Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

Yeah, admiring, I would do JUST that with the box... :shiftyninja:

Wait! Did I say that? :o

Don't worry, it happens to the best of us.

mgspb1.jpg

Oh, and nice first post there on Kotaku, Sethos. :D

http://kotaku.com/5017051/youve-got-playbo...zine-in-my-mgs4

I don't get why so many people are bitching about MGS's cut scenes.

I know they go on for a bit, but come on - ALL of the MGS games are the same!

It seems that most of the complainers just get caught in the hype for the game and IGNORE ALL THE WARNINGS that it contains lots of long cut-scenes.

Some of us absolutely love them and if anything can be said about this game it's that it was made for the fans, so really, what did they expect?

^

Probably due to the higher scoring of MGS4.

No MGS game till this one has received the praise/notice that 4 has.

That's bound to bring out more of the jokers/haters.

Cutscene length jokes are funny to start off with, but when FoxNews joins the party

With some lengthy interstitials lasting 30 minutes — and an epilogue that clocks in at nearly an hour — the footage, always a "Metal Gear Solid" staple, begs the question: Why didn't creator Hideo Kojima just make a movie this time around!?
Worst of all, newcomers are likely to find themselves completely lost in the wordy dialogue and plots folded in from previous "Metal Gear Solid" games.

Anyone with a brain would tell you joining a series on the 4th instalment is not going to help you out *facepalm*.

Source: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,369561...ech/videogaming

You're like :blink: WTF, shutup.

Whenever FoxNews covers anything gaming, you just want to staple your nuts together (remember hardcore porn in ME?).

It's almost as if people are trying to say MGS4 should be a casual game and appeal to casual gamers for the sake of it. It was never meant to be that, nor does anyone want it to be.

Buy hey, casual games are all the rage, so maybe some of the journalists out there can't handle anything that doesn't involve swinging a remote, or pushing one button to win the whole game.

It's one game out of thousands/millions of games out there, aren't we allowed ONE game like that in the gaming world with lengthy cutscenes without people going mental...?!

Edited by Audioboxer

Just a quick question, doing the no alert no kills on easy, is there a way to find out if you killed anyone, other than completing the act? It would be kinda annoying if I got one kill and not knowing where it was.

I don't understand what they show when you first start the game... that television broadcast channels or whatever it is its ****ing scary. I thought something was wrong with my game at first.

The game is very difficult, I must admit.

I don't understand what they show when you first start the game... that television broadcast channels or whatever it is its ****ing scary. I thought something was wrong with my game at first.

The game is very difficult, I must admit.

You can watch all the advertisements if you just let your game idle on the main menu without pressing start. They are each propaganda advertisements for the PMC units.

I don't understand what they show when you first start the game... that television broadcast channels or whatever it is its ****ing scary. I thought something was wrong with my game at first.

The game is very difficult, I must admit.

I thought my game was messed up too. I kept pressing x and start and nothing happened so I pressed video source on my remote thinking I was watching TV and I wasn't :laugh:

ROFL @ Fox News.... American "news" TV is ridiculous in general, but Fox is their brainless overlord. And yep, anyone joining a series in its fourth installment and then complaining abotu not understanding most of it needs to be hit with the logic hammer.

Just a quick question, doing the no alert no kills on easy, is there a way to find out if you killed anyone, other than completing the act? It would be kinda annoying if I got one kill and not knowing where it was.

I think if you go to mission briefing in the main menu and load your game and go to a briefing, it will show you your stats in an orange bar during the scene. I read that somewhere.

I know that you can see the bar in mission briefing once you finish an act but I haven't tried the main menu/load method.

I think if you go to mission briefing in the main menu and load your game and go to a briefing, it will show you your stats in an orange bar during the scene. I read that somewhere.

I know that you can see the bar in mission briefing once you finish an act but I haven't tried the main menu/load method.

Thanks for the info. I'll give that a shot when I play again. Finished Act 1 no kills no alerts. It's kinda fun, a lesson in patience, there were many a restart I assure you heh.

I also have a question about alerts. Is an alert when the alert sound is made or when the counter pops up? I have had two instances where I popped someone with the Mosin Nagant and the alert sound was made, but they dropped instantly. To be safe, I restarted. Is the alert sound alone considered an alert?

I don't understand what they show when you first start the game... that television broadcast channels or whatever it is its ****ing scary. I thought something was wrong with my game at first.

The game is very difficult, I must admit.

Same happen to me at first. I honestly was wondering if I somehow did not realize the game came with two disks or something. Especially in those opening sequences, that game show movie is incredibly trippy with all of the graphics spinning around the player and the host on the platform. It definitely gives the vibe of creating a very disorienting state. Now it totally makes sense it is propaganda, did not realize until reading it right now. And I could not help but like hearing my name Larry in it, even if it was the stupid husband of the women on the game show.

And indeed, the game is definitely very difficult at times. Ironically, so far the easiest part of the game for me was the first boss battle.

Just curious, are you a new player to the series itself like I am? I think being a MGS noob has a lot to do with making it harder than it probably would be otherwise.

I have lived in my house now for 7 months, and I finally earlier tonight went out and bought 100 ft of speaker wire and ran it to get my surround sound rear speakers hooked up. They were hooked up before this, but all 5 speakers (2 Fronts, 2 Rears, and Center) were all on my entertainment center in the front. I was really lazy about it but it all, but for good reason as it was indeed a project and I am still not done.

Truth is, I literally HAD to do get my rear speakers hooked up once hearing the amazing sound on this game. (I also know Battlefield Bad Company has some amazing sound too which I plan on getting late next week)

So I am looking over on the couch, and my wife looks to be sound asleep as she usually does right about now on a Friday night, so before I pass out as well as I am also tired, I am hoping to give my new and improved surround sound a go with some MGS4. :yes:

If not tomorrow, for sure.

Yeah Larry, surprisingly enough this is the first MGS I've owned. I've played older versions once or twice on PS1 and that's about it. I'm at the start of Act 2 now, so far I love it! I found the best way to move along the battlefield is to shoot the guys with the silent pistol that makes them sleep. :)

I'm trying to get a hold of a a/v cable so I can connect my PS3 to my audio system because at the moment I have my Ps3 connected to my TV via HDMI aka not real surround sound.

Stupid audio system that has no optical or HDMI inputs. :(

The only downside is I wish I knew the history about whats going on, like Vamp, I have no idea what or who he is, but clearly Snake has history with him. Same with Liquid. I need to do some reading!

I have all the cut scenes from all the MGS games (MGS1-3) that were on a torrent in a MGS4 thread in this forum. I watched all the cut scenes even though I played all 3 games in order to catch up and I Must say, it did help.

MGS4 - 2nd Highest scoring console exclusive (This Gen)

MGS4 recently cracked the 95/100 mark on Metacritic. Making MGS4 the 2nd highest scoring console exclusive(This Gen).

The highest scoring console exclusive is held by 'Super Mario Galaxy' at 97/100.

With this, MGS4 now has higher scores than,

1) Gears of war (94/100)

2) Halo 3 (94/100)

3) Super Smash Bros. Brawl (94/100)

This also makes it higher than 'Call of Duty 4 Modern Warfare' which scored 94/100.

'Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess, The' has the same score as MGS4, thus sharing the spot as the 2nd highest scoring console exclusive.

Grand Theft Auto IV currently is the highest scoring game with 98/100.

Source: http://n4g.com/gaming/News-160100.aspx

I'm going through it trying not to get any kills or alerts. Got to the end of act 2 and seen i had one kill, got absolutely NO idea where it came from, either!

It's really ****ing me off, there's a few times when I've done something like tranq a guard, go to pick up his weapon and accidentally set off a claymore, killing him. No indication if that's added to my kill at all, so I just restarted just in case and yet I STILL ended up with a kill >_<

Another time something similar happened was when I was fighting Octopus and she disguised herself as the MK II. I gave chase and ran straight into a claymore, killing one of the frogs that was slumbering just beside it >_<.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!