For those of you with 2 GB RAM - do you feel it's enough?


Is 2 GB RAM enough?  

405 members have voted

  1. 1. Is 2 GB RAM enough for you at the moment?

    • Yes
      224
    • No
      181


Recommended Posts

I firmly think 2gb are enough today. However, I just bought 4gb ram :blush:

I'm going to start virtualizing every operating system I have a license for, out of boredom, so I need memory :p

dont ''forget''to have loads of hd space :lol:

have a laptop with 2gigs of sheep seems to be more than enough

my older lappy is 1 gig and the newer one is 2 gigs. the desktop is also 1 gig. And for normal usage (no gaming) 1 gig works fine. But I can't run any virtual machines on the 1 gig computers because there's just not enough ram to go around. It's much better with the 2 gig computer, I could run the native OS and a virtual one with no lag, but not more than that.

so...enough? yea. ideal? not really.

  • 4 weeks later...

For what I use my machine to do, yes 2 Gigs is enough, but everyone uses their computers for various different things, so your mileage may vary.

Even using Vista 32bit my used ram is usually around 700-800Mb. I really thought by the way a lot of people were talking, I'd see closer to 3/4 of my ram being used, not 1/3. Guess Vista isn't so memory hungry as some make it out to be. :p

I have 2 GB of RAM in my MacBook Pro and I feel that it is more than plenty even under a heavy workload. However, on Windows-based computers and especially with those running Windows Vista, I find that 2 GB is not enough in all cases and that a bump to 4 GB is beneficial.

I have 2GB of ram on my XP desktop and Vista laptop, both are quick and are running smooth. (Y)

If I were to go to 4GB, I'd move to 64-bit since you sort of have to, but I'd have to be sure that going 64-bit won't cause any new problems.

My Work and Home PC's both running XP I use 2gb and it seems sufficient.

My iBook has 1.25gb ram and runs decent enough for what it's used for.

My iMac has 4gb of ram. I recommend 4gb in that without a doubt.

What was that Bill Gates said a very long time ago. I think it was "People would not need more that 64mb of memory"... Boy what an understatement. For me though 512mb runs Xp to meet my needs. I don't do much gaming anymore.

Actually he said "people will not need more than 640kB of memory" in the very old 8086 days. (It was 640kB at least instead of 64MB :)).

And on-topic: I have 2GB of RAM in my Deskop and Laptop, and it's sufficient for most applications and / or games, but sometimes (like with heavy renders) I can see it's not enough, IE: in task manager "using 2.5GB" :)

Actually he said "people will not need more than 640kB of memory" in the very old 8086 days. (It was 640kB at least instead of 64MB :)).

Actually, he denies ever saying anything like that.

I've said some stupid things and some wrong things, but not that. No

one involved in computers would ever say that a certain amount of memory is

enough for all time.

The need for memory increases as computers get more potent and software gets

more powerful. In fact, every couple of years the amount of memory address

space needed to run whatever software is mainstream at the time just about

doubles. This is well-known.

When IBM introduced its PC in 1981, many people attacked Microsoft for its

role. These critics said that 8-bit computers, which had 64K of address space,

would last forever. They said we were wastefully throwing out great 8-bit

programming by moving the world toward 16-bit computers.

We at Microsoft disagreed. We knew that even 16-bit computers, which had 640K

of available address space, would be adequate for only four or five years. (The

IBM PC had 1 megabyte of logical address space. But 384K of this was assigned

to special purposes, leaving 640K of memory available. That's where the

now-infamous ``640K barrier'' came from.)

A few years later, Microsoft was a big fan of Intel's 386 microprocessor chip,

which gave computers a 32-bit address space.

Modern operating systems can now take advantage of that seemingly vast

potential memory. But even 32 bits of address space won't prove adequate as

time goes on.

Meanwhile, I keep bumping into that silly quotation attributed to me that says

640K of memory is enough. There's never a citation; the quotation just floats

like a rumor, repeated again and again.

from http://groups.google.com/group/alt.folklor...9ce4b0555bf35f4

for a gaming rig 2gb on vista is not enough. you'll get stuttering here and there. anything over 2gb on vista is enough for gaming because 2gb alone is "almost" enough but not quite.

I had a backup PC that had 1gb of ram and that was great for vista if your not gaming.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!