How big is your windows folder?


Recommended Posts

  • 5 months later...

I know this is a dusty old post but your Windows folder size is almost entirely irrelevant. Having a 400MB or a 3GB Windows folder will do little if anything to contribute to overall performance. Yes, having 30 items in your Startup folder and another 25 in your HKLM\SW\MS\Win\Current Version\Run will hamper performance (99% of all these items are 100% unnecessary aside from poorly-written but "necessary" drivers). Other biggest killers are unneeded services that startup automatically.

The NTFS file system provides performance over a long curve, from recently-installed OS to bloated C: drive full of whatchoohave. Any FAT flavor gets antsier and trudgier as the drive gets fuller.

The "best" way to streamline a system and get it to perform is to:

-Kill all unnecessary (not to you, to functionality) Startup Items

-Kill all unnecessary (not to you, to functionality) Autostarting Services

-Kill all temp -including browser cache - files, not necessary log files. *

* Log files that are rebuilt or are dynamic in nature are going to reappear no matter what you do. Sometimes, some log files get hefty but in order to not have them get too fat for your taste, logging has to be disabled for that feature/application/whatever.

"Streamline" your registry. **

**After using a computer for a couple years, any user accumulates untold registry updates, e.g. application versions, MS updates, etc. You can see scads of "Cur Ver" keys that simply point to other hives and keys. These are redundant and swell the registry database. Nevertheless it isn't too wise to edit these, because sometimes these pointers are multifaceted and their references thread to multiple endpoints (classes, etc.) Some of them are monofaceted and can be edited to point directly to the newest incarnation, but there could be hundreds of these.

The five biggest subversive culprits of performance hits, IMHO, are:

-Regsitry entries that never go away even after uninstallation

(RealPlayer and Norton anything are two notorious violators here)

-Undue registry entries.

(Ditto RealPlayer and Norton)

-Recurrent installation and reinstallation of the same programs/drivers.

(This rarely ever fixes a broken app or driver from the registry angle)

-Undue Services installed by Apps (Norton, McAfee, the usual suspects)

-DLL versions that don't play nice with other DLLs even though they're "updates"

The plague of Windows since V3.0

A side note on the above: sometimes new hardware doesn't really play nice with all other hardware. IOW, even if it installs correctly and seems to work properly, sometimes default settings are very conservative OR some goodies, no matter how good, just don't rise to their full potential when they're in the company of other stuff. Mating computer hardware upgrades is a lifelong education.

Defragging your hard disk helps, mostly so after deleting unnecessary/redundant/duplicate garbage, but it's not a panacea.

If you're concerned about space (and almost all PC users SHOULDN'T be), put all your data on a separate hard disk. (Note: a second partition is NOT the same; it's the same physical disk). Get a big enough data drive to do an occasional C: drive backup onto.

The biggest performance increase can be to do all the above AND use SCSI drives, especially 10K- or 15KRPM drives. SCSI drives outperform even the fastest SATA drives for at least two reasons:

-A SCSI controller only makes small and infrequent requests to the CPU for reads or writes. SATA is little better than the CPU hog that ATAPI has been.

-SCSI drives can perform SIMULTANEOUS reads and writes. SATA and ATAPI don't.

Other than the above, in my humble experience (and I learn a bit more every day), there's little more to do to increase or even maintain performance over time.

  • 1 year later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • These features described above are good, but far from what developers will like the most. The main feature that developers will care and love the most it's called "Bring Your Own Models". It gives us the ability to connect to LOCAL AI models running on Ollama. The feature it's located on GitHub Copilot tab -> On the model picker where you can select "manage models" instead of paid models and then it will show you the "Bring your own models" window where you can now select Ollama and the endpoint of your local server. So if you have a beefy spec machine you can now use your own model 100% local inside Visual Studio 2026 18.7.0
    • Microsoft Teams is getting a controversial location tracking feature that users may hate by Usama Jawad Image generated with Microsoft Copilot Earlier this year, Microsoft planned to roll out a controversial location tracking feature in Teams, but following customer feedback, it decided to delay its release. The bad news is that the company has decided to launch it later this year, but it's based on roughly the same design that was shared earlier, which means that many users still have good reason to worry. Basically, Microsoft Places and Teams have received workplace check-ins via Wi-Fi. The idea is that if an employee arrives at the office and connects to their enterprise network, their profile status indicator will show them as being present in the office. For example, if you arrive at work, open Teams on your PC, and connect to the "Studio B" company Wi-Fi network, your Teams profile will indicate that you are present in "Studio B", as shown below: Microsoft says that this feature is basically a replacement for physical workplace check-in peripherals, it reduces the need to manually update your status, and it also enables co-workers to know that you're at work so that they can coordinate in-person meetings with you. IT admins can enable this workplace check-in capability at a tenant level, and users have the ability to control whether they want to enable it or not. Of course, all of that sounds great on paper, but naturally, many Teams customers may still have concerns, as they did before. This is because it enables your reporting manager and other members of the organization to track if you are at the office, when you arrive at the office, and where you are right now. This could be problematic for people who work in what they consider to be flexible work environments or hybrid setups, and this kind of location tracking could be considered an invasion of privacy. Microsoft has tried to alleviate some of these concerns by letting users know that they can manually set their location easily, which essentially overrides workplace check-in if they feel uncomfortable with it. However, that doesn't really solve the problem because your organization could enforce a workplace policy that mandates that this feature remains enabled. The Redmond tech giant has also assured users that this capability does not store historical data and is only a real-time indicator of location. Finally, it only generates a signal when you connect to a corporate network, which means that if you are working from home and connect your PC to your personal Wi-Fi, it won't broadcast your location to your employer; you will simply be shown as "Remote". Microsoft has encouraged IT admins to prepare for this change and begin informing users so they know what to expect once it begins rolling out later this year.
    • Wow, Microsoft IS cooking lately... This only shows that they COULD improve, they just chose not to for whatever reasons. That obsession with AI was destroying them from the inside out.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      AndrewSteel earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Veteran
      Taliseian went up a rank
      Veteran
    • One Month Later
      Clizby earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      82
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!