Mac hacked in 2 minutes


Recommended Posts

the cracking contest doesn't really count

This is exactly the response I would expect from Steve Jobs because I think he honestly believes his gadgets are invincible, even with proof thrown in his face. Poor guy.

Back to reality now...

I hope this demonstrates to everyone who fell for Apple's hype and perhaps opens their eyes to the FACT that Macs are designed and programmed by humans. They are subject to human error and can never, ever be 100% perfect. This goes for any other hardware or software out there. No one should expect it and no one should promise it.

You might want to be a little careful with those claims.

Actually, the claims appear to be valid. Microsoft did a tremendous amount of security work in the past few years. The number of exploits in MS products since they started rolling out in 2005 are quite low. On the other hand Apple seems to be patching more lately, and their number of unpatched exploits is slowly creeping up.

If it's more secure, why was it the first one hacked out of 2 Windows laptops and a MacBook? And that's exactly what the article is about.

Maybe he just wanted a macbook air for free?

Nobody was able to hack into the systems on the first day of the contest when contestants were only allowed to attack the computers over the network
He was the first contestant to attempt an attack on any of the systems.

:huh:

Also, how do you measure the time it took him to hack it? It's just the time from the start of the contest? Does it count the time it took him to set up the web page? Or all the previous research?

Edited by ichi
Actually, the claims appear to be valid. Microsoft did a tremendous amount of security work in the past few years. The number of exploits in MS products since they started rolling out in 2005 are quite low. On the other hand Apple seems to be patching more lately, and their number of unpatched exploits is slowly creeping up.

well put.

More to the point, rather than bashing Apple for having a computer than be be exploited by a person with physical access to it, (very very very very few workstations will not be exploitable) shouldn't we be lauding the guy who did it as a genius?

bloody fanboy threads! :)

true, but i think alot of exploits are with 3rd party software, like MS. but MS has more as there is more 3rd party software available making holes

Actually, the claims appear to be valid. Microsoft did a tremendous amount of security work in the past few years. The number of exploits in MS products since they started rolling out in 2005 are quite low. On the other hand Apple seems to be patching more lately, and their number of unpatched exploits is slowly creeping up.

agreed, but genius would be to much i feel, more along the lines of "knows his stuff"

well put.

More to the point, rather than bashing Apple for having a computer than be be exploited by a person with physical access to it, (very very very very few workstations will not be exploitable) shouldn't we be lauding the guy who did it as a genius?

bloody fanboy threads!

It was social engineering however so the cracking contest doesn't really count - this is no different than me putting up an iFrame vulnerability that exists in IE6/IE7 even today.

99% of all hacks are via social engineering. There is no difference between tricking someone on the phone into believing you're with the IT department and need their password and tricking them into going to a web site that isn't what they expected.

Anyone using MSN yesterday should be very aware how easy it's to blow up your IE because I kept getting messages from people asking me to click a certain link that opened an iframe and affects all IE6 and IE7 (Also Vista, because most of the people on the list who sent me the message were Vista users).

Erm... "Open an IFrame?" It's part of a web page. an IFrame is simply a frame that isn't anchored to a page edge and may therefore be obfuscated. (Like overlaying a fake forum menu on top of the real one.)

I have to admit I'm glad to see this. To many times Apple (not all) users delude themselves and act as if Apple is the savior or something when it is really just the same <snipped> different pile

Edited by John S.
circumvention of swear filter
but then all the macusers couldnt say "hey i dont need antivirus, im on a mac"

Circaflex,

Contray to popular belief not all of us Mac users think like that or even consider that to be the case. Many of us are actually quite security conscious. I run antivirus to protect myself, as well as to prevent myself from inadvertantly sending nasties off to my PC using friends.

and your reply to the windows PC, is actually true, it was done in my Security Class before i graduated, just like i also used the MMC to remotely connect to a machine across the classroom and edited their registry(entrys in MMC go to registry) to lock their startmenu, edit permissions. and at a LAN party as a practical joke, inserted a couple porn vid's to a friends startup. if i have physical access to it but its locked, i can BART it, remove the PW, load the registry into BART Edit that, and do whatever else to the system

You have to be on the same network as the machine, and have the Admin password to do that...

there was more involved then going to a site

and your reply to the windows PC, is actually true, it was done in my Security Class before i graduated, just like i also used the MMC to remotely connect to a machine across the classroom and edited their registry(entrys in MMC go to registry) to lock their startmenu, edit permissions. and at a LAN party as a practical joke, inserted a couple porn vid's to a friends startup. if i have physical access to it but its locked, i can BART it, remove the PW, load the registry into BART Edit that, and do whatever else to the system

there is no Bull***, its fact as iv done it, my job requires me to break into a system @ customers request, or recover files/information if they can no longer access their computer

You need to stop posting and read the article.

"Within 2 minutes, he directed the contest's organizers to visit a Web site that contained his exploit code, which then allowed him to seize control of the computer, as about 20 onlookers cheered him on."

ALSO

"Contest rules state that Miller could only take advantage of software that was preinstalled on the Mac, so the flaw he exploited must have been accessible by, or possibly inside, Apple's Safari browser."

There was NOT more involved than visiting a web site.

And as for your security experiences, it's getting more fanciful every time, so I just don't believe a word of it now.

Edited by GreyWolfSC

you missed where i said "connect to a machine across the classroom"

and all passwords can be bypassed, or gotten

You have to be on the same network as the machine, and have the Admin password to do that...
Maybe he just wanted a macbook air for free?

:huh:

Also, how do you measure the time it took him to hack it? It's just the time from the start of the contest? Does it count the time it took him to set up the web page? Or all the previous research?

What he wanted makes no difference in whether the exploit happened or how long it took. And I think measuring it from "go" to the hack working is fair. How would you measure time for a real exploit? From the time that the user encounters it to the time that access is obtained, of course.

i would post my CompTia Cert's, but because i would block out the comp001003****** CareerID number as well as my name and date validated, it would jsut be the same as posting a random pic of a cert, just with more numbers

And as for your security experiences, it's getting more fanciful every time, so I just don't believe a word of it now.
i would post my CompTia Cert's, but because i would block out the comp001003****** CareerID number as well as my name and date validated, it would jsut be the same as posting a random pic of a cert, just with more numbers

Wouldn't help. I know people that have Bachelors in Computer Science that can hardly even use a computer.

you can get an A+ and can barely use a computer as that test was easy, the MS and above A+ actually require some thought, tests for MCSE where a pain when i took them 3-4 years ago

why i went with Certs instead of Computer Science, because iv experienced same people that your talking about, and alot of companies view Certs over Computer Science Degree, heck my Interview for MS ( Contractor in Reston VA for Network Engineer) main thing they asked about were my Cert's and RAID50 ( Mainly just asked if i was MCSE or could be in 3 months), didnt even ask once about a degree

but you got it in your head that i supposedly don't know squat, and im shure nothing will change that

Wouldn't help. I know people that have Bachelors in Computer Science that can hardly even use a computer.

*Edit* because i have a feelign it will come up, just because i had an interview, i do not work for MS, i don't like to sit behind a desk, it sucked @ DoE in Germantown, im pretty shure it still does.

Edited by Hell-In-A-Handbasket

agreed

ive been saying this for a while, as apples user base increases, more and more hackers will divert their attention towards macs. its only a matter of time before even more exploits are found. plain and simple.
market share has nothing to do with vunerabilities,the holes are there regardless of how many use a system

Well that assumption isn?t correct,can you explain why OSX had a surge in vulnerabilities the last 2 years? (aprox)

Obviosuly the OS has evolved since,but evolved negatively or positively? i have no doubt that has evolved in a positive manner,however the switching to the x86 architecture,the introduction of new features not related to designers,and the increasing user base,this bring a whole new choices of configurations in every system.

This reason make me belive that OSX is entering a dangerous era,in few words OSX isnt a Multistellar OS,and this transision will cause a lot of damage,this menas that apple has no idea in wich terrain is entering,competing with an expierenced and dominant Windows,that has been testes and tested by hundreds of million people all over the world,with i may say infinite configurations,and this is the day that winows still has problems with drivers from many manufacturers.

Apple proposed this chanllenge

and Microsoft says ?bring it on?

My opinion, if a human makes it, there is always another human who can break it. Whether it's Linux, Windows or OS X. So, I see no surprise in this. P.S. that guy already had hacked the iPhone last year, which runs the same browser, so no wonder he did it in 2 minutes.

P.S. Why are there 2 thread on the same topic?? This is the other one:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...628158&st=0

Well that assumption isn?t correct,can you explain why OSX had a surge in vulnerabilities the last 2 years? (aprox)

Obviosuly the OS has evolved since,but evolved negatively or positively? i have no doubt that has evolved in a positive manner,however the switching to the x86 architecture,the introduction of new features not related to designers,and the increasing user base,this bring a whole new choices of configurations in every system.

This reason make me belive that OSX is entering a dangerous era,in few words OSX isnt a Multistellar OS,and this transision will cause a lot of damage,this menas that apple has no idea in wich terrain is entering,competing with an expierenced and dominant Windows,that has been testes and tested by hundreds of million people all over the world,with i may say infinite configurations,and this is the day that winows still has problems with drivers from many manufacturers.

Apple proposed this chanllenge

and Microsoft says ?bring it on?

We a company called MSI in our hospital this week, doing security checks via DDOS attacks, etc on our network to see how secure we our, we run a strict MS network and so far they've managed to bring down 5 systems since Monday

Windows is scary.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Apple is expanding Private Cloud Compute beyond its own data centers by Pradeep Viswanathan At WWDC 2026, as part of the improved Apple Intelligence capabilities, Apple today announced that it is expanding Private Cloud Compute (PCC), its privacy-focused cloud infrastructure for Apple Intelligence, beyond its own data centers for the first time. Private Cloud Compute was designed to handle Apple Intelligence requests that are too complex to run fully on-device. The PCC system does not store user data and does not allow Apple or anyone else to access user requests. Last year, Apple also expanded its Security Bounty program with rewards of up to $1 million for researchers who could find serious vulnerabilities in PCC. Until now, Apple's PCC data centers were using Apple's own silicon. As part of the expansion, Apple is working with Google and NVIDIA to run new Apple Intelligence workloads on Google Cloud systems powered by NVIDIA GPUs. Apple will be using this new infrastructure to execute more demanding AI tasks while maintaining the same privacy and security guarantees of PCC. The new implementation uses NVIDIA Confidential Computing with NVIDIA GPUs, Intel CPUs with TDX, and Google’s Titan chip. Apple says it has worked with Google to build additional protections beyond a traditional confidential computing deployment. Despite the expansion to third-party data centers, Apple claims that its core PCC requirements remain unchanged, including stateless computation, no privileged runtime access, non-targetability, and verifiable transparency. The company highlighted that it will continue to control the PCC software stack, and Apple devices will only trust PCC software that has been cryptographically approved by Apple. To take security to the next level, Apple mentioned that it is maintaining an append-only ledger of Google Cloud hardware that is part of the PCC fleet. The company claims this will help reduce the risk of supply chain attacks. In addition to AI infrastructure, Apple also worked with Google to use technologies behind the Gemini family of models to build the next generation of Apple Foundation Models to power Apple Intelligence features across on-device and cloud workloads. As expected, for more demanding AI tasks like agentic tool use and complex reasoning, Apple will rely on the expanded PCC infrastructure running on Google Cloud. The expansion of PCC on Google Cloud will gradually ramp toward the full set of protections during the summer preview period. As before, Apple will also publish binaries for public inspection, provide research tooling, and give researchers access to live PCC nodes in research mode through the Apple Security Bounty Program.
    • my problem with outlook (new) is that it connects only to outlook.com. all connections to external providers goes through there. Got your mail server and want to use imap directly? no way... it adds a connector on outlook.com. last bug; if your email on an external provider if the same as principal email of your microsoft account, it doesn't work...
    • It's the only reason I finally have an iPhone (for work) and enjoy using it so much that I'm tempted to move from android next time I need to replace my own device
    • So is Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, just to mention a few. What's your point? Everyone is a threat from their enemies' perspective. I'd say that Israel is only a threat to their immediate enemies like Hamas, Hezbollah and the Iranian regime, not to anyone else.
    • The government is not the good guy either. You propose 99% of people require that the government overreach and govern their freedom of information and privacy, while ignoring the government is made up 100% of people, of which 99% are (as you described) brain dead. You can't have both. The reality is Signal is absolutely right and the government is doing what it has always done. Ignoring that we are their boss and grabbing all the power they possibly can to make sure we aren't. Your (societies) ###### parenting is not reason enough as to why I can't have a safe platform for my data/information. Thinking the government is helping is precisely what they are targeting psychologically to take suckers like you for a ride. "Think of the children" was, has, is, and will always be a mechanism of control. In the rare occasion it's actually essential the mass consensus has always been there and it doesn't become a debate.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      222
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      92
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      86
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!