242 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you think about the Mozilla Firefox 3.0 Beta 4?

    • Great!
      78
    • Crap!
      11
    • AWESOME!
      36
    • Biggest Crap ever!
      15
    • Thanks for the heads up.
      24
    • Stop making polls.
      78


Recommended Posts

whoever proposed to put the Home button in the bookmarks bar should be hung. also, the fact that the GUI devs all agreed that it was a good idea and actually implemented it is REALLY disappointing. what in the world were/are they thinking. they better change that

btw, I know you can add the Home button to the main toolbar. I'm just saying it was a terrible decision to make the default as having it only on the bookmarks bar

haha yeh, i was looking for it when i tried out beta 3, and couldnt find it. i have to agree, its in a very awkard place

whoever proposed to put the Home button in the bookmarks bar should be hung. also, the fact that the GUI devs all agreed that it was a good idea and actually implemented it is REALLY disappointing. what in the world were/are they thinking. they better change that

btw, I know you can add the Home button to the main toolbar. I'm just saying it was a terrible decision to make the default as having it only on the bookmarks bar

lol.

That change was made in beta 3, and some of us already had much too long of a conversation about it.

Please don't make us relive that. :p

How do you stop it from showing bookmarks in the drop down menu on the url bar?

about:config -> browser.urlbar.matchOnlyTyped -> true

Download:

ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/3.0b4/win32/

http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.or...es/3.0b4/win32/

Yes, i know it's the download trough the FTP, but i only post the links to it because there is NO links on the releases folder at this time.

I'll edit the post as soon as it will become available on the releases folder.

Also i've "coded" the link so this won't be like click'n'go, to prevent more server overload.

Does the fact there's nothing in the releases folder not kind of indicate the obvious - that it's not actually released?

Am off to create a "Windows 7 released" thread now - I'll edit the post when the OS is released.

Arguing about releases aside, I'm using the beta 4 rc2 now..

OH MY GOD IT FLIES!!

each firefox beta release gets faster and faster and faster, they're doing great work!

I used the opera nightlies for a bit, but they fell way behind at around beta 2 of ff3..

now if only my stupid bank would let me use a different browser than IE, I think i would be running a pc with just one browser for the first time in years.

Does the fact there's nothing in the releases folder not kind of indicate the obvious - that it's not actually released?

Am off to create a "Windows 7 released" thread now - I'll edit the post when the OS is released.

There's nothing there because Mozilla removed the files and the folders, but don't cry, they will announce it soon and you can then download the files again... Believe if you want, i dont' care, the people which downloaded it in time know that the files where there when i've posted this, so you fail.

Go ahead, create the threads you want, who cares? But at least post something that is true, even when the developer decides to remove the files. :rolleyes:

Do you mean this one:

ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/3.0b4/win32/

?

If so, I get a "550 Failed to change directory." error every time. I'm assuming you're referring to the nightlies (which aren't on the first page). They're not the same as 3.0b4. They are release candidates for 3.0b4. That is why the path contains "nightly/3.0b4-candidates/rc2/". The official 3.0b4 will be found in the releases directory, not the nightly directory.

No, he means this one:

ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/3.0b4-candidates/

I've edited the first post and replaced the link. :|

One of the major new features of fx3 beta 4 is the PGO which should improve JavaScript speeds.

A quick comparison of JavaScript benchmark results on my system:

post-202145-1204915172_thumb.png

  1. Firefox3 beta 4: 6775.4 ms
  2. Opera 9.5 beta build 9815: 10957.4 ms
  3. IE8 Beta 1: 15095.2 ms
  4. Firefox 2.0.0.11: 29346.0 ms

That's pretty much Blazing!

How did you get folders at the top toolbar like that?

Acid3 was developed to test the next generation of web browsers in development wasn't it? i.e firefox 4 and the like, ACID 2 is the one to judge FF3 and IE8 by, according to what i've read around these forums.

Acid3 is based off of 2004 web standards. So no, the newest browsers should be passing with flying colours. Webkit is doing good and at 90 so far.

How do you stop it from showing bookmarks in the drop down menu on the url bar?

Found a solution. Take all the bookmarks from your Bookmark Toolbar, copy them to a new Bookmark Folder. Then delete all the bookmarks from the Bookmark toolbar, and walla!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If I ever get that issue I will let you know how I fix it
    • As I've been usually saying lately - we all can thank "AI" for this.
    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      540
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      80
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!