AV-Test.Org - March 2008 Test Results


Recommended Posts

Nice! Avast! is in the top 5 and beat NOD32, Kaspersky and Symantec!

I heard that the scanning engine in Avast! Home is the same as that in Professional, only thing is that Professional is licensed for more computers. Can anyone confirm that?

Professional also allows you to make use of that virus recovery database that it's always building...

ahaha yeah right, MS AV passed Kaspersky and others, wow this must be relly legit....ahahha

OMG do you really think this is true? if they really tested this, they made a really nice virus list lol

These are the overall grades and they tell a slightly different story:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ihs/alex/R...D2008m3b_US.htm

Proactive detection and response times to new malware are just as important as detection of known malware, and this is where many AVs fail miserably. These days rootkit detection is also important.

Also no mention of scanning of packed files. Many of these AVs fail to detect viruses hidden in packed .exes.

tried Avast after using NOD32. I felt somewhat safer with Avast, but it was slowing down my net connection badly. I mean BADLY, I could not even stream youtube properly. I isolated the problem by ending all the AVG process using my task manager and things went back to normal. Uninstalled Avast without a moment of hesitation after that. Thank god it was free, I cannot imagine paying for a product that slows down my net.

Went back to NOD32. Not going to be tempted to switch again....

I bought ESET Smart Security when it first came out and I've never looked back.

I've never even heard of the OP's quoted website so I'm not too worried by the results.

I've always worked on the principle that an AV is only there as a backup in case common sense of the user fails.

I bought ESET Smart Security when it first came out and I've never looked back.

I've never even heard of the OP's quoted website so I'm not too worried by the results.

I've always worked on the principle that an AV is only there as a backup in case common sense of the user fails.

I feel the same. I only surf trusted web sites and I do not look at porn or warez or cracks and what not. I used to years ago.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • There are so many of these apps now that do this, what do people recommend?
    • Just the price of doing business. The scamble to pull as much from the web as possible is happening, and it's happening before a case like this changes how or what is legal do to with AI in terms of data harvesting. But even then as we've seen with the likes of Google who ignore cookie requests and just accept the fact they'll get fined, it's built into their business price model now. AI is here, its not going away. Their reward if any from the court case would be best suited to trying to incorprate AI or licence their end points as authentic human verified content. The problem is, as we've seen these same news papers are using AI themselves.
    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!