Recommended Posts

According to F4WOnline.com, WWE NXT trainer Billy Gunn, real name Monty Sopp, has been fired by WWE for testing positive for elevated levels of testosterone in a powerlifting meet on July 25.

According to the report, Sopp’s drug test at the meet came up with a 37-1 testosterone/epitestosterone ratio, well over the 4-1 limit, and he was suspended from powerlifting for four years.

It’s also being said WWE officials did not become aware of Sopp competing as a powerlifter, or the fact that he had been banned from the sport four years ago, until a few weeks ago.

http://www.wrestlezone.com/news/641797-breaking-news-wwe-nxt-trainer-billy-gunn-fired-for-ped-test-failure 

Hi All,

Sorry to be the bad guy here guys but we are unfortunately getting reports from members that NSFW filters are being applied to this forum because of some of the pictures (I don't think I need to spell out which ones!). In hope you can all understand that because of our COPPA agreement I regret I'm going to have to ask people stop posting these. from now on.

For those of you who do subscribe there is a forum where you can post these types of pictures as it's out of the general view. Any future posts will be removed and repeated posts may result in warnings.

Again, sorry to have to be that guy :/

 

Once again, the people in charge of this site do not understand COPPA at all. It has NOTHING to do with scantily clad women. Or nude women. Or basically anything on this entire site. It is about marketing (AKA selling) things to children under 13. I've said this before in various discussions but no one ever actually reads the damn law. Or doesn't change their excuse that they give, at least. 

If you (or Steve, or whover) is against the pictures - then say that. Don't blame it on a law that has nothing to do with this site, the content you are objecting to, or frankly, anything. 

Its this simple: You don't market the site (or products on this site) to children under 13, and more importantly are not collecting their information. COPPA doesn't apply.

http://www.coppa.org/

Edit: And just because children under 13 may visit the site doesn't 'make' COPPA apply. The law is very clear that if you are not collecting information from children under 13, you are not violating COPPA. It has nothing to do with content, because that, as we all know, is protected in the US under freedom of speech.

Edited by episode
  • Like 1

 

Once again, the people in charge of this site do not understand COPPA at all. It has NOTHING to do with scantily clad women. Or nude women. Or basically anything on this entire site. It is about marketing (AKA selling) things to children under 13. I've said this before in various discussions but no one ever actually reads the damn law. Or doesn't change their excuse that they give, at least. 

If you (or Steve, or whover) is against the pictures - then say that. Don't blame it on a law that has nothing to do with this site, the content you are objecting to, or frankly, anything. 

Its this simple: You don't market the site (or products on this site) to children under 13, and more importantly are not collecting their information. COPPA doesn't apply.

http://www.coppa.org/

Edit: And just because children under 13 may visit the site doesn't 'make' COPPA apply. The law is very clear that if you are not collecting information from children under 13, you are not violating COPPA. It has nothing to do with content, because that, as we all know, is protected in the US under freedom of speech.

I'm not getting into something that I admit I do not know enough, so lets remove the entire COPPA thing out of this for one second. The thread is being blocked by NSFW filters, The team behind this forum do not want any public forums to be blocked because of NSFW content therefore we are asking people to stop.

We asked for pictures like this to be stopped a long time ago from one of the general forums, this one slipped through the net.

Now, it is what it is, let's not derail this thread any more than it already has been.

 

I'm not getting into something that I admit I do not know enough, so lets remove the entire COPPA thing out of this for one second. The thread is being blocked by NSFW filters, The team behind this forum do not want any public forums to be blocked because of NSFW content therefore we are asking people to stop.

We asked for pictures like this to be stopped a long time ago from one of the general forums, this one slipped through the net.

Now, it is what it is, let's not derail this thread any more than it already has been.

 

What exactly is a 'NSFW filter'? Where is it applied? At the forum level? Or are you talking about content filters in a corporate network? Shouldn't a thread about wrestling be considered NSFW anyway? Or anything in the media section, really?

Don't try to tell me its an SEO/Google/ranking thing. Because its not - that doesn't exist.

Steve can enforce whatever rules and policies he wants. Its his site. I've been a member here a very long time. But give the correct reasoning as to why.

Edited by episode
  • Like 1

 

 

What exactly is a 'NSFW filter'? Where is it applied? At the forum level? Or are you talking about content filters in a corporate network? Shouldn't a thread about wrestling be considered NSFW anyway? Or anything in the media section, really?

Don't try to tell me its an SEO/Google/ranking thing. Because its not - that doesn't exist.

Steve can enforce whatever rules and policies he wants. Its his site. I've been a member here a very long time. But give the correct reasoning as to why.

I believe corporate network filters.

Shouldn't a thread about wrestling be considered NSFW anyway?

Yeah, I'd agree there. If this was still just a WWE thread, you could possibly argue otherwise, because of their PG rating, but that argument goes out the window as soon as you start posting vintage WWE stuff. :p

So, about that segment from this week's Raw...

Bad form, WWE. :/

Well, that went off well!  Daddy may not have been brought in about it, but Paige and Charlotte sure were...otherwise, why would Charlotte bring up Reid in the first place?

Well, that went off well!  Daddy may not have been brought in about it, but Paige and Charlotte sure were...otherwise, why would Charlotte bring up Reid in the first place?

It's a bit low to not consult the rest of the family before going ahead with it. They did it with Paul Bearer's family before using him in the CM Punk/Undertaker rivalry, so it's weird that they didn't do it for this one.

Lance Storm nailed it for me, anyway...

 

As noted, former TNA and ROH star Austin Aries is backstage at the NXT television tapings at Full Sail University this evening, however he isn’t the only former TNA star at the show.

It was rumored earlier this week that James Storm would be making his NXT return after debuting a few weeks ago. As it turns out, Storm is indeed backstage at the show and is expected to wrestle during tonight’s taping.

Finally, Storm’s former TNA World Tag-Team Champion partner Gunner is backstage at the show in Winter Park, Florida as well.

In the case of Gunner, much like Aries, it isn’t exactly clear what he is doing at the show and is in no way confirmed that he will be debuting for NXT tonight.

http://www.sescoops.com/spoiler-two-more-former-tna-stars-backstage-at-nxt-taping-this-evening/ 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMAZON needs to take total accountability for this.
    • Server Summit had a heap of announcements, ADCS changes are baller.
    • Nice, hope they *finally* fixed the issue with the NTFS driver where the system would completely brick during large file copies using the built in driver. It's been broken for years requiring me to use the older, slower, NTFS-3G FUSE driver.
    • Windows 11 KB5094126 BSODing, freezing, forcing BitLocker lockout, breaks OneDrive, and more by Sayan Sen Microsoft released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 last week as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. While Microsoft has so far not acknowledged any major problems with the release, some users online are running into problems. These range from OneDrive and Dropbox access issues, BitLocker recovery lockouts, to blue screens and BSODs. The most common one seems to be happening with HP systems wherein affected users say they hit 0xc0430001 BSOD (blue screen of death) error code after the KB5094126 update. We wonder if this could be related to the recent bug we covered on HP devices wherein the ongoing Secure Boot certificate updates are leading to similar issues. While we are not certain, users affected by this issue likely need to ensure that the boot.stl file is included on the installation media (such as a USB installer or ISO), if the above-mentioned dynamic updates are deployed. If this file is missing, computers may fail to boot from the installation media and could display the error 0xc0430001. This STL file is used by Secure Boot to verify that the boot files are trusted, so it must match the same Windows version and system architecture. To ensure the file is included, Microsoft recommends using the Update WinPE script, which automatically updates the image and handles the required files. Alternatively, you can manually copy the boot.stl file from the Windows\Boot\EFI folder on a Windows device and place it in the matching folder on your installation media before deploying the updated image. Aside from blue screening some users also note their systems have been freezing following the update. This could be happening to Lenovo PCs specifically. In the case of the OneDrive and Dropbox access issues, a user figured out that there could be a conflict with UAC. He explained: "Okay, so I did some digging, and in our environment KB5094126 breaks OneDrive and Dropbox in Explorer. I went through all our GPOs and found out that the combination of disabling UAC and having my user being a local admin breaks OneDrive in Explorer. ... If I enable UAC again, then it works, even with KB5094126 still installed." Hopefully, Microsoft will look into these issues. Source: Microsoft forum (link1, link2, link3, link4), Reddit (link1, link2, link3, link4)
    • It is when it's a desktop in my house though for a PC that's lightly used and not really important when it is. If it was a laptop, it would be a different story. The real solution is varied and begins starting at post #22 in that thread.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!