorrent 5.2.2 changelog: FEATURE: Use D-Bus to show file in file managers (Chocobo1) #24340 BUGFIX: Fix friendlyUnitCompact precision calculation (vafada) #24323 BUGFIX: Remove all top-level folders (glassez) #24333 BUGFIX: Use proper API for checking exit status (Chocobo1) #24349 BUGFIX: Delete stale lockfile when hostname mismatch (TurboTheTurtle, glassez) #24363 BUGFIX: Fix wrong removal procedure of watched folder paths (Chocobo1) #24413 BUGFIX: Don't reannounce before interface changes are applied (glassez) #24447 BUGFIX: Use Latin script for Bosnian locale name (Andy Ye) #24342 WEBUI: Fix performance of global checkbox toggling (tehcneko) #24316 WEBUI: Fix Safari transfer list header misalignment (Piccirello) #24377 WEBUI: Fix error when submitting magnet before metadata loads (Piccirello) #24378 WEBUI: Use correct row id when updating Rss Downloader feed selection (Chocobo1) #24402 WEBUI: Use SameSite=Lax for session cookie to fix cross-site login (Piccirello) #24422 WEBUI: Bring back properties panel expand/collapse button (vafada) #24430 WEBAPI: Only use X-Forwarded-Host header when reverse proxy support is enabled (Chocobo1) #24457 RSSS: Fix "RSS Smart Episode Filter" RegEx (nathanon-akk, glassez) #24398 RSS: Fix previously matched episode format (glassez) #24452 WINDOWS: Fix Python fallback search path (TurboTheTurtle) #24325 WINDOWS: NSIS: Allow to install x64 binary on ARM64 (Chocobo1) #24358 Download: qBittorrent 5.2.2 | 41.1 MB (Open Source) Download: qBittorrent 64-bit installer (qt6) | 43.6 MB Links: qBittorrent Home page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Weechat. https://weechat.org/
  • Recent Achievements

    • Veteran
      branfont went up a rank
      Veteran
    • Reacting Well
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      Cosminus earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      126
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      87
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!