Microsoft will not extend availability of XP


Recommended Posts

PressPass: Will Microsoft extend sales of other editions of Windows XP?

Dix: No, there is no plan to extend sales of other editions of Windows XP beyond June 30, 2008. We are very proud of the progress that we have made with Windows Vista over the last sixteen months. Since its launch, Windows Vista has become the fastest-selling operating system in Microsoft history, and more than 100 million Windows Vista licenses have been sold worldwide.

Last fall, our OEM partners asked us to extend sales of Windows XP to give their customers more time to transition to Windows Vista while we worked with other software vendors to expand application compatibility. Today, more than 2,500 applications have received the Windows Vista logo (a ten-fold increase since launch) and more than 78,000 devices and components are supported by drivers either in-box or on Windows Update. On NPD?s list of the top 100 consumer applications selling at retail, 98 are now compatible?and the latest versions of the top free downloads (Adobe Reader, Shockwave and iTunes) are all compatible.

Given this landscape and after consulting with our partners, apart from today?s announced extension of Windows XP Home for ULCPCs, we are maintaining the timelines we announced in September.

I should also note that there will also be no impact on our technical support plans?mainstream technical support will continue to be available until April 2009 and extended support will continue until April 2014.

http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/feature...04-03xpeos.mspx

does this mean that past June 30th I will not be able to buy a laptop with XP on it? Please tell me I am mistaken. I am hoping to upgrade to a new laptop mainly for battery life, so I am looking at panasonic toughbooks, mainly the t7 with xp on it. I wasn't going to upgrade before July but now I might have to.

does this mean that past June 30th I will not be able to buy a laptop with XP on it? Please tell me I am mistaken. I am hoping to upgrade to a new laptop mainly for battery life, so I am looking at panasonic toughbooks, mainly the t7 with xp on it. I wasn't going to upgrade before July but now I might have to.

Yes, thats what it means. Remember though, that it go 'off sale' right on that day. The quantities of it would then have to be sold through.

You could always buy a copy of it now and install it on the laptop whenever you decide to purchase one. It costs a little more, sure, but if its what you really want then ...

... except for low-end laptops

ULCPCs and 'low end laptops' are not really the same thing. ULCPCs are things like the Asus Eee. Not really a laptop. A low end laptop would be something like the cheapest HP you can buy.

how is vista anyway with laptop battery life compared to xp?

My experence has been that there is very little difference between the two, with XP just having a slight edge over Vista.

Since its launch, Windows Vista has become the fastest-selling operating system in Microsoft history, and more than 100 million Windows Vista licenses have been sold worldwide.

This isnt a Vista bash (for once...) but PC's are more common (and cheap) than ever these days, so when the average consumer (and everyone else that upgraded) buys a new PC there going to get Vista, with no choice in the matter. Also I'm buying a Dell XPS laptop and I don't get any other options other than Vista, so that will be a sale from me, but I shall be sticking XP on it as soon I get it.

"Windows Vista has become the fastest-selling operating system in Microsoft history"

That's a joke. Who are they trying to fool?

No one, because that statement is true.

Anyway, if they really think Vista is ready enough for low end PCs and Laptops, and are prepared to sort out the numerous problems this is likely to cause, then meh.

They should leave it for another 6 months at least, or just before the Holiday season.

That makes sense. Regardless how you look at it, Vista has been a success from Microsoft's POV. They've sold more than any other commercial OS on the planet in the last 16 months - including other versions of Windows, and last year had the most revenue ever as well....

Anyway, Vista on a laptop runs fine - as it does witha desktop that's no older than 4 years. Battery is slightly worse if you have all the graphical and SuperFetch stuff running. Also remember, Vista uses a 'Sleep' mode (hibernation and traditional sleep) by default when you power it off. Essentially, if you don't use the Aero glass interface and really power off or hibernate (like you do in XP) then it's the same or better than XP regarding power consumption.

Also, the mobility centre is a vast improvement. Desktop/SysTray app that with one click allows you to enable/disable wifi, bluetooth, network based presentations, contrast etc. As well as viewing / editing power management and battery setting and a whole host of other stuff.

If the laptop is no more than 2 years old (3 if it was a high-end laptop at the time) then shove Vista on it.

Stevan = if you really want to have XP on your box (and I honestly recommend just moving to Vista. It really does work fine) then get an OEM copy now. Buy a IDE ribbon cable or something with it so it's technically legal and you'll have XP for ?50 on a CD. When you buy a new laptop then just get it with PC-DOS or something.

Cheers,

Steve.

It's a shame you have to get stuck with one OS when you buy a PC rather than having a choice or being able to buy it with no OS installed. According to Microsoft buying a PC with no OS means you are a pirate though. That's another great thing about building your own. Put any OS you choose on it, and Ballmer and company can go jump in a volcano.

It's a shame you have to get stuck with one OS when you buy a PC rather than having a choice or being able to buy it with no OS installed. According to Microsoft buying a PC with no OS means you are a pirate though. That's another great thing about building your own. Put any OS you choose on it, and Ballmer and company can go jump in a volcano.

No custom laptops though :s

I will move onto Vista when it stops being a resource hog and the license costs $50.

Good. I honestly don't see what the big problem is here. IMO, Microsoft should have pulled XP from OEM's hands a lot sooner. Vista RTM was a good OS and SP1's made it even better.

I don't see why people would want to run a six year old OS on a brand new computer. If anyone would still want to run XP on a new computer, go right a head and install it yourself.

Good. I honestly don't see what the big problem is here. IMO, Microsoft should have pulled XP from OEM's hands a lot sooner. Vista RTM was a good OS and SP1's made it even better.

I don't see why people would want to run a six year old OS on a brand new computer. If anyone would still want to run XP on a new computer, go right a head and install it yourself.

QFT (Y)

Well this blows. At my company we need XP licenses for software Q&A testing. We usually buy XP Home because our clients have more of a demand to it then XP Pro. I freaking wished XP Pro would be the defacto managing 250 Stations on XP Home really blows sometimes. I have a feeling I'll be walking away from a job in the coming months. Due to certain unethical Business / IT Practices.

Good IMO MS should EOL XP asap, so that we get more Vista optimised software sooner.

I agree 100%.

The computer industry would just stagnate if MS continues to sell XP. We need to move on to better things, whether you like it or not. If MS released a Win XP SP3d (the d is for the extended-support security updates post-SP3) in April 2014, well don't expect a SP3e then, lol.

XP has been with us since 1999, when it was under Neptune, then Whistler in 2000, meaning it'd be 15 years in total, from Alpha release M1 of Neptune build 5000 all the way to the end of XP in 2014.

Does anyone remember when XP was released in 2001? A lot of people still preferred 98 and 2000 over XP back then. Now, with Vista released .... those same people held on to XP instead of 98/2000.

Ha, I won't ever be surprised when Win 7 comes out in 2010, *those* people would have held on to Vista, the OS from 2006 (I'm not speaking of the general availability; I'm referring to the RTM date - Nov 8th, 2006). They can look back on those days and laaaaaaugh.

On a side note, I'm sorry for this snobby post, but still .... ! The "Save XP" petition is just plain RETARDED. I don't think I have seen petitions for saving Win 2000 or Win *cough* 98.

Glad to see that MS is still pulling XP outta the market by June 30th, 2008. As quoted from Paul Thurrott, "You've seen the absurd claims about Vista's supposed compatibility issues, trumpeted by Benedict Arnold tech pundits who should know better or were simply seeking cheap hits." And believe me, I have! I haven't had any problems with Vista Ultimate from RTM to the new SP1 on my 4-yr-old Dell Dim 8400, with some hardware changes.

*shakes head* People these days ...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!