I will not buy Windows 7 unless it has ... *Feature*


Recommended Posts

That's why I'm here :)

That and the E7 blog are the real reasons im optimistic for Windows 7. I get a real sense that this time around Microsoft is listening to its users, i did feel that certain things were added to Vista which were thought to be a good idea without actually thinking about end users.

When Vista was first released i didn't really think much off it, i found it slow, offering no incentive over Windows XP. However in September at work, i swapped from dual boot WinXP and Vista to just Vista. It run's really well, and handles memory very well also. An example of which is when running Virtual machines on WinXP, after shutting them down, it seemed that XP had a problem returning the unused memory and made the hdd thrash a little bit. With vista however, i max out the RAM utilisation with virtual machines and find that all of the memory is reused in caching.

The only problem i have with Vista is that sometimes copying large files over the network in vista is seems to slow the machine down, which i can only put down to drivers (however that's for another thread).

The feature i would like to see in Windows 7

custom install, i.e. selecting the components to install during setup not after.

Adopt some kind of disk image system like the Mac's use. i.e. I can create a 10GB encrypted disk image and then mount it to save data, it's really handy when moving large amounts of secure data around. I know there are some freeware tools out there but having it native in the OS would be nice.

Better ejecting of USB memory sticks.

Better support of USB drives when booting and logging onto a network. For example some users have plugged in a USB memory stick during boot only to find that the USB drive takes the drive letter of mapped network drives, again this is fixed via third party, but it would be nice if it was native.

Please save PC gaming. Vista introduced some good ideas as did live. However Microsoft really needs to make up some sort of team similar to the xbox team to really push windows gaming, there is defintley enough space in the market for pc gaming and console gaming.

Actually its not bad if you think that different UI's work in different windowing schemes. Not everything is gonna look right with the same UI throughout the operating system. Keep in mind what might look good on one window might look or is impractical in another. Which is what I think is the major challenge at hand for MS. The ribbon UI looks great but it might not work for everything, if they come to a medium with 2 or 3 schemes for different aspects of the OS then i think things will look alot better.

Did you actually read the article?

Even apps that share the same look are different, Mail and Calendar - Search box is in a different place. Media Player and DVD maker, both are black one has a much fatter bar for some reason. Even the back and forward arrows are different on these apps!!
In Windows Vista, right click the Desktop > click 'Personalization" > click Themes > select 'Windows Classic' > click Apply > OK. Done

You can further adjust effects and animation in the OS by clicking Start > right click 'Computer' > click 'Properties' > under Task > click 'Advance System Settings' > select the 'Advanced' tab, under 'Performance' > click 'Settings' under the 'Visual Effects' tab, select the appropriate options for best performance, you can also uncheck some of the visual effects listed.

Its that easy.

But that's not what I want. I want a modern GUI that is not gimmicky. I don't want to have to go back to the days of Windows 95 like you suggested. I want something nice, just not useless. Look at Windows XP, OS X, Ubuntu (minus their sucky fonts) for reference. (Which would make the start menu look equally as vomit inducing)

More and more, I really think Windows XP was most definitely the ideal OS by Microsoft. It worked great, looks just nice, and was very fast, no frills.

But that's not what I want. I want a modern GUI that is not gimmicky. I don't want to have to go back to the days of Windows 95 like you suggested. I want something nice, just not useless. Look at Windows XP, OS X, Ubuntu (minus their sucky fonts) for reference. (Which would make the start menu look equally as vomit inducing)

More and more, I really think Windows XP was most definitely the ideal OS by Microsoft. It worked great, looks just nice, and was very fast, no frills.

Please! Realize its an operating system, not a toy. Its great that you have an interest in aesthetics, but what you are suggesting is either confusing or not achievable. Windows has to meet the expectations of over a billion users already. The purpose of an OS is to manage the interactions between your applications and device drivers and to avoid them from invading another's memory space to avoid crashes. Lets focus on the fundamentals, performance, improved device driver support, improved networking. These are things that matter the most. If you can't get the out of box experience you want in Windows, its best you look to a third party.

Did you actually read the article?

Now you read this, and go by what the developers are saying not by joe shmoe is saying. Seems logical that certain aspects of the UI will be different throughout different windows and applications.

http://blogs.msdn.com/e7/archive/2008/10/0...ws-windows.aspx

http://blogs.msdn.com/e7/archive/2008/10/0...ws-windows.aspx

http://blogs.msdn.com/e7/archive/2008/09/2...-switching.aspx

...sounds more realistic to look at the facts and think that MS has to try and please a very broad range of customers.

From home users to enterprise users and people in the IT field finding a medium that everyone agrees on is gonna be a challenge. Especially when ppl want more features and more control over the operating system and want control over what features get installed into the operating system. As for the UI setting up and dividing the window schemes and parting them into 3 seperate schemes wouldn't be a bad idea. One scheme for system windows, another for window applications, and another for wizards and such. You also have to take into account branding and other issues.

But that's not what I want. I want a modern GUI that is not gimmicky. I don't want to have to go back to the days of Windows 95 like you suggested. I want something nice, just not useless. Look at Windows XP, OS X, Ubuntu (minus their sucky fonts) for reference. (Which would make the start menu look equally as vomit inducing)

More and more, I really think Windows XP was most definitely the ideal OS by Microsoft. It worked great, looks just nice, and was very fast, no frills.

If Microsoft ever designed a gimmicky theme it was Luna. It looked childish and not very professional. Also, it's very hard to revert to a software-rendered GUI one you've used to the smoothness and power of hardware acceleration. And besides the looks, the UI of Vista is a lot easier to use. The start menu doesn't expand to fill your whole screen when you have too many programs installed, the search bar is a versatile tool (it also acts as a run dialog!), My Computer is better organised, etc.

I find that an XP install tended to degrade over time, and sometimes alarmingly fast. Also, you had to love explorer crashes. Vista is such a trouble-free experienced compared to XP, I wouldn't revert any day.

... The purpose of an OS is to manage the interactions between your applications and device drivers and to avoid them from invading another's memory space to avoid crashes.

...

Seriously, if that is the "purpose of an OS", then it was met long ago in various Unix flavors.

Windows got there with the NT kernel.

The rest is exactly what you look down upon - aesthetics, user experience, ability to customize to fit a user's specific (and individual) needs.

Seriously, if that is the "purpose of an OS", then it was met long ago in various Unix flavors.

Windows got there with the NT kernel.

The rest is exactly what you look down upon - aesthetics, user experience, ability to customize to fit a user's specific (and individual) needs.

Actually, I don't look down on it. But, I think a lot of us in this forum have some wild expectations we are expecting to be met that are either asking too much or just ridiculous. We are complaining over how the boot screen looks, which is just no essential. I am a big believer in the OS, its all three of my systems. Of course customization can go further. But, I think we are not appreciating what we have right now. You dispute that UNIX met the key requirements of an OS long before Windows and NT. Then again, Windows met the stability and carried with it compatibility, large support from ISVs and IHVs and continues. Linux and UNIX are trying to meet those expectations for many years. Even with consumer oriented distributions of Linux such as Ubuntu, it still can't be met. The return rate for Linux based netbooks is 4 times higher than Windows. But, I believe we need to focus on what is most important in Windows, doing things in a way that we expect. The remembering explorer views for eg. is a valid one. But some of the stuff we rant about are just irrelevant.

I don't dispute that Unix met the application separation/management requirements of an OS. I assert that it did before Windows. NT was a good solid foundation for Microsoft, and with Vista, they have done with it as they should have.

XP brought NT to the home, and Vista made it more properly secured by default. Both good moves.

You make it sound like Linux is competing only in the desktop market. It is going strong in servers, HPC, and embedded, due to its incredible scalability and customizability. It is under 1% on the desktop, but that doesn't bother me. It suits my needs perfectly, but I never begrudge others from using the OS of their choice.

Actually, I don't look down on it. But, I think a lot of us in this forum have some wild expectations we are expecting to be met that are either asking too much or just ridiculous. We are complaining over how the boot screen looks, which is just no essential. I am a big believer in the OS, its all three of my systems. Of course customization can go further. But, I think we are not appreciating what we have right now. You dispute that UNIX met the key requirements of an OS long before Windows and NT. Then again, Windows met the stability and carried with it compatibility, large support from ISVs and IHVs and continues. Linux and UNIX are trying to meet those expectations for many years. Even with consumer oriented distributions of Linux such as Ubuntu, it still can't be met. The return rate for Linux based netbooks is 4 times higher than Windows. But, I believe we need to focus on what is most important in Windows, doing things in a way that we expect. The remembering explorer views for eg. is a valid one. But some of the stuff we rant about are just irrelevant.

The return rate you quote has only to do with the fact people aren't used to Linux's various interfaces. Having mind 'lock-in' is the issue here, and Microsoft, because of their monopoly, wins there. It is not a comment on Linux. ;)

I see an OS as several things. It's the platform that provides useful reuseable functionality through its APIs. It provides standardized integration points so that apps can interact (drag-drop, copy-paste, etc). It provides abstractions to things like hardware and storage (so apps can use the Common File Dialog and things like the shell storage abstractions). It provides a set of applications that demonstrate the platform (and prove + test the platform).

And to be honest, I love it when Windows obviates the need for third-party craplets to do fairly basic things. How many god-awful brightly branded wireless networking utilities does one user need? Why did my Sony laptop come with 18 different little background processes that all have goofy one-off UIs just to control some extra buttons or monitor settings or whatever. The less of that the better, in my humble opinion.

The return rate you quote has only to do with the fact people aren't used to Linux's various interfaces. Having mind 'lock-in' is the issue here, and Microsoft, because of their monopoly, wins there. It is not a comment on Linux. ;)

How come the return rate on Macs is so low even for first-time buyers? Surely they've all been "locked in" and won't be used to OS X, right?

Oh wait, no they haven't, and people who use Windows aren't mindless idiots who were "tricked" into it by some evil corporation. They return their Linux PCs because the Linux user experience sucks for them. Not because they "aren't used to it." Unless you meant that they aren't used to suckiness, in which case I guess you'd be correct.

I see an OS as several things. It's the platform that provides useful reuseable functionality through its APIs. It provides standardized integration points so that apps can interact (drag-drop, copy-paste, etc). It provides abstractions to things like hardware and storage (so apps can use the Common File Dialog and things like the shell storage abstractions). It provides a set of applications that demonstrate the platform (and prove + test the platform).

And to be honest, I love it when Windows obviates the need for third-party craplets to do fairly basic things. How many god-awful brightly branded wireless networking utilities does one user need? Why did my Sony laptop come with 18 different little background processes that all have goofy one-off UIs just to control some extra buttons or monitor settings or whatever. The less of that the better, in my humble opinion.

How come the return rate on Macs is so low even for first-time buyers? Surely they've all been "locked in" and won't be used to OS X, right?

Oh wait, no they haven't, and people who use Windows aren't mindless idiots who were "tricked" into it by some evil corporation. They return their Linux PCs because the Linux user experience sucks for them. Not because they "aren't used to it." Unless you meant that they aren't used to suckiness, in which case I guess you'd be correct.

Gotta love sarcasm...as for the linux fiasco, linux in itself has grown yea look at Fisherprice-ubuntu its gaining popularity cause its just that fisherpricedup if you dropped joe shmoe to the console they'd be totally lost, or tell them there slackbox needs to have there kernel recompiled from source...they'll look at you like your talking chinese. Seems the user experience on windows is better for the average person thats why theres more people using it not cause MS is pushing it on them. Dont know how a windows thread got linux involved in it.....

Please! Realize its an operating system, not a toy. Its great that you have an interest in aesthetics, but what you are suggesting is either confusing or not achievable. Windows has to meet the expectations of over a billion users already. The purpose of an OS is to manage the interactions between your applications and device drivers and to avoid them from invading another's memory space to avoid crashes. Lets focus on the fundamentals, performance, improved device driver support, improved networking. These are things that matter the most. If you can't get the out of box experience you want in Windows, its best you look to a third party.

Windows (save the Server versions) is an Operating system that's meant for consumer usage. Not a bunch of programmers or systems people. If you want to penetrate the mass consumer, you do have to put high importance on the aesthetics. And Microsoft is a BIG company with a HUGE number of teams, you realize that right? They have different departments working on different aspects of Windows, one of which is definitely the aesthetics. So pointing out that somehow more focus needs to be put on the system/functional aspects of the OS than the GUI makes no sense. I'm sure if the same amount of the work that went into the likes of Translucency in Aero actually went into creating a more sensible, useful GUI would have made things a lot better. Hell, I'd say HALF of the work that went into Aero could come up with something highly beautiful and productive in terms of aesthetics. Yes, Vista's translucency impedes productivity, and I shouldn't have to switch to a design based on Windows 95 to overcome that shortcoming. Just because you do not care about the aesthetics and want to focus on the fundamentals (which ARE important, I do not disagree one bit) does not mean the entire userbase of Windows thinks the same way.

Which brings me back to my earlier point: "Refer to Mac OS X, Windows XP, and certain flavours of Ubuntu for good aesthetical designs of the GUI"

If Microsoft ever designed a gimmicky theme it was Luna. It looked childish and not very professional. Also, it's very hard to revert to a software-rendered GUI one you've used to the smoothness and power of hardware acceleration. And besides the looks, the UI of Vista is a lot easier to use. The start menu doesn't expand to fill your whole screen when you have too many programs installed, the search bar is a versatile tool (it also acts as a run dialog!), My Computer is better organised, etc.

I find that an XP install tended to degrade over time, and sometimes alarmingly fast. Also, you had to love explorer crashes. Vista is such a trouble-free experienced compared to XP, I wouldn't revert any day.

We'll have to agree to disagree on Luna, it's nowhere near as gimmicky as translucent windows. :rolleyes: How the hell could one even find that productive or useful is beyond me... the only way I see it, MS wanted to look cool, and so they decided a Translucent would bring oohs and aahs out of people. It impedes and functional or a productive purpose.."but you can see through windows"..yeah right, don't get me started on that.

And all the good things you mention about Vista's start menu are true and I completely agree. I've always been an avid Run fan, I used it almost exclusively to load many apps in XP, and this further improved my experience in Vista. HOWEVER! That has nothing to do with the aesthetics, that's completely a functional aspect, some of which I think have been greatly improved in Vista (breadcrums view in Vista's explorer are a gothsend, really).

As for XP's explorer crashes... I'm not sure. I almost never had any bluescreens in XP. It had always been a snappy OS (oh Lucifer won't thy resurrect BeOS? :() and the aesthetics were simple and to the point.

you can turn off the transparency in aero easily so idk why people bitch about it. I personally think it looks good.

Only to have solid bricks of nothing with dynamic wavy patterns on top of every non-maximized Windows.. It's just fugly eitherway. :x

We'll have to agree to disagree on Luna, it's nowhere near as gimmicky as translucent windows. :rolleyes: How the hell could one even find that productive or useful is beyond me... the only way I see it, MS wanted to look cool, and so they decided a Translucent would bring oohs and aahs out of people. It impedes and functional or a productive purpose.."but you can see through windows"..yeah right, don't get me started on that.

Well, all the design and useability research disagrees with you :)

The glass look allows for:

1) Larger borders that are easier to grab with the mouse

2) A clearer (no pun intended) depiction of what is draggable to move the window around

3) Visual focus to be placed on the window content (so it looks more like it's "floating" on top of the glass sheet, instead of sunken in as in Luna).

Nevermind that most people find it's far more attractive and less fisher-pricey.

3) Visual focus to be placed on the window content (so it looks more like it's "floating" on top of the glass sheet, instead of sunken in as in Luna).

This especially is a reason why I like aero. The bright green/blue of XP is waaay too distracting.

Nevermind that most people find it's far more attractive and less fisher-pricey.

I have to totally agree with you on that. Aero looks awesome and is a hellava jump in UI aesthetics.

I just hope that Windows 7 brings something new and sparks some more interest into the OS.

I only meant by mind lock-in that people like to stick with what they know or think others use. It's like office suites: people are used to Microsoft so they find there is a mental barrier to using other office programs.

If everyone out there could look at things from a slightly higher level and realise that these are variations on a theme and that moving from one to the other is a mere matter of adjustment, then they would be less frightened of change and actually better computer users. A better computer user is one who can switch easily between programs that all serve a similar purpose, rather than feel they just can't cope. That is what mind lock-in is. Microsoft has it for its core products. Adobe has it too. Quark has it for DTP users in professional settings. Adobe would love InDesign to take over from Quark--and for most things it could quite easily do so, but long-term Quark users are mentally locked in. Same with Windows.

Perhaps Brandon can comment on this - Is it not true that Luna was destined only for Windows XP Home at one stage before XP RTM, but there was not enough time/effort to develop a more appropriate XP Professional theme?

My understanding is, more themes under Luna were being developed with different color schemes. But usability testing showed they did not meet a certain level of quality like Blue, Olive and Silver, so they were discarded. Microsoft promised though to deliver them as free downloads after RTM. The only ones I have seen since are Royale and that Zune Theme.

Well, all the design and useability research disagrees with you :)

The glass look allows for:

1) Larger borders that are easier to grab with the mouse

2) A clearer (no pun intended) depiction of what is draggable to move the window around

3) Visual focus to be placed on the window content (so it looks more like it's "floating" on top of the glass sheet, instead of sunken in as in Luna).

Nevermind that most people find it's far more attractive and less fisher-pricey.

Just what we need, a "useability research" to decide what's good for us. No science, beyond the fundamentals, can depict what people find comfortable. Aesthetics are a part of that. Hell, if you use science to depict what is good for people, Microsoft Bob would have been an immense success. You need a more human approach to this than leaving it to scientific research to try and analyze something as vague as aesthetics.

And it's funny, these research approven "improvements" you suggest that comes as a result of glass, are exactly the kind of things I get rid of at Vista's first installation. I get rid of all thick Window borders because they look very bloated and unnecessary (Appearance Settings -> Advanced -> Set "Border Padding" to 0).

I think dragging content was very clear in XP. And I'm not sure about focus being placed on a windows content, but millions of people did not have a problem with that in XP.

Most people I've talked to find Aero very unadaptable and more overwhelming to use, again, I don't know what your research poll suggests, but for sure I and many others find the Aero UI unintuitive when compared to other interfaces such as OS X's. (Don't mistake me, I use Windows (and already highly used to Vista and Aero) and not OS X, but I prefer Apple's UI design choices). There are many reasons why a vast majority of users despise Vista and have made it a point to stick to XP, and the aesthetics are a significant part of it. Not many had problems navigating around XP, really.

Let me make it clear: Functional wise, Vista is definitely an improvement (however not too much) over XP, definitely. But Aesthetics wise, it's highly a gimmick. It's done based on a manner very unbalanced between semi-sciences of what people might find useful and what looks "cool". Vista is overwhelming to look at and use for many, many consumer people, in comparison to XP. XP has a no-frills, highly usable UI. Vista is full of frills. IMO.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I gave the tool a chance the other day to make a USB. An hour later it was stuck at 0% downloaded. I downloaded the official ISO, downloaded Rufus, and made the USB myself in 15 min.
    • <Moved to software discussion and support> I've got fond memories of Winamp. Changing the skins, the different visualisations etc. But now I just need a simple music player. MSN messenger would be another one, MSN Messenger Plus (I think?) offered so many different plugins. But again, it probably wouldn't work for me these days. And then there is miRC. i think it's still going these days, but lord i had fun with that back in the day. Now it's mostly stuff like Discord, WhatsApp group chats, Signal, Telegram... /me is showing his age...
    • ive always been fascinated by old software this is an old video player for windows from apple
    • In the way that you framed it incorrectly. You wrote: "The constant need to close all browser sessions and wait for a new version to install" There's no "constant need to close all browser sessions". That's factually incorrect. The browser downloads its updates in the background and installs them when you open it again. Silently. And there's no "wait for a new version to install", updates are small and take 2-3 extra seconds AT MOST, if any. If you have an SSD, there's zero extra time. Also, every mainstream browser operates this way. Firefox, the FOSS go-to browser, the default on almost every Linux distro, does exactly the same. Also, you don't need to constantly restart Edge for updates to install, you can completely ignore them and it doesn't even ask you to handle them, it's all silent and automatic. So I don't understand what else do you want.
    • DuRoBo Krono Review: Portable E-Ink reader with great ideas that need a bit of improvement by Taras Buria Phone-sized e-readers are gaining traction these days, with more people treating them as a getaway device to cure phone addiction (or at least they are trying to) or having a more pocket-friendly reader that is easier to carry and hold. The market now has plenty of such readers to choose from, and DuRoBo is the latest addition, a new player that offers a more interesting approach to the idea. The Krono is a $279 e-reader with an interesting twist, which tries to make the device more fun and ergonomic. Here is my review. Disclaimer: DuRoBo provided the review sample without any editorial input or pre-approval. The Krono comes in a phone-sized box with pink accents. Inside, you get the device itself, a short user manual, and a USB cable. The cable is a bit old-fashioned, Type-A to Type-C, which is a bit disappointing. Hot take: I would rather have no cable in the box rather than another Type-A cable that gets immediately thrown into my box full of similar cables I never use. The Krono also has no charger in the box, as it relies on accessories you already own, which is fine with me. Here are the specs: Dimensions 154 x 80 x 9.0 mm or 6.06" x 3.15" x 0.35" 173 g or 6.10 oz Materials Black or White plastic Display 6.13-inch E-Ink Carta 1200, 1,648 x 824 pixels, 300 ppi Touch-capacitive. Dual-tone frontlight. Processor 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 (QTI SM6350) 2 performance cores at 2.07 GHz 4 efficiency cores at 1.71 GHz Memory 6 GB Storage 128GB, non-expandable ~104GB available out-of-the-box Operating system Android 15 with a custom launcher Connectivity Wi-Fi and Bluetooth Battery 3,950 mAh battery Buttons and port USB Type-C port Power button, Volume button, Smart Dial Breathing Lights Audio Mono Speaker and Dual microphones In the box The Krono, a Type-A to Type-C cable, user manual Price $279 on Amazon First impressions Right off the bat, no, this is not a phone replacement. Do not approach this device thinking it can serve you as a dumb phone to cure your TikTok addiction. In addition to the fact that the Krono has no cellular connectivity, I strongly believe that no amount of extra devices can fix your phone addiction until you put some serious effort into it. The Krono is a phone-sized e-reader, a companion for your phone dedicated to reading without distractions. The DuRoBo Krono is made of plastic with a very fine texture. It is hardly premium, but I also cannot say it feels cheap. The device is also a bit thick, quite dense, and well-built without rattling or cracking. You get to choose between two colors: white and black. The front has quite thick bezels, which is hardly surprising for an e-ink device. These things use front light, with LEDs usually placed on the screen perimeter. While I do not mind thicker bezels, the notably larger chin cheapens the look a little. What I mind is a notable seam between the display and the main case, which, after just two days of use, collected plenty of dust and specks. The back of the Krono is what makes the device stand out. There is a cylinder (DuRoBo calls it the Axis) embedded in the back of the reader, housing three elements: a power button on the right edge, a Smart Dial on the left edge, and "Breathing Lights" on the back. An etched DuRoBo logo sits below the cylinder, and it is the only piece of branding you can find on the device. Overall, the design and materials are very unassuming, but the cylinder with additional control elements certainly elevates the look and makes it more interesting. Other physical elements include two microphones (one on the top edge and one on the bottom edge), a USB Type-C port, a volume rocker, and a single mono speaker. There is no fingerprint reader, so if you want to protect your device, a PIN is your only option. The official TPU case is not the most premium-looking Display The Krono has a 6.1-inch E-Ink Carta 1200 touchscreen display with a resolution of 1,648 x 824 pixels (300 ppi). The display is front-lit, and you can adjust the brightness and temperature from cool to warm. Unfortunately, the Krono lacks automatic brightness and temperature adjustments, and you cannot set a custom schedule for the frontlight. However, you can set it to always enable frontlight so that you can see what is happening on the screen when turning it on in a dark environment. On the bright side (get it?), the front light can get extremely dim so that the screen is barely readable in a pitch-dark room. The front light is also uniform across the screen, with no noticeable temperature gradients. I am very susceptible to uneven front light, and it is very easy for me to notice it, but the Krono is doing a very good job in this area. I also like that the edge shadow is not very prominent and barely visible in the black variant. E-Ink Carta 1200 is not the newest generation (there are Carta 1250 and 1300), but it is still a good display. It supports three modes: Clarity, Speed, and Quality. In Clarity mode, text is very sharp and easy to read, but you trade that for more ghosting, a slower refresh rate, and more artifacts when the display changes images. Speed mode, as the name suggests, boosts refresh rate and reduces ghosting, but fine print and text become more jagged. Finally, Quality mode is only available in Android apps. It has the lowest refresh rate, but in return, you get much better visuals, improved gradients, and more. Like brightness and temperature, you can toggle modes from the control center. It is available when swiping from the top-right corner of the screen (the top-left is for notifications). I also like that the Krono can work as a desk clock when not in use. It has a bunch of screensavers, including horizontal clocks with time, date, and current battery level. The screen refreshes once per minute, and battery drain is extremely low (not even 1% in 24 hours). It is a great use of the technology, and another thing I wish more e-ink devices featured. Smart Dial The Smart Dial is Krono's main party trick. It sits on the left side of the device and serves multiple purposes. You can twist or press it to perform various actions, depending on the current use case scenario. When reading books, twisting the dial flips through pages, and pressing it refreshes the screen. On the home screen, the dial adjusts the brightness, and holding the dial pressed launches voice note recording. Finally, a quick double press launches the DuRoBo AI chatbot. While the dial scroll is not notched, it is very smooth and has haptic feedback that confirms your actions, which feels very nice. As a long-term Apple Watch user, I love the idea behind the dial. It feels very natural and oddly satisfying to use, especially with that subtle haptic feedback. I never liked flipping pages with touch input, and I strongly believe each e-reader should come with some sort of physical controls for turning pages. The Krono has both volume buttons (which also work as page turners) and the dial, so you are free to use whichever you prefer. With that said, the dial is not perfect. For one, it sticks out of the case way too far for my liking, raising concerns about durability and longevity when carrying the Krono around in a pocket (it is a pocket-sized device after all). Also, it has too much wobble, which cheapens the experience and makes it feel a bit flimsy and unsecured. While there are two plastic guards on the Krono's case, they are way too small for any kind of protection. I also think DuRoBo should let users customize dial actions (the only available customization is scroll direction), particularly for long and double presses. Not everyone needs voice notes, and DuRoBo AI does not work without an active internet connection, leaving the long press essentially useless when offline. I do not mind these features, and I genuinely think they are useful, but I would rather have the ability to toggle between screen modes, turn the frontlight on/off, or launch my favorite app. I also agree with people on Reddit asking developers to let users adjust the dial sensitivity. I hope this is something DuRoBo can implement with a software update to make the experience more personalized (it is a Smart Dial, after all) and incentivize users to fiddle with the Dial more often. The Dial is a fantastic idea, so please, guys, improve it a little. As for ergonomics, they are mostly fine, but the dial's position may feel a little awkward and way too high. When I use a phone or a phone-sized gadget, I tend to rest one of its corners on my palm for a more secure grip. With the Krono, such a grip is impossible because you cannot reach the dial even with big hands. You have to lower the reader a bit and hold it like a bottle without any extra support for the bottom edge. Such a grip is not necessarily uncomfortable (the Krono is also light enough for it), but it requires a bit of muscle retraining. Sometimes, I do not bother with the dial and hold the Krono like my phone, flipping through pages with volume buttons, as they are perfectly positioned for my right-hand thumb. Interestingly, when testing the Krono, I would often find myself thinking that a roller embedded in the long plastic cylinder on the back of the device would have been a much more comfortable solution. There is a free idea for you, guys. Software The Krono runs Android 15 with a very minimal launcher on top. The home screen presents you with a list of apps, a scrollable list of widgets, and your user profile. Widgets can display time, calendar, or recent books for quick access. You can also add or remove apps from the home screen to keep the most useful stuff around without tapping "Apps." I like this minimalistic approach; it looks clean, easy to understand, and light. I understand that some may find the list of all apps way too clean, but fortunately, DuRoBo lets you switch to traditional icons. The reader also has a bunch of preinstalled apps: Read: The default app for reading. Browser: A Chromium-based browser. Files: A simple file manager. Music: A simple music player. Spark: A voice recorder with transcription support and AI summarization DuRoBo AI: A built-in AI chatbot. Transfer: An app for file transfer over Wi-Fi. If that is not enough, there is the Google Play Store, where you can download all the extra apps you need, alternative readers, podcast apps, chatbots, and more. DuRoBo is not trying to give you an all-in-one device. The standard software experience is quite minimal, which makes it easy to approach and learn. The standard reader supports EPUB, EPUB3, AZW3, MOBI, PDF, TXT, DOC, and DOCX, which is more than enough to let you read most books without third-party software. As for customizing the reading experience, you can select one of five built-in fonts, adjust size and thickness, adjust margins and spacing (only three variants for each), change text alignment and direction, toggle the reading status bar, and switch to dark mode. There is also text-to-speech, which utilizes Android's default TTS tech. While I like the simplistic approach, I cannot help but feel DuRoBo could have made the built-in reader a bit more customizable. However, I am not going to bog down on this, as you can always install any other reader you prefer using the Play Store or by sideloading an APK. Getting books to the Krono is very simple. Given that the device is an Android smartphone without cellular connectivity, you can transfer files via a USB Type-C cable, download them using the built-in browser, share them over Bluetooth, or use cloud storage. My favorite was the built-in Transfer app. It is simple, reliable, and very well-designed. I was surprised by how well-designed the web portal is. It is fast, pretty, and properly categorized. Well done! Once you have your books loaded, you can highlight or underline text, add annotations, bookmark pages, check the table of contents, and ask AI about the selected text. Unfortunately, the Krono has no built-in vocabulary, but again, that is something a third-party reader could fix. Overall, the built-in reader is light and snappy, with just the minimum amount of features for a regular user to enjoy reading books. The Krono has no built-in reading tracking, so stat nerds will have to look for third-party reading apps. However, you can set a daily reading goal, and the reader will notify you when you reach it (for example, one hour). You can also set a reminder to read at a certain time, and when the time comes, the Krono will light up its back LEDs and unlock itself to nudge you. Other than that, the rear LEDs do nothing, not even showing charging progress, which is an unfortunate misopportunity if you ask me. Quirks aside, Krono's Android runs quite snappily and bug-free. Early reviews of the Krono criticized its Android 13-based software quite a lot, but now, the reader runs Android 15, and its software has fixed plenty of initial complaints. I never experienced any issues with built-in apps. AI attempts The DuRoBo Krono comes with a built-in AI chatbot. There is no information on what model powers this thing, but the system says it was "trained by Google." You can launch the bot from the app list or by double-pressing the dial. It works just like any other chatbot, and you can ask it anything by typing or using voice input. The AI saves your chats, and you can rename, export, or delete them. DuRoBo AI requires an active internet connection, and it does not work offline. Its reach and capabilities are also limited. You can only chat in the app and use it in the reader app as a makeshift vocabulary. However, the implementation is kinda awkward. You can only send a selected portion of text to AI without giving it any requests or instructions. I highlighted the word "dumb," and it apologized to me for not being useful. You also cannot ask follow-up questions or send the generated response to a separate chat. The chatbot is also slow, even with fast Wi-Fi, making the overall experience quite frustrating, which makes me again wish for the ability to remap the double press to something else. Spark, the standard voice recording app, also uses AI for note summarization and transcribing. Neither feature works offline, unfortunately. Spark records notes up to 30 minutes using Krono's dual microphones, and you can rename or export notes. Transcription quality is decent, and the speed is alright, but you can find much better solutions in the Google Play Store. What I like about Spark is that transcribed notes are not locked, and you can always type more to elaborate on your ideas, which is handy. Overall, I like that the Krono is not shoving AI down my throat, but to be honest, there is really not that much to shove. AI features here feel raw and need improvements to be more useful. Battery Life Like most E-Ink readers, the Krono has fantastic battery life. Even with a clock as a screensaver, its standby power consumption is incredibly low. And when in use, you can get weeks of reading on a single charge. Without the front light, my unit never sipped more than one or two percent of battery during a one-hour reading session. It was nice to see plenty of battery-related settings. You can limit charging at 80% to protect battery health long-term, check the number of charging cycles, manufacturing/first-time use date, battery health, and the maximum capacity. Additionally, the Krono lets you select what hardware remains enabled when sleeping. This lets you keep Wi-Fi and Bluetooth on (say, if you want to receive notifications, for some reason) and keep audio playing when locked. Turning these features off effectively eliminates any standby battery drain. I left my Krono sitting for 24 hours with a clock screensaver on, and it did not drop a single percent. The pretty big 3,950 mAh battery justifies the device's thickness and ensures you do not have to charge it for long periods. Speaking of charging, it is capped at only 10W, which is a bit disappointing, as getting such a big battery to 100% takes a notably long time in the era of super-fast charging smartphones. DuRoBo Moodi The Moodi is a standalone, optional accessory for your Krono. It is a wireless remote with two customizable buttons that you can use to flip pages, control media, or scroll webpages. The accessory connects via Bluetooth. Despite having a built-in rechargeable battery, it is extremely light. While the Moodi's shape and form factor is not what I would call particularly ergonomic, it is not uncomfortable to hold and use. The Moodi comes with six removable magnetic buttons with various smiley faces. Buttons sit securely, and they have nice-feeling, albeit a little loud, clicks. It is a cute touch that adds a little more fun and character to the device. There is also an accented power button and a single status LED. The latter displays charging status and connection mode. The Moodi supports three modes: Reading: Buttons work as volume buttons, allowing you to flip pages in the built-in reader or other apps that support page turning with volume buttons. Media: Buttons work as skip forward/backward, which is useful when listening to audiobooks, podcasts, or music. Scroll: The third mode lets you scroll pages in the web browser or any other application The Krono properly detects the Moodi and presents you with an on-screen guide when you connect it for the first time (it also displays the battery level). However, you can only change modes by holding both buttons for a few seconds. It is also worth noting that the Moodi works with other devices. I connected it to my iPhone and it let me adjust volume or control media playback. Sadly, the scroll did not work, so you cannot use it to waste time scrolling TikToks. Overall, the Moodi is a cute little accessory, which I can recommend for those who read a lot. It is very useful for remote page flipping when you do not want to burden your hands by holding the Krono all the time. I only wish DuRoBo included a lanyard for the built-in loop. As for the battery life, after using the Moodi for a few days, I only managed to drop several percent of its 90 mAh battery. Despite the small size, it is rated for weeks of use, which is pretty impressive. At $35.99, I cannot say the Moodi is a must-have accessory, but I see the appeal. I prefer using the Krono with its Smart Dial, as I rarely read for more than 40-60 minutes in one sitting. However, if you have a stand and like reading for long periods, the Moodi is the right thing to have. It is a bit more expensive than regular page flippers on Amazon, but it is on par with similar products from Kobo or BOOX. Plus, it has a little more fun to it with removable buttons and better integration into the Krono. Conclusion At the end of the day, DuRoBo Krono is a nice pocket-sized e-reader. Its software focuses on the main things without trying to be everything at once. The smart dial idea is unique and great, and I wish more manufacturers had something similar in their devices. The display is also good, with an even frontlight and "always-on" support. I did not notice any deal-breaking issues with the Krono. However, you can feel that the idea needs some improvements, such as a slightly stiffer dial in a more ergonomic location, perhaps a little more premium materials, and better software customization. I hope the company won't give up on the idea and improve the dial and ergonomics in the second generation. Buy DuRoBo Krono Black - $279.99 on Amazon Buy DuRoBo Krono White - $279.99 on Amazon Buy DuRoBo Moodi - $35.99 on Amazon As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      195
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      96
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!