Recommended Posts

T

Take a look at the video of Taker I posted and look at him on those pictures. He is getting fat and out of shape. He looked awesome when he faced Shawn Michaels, but lost his shape when he faced Triple-H and on those photos you posted, he looks like crap.

He's nearly 50. He looks pretty good, considering the abuse his body has taken for about 30 years in the ring.

Looks like DDP may have yet another recruit:

http://www.ewrestlin...e-in-nyc-subway

He's always been trying to push signed photos on people. The 'in-subway' thing is new, but I bet either a) the indy show he was going to required him to take the subway or b) that indy show cancelled on him. Look at the short-lived column Virgilbag on Deadspin for lots of laughs.

Yikes, Undertaker looks horrible. Granted, doing one match in a year does not require you to be at a top physical shape. However, I still think he should have put in some work and hit the gym a bit. :p

He really doesn't look THAT bad. He never really was the most in-shape guy to begin with.

While I like The Rock and all, this WWE title run has been a joke. The WWE Champ is suppose to wrestle day in and day out. The Rock just shows up, says a few catch phrases and then leaves.

Gonna make you REALLY mad that he won't even be on TV this week or next.

In reality, he is the most qualified celebrity they have inducted. Trump Plaza hosted 2 WMs, they had the 'hair vs hair' match at WM23, and Trump 'bought' WWE in 2009.

OK, admittedly it's not as bad as Mike Tyson, or William "The Refrigerator" Perry (who made one appearance), or Drew Carey, but you'd think WWE would want to distance themselves from someone like Trump, considering how insane he got during the last US election (mostly on Twitter, but then there was the "birther" movement as well).

Speaking of insane, I heard a rumour that there's going to be a Glenn Beck parody on RAW tonight, which has actually just started...

Donald Trump is the new inductee of the WWE Hall fo Fame? Seriously? The WWE is becoming a joke for sure. The hall of fame is supposed to be for wrestlers only, not celebrities such as Donald Trump and Mike Tyson. That is ridiculous.

Donald Trump is the new inductee of the WWE Hall fo Fame? Seriously? The WWE is becoming a joke for sure. The hall of fame is supposed to be for wrestlers only, not celebrities such as Donald Trump and Mike Tyson. That is ridiculous.

Donald Trump is the new inductee of the WWE Hall fo Fame? Seriously? The WWE is becoming a joke for sure. The hall of fame is supposed to be for wrestlers only, not celebrities such as Donald Trump and Mike Tyson. That is ridiculous.

There is a celebrity "wing"

As seen in the opening RAW segment tonight with Triple H and Brock Lesnar, Lesnar was busted open after a shot into the ring post.

Lesnar received twelve staples to close the wound backstage. He is now walking around backstage telling everyone is he completely fine.

wrestlingrumors.com_crop_exact.jpg?w=650&h=440&q=75

Donald Trump is the new inductee of the WWE Hall fo Fame? Seriously? The WWE is becoming a joke for sure. The hall of fame is supposed to be for wrestlers only, not celebrities such as Donald Trump and Mike Tyson. That is ridiculous.

Pete Rose went in the first year.

Hell, Bob Uecker went in a few years ago and his only tie to WWE has doing interviews at a couple of wrestlemanias.

People need to relax. Its entertainment. There isn't even a real building. Its not like they are 'voted' in or anything.

F4Wonline.com is reporting Vince McMahon blew up backstage last night during the main event match between CM Punk and John Cena on RAW.

McMahon apparently got upset when Punk hit Cena with a piledriver. The move being done the way it was is banned in WWE because of the potential danger to a performer's neck.

While McMahon was mad the move was used, nobody is expecting anything more to come of the issue other than McMahon saying something to Punk and moving on.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1uS9n-Eceo

Be honest, who else marked out when they saw that? :p

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!