Microsoft will not extend availability of XP


Recommended Posts

I disagree, I'm still selling pcs with XP on them, in fact trade for XP licenses and computers has INCREASED since Vista has come out. The public agrees : they DONT want Vista. Simple.

Runs fine on a core duo 1.8 with 1gb ram? Geez, I need to find out how you're doing that. Repeatedly is slow on systems much faster than that.

XP ftw, and imo, will be for a while. SP2 anyone? :/

Runs fine on a core duo 1.8 with 1gb ram? Geez, I need to find out how you're doing that. Repeatedly is slow on systems much faster than that.

It runs perfectly like a champ on my sis's AMD Sempron 1.8 Ghz. Aero enabled and everything. She instantly fell in love with it and decided not to downgrade back to XP. And she's only 12.

I think you're just using it wrong. :p

Wait, so will I or will I not be able to purchase a retail copy of Windows XP Home after June 30?

This post kinda contradicts the main site headline. "Microsoft Extends Life of Windows XP"

No it doesn't. What this post says is that the life of Windows XP Home will be extended and not the other versions. The news article confirms this fact [Life of Windows XP Home is extended].

I disagree, I'm still selling pcs with XP on them, in fact trade for XP licenses and computers has INCREASED since Vista has come out. The public agrees : they DONT want Vista. Simple.

I disagree, the buying public has become a touch confused by the successful anti-vista campaign, but they quickly figure out it's all FUD once they actually use Vista for a few minutes.

I'd guess your own bias against vista is showing through on your sales, hopefully you don't have a customer backlash after they figure out you were wrong.

...Runs fine on a core duo 1.8 with 1gb ram? Geez, I need to find out how you're doing that. Repeatedly is slow on systems much faster than that.

It's not just the CPU but the other components that play a major factor. As someone who sells PCs you should know that.

My 1.8GHz Core 2 Duo rig scored 4.8 when it had just 1GB RAM in it (which I upgraded to 2.5 [one 512MB stick died on me]) and as such ran quite nicely. After the upgrade it ran better due to the increased RAM but the index was still 4.8, purely because of the processor (all other scores were 5.9 across the board before upgrade and after, and why shouldn't they be?).

Full Aero with DreamScene and sidebar enabled before and after; the ONLY thing I did was increase the RAM. Of course when I dual boot into XP (or Server 2003) it screams along with the extra RAM and reset settings like pagefile size.

I was once a Vista Basher I'll admit that, I mainly used Vista on VMware at work, it ran slow (obviously) I didn't like the UI and the new Explorer...but.....

I have a new PC at home now with Vista premium, I mainly play games and was ready to install XP for that performance boast...but I thought, lets just see how it goes....and its is actually a good OS, boot time is increadably fast. I thopugh UAC would be a pain,but after the initail configuration of the PC I don't get bothered by it (and its ON as default, i.e. no configuration, its set to prompt) The sidebar (which I thought would bya fad) is actually useful.

So I have converted to a Vista owner, so much so I am think of installing it at work to develope on rather than XP :)

I used to say that win98se was better than XP in 2001.. used 98 to 2003 then XP..

since vista came i use dual boot =) never (almost) had problem with it :p

so i dont care wicth i use now, as long those both can play programs i use. and games :D .

Vista is a very good operating system in my opinion works great if your doing everyday things like email, word processing, web surfing things like that it works fine very compatable with all new devices is a very good OS.

My problem with vista is the compatability with older video games i have noticed that very few older games work with vista that is a problem seeing is i still like to play games like BF2 and the older C&C games because of that i am still running XP Pro. Where i work we are not switching to Vista because of the problems with networking, security and program compatability. Vista is a very good OS. for the everyday consumer who uses their computer to do basic operations.

Just buy a pre-owned copy off eBay, or make your point heard and switch to an alternative OS. There has never been a better time.

I use Vista at work but don't find it a particularly revelatory experience - I just use it because its free for me to move over from XP to Vista and I figure I might as well get as familiar as possible with Microsofts 'latest and greatest'.

It's a shame you have to get stuck with one OS when you buy a PC rather than having a choice or being able to buy it with no OS installed. According to Microsoft buying a PC with no OS means you are a pirate though. That's another great thing about building your own. Put any OS you choose on it, and Ballmer and company can go jump in a volcano.

What does has to do with MS?! MS dont make PCs... period.

Why phase off an operating system that's reliable and usable. The reason why no-one wants to upgrade to Vista is because of the lack of features upgrading.

Look at Microsoft's history here

Win95 -> Win98 - More stable, quicker

Win98 -> Win2000 - Hardware Level support

Win2000 -> WinXP - Hardware Support with better software support for gaming

WinXP -> Vista - ?????

I just cannot see the advantages of upgrading to Vista when Windows XP does everything that Vista can do.

So what if it has a nice front end and some added functionality, but what makes Vista so much better than XP?

The problem here is that Microsoft pulled a lot of stuff they said they were going to include in Vista, and because of this users don't see or feel the need to upgrade to a newer version.

This isn't a flame, I'm just trying to give my $0.02.

Thanks for listening :)

EDIT: If someone wants to put me in my place and give me a good reason to upgrade, please feel free and I'll take on board all comments, I just don't understand what makes Vista so unique from its predecessor.

Just want to give my opinion here too.

Vista sucks, its a memory hog...full of useless services and security features that makes the OS slow.

XP was a huge step, but Vista doesnt bring anything that worth the upgrade for an average user.

After using Vista for 4 months i moved back to XP Pro SP2, which is MUCH faster.

Anyway, thats for my Windows partition which is still required for gaming a bit, unfortunately.

Of course im a linux user.

Im not trolling, its just my experience with it.

period

there isn't any particularly amazing reason. for me if i had to give the one thing that make vista worth having its networking. its so much better organised in vista and easier to use. oh and if you have 4GBs of ram and so should to go with 64bit then vista is a must as the 64bit version of xp has rubbish driver support.

but no i agree with you there isn't any point upgrading to vista on your current machine. it probably won't run that well. but if your buying a new pc that's powerful then vista is the way to go imo.

Dix: Since its launch, Windows Vista has become the fastest-selling operating system in Microsoft history.

Does this consider the fact that Windows XP was released almost 7 years ago, when the consumer market for computers itself was smaller?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMAZON needs to take total accountability for this.
    • Server Summit had a heap of announcements, ADCS changes are baller.
    • Nice, hope they *finally* fixed the issue with the NTFS driver where the system would completely brick during large file copies using the built in driver. It's been broken for years requiring me to use the older, slower, NTFS-3G FUSE driver.
    • Windows 11 KB5094126 BSODing, freezing, forcing BitLocker lockout, breaks OneDrive, and more by Sayan Sen Microsoft released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 last week as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. While Microsoft has so far not acknowledged any major problems with the release, some users online are running into problems. These range from OneDrive and Dropbox access issues, BitLocker recovery lockouts, to blue screens and BSODs. The most common one seems to be happening with HP systems wherein affected users say they hit 0xc0430001 BSOD (blue screen of death) error code after the KB5094126 update. We wonder if this could be related to the recent bug we covered on HP devices wherein the ongoing Secure Boot certificate updates are leading to similar issues. While we are not certain, users affected by this issue likely need to ensure that the boot.stl file is included on the installation media (such as a USB installer or ISO), if the above-mentioned dynamic updates are deployed. If this file is missing, computers may fail to boot from the installation media and could display the error 0xc0430001. This STL file is used by Secure Boot to verify that the boot files are trusted, so it must match the same Windows version and system architecture. To ensure the file is included, Microsoft recommends using the Update WinPE script, which automatically updates the image and handles the required files. Alternatively, you can manually copy the boot.stl file from the Windows\Boot\EFI folder on a Windows device and place it in the matching folder on your installation media before deploying the updated image. Aside from blue screening some users also note their systems have been freezing following the update. This could be happening to Lenovo PCs specifically. In the case of the OneDrive and Dropbox access issues, a user figured out that there could be a conflict with UAC. He explained: "Okay, so I did some digging, and in our environment KB5094126 breaks OneDrive and Dropbox in Explorer. I went through all our GPOs and found out that the combination of disabling UAC and having my user being a local admin breaks OneDrive in Explorer. ... If I enable UAC again, then it works, even with KB5094126 still installed." Hopefully, Microsoft will look into these issues. Source: Microsoft forum (link1, link2, link3, link4), Reddit (link1, link2, link3, link4)
    • It is when it's a desktop in my house though for a PC that's lightly used and not really important when it is. If it was a laptop, it would be a different story. The real solution is varied and begins starting at post #22 in that thread.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!